103urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:77d0745d-c3a1-5248-81de-8cdc02bed84aurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F56F6CF9-7502-4001-A751-35D5F2EF6CA0Arthropod Systematics & PhylogenyASP1863-72211864-8312Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung10.3897/asp.82.e112587112587Research ArticleTrichopteraCladisticsTaxonomyComparative geometric morphometrics of male genitalia in Xiphocentron subgenera (Trichoptera: Xiphocentronidae): new species, revision and phylogenetic systematics of the subgenus SphagocentronVilarinoAlbanealbanevilarino@alumni.usp.brhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-89281CalorAdolfo R.https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-31761Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Biologia, Laboratório de Entomologia Aquática, Salvador, Bahia, BrazilUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrazil
20242105202482407431E54D30EB-4688-54F3-9F8B-C2351EFB7165CB81B265-46A0-4247-A2F2-C9AC2394BC4E1909202329012024Albane Vilarino, Adolfo R. CalorThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/CB81B265-46A0-4247-A2F2-C9AC2394BC4E
Geometric morphometric statistics have been employed to reduce the subjectivity of visual evaluations in taxonomy. Taxonomy in most insect groups relies strongly on male genitalia morphology which is often the structure with most data available, which is also true to caddisfly taxonomy. Here we revise the caddisfly subgenus Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) adding five new species after 40 years: X.dactylumsp. nov., X.eurybrachiumsp. nov., X.tapantisp. nov., and X.tuxtlasp. nov.Additionally, we describe a new X. (Antillotrichia): X.drepanumsp. nov. from French Guiana and provide new species records of Xiphocentronidae from Bolivia, Costa Rica and Ecuador. We performed exploratory geometric morphometric analysis on the male genitalia’s preanal appendage to characterize the shape differences among the species, and to investigate its utility to classify species to subgenera. In order to infer species relationship and assess if shape congruences are due to phylogenetic signal or convergence data from 100 landmarks and semilandmarks, and 30 discrete characters were used to generate a phylogenetic hypothesis. The morphometry partially supports the subgenera delimitations, but the Antillotrichia subgenus greatly overlapped with other subgenera. The discriminant analysis overall classification correctness was 64%. Some suggested phenotypic groups were due to convergence. According to the preanal appendage morphometry, X. (Antillotrichia) fuscum is a Sphagocentron species. The phylogenetic analysis recovered Sphagocentron as monophyletic, but not Antillotrichia. Sphagocentron subgenus was placed within a clade of several Antillotrichia species, with X. (A.) fuscum as the sister of the other Sphagocentron species, although support values were low.
Aquatic insectsLandmarkMorphologyMorphometryNet-tube caddisflyTaxonomyCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior501100002322http://doi.org/10.13039/501100002322Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico501100003593http://doi.org/10.13039/5011000035931. Introduction
Male genitalia features play an important role in insect taxonomy as they contain the principal traits used to delineate genera and delimit species in many insect groups, and often the male genitalia is the structure with most data available (Shapiro and Porter 1989; Hosken and Stockley 2004). Moreover, the genital morphology has the potential to directly contribute to the reproductive isolation and speciation process through divergent sexual selection and mechanical or sensory incompatibility (Eberhard 1992; Arnqvist 1998). Morphometric statistics have been advocated as a tool to reduce the subjectivity of visual evaluations in taxonomy (Mutanen and Pretorius 2007). Geometric morphometrics, for instance, allows detailed analysis and visualization of shape changes in complex structures, removing size variation from the data through superimposition, while capturing all aspects of shape variation (Bookstein 1997; Rohlf and Marcus 1993). This constitutes a sophisticated method for collecting and analyzing data to address questions in anatomy and evolutionary biology (e.g., Klingenberg 2016). Genital morphology is the second most studied insect body part in morphometrics (after wings), with male genitalia accounting for most studies (Tatsuta et al. 2018; Mutanen and Pretorius 2007; Jauset et al. 2017; García-Román et al. 2019). Studies using traditional morphometry on adult caddisflies (Trichoptera) are uncommon, with notable exceptions of Goretti et al. (2005), Svensson (1975), and Bálint et al. (2008) who focused on male genitalia structures. Despite the relevance of genitalia characters in species delimitation, geometric morphometry was so far applied only to caddisfly wings by Sganga et al. (2022).
Since Nielsen (1957), several studies have discussed the morphology of Trichoptera male genitalia (e.g., Holzenthal et al. 2007; Ivanov 2005; Morse 1975; Ross and Unzicker 1977; Schmid 1970, 1979, 1989; Oláh and Johanson 2008). The genitalia is associated with abdominal segments IX, X and XI, and bears several paired appendages: the ventral inferior appendages (gonopods), often bi-articulated, are thought to have a clasping function during copulation; the mesal intermediate appendages (paraprocts) usually perform accessory copulatory and stimulatory functions, and are often fused to other structures (Oláh and Johanson 2008; Nielsen 1957); and the dorsal superior appendages (preanal appendages) are setose and thought to have a sensory function. Some authors infer that these superior appendages are homologous to the cerci (Ross 1938; Ivanov 2005; Oláh and Johanson 2008) while others have stated that Trichoptera do not possess cerci (Holzenthal et al. 2007; Nielsen 1957; Schmid 1998). The preanal appendage is often elongate, and digitate, but can be reduced to a knob-like structure or even be absent or fused to the paraprocts and tergum X (Nielsen 1957; Oláh and Johanson 2008).
Xiphocentronidae Ross, 1949 is a pantropical net-tube caddisfly family comprising 205 species, classified in eight genera: Abaria Mosely, 1948 with 40 species (Oriental and Afrotropical regions); Caenocentron Schmid, 1982 with nine species (southwestern USA to northern South America); Cnodocentron Schmid, 1982 with six species (India and Southeast Asia); Drepanocentron Schmid, 1982 with 43 species (Oriental region); Machairocentron Schmid, Schmid, 1982 with 10 species (Central America and northern South America), Melanotrichia Ulmer, 1906 with 30 species (eastern Palearctic and Oriental regions); Proxiphocentron Schmid, 1982 with five species (India and Southeast Asia), and Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870 with 62 species (Neotropical region, extending into Mexico, the southwestern USA, and the Greater Antilles) (Peng et al. 2022; Vilarino and Bispo 2020; Vilarino et al. 2023).
The majority of xiphocentronid species are found in small streams in the tropical zone, primarily in the Oriental region (with five genera) and the Neotropical region (with three genera), few species are also distributed in the Afrotropical, East Palearctic and Nearctic regions (Vilarino and Bispo 2020; Vilarino et al. 2021). The adults are small with forewings ranging from 2.5 to 8.5 mm uniformly brown or with one to three white patches on the forewing, and are often active during the day (Flint 1968; Schmid 1982). The family is inferred to have diverged from the sister group, Psychomyiidae, in the early Cretaceous (Thomas et al. 2022; Malm et al. 2013) although the only xiphocentronid fossil known is from Miocene Mexican-amber, XiphocentronchiapasiWichard et al. 2006. The male genitalia of the Xiphocentronidae is characterized by: (1) the great horizontal stretching of the genitalia; (2) the reduced tergum IX; (3) the preanal appendages very long and robust; (4) the fused segment X and paraprocts closed ventrally forming a support under the phallus; (5) the phallus reduced to a very short phallotheca and an extremely long and slender cylindrical aedeagus, while the endotheca is completely obliterated (Schmid 1982). The 2nd and 3rd characters are not exclusive to the xiphocentronids, but represent a development taken to the extreme of tendencies already present in certain Psychomyiidae (Schmid 1982).
Currently, the New World fauna comprises 81 species, most of them belonging to the genus Xiphocentron, making it the most species-rich genus within the family with 62 species (Vilarino et al. 2023; Bueno-Soria et al. 2022). Xiphocentron circumscription is based mostly on the absence of characteristics seen in other genera, although the established subgenera in general have defining traits. The genus was classified by Schmid (1982) into five subgenera: Glyphocentron Schmid, 1982 (3 spp.); Rhamphocentron Schmid, 1982 (6 spp.); Sphagocentron Schmid, 1982; Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870 (6 spp., including 1 fossil sp.); and Antillotrichia Banks, 1941 (47 spp.) (senior synonym of Xirocentron Schmid, 1982 (Botosaneanu 1988)). The last subgenus Antillotrichia was designated to accommodate species that could not beplaced in other subgenera (Schmid 1982), so it might not be monophyletic. The Antillotrichia subgenus is the most heterogeneous among the subgenera established, so Schmid (1982) suggested that it would be subdivided as more species are included. Some characters of each subgenus based on Schmid (1982) descriptions are shown in Table 1.
Characters described to each Xiphocentron subgenus according to Schmid (1982). Abbreviations: FW, forewing; app., appendage.
Subgenera
Characters
Antillotrichia Banks, 1941
Glyphocentron Schmid, 1982
Rhamphocentron Schmid, 1982
Sphagocentron Schmid, 1982
Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870
Male hind tibia, modified spur
absent
absent
present
absent
present
FW fork I
absent
absent
absent
rudimentarily present (some species)
present
FW thyridial cell
short
short
medium-sized
long
short
FW anal veins
3
3
2
3
3
Sternum IX posterior margin
indented
straight
with two small lobes
projecting and with two small lobes
with one or two prominent lobes (some species)
Paraproct lateral points
absent
present
absent
absent
absent
Preanal app.
moderately narrow
strong
robust and wavy
strong, pointed at apex
strong, wide and straight
Inferior app. articles
fused, vestigial suture may be visible
segments well distinct
fused, vestigial suture may be visible
fused, no suture visible
segments well distinct
Inferior app. coxopodite, zone of points
absent
present
absent
absent
absent
Inferior app. harpago, ornaments
spiny structures weakly developed, mesal sclerite present in some species
long, narrow, with subbasal zone of strong spines
long zone of tubercles, mesal sclerite present
markedly contorted with well-defined area of strong setae
wide basal zone of dense and long setae
Segments II and IV, abdominal vesicles
absent
absent
present in X.mexico group; absent in X.lavinia group
absent
absent
All the five subgenera occur in Mesoamerica and Central America, while only speciesplaced within Antillotrichia occur in the Caribbean islands and South America (Holzenthal and Calor 2017; Vilarino and Bispo 2020). So far, only two species wereplaced within the Sphagocentron subgenus: Xiphocentronevandrus Schmid, 1982 from Costa Rica and Panama, and X.julus Schmid, 1982 from Mexico and Panama. Sphagocentron is characterized mainly by the angularly curved inferior appendages, the inner face of the harpago with a large area of fine setae and the simple segment X (including the paraprocts) (Schmid 1982).
In this study we revise the subgenus X. (Sphagocentron), providing identification key, the synopses of the two previously described, X.julus and X.evandrus, and the description of five new species, X. (Sphagocentron) dactylumsp. nov. and X. (S.) eurybrachiumsp. nov. from Venezuela, X. (S.) tapantisp. nov. from Costa Rica, and X. (S.) tuxtlasp. nov. from Mexico. In addition, we describe one species, X. (Antillotrichia) drepanumsp. nov., from French Guiana and include new distributional records of Xiphocentronidae from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Costa Rica.
We performed exploratory geometric morphometric analysis on the male genitalia’s preanal appendage characterizing the shape differences among the species described, as well as among the five subgenera, in order to investigate the utility of morphometrics to classify species to subgenera. Additionally, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of X. (Sphagocentron) species combining morphometric and discrete characters, to test Sphagocentron subgenus monophyly, new species placement, and to verify if the preanal appendage shape congruences are due to phylogenetic signal or convergence.
2. Material and methods2.1. Male genitalia morphology analyses
New species propositions are testable hypotheses of the distinction of separately evolving metapopulation lineages (Pante et al. 2015). Here, the new species hypotheses were based on distinct male genitalia characters which were used as an indirect indicator of reproductive isolation and evolutionary divergence. In order to visualize internal structures of the adult male genitalia, the entire abdomen of the specimen was removed and diaphonized using 85% lactic acid (Blahnik et al. 2007). The abdomens were thenplaced in excavated glass slides with a drop of glycerin and examined with a compound microscope at 200–400× magnification. The abdomens of the specimens were stored in microvials with 80% ethanol and kept with the specimen to which they belonged. All species were conserved in 80% ethanol. The species drawings were made by tracing the observed structures in pencil using a camera lucida attached to a compound microscope or taking multiple photographs with a digital camera attached to a microscope. Then the drawings or the photographs were used as a template and digitally traced using Adobe Illustrator CS6 software. The distribution maps were created with the software QGIS v2.8.2.
The morphological terminology for male genitalia followed Vilarino and Bispo (2020). The terminology for wing venation followed the Comstock – Needham system as interpreted for Trichoptera by Mosely and Kimmins (1953). In the descriptions, paired structures are referred to in the singular form.
Types of the species described herein and other material examined are deposited, as indicated in the species descriptions, in the following institutions:
BIOUG –Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada;
MZUSP – Museu de Zoloogia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
NHRS – Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden;
UMSP – the University of Minnesota Insect Collection, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA;
USNM – National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA.
Barcode sequence identification numbers are presented whenever they are available for the analyzed specimens.
2.2. Geometric morphometric analyses
Geometric morphometry allows quantitatively evaluating the shape variation of morphological structures across a sample using standardized images and ‘landmarks’ (Bookstein 1991; Rohlf and Marcus 1993). For the analysis the datasets included the male genitalia of the species in Table 2 and the genitalia depicted in the original descriptions of X.julus and X.evandrus. Tps files were created from the specimens illustrations using the software TpsUtil v.1.81 (Rohlf 2021). The landmarks were digitized using TpsDig2 v.2.31 (Rohlf 2017). Curves were traced along the preanal appendage in lateral view. We utilized 97 curve points (semi-landmarks) and three landmarks aiming to get most of the shape information (Fig. 1). Curves were appended to landmarks and semi-landmark sliders files were generated with TpsUtil (File S1). All samples were aligned using Generalized Least Squares (GLS) Procrustes superimposition (Bookstein 1991) after importing the data and sliders file into TpsRelw v.1.75 (Rohlf 2021). This removed any variations in the scale, position, and orientation of the landmark coordinates. The aligned procrustes were imported into PAST 4.09 software (Hammer et al. 2001), which was used to generate shape thin-plate splines, and perform statistical analyses. To verify the congruence of the preanal appendage shape within genera, possibly misplaced species and suggested phenotypic groups we used three exploratory analyses: The Principal Component Analysis (PCA), was used to characterize the ordination of the specimens irrespective of predetermined grouping, so, it is more conservative about the assumption of shape congruence and distinction between subgenera, it also was used to visualize main contributors of shape change. We also used Discriminant Analysis (DA) in which data is addressed to a priori groups, this analysis maximizes the between-group variance and minimizes the within-group variance, therefore highlighting group differences and being more conservative about the assumption of misplaced species. Discriminant Analysis is affected by the sample size about the number of variables, so the analysis was made using only the ten first Principal Components (PCs). Jackknifed group assignment was verified to see the correctness of subgenera classification based on the preanal appendage shape. No formal statistical test was performed since the sample for some subgenera is rather small. The shape congruence and distinction among subgenera was observed through the degree of morphospace superimposition in the convex hulls. The overall similarities between the specimen’s shape were summarized through a neighbor-joining cluster analysis based on all the PCs, which was utilized to visualize suggested phenotypic groups.
Xiphocentron specimens used the morphometric analysis, country, location and depository.
Species
Country
Location
Depository/Source
X.cubanum
Cuba
Pinar del Rio Soroa, 22°47.7′N 83°00.1′W
USNM
X.borinquensis
Puerto Rico
El Yunque
USNM
X.dactylumsp. nov.
Venezuela
Falcón, Quebrada del Toro 10°49.581′N, 69°07.990′W
Location of the landmarks on the preanal appendages. Variations among samples at distinct landmarks are displayed as small dots, dark circles are landmarks and white circles are semi-landmarks.
The phylogenetic analysis used the same 29 taxa as the morphometric analyses (Table 2), using 30 discrete morphological characters (five non-informative) and the geometrical morphometric characters from the preanal appendage landmark configurations (Table 3). From the discrete characters, 15 were adapted from Vilarino et al. (2022). Morphological characters and character state constructions were based on Sereno (2007). When a given structure was not present in the analyzed specimens, it was coded as ‘–‘; when the character state was not clear or could not be assessed, it was coded as ‘?‘. All characters were binary. The morphological dataset matrix was built using Winclada 1.89 (Nixon 2002) (File S2). The TPS file with the aligned procrustes was imported into TNT 1.6 (Goloboff and Morales 2023) and combined with the matrix of discrete characters as detailed in Catalano and Goloboff (2018) (File S3). The analyses were made treating each landmark configuration as a different character (TNT default), landmark optimization, and landmark branch swapping settings also were used in default. The taxon Xiphocentronaureum was set as an outgroup for three rooting. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using implied weighting with the rescaled k, so that the minimum/maximum homoplasy weight ratio is 1 to 10 as implemented in TNT 1.6., with a resulting k = 5.54. Heuristic searches were performed through ‘Traditional Search’, with 500 replications, five trees saved per replication. The branch support was measured using symmetric resampling (Goloboff et al. 2003) expressed as the difference in the CG (contradicted/present groups) frequency (100 replications). Clades with support above 60 were considered well supported. The trees were visualized using Winclada 1.89 (Nixon, 2002) and edited in Adobe Illustrator CS6.
List of morphological characters used in the cladistic analysis. Phylogenies that previously used the character and values of Consistency index (CI) of each character are shown.
1
Hind tibia apical spur: (0) simple; (1) modified (conspicuously enlarged or shape distinct from the preapical spurs). [Character 3 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 84,7.
2
Sternum V anterior margin, reticulate cuticular region: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 4 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 84,7.
3
Sternum V reticulate region, elongate process: (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 64,8.
4
Forewing fork I (R2 and R3): (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 84,7.
5
Forewing fork II (R4 and R5): (0) rooted or sessile; (1) petiolate or with nygma isolated by cell. [Character 7 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 58,0.
6
Forewing with nygma surrounded by a cell: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 6 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 73,4.
Discoidal cell relative length to thyridial cell: (0) longer than thyridial cell; (1) subequal shorter than thyridial cell.— CI = 100.
9
Tergum VIII produced posterad over tergum IX: (0) absent; (1) present.— CI = 100.
10
Tergum IX, shape, in dorsal view: (0) very narrow, subrectangular (1) elongated, with apical lobes, roof shaped. [Character 18 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 100.
11
Tergum IX, posterior margin incision: (0) shallow or absent; (1) deep.— CI = 84,7.
12
Tergum IX, anterior margin incision: (0) shallow or absent; (1) deep.— CI = 40,9.
13
Sternum IX, apodeme shape: (0) narrow, forming ~90° angle with anterior margin; (1) broad and contiguous with sternum IX. [Character 11 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 84,7.
14
Sternum IX, relative length, in lateral view: (0) short, slightly longer than high or shorter; (1) long, 2× as long as high or longer. — CI = 100.
15
Sternum IX posterior margin projecting mesally: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 12 (Vilarino et al. 2022)] — CI = 58,0.
16
Sternum IX posterior margin projection, incision: (0) shallow incision or not divided; (1) divided by deep mesal incision. — CI = 84,7.
17
Sternum IX apical projection length: (0) short; (1) very elongate (about half inferior appendage length). — non-informative.
18
Sternum IX, in lateral view, dorsal margin incision near preanal appendage: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 17 (Vilarino et al. 2022)] — CI = 100.
19
Inferior appendage, articles (coxopodite and harpago), fusion: (2) articles broadly fused, indistinct; (1) articles well evident by suture line. [Character 25 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 100.
20
Coxopodite basal region, inner face setose or granulose: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 33 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 64,8.
21
Harpago spine-like setae, length: (0) short or absent; (1) very long. [Character 45 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 84,7.
22
Harpago spine-like setae, density: (0) few, sparse spines; (1) many dense spines. [Character 46 modified from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 73,4.
23
Harpago base, inner face setose area, shape: (0) narrow; (1) broad. [Character 46 modified from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — non-informative.
24
Harpago, stalked, polype-like mesal sclerite: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 39 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — CI = 84,7.
25
Harpago, group of conspicuously elongate setae in the same position of the mesal sclerite: (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 100.
Harpago, subbasal region shape: (0) linearly contiguous with base and apex; (1) bent in an elbow-like shape (usually with a group of spines). — non-informative.
Paraproct, lateral points or spine-like setae: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 20 from Vilarino et al. (2022)] — non-informative.
31
Geometric morphometric characters, shape of preanal appendage, in lateral view: 100 landmark configurations. — CI = 97,2.
3. Results3.1. Preanal appendage morphometrics
The exploratory PCA resulted in 28 PCs. The distribution of the species in the morphospace was presented over the four first PC axes (90.59% of the total variance). The PC1 (49.74%) and PC2 (17.07%) could partially separate among Sphagocentron, Rhamphocentron and Xiphocentron subgenera, but Antillotrichia morphospace overlapped most of the species. Some Sphagocentron were highly separated from all other subgenera by the PC2, with a wide preanal appendage bearing an acute apex. The PC3 (13.51%) and PC4 (10.27%) strongly separate Xiphocentron subgenus from all other subgenera, with the species having preanal appendage mostly straight with wide base tapered to a narrow apex. The PC4 also separates Sphagocentron from Rhamphocentron, but with Antillotrichia overlapping with both subgenera. Showing that the preanal appendage morphology allows the sub-generic distinction between Sphagocentron, Rhamphocentron and Xiphocentron species, but not between Antillotrichia and most other subgenera, except Xiphocentron subgenus. The main contributors to the shape changes in each PC are presented in the thin-plate splines at Figure 2.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of preanal appendage shape, male genitalia. Showing the four major principal components (PCs) (90.59% of the total variance). The percentage of shape variance represented by each PC is presented along the axes. Thin-plate splines show the degree of shape deformation from the mean overall shape.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053140
The shape similarities were summarized in the cluster analysis dendrogram from the 28PCs distances (Fig. 3). The cluster analysis recovered most of the Sphagocentron subgenera except by X. (S.) julus, and also included X. (A.) fuscum and X. (A.) borinquensis and more distantly X. (Glyphocentron) euryale. In the Xiphocentron subgenus despite being well separate by the PC4 only X. (X.) aureum and X. (X.) polemon were clustered and in the Rhamphocentron only X. (R.) lavinia and X. (R.) messapus but also including other subgenera species. The results show three main clusters: (1) a cluster including species with wide preannal appendage, which are most of Sphagocentron species; (2) a cluster including many species with mostly straight appendage, including two X. (Xiphocentron) species, X. (S.) julus, X. (R.) numanus and a couple of X. (Antillotrichia) species from the greater and lesser Antilles; and (3) a cluster with many X. (Antillotrichia) species from South America having highly wavy appendage narrow at midlenght and wide and round at apex, but also including a cluster of species from Mexico and Central America having appendage with wider base and digitate apex with two X. (Rhamphocentron), X. (X.) polemon and X. (A.) moncho. The average overall phenotype distance was 0.137 (maximum = 0.349; minimum = 0.049). For the Sphagocentron subgenus (n = 7) was 0.129 (max = 0.240; min = 0.049); for Xiphocentron subgenus (n = 3) was 0,142 (max = 0.269; min = 0.074); for Rhamphocentron subgenus (n = 3) was 0.139 (max = 0.275; min = 0.067); for Antillotrichia subgenus (n = 15) was 0.093 (max = 0.349; min = 0.049).
Neighbor-joining cluster analysis based on distance coordinates of the principal components (PCs). Representation of the preanal appendage of each species is also depicted. Bootstrap values greater than ten are shown at the nodes.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053141
The divergence of the preanal appendage shape among subgenera with groups defined a priori was visualized through the discriminant analysis over the 10 first PCs (Fig. 4). After the discriminant analysis adjusted the data to maximize between-group differences the subgenera were in general well separated except by the overlapping of X. (S.) julus within Antillotrichia and X. (A.) fuscum within the Sphagocentron subgenus morphospace. The jackknife cross-validation test had an overall correctness 64.29%, and was able to correctly classify 71% (5/7) of the Sphagocentron, 73% (11/15) of the Antillotrichia, 33% (1/3) of the Rhamphocentron, and 33% (1/3) of the Xiphocentron subgenus.
Discriminant analysis of preanal appendage shape over the ten first Principal Components (PCs). The percentage of shape variance is presented along the axes.
The analysis ran for around four hours and examined 8,641,321 rearrangements, with one most parsimonious topology retained with a score of 3.91330. The tree topology and the distribution of the analyzed species are displayed at Figure 5. Most clades had very low or no statistical support, except X. (Xiphocentron) tarquon and X. (Xiphocentron) polemon (95%), the clade with X. (Rhamphocentron) species (68%), the clade X. (Antillotrichia) regulate and X. (Antillotrichia) sturmi (87%) and the clade with X. (Antillotrichia) species from Great Antilles (X.haitiense (X.cubanum, X.nesidion)). Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) subgenus was placed in a clade including many X. (Antillotrichia) species that do not present a mesal sclerite but instead longer spine-like setae at the same position (character 25(1)). Xiphocentron (A.) fuscum appears as the sister clade of X. (Sphagocentron) species (support of 44%), based on the sternum IX apodeme wide and contiguous with sternum margin (character 13(1)), absence of spines at the coxopodite basal region (character 20(0)), and contributions of the preanal appendage morphometry (not shown on the cladogram). The monophyly of X. (Sphagocentron) subgenus (support of 37%) is recovered based on the character 14(1) (sternum IX, in lateral view 2× as long as high or longer) and the contributions of the preanal appendage morphometry. The new species X.dactylum and X.eurybrachium are shown as first cladogenesis of the subgenus. Clades within X. (Sphagocentron) presented very low support (<30%) (Fig. 5A). Xiphocentron (Antillotrichia) subgenus is not recovered as a monophyletic group, with the species included in the analysis being split into three different clades.
Phylogeny of Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) species and other subgenera, and distribution map. A Implied weighting parsimony of geometrical morphometric data and 30 discrete characters, unambiguous discrete characters states are shown at the branches. Representation of the preanal appendage is depicted to each species. Symmetric resampling support values are shown at the node boxes. B Corresponding distributions of the analyzed species are indicated in the map with the respective number as in the phylogeny.
Holotype: VENEZUELA • ♂; Falcón, P. N. Cueva de la Quebrada del Toro, Quebrada del Toro, 10°49.581′N, 69°07.990′W, el. 530 m, 11.vi.2001, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Paprocki, Cressa leg., UMSP000075081. — Paratypes: VENEZUELA • 1♀; same data as holotype, UMSP000075082. • 1♂; Aragua, Tiara, 30.i.1983, Flint leg., USNMENT01518180.
Diagnosis.
Xiphocentrondactylumsp. nov. is particularly similar to Xiphocentron (S.) eurybrachiumsp. nov. mainly by the shape of the preanal appendage (in lateral view, straight throughout length, apically wide). However, X.dactylumsp. nov. can be differentiated from its congener by the (1) shape of sternum IX in ventral view, elongate and about as wide basally as apically, subrectangular (trapezoid, conspicuously wider apically in X.eurybrachiumsp. nov.), by (2) the posterior margin of sternum IX with wide shallow V-shaped incision (absent in X.eurybrachiumsp. nov.) in ventral view.
Description.
Male: Forewing length 3.0 mm (n = 2). Color overall dark brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated round region (Fig. 6E).
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) dactylumsp. nov., holotype, male (UMSP). Genitalia: A left lateral, B dorsal, C ventral, D phallus dorsal, E sternum V left ventral reticulate region. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053144
Genitalia (Fig. 6A–D). Tergum IX, in lateral view, narrow basally, acuminate apically (Fig. 6A); in dorsal view, anterior margin straight; posterior margin with round lobes and mesal V-shaped incision, and narrow suture line (Fig. 6B). Sternum IX, in lateral view, length more than 2× as long as wide, apex subdeltoid; anterior apodeme short, wide (Fig. 6A); in ventral view, about 2× as long as wide, posterior margin with V-shaped mesal incision (Fig. 6C). Tergum X membranous fused basodorsally to each paraproct. Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, width subequal throughout length, apex round, with narrow, short ventral lobe (Fig. 6A); in dorsal view, wide basally, narrowed mesally and wide apically, divided apicomesally, each side partially fused at base, without clear sclerotized mesal band, apex with several sensillae (Fig. 6B). Preanal appendage, in lateral view, setose, length more than 2× as long as tergum IX, wide, straight throughout length, apically wide, 1.5 as wide as base, with narrow digitate projection (Fig. 6A); in dorsal view, narrow throughout length, wide at apex with digitate projection curved mesad (Fig. 6B). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2× as long as tergum IX, curved mesally in dorsal view (Fig. 6B); coxopodite and harpago completely fused to each article, inner face with longitudinal area of numerous, slightly sparse, spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region with dense, long spine-like setae, with line of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 6A); basal region (coxopodite) wide, without clear basomesal spine-like setae; apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, about as long as basal region, apex slightly globose and curved distad (Fig. 6A); basal plate in lateral view wide (Fig. 6A). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex enlarged (Fig. 6D).
Etymology.
From the Greek dáktulos, ‘finger’, in reference to the conspicuous digitate projection of preanal appendage curved mesad.
Holotype: VENEZUELA • ♂; Falcón, Mitare river, near San Luis, 11°07.930′N, 69°39.184′W, el. 589 m, 07.vi.2001, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Paprocki, Cressa leg., UMSP000074031. — Paratypes: VENEZUELA • 6♂; same data as holotype, UMSP000074032, 000074033, 000074034, 000074035, 000074036, 000074037.
Diagnosis.
Xiphocentroneurybrachiumsp. nov. is mostly similar to Xiphocentron (S.) dactylumsp. nov.. However, X.eurybrachiumsp. nov. can be differentiated mainly by the presence of the following characters: (1) the preanal appendage in lateral view conspicuously wide subapically (2× wider than basal section), without narrow digitate projection; (2) inferior appendage basal region (coxopodite) with small spine-like setae in ventral view, apex curved dorsolaterally in dorsal view; (3) paraproct ventroapical lobe wide (as wide as preanal appendage basal section) (narrow or indistinct in the other species); (4) sternum IX trapezoid, posterior margin without incision; (5) sternum V with a digitate lateral projection.
Description.
Male: Forewing length 3.5–3.8 mm (n = 7). Wing without spots. Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell 3/4 as long as thyridial cell, very conspicuous nygmata. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig. 7A). Sternum V with elongate, digitate, lateral glandular process (Fig. 7F).
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) eurybrachiumsp. nov., holotype, male (UMSP). A wing venation left. Genitalia: B left lateral, C dorsal, D ventral, E phallus dorsal, F sternum V left ventral reticulate region. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053145
Genitalia (Figs 7B–E). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wide basally, narrower apically (Fig. 7B); in dorsal view, anterior margin substraight; posterior margin with very narrow incision (Fig. 7C). Sternum IX, in lateral view, length more than 2× as long as high, apex subtruncate, posterior margin concave, with a posterobasal short projection, anterior apodeme short, wide (Fig. 7B); in ventral view, about as long as wide, posterior margin slightly produced posterad, mesally convex, with a posteromesal, short projection (Fig. 7D). Tergum X membranous fused dorsally to each paraproct (Figs 7B, 7C). Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, narrow basaly, wider apically, apex subtruncate, with wide round ventroapical lobe (Fig. 7B); in dorsal view, wide basally, narrowed mesally and wide apically, divided apicomesally, each side fused at midlenght, with narrow sclerotized mesal band, apex with line of sparse sensillae (Fig. 7C). Preanal appendage, in lateral view, setose, about 2.5× as long as tergum IX, wide, substraight throughout length, apically wide, 2× as wide as base, with short, narrow projection (Fig. 7B); in dorsal view, narrow and curved mesally throughout length, tapered apically (Fig. 7C). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2.5× as long as tergum IX, coxopodite and harpago completely fused to each article, inner face with longitudinal area of dense, long spine-like setae, spine-like setae shorter towards base, with multiple lines of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 7B), (Fig. 7D); basal region (coxopodite) wide, with several basomesal short spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region indistinct (Fig. 7B); apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, 2× as long as basal region, apex slightly globose and curved dorsally; (Fig. 7B); basal plate in lateral view, wide, anteriorly with long, narrow flange (Fig. 7B). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex enlarged (Fig. 7E).
Etymology.
From the Greek eurus, ‘wide’, and brakhíōn, ‘arm’ in reference to the preanal appendage shape in lateral view.
Schmid 1982:56 [Type locality: Costa Rica, Juan Vinas, Chiz river; USNM; ♂]. — Holzenthal 1988c:58 [distribution]. — Armitage et al. 2015a:3 [distribution]. — Armitage et al. 2015b:5 [checklist]. — Armitage and Cornejo 2015:193 [checklist]. — Harris and Armitage 2019:7 [distribution]
Material examined.
COSTA RICA • ♂; Juan Vinas, Chiz river, 21.vi.1967, Flint and Ortiz leg., USNM. • ♂; Alajuela, Río La Vieja, nr. Lagarto, 2-3.vii.1967, Flint and Ortiz leg., USNM.
Diagnosis.
Xiphocentronevandrus can be differentiated by the combination of preanal appendage subapically wide, sternum IX posterior margin produced, overall deltoid, with shallow apical incision forming very small lobes; tergum IX with very deep, narrow, parallel sided mesal incision.
Synopsis.
Adult male. Forewing length 4-4.25 mm (n = 2). Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks I, II and IV present; fork I petiolated, fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell (Fig. 8A). Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated region.
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) evandrus Schmid, 1982, holotype, male (USNM). A forewing venation. Genitalia: B left lateral, C dorsal, D ventral. Modified from Schmid (1982). Small dots are inferred based on other species.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053146
Genitalia (Fig. 8B–D). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wide basally, narrower apically (Fig. 8B); in dorsal view posterior margin forming two dorsal lobes in quarter circle shaped and large lateral flanges (Fig. 8C). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 3× as long as high, apex narrow, anterior apodeme short, truncate (Fig. 8B); in ventral view, greatly enlarged at middle length, then greatly narrowed towards posterior margin, posterior margin with two very small lobes (Fig. 8D). Paraproct, in lateral view, with apex oblique (Fig. 8B); in dorsal view, apex round, ending in three equal lobes (Fig. 8C). Preanal appendage, in lateral view, wide, strongly thickened subapically then tapering into long triangular pointed apex (Fig. 8B). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2× as long as tergum IX, coxopodite and harpago completely fused to each article, inner face with longitudinal area of dense, long spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 8B); basal region (coxopodite) wide, mesal sclerite region indistinct (Fig. 8B); apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, 3× as long as basal region, strongly curved (Fig. 8B); in dorsal view, strongly sinuous (Fig. 8C). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex enlarged.
Distribution.
Costa Rica, Panama.
Remarks.
Type was fixed in a permanent slide and displayed in a dorso-lateral view.
Holotype: COSTA RICA • ♂; Guanacaste, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Estacion San Gerardo, 10°52′48.00”N, 85°23′20.40”W, el. 575 m, 26.viii. 2013, Malaise Trap, D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs leg., [BOLD: GMAAG1127-16] BIOUG28044-C01. — Paratypes: Same data as holotype, except 09.ix.2013. • 2♂; 09.ix.2013, [BOLD: GMACB1559-15] BIOUG19725-A07, [BOLD: GMACB1565-15] BIOUG19725-B01. • ♂; same data, except 26.viii.2013, [BOLD: GMAAG1127-16] BIOUG28044-C01. • ♂; same data, except 31.iii.2014, [BOLD: GMAAQ746-16] BIOUG28344-B02. • ♂; same data, except 11.ix.2013, [BOLD: GMACA1002-15] MZUSP.
Diagnosis.
The new species is most similar to X.tuxtlasp. nov. by sharing the prominent acute lobes at the posterior margin of sternum IX and the slightly divergent lobes of tergum IX posterior margin. The new species can be diagnosed in lateral view by (1) the preanal appendage with about the same width throughout length; (2) the spine-like setae of inferior appendage numerous and very dense (sparser basely in X.tuxtlasp. nov.); and (3) the shape of paraproct apicodorsaly round (truncate in X.tuxtlasp. nov.). In dorsal view (4) the tergum IX is longer than wide (about as long as wide in X.tuxtlasp. nov.).
Description.
Male: Forewing length 4–4.2 mm (n = 3). Color overall pale brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig. 9A). Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated region and wide sclerotized lateral projection.
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) guanacastesp. nov., holotype, male (BIOUG). A wing venation left. Genitalia: B left lateral, C dorsal, D ventral. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053147
Genitalia (Fig. 9B–D). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wider basally, narrower apically (Fig. 9B); in dorsal view, anterior margin with deep wide concave incision; posterior margin with round lobes and deep v-shape mesal incision (Fig. 9C). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 3× as long as high, apex subtruncate, with narrow, straight anterior apodeme, tapering to narrow flange (Fig. 9B); in ventral view, longer than wide, posterior margin produced mesally, forming prominent acute lobes divided by v-shaped mesal incision (Fig. 9D). Tergum X membranous fused basodorsally to each paraproct. Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, width subequal throughout length, dorsoapically round, with narrow, short ventral lobe (Fig. 9B); in dorsal view, wide basally, divided apicomesally, each side partially fused at midlenght, without clear mesal band, apex with several sensillae (Fig. 9C). Preanal appendage setose, in lateral view more than 2× as long as tergum IX, mostly straight to slightly wavy, with same width throughout length, apex tapered, acute (Fig. 9B); in dorsal view, about same width throughout length (Fig. 9C). Inferior appendage in lateral view about 3× as long as tergum IX; coxopodite and harpago completly fused, without suture line between each article, inner face with area of dense, long spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 9B); basal region (coxopodite) wide, without basomesal spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region with dense, long spine-like setae, longer than other spinelike-setae; apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, 1.5× as long as basal region, apex slightly enlarged (Fig. 9B); basal plate in lateral view wide, anteriorly with long, narrow flange (Fig. 9B). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex slightly enlarged.
Etymology.
Name in apposition; from the indigenous Nahuatl language: guaitil, ‘tree’, and nacaztli, ‘ear’. It is the popular name of the tree Entelorobiumcyclocarpum and also the name of the conservation area where the species was collected.
Xiphocentronjulus is particularly similar to X.tampatisp. nov. by the posterior margin of sternum IX mostly straight with very small mesal lobes; and can be differentiated from this and other species mainly by the uniform width of the preanal appendage, the posterior margin of sternum IX mostly straight with very small mesal lobes, and the paraproct apex oblique.
Synopsis.
Male. Forewing length 4.0 mm. Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Genitalia (Fig. 10A–C). Tergum IX in lateral view, wide basally, narrower apically (Fig. 10A); in dorsal view, posterior margin with two ogival shaped lobes and small lateral flanges (Fig. 10B). Sternum IX, in ventral view, posterior margin abruptly truncated, straight at its ventro-apical margin, forming two low lobes, barely produced (Fig. 10C). Paraproct, in lateral view, slender tapering to a pointed apex (Fig. 10A); in dorsal view, apex round and forming two apical lobes (Fig. 10B). Preanal appendage in lateral view, regularly narrow and pointed at apex (Fig. 10A). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2.5× as long as tergum IX, coxopodite and harpago completely fused to each article, inner face with longitudinal area of dense, long spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 10A); basal region (coxopodite) wide, mesal sclerite region indistinct; apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate 2× as long as basal region, curved dorsad (Fig. 10A); in dorsal view, strongly curved mesad, apex twisted posterad (Fig. 10B). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex enlarged.
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) julus Schmid, 1982, holotype, male (USNM). Genitalia: A left lateral, B dorsal, C ventral. Modified from Schmid (1982). Small dots are inferred based on other species.
Holotype COSTA RICA • ♂; Cartago; Tapanti Reserve, quebrada palmitos and falls, 9.72°N, 83.78°W, 24–25.iii.1991, el. 1400 m, Holzenthal, Muñoz, Huisman leg., UMSP000143451. — Paratypes COSTA RICA • 2♂; same data as holotype, UMSP000143450, 000143452. • 9♂; same data, except 23.viii.1990, Holzenthal and Huisman leg., UMSP000143453, 000143454, 000143455, 000143456, 000143457, 000143458, 000143462, 000143463, 000143464.
Diagnosis.
The new species is similar to Xiphocentronjulus by the posterior margin of sternum IX with weakly produced mesal lobes. It can be differentiated from these and other species by the combination of the following characters: (1) the preanal appendage very wide subapically (narrow throughout length in X.julus); (2) shape of paraproct in lateral view, with apicodorsal margin truncate with conspicuously narrow ventral lobe (apicodorsal margin oblique, contiguous with the ventral lobe in X.julus); (3) tergun IX in dorsal view, posterior and anterior margins with wide deep mesal incisions.
Description.
Male: Forewing length 3.6–4.4 mm (n = 12). Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal 3/4 as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig. 11A). Sternum V with short, flattened projection, somewhat angular apically.
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) tapantisp. nov. Holotype (UMSP), male. A wing venation. Genitalia: B left lateral, C dorsal, D ventral, E phallus lateral. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053149
Genitalia (Fig. 11B–E). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wide basally, narrower apically (Fig. 11B); in dorsal view, anterior margin with deep concave mesal incision; posterior margin with round lobes and deep mesal incision (Fig. 11C). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 3× as long as high, apex subround; anterior apodeme wide, straight, slightly tapering (Fig. 11B); in ventral view, slightly longer than wide, posterior margin substraight, with shallow, narrow mesal incision forming weakly produced mesal lobes (Fig. 11D). Tergum X membranous fused basodorsally to each paraproct. Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, wide at base, narrowing apically, with narrow, ventral lobe (Fig. 11B); in dorsal view, wide basally, divided apicomesally, each side fused at midlenght, without sclerotized mesal band, apex with several sensillae (Fig. 11C). Preanal appendage setose, in lateral view about 2.5× as long as tergum IX, sigmoid, narrow at base, wide subapically, about 2× as wide as base, tapering at apex (Fig. 11B); in dorsal view, substraight, tapering apically (Fig. 11C). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2.5× as long as tergum IX; coxopodite and harpago fused, with suture line between each article, inner face basally with long, dense spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 11B); basal region (coxopodite) wide, without basomesal spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region with few difuse long spine-like setae; apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, about as long as basal region, apex slightly enlarged, round (Fig. 11B); basal plate in lateral view wide, anteriorly with, narrow flange (Fig. 11B). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V; basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized; apex slightly enlarged (Fig. 11E).
Etymology.
Name in apposition; in reference to the Tapantí National Park where the species was collected.
Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Veracruz; Los Tuxtlas area, Maquinas river 4–14.v.1981, C.M. and O.S. Flint Jr leg., USNMENT01518157.
Diagnosis.
The new species is most similar to Xiphocentronguanacastesp. nov. by having the sternum IX posterior margin with a deep mesal incision forming two prominent lobes and is similar to X.julus and X.evandrus by the paraproct shape without the round apicodorsal margin. The species can be diagnosed from this and other congeners mainly by: (1) the shape of tergum IX with the posterior margin with wide subtruncate lobes slightly divergent, (2) the inferior appendage with sparser spine-like setae at the proximal region, and the combination of (3) the sternum IX posterior margin forming prominent mesal projections divided by a narrow incision, (4) the paraproct in lateral view truncate without round apicodorsal lobe and (5) the preanal appendage subapically wide.
Description.
Male: Forewing length 4.0 mm (n = 1). Color overall pale brown, forewing overall dark brown (in alcohol). Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present, fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated region.
Genitalia (Fig. 12A–D). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wide basally, narrowing apically (Fig. 12A); in dorsal view, anterior margin straight with mesal concave line; posterior margin with wide subtruncate lobes and narrow deep mesal incision (Fig. 12B). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 3× as long as high, apex truncate; anterior apodeme narrow, straight, tapering to narrow flange (Fig. 12A); in ventral view, about 1.5× as long as wide, posterior margin with prominent, acute, mesal lobes devided by narrow incision (Fig. 12C). Tergum X membranous fused basodorsally to each paraproct. Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, dorsoapically truncate, without round lobe, with narrow, ventral lobe (Fig. 12A); in dorsal view, wide basally, divided apicomesally, each side partially fused at midlenght, without clear sclerotized mesal band, apex with several sensillae (Fig. 12B). Preanal appendage setose, in lateral view about 2× as long as tergum IX, straight to slightly sigmoid, distal half wide, tapering to acute apex (Fig. 12A); in dorsal view, substraight, tapering apically (Fig. 12B). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2.5× as long as tergum IX; coxopodite and harpago fused, with dorsal suture line between each article, inner face with longitudinal line of setae, area of dense, long spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 12A); basal region (coxopodite) wide, without basomesal spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region with dense, longer spine-like setae (Fig. 12A); apical region (harpago) in lateral view narrow, digitate, 1.5× as long as basal region, inner face with longitudinal line of setae (Fig. 12A); basal plate in lateral view wide, anteriorly with narrow flange (Fig. 12A). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V; basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized; apex slightly enlarged (Fig. 12D).
Preanal appendage width in lateral view, narrow, less than half sternum IX width; sternum IX posterior margin in ventral view, with small, inconspicuous mesal lobes; paraproct apex in lateral view oblique (Fig. 10)
X. (S.) julus
2’
Preanal appendage width in lateral view more than half sternum IX width; sternum IX posterior margin in ventral view, with a pair of prominent acute mesal lobes; paraproct apex in lateral view rounded apically with narrow ventral lobe (Fig. 9)
X. (S.) guanacaste sp. nov.
3 (1)
Tergum IX posterior margin with deep mesal incision (about as deep as half tergum length) (Figs 11C, 12B)
4
3’
Tergum IX posterior margin with shallow mesal incision (as deep as less than 1/4 tergum length) (Figs 6B, 7C)
5
4 (3)
Sternum IX posterior margin substraight with inconspicuous mesal lobes (Fig. 11D); tergum IX anterior margin with mesal incision and suture almost reaching the posterior margin incision (Fig. 11C); paraproct in lateral view with narrow long ventral lobe (Fig. 11B)
X. (S.) tapanti sp. nov.
4’
Sternum IX posterior margin acute mesaly or straight with prominent acute mesal lobes (Figs 8D, 12C); tergum IX anterior margin straight without incision and mesal suture not reaching tergum mid-lenght (Figs 8C, 12B); paraproct in lateral view oblique without conspicuous ventral lobe (Figs 8B, 12A)
6
5 (3)
Abdominal sternum V with membranous, digitate lateral process (Fig. 7F); preanal appendage apex very wide (as wide as 2× basal region) (Fig. 7B); inferior appendage basal region with small spine-like setae (Figs 7B, 7D); sternum IX posterior margin without mesal incision (Fig. 7D)
X. (S.) erybrachium sp. nov.
5’
Abdominal sternum V without lateral process (Fig. 6E); preanal appendage apex slightly wider than basal region (Fig. 6A); inferior appendage basal region without spines (Fig. 6A); sternum IX posterior margin with V-shape incision (Fig. 6C)
X. (S.) dactylum sp. nov.
6 (4)
Forewing fork I (R2 and R3) present (Fig. 8A); tergum IX posterior margin lobes round, ogival-shaped (Fig. 8C); sternum IX posterior margin acute with very shallow mesal incision (Fig. 8D)
X. (S.) evandrus
6’
Forewing fork I (R2 and R3) absent; tergum IX posterior margin lobes, oblique, truncate (Fig. 8B); sternum IX posterior margin straight with a pair of prominent acute mesal lobes (Fig. 8C)
The new species can be diagnosed mainly by the sickle-shape of preanal appendage in dorsal view, in which the mesal margin has a strong concavity and the apex is wide with a mesal pointed projection. This character is unique to this species.
Description.
Male: Body. Forewing length 3.5 mm (n = 1). Color overall brown, forewing pattern uniformly brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal slightly shorter than thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig. 13A). Sternum V with short, sclerotized anterolateral projection.
Xiphocentron (Antillotrichia) drepanumsp. nov. Holotype (NHRS), male. A wing venation. Genitalia: B left lateral, C dorsal, D ventral. Genitalia scale bar 0.1 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1053152
Genitalia (Figs 13B–D). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wider basally, narrower apically (Fig. 13A); in dorsal view, anterior margin with deep narrow concave incision; posterior margin with round lobes and shallow mesal incision (Fig. 13C). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 2× as long as high, apex deltoid; anterior apodeme narrow, straight, tapering to narrow flange (Fig. 13B); in ventral view, about as long as wide, posterior margin with shallow mesal incision (Fig. 13D). Tergum X membranous fused basodorsally to each paraproct (Figs 13B, 13C). Paraproct, in lateral view, oblong, wide at base, tapering apically with submesal angle, apex round, with narrow, short ventral lobe (Fig. 13B); in dorsal view, wide basally, divided apicomesally, each side partially fused at base, without clear sclerotized mesal band, apex with several sensillae (Fig. 13C). Preanal appendage setose, in lateral view, about 2× as long as tergum IX, narrow, bent posterad at basal 1/3, apically wider and curved upward, apex round (Fig. 13B); in dorsal view, sickle-shaped, enlarged at base, narrow at midlength with concave mesal margin, wide at apex with mesal wide pointed projection (Fig. 13C). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2× as long as tergum IX; coxopodite and harpago partialy fused, with shape discontinuity between each article, inner face with longitudinal area of dense, long spine-like setae (Fig. 13B); basal region (coxopodite) wide, with small basomesal spine-like setae, mesal sclerite region with dense, long spine-like setae; apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, 1.5× as long as basal region (Fig. 13A); basal plate in lateral view wide, anteriorly with short, narrow flange (Fig. 13B). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V; basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized; apex slightly enlarged.
Etymology.
From the Greek drepánē, ‘sickle’, in reference to the preanal appendage shape.
Distribution.
French Guiana
3.4. New recordsAnimaliaTrichopteraXiphocentronidaeF166E852-C71D-5BED-BCDF-22131740062CXiphocentroncaeninaSchmid, 1982Material examined.
BOLIVIA • 3♂, 11♀; Santa Cruz Dept., PN and ANMI Amboró, Guarda Parque Mataracú, Q. Verde Uno, 17°33.136′S, 63°52.092′W, el. 374 m, 21–27.xi.2004, Malaise, Robertson, Garcia and Vidaurre leg., UMSP.
ECUADOR • 8♂; Pichincha 7km E Pito, el. 2950 m, 26–28.ix.1990, Flint leg., USNM. • 7♂; Azuay, Llaviuco river, el. 3010 m, 16 km W Cuenca, 18.ix.1990, Flint leg., USNM. • 4♂; Napo, 5km S Baeza, el. 1900 m, 10.ix.1990, Flint leg., USNM. • 3♂; Cañar, Chauchas river, 3 km N Zhud, el. 2910 m, 17.ix.1990, Flint leg., USNM.
COSTA RICA. • ♂ Cartago, Reserva Tampati, Quebrada Palmitos and falls 9.72°N, 83.78°W, 2–3.vi.1990, el. 1400 m, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Muñoz leg. UMSP000143465. • ♂ Same data, except 1-2.viii.1990, UMSP000143460. ECUADOR: • 2♂ Napo, Sebundoy, el. 2600 m, 11–15.ix.1977, L.E. Pena G. leg., USNM; 7♂ Napo, Reventador, el. 1750 m 3–6.x.1977, L.E. Pena G. leg., USNM.
Distribution.
Colombia, Costa Rica (new record), Ecuador (new record).
COSTA RICA • 1♂; Guanacaste, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Estacion San Gerardo, 10°52′48.0”N, 85°23′20.4”W, el. 575 m, 14.iv.2014, Malaise Trap, D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs leg., [BOLD: GMACC652-15] MZUSP. • 1♂; same data, [BOLD: GMAAR086-16] BIOUG28246-H01.
Distribution.
Costa Rica (new record), Mexico.
AnimaliaTrichopteraXiphocentronidaeC098DC03-EE05-5EC5-A75B-E09A35A333E6XiphocentronyineVilarino et al., 2023Material examined.
BOLIVIA • 2♂ Dept. La Paz, ANMI Madidi, Chalalan Ecolodge, Tuichi river at entrance to lodge and trib., 14°25.017′S, 67°54.378′W, el. 300 m, 29.vii.2003, Robertson and Blahnik leg., UMSP. • 3♂, 1♀; San Buenoventura–Ixiamas rd., km 23, Hacienda Chiquitos, Arroyo Chiquitos, 14°20.082′S, 67°42.204′W, el. 283 m, 13–14.vii.2003, Robertson and Blahnik leg., UMSP.
Distribution.
Bolivia (new record), Peru.
AnimaliaTrichopteraXiphocentronidae1D227568-8BBA-5354-9158-7D32F525A86DMachairocentronSchmid, 1982MachairocentronamahuacaVilarino et al., 2023Material examined.
BOLIVIA • 9♂. 119♀; Santa Cruz Dept.: PN and ANMI Amboró, Guarda, Parque Mataracú, Q. Verde Uno, 17°33.136′S, 63°52.092′W, el. 374 m, 21–27.ix.2004, Malaise, Robertson, Garcia and Viduarre leg., UMSP.
Distribution.
Bolivia (new record), Peru.
4. Discussion
In this study new species of Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) are described after more than 40 years. Now, the subgenus includes seven species from Central and South America. However, the preanal appendage morphometric analysis and the phylogenetic analysis suggest the inclusion of some Antillean species currently in Antillotrichia subgenus. Additionally, a species of X. (Antillotrichia) was also described sharing similarities with other species from northern South America. The new records expand the distribution of the genus with the first records of the family in Bolivia, which have a similar fauna to that of northern Argentina and the Peruvian Amazon. Also, the first species of Xiphocentron are identified in Ecuador showing a wider distribution range of X.mnesteus and X.sturmi along the northern Andean foothills, and with X.sturmi species occurring even in Central America.
The phenotypic groups defined by the cluster analysis (Fig. 3) only partially recovered the phylogenetic groups (Fig. 5A). The principal components of preanal appendage shape (Fig. 2) could mostly differentiate between the subgenera Xiphocentron, Sphagocentron and Rhamphocentron but not the Antillotrichia subgenus which overlapped with most of other subgenera. In the discriminant analysis (Fig. 4) the Antillotrichia only partially overlapped with Sphagocentron subgenus. The jackknife cross-validation test was around 70% to Sphagocentron and Antillotrichia, and 33% to genera with a very small sample (n = 3). Therefore, despite the overlapping, the preanal appendage shape shows a good accuracy to classify species to subgenera when an adequate sample size is used. The shape overlapping is in accordance with the initial expectations that X. (Antillotrichia) is possibly paraphyletic (or polyphyletic), which is also corroborated by the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 5A). Only a single Glyphocentron was introduced in the analyses and its shape does not show any conspicuous feature, beingplaced closer to the X. (Sphagocentron) cluster (Fig. 3), although it wasplaced near X. (Rhamphocentron) species in the phylogenetic results (Fig. 5A).
The generalized shape patterns that could be recognized in the majority of the analyzed species within each subgenus are as follows: In the Xiphocentron subgenus species exhibit a straight preanal appendage that is wide at the base and progressively tapers to a narrow apex (indicated by the positive values of PC4). In the Rhamphocentron subgenus, most species have the preanal appendage conspicuously wide at the basal third, and becomes slightly wavy and equally subnarrow at the apical 2/3 with a round apex (indicated by the positive values of PC1). In the Sphagocentron subgenus, most species share an overall wide preanal appendage, which becomes enlarged subapically and narrows towards apex (indicated by the negative values of PC2) (Fig. 2).
The Antillotrichia subgenus exhibited great morphological variation, with the cluster analysis (Fig. 3) revealing three main species groups: A group of several South American species that share preanal appendage strongly curved, narrow mesally with an enlarged, round apex (seen in the negative values of the PC4). The second group includes Antillean species, that present appendage slightly wavy and subequal narrow width throughout their length (seen in the positive values of the PC2). The third are species from Lesser Antilles with overall wide preanal appendage similar to Sphagocentron. However, the Antillotrichia subgenus groups inferred from the preanal appendage phenotype differed from the phylogenetic results (Fig. 5A). The species with wavy appendages narrow at midlenght and wide, round apex wereplaced at distinct clades defined more by characters of the inferior appendage setose ornaments rather than preanal appendage shape, suggesting convergent evolution of the preanal appendage.
Some species with less modified preanal appendage, such as X. (S.) julus and X. (R.) numanus were not grouped with other congeners in the morphometric analysis (Fig. 3), however, they have other characters that support their recovering within their subgenera in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 5A). The placement of X. (A.) fuscum as shown in the cluster, phylogenetic and discriminant analyses, suggests that this species belongs to X. (Sphagocentron). However, the phylogeny indicated that other species also could be included in a broader sense of the Sphagocentron subgenus (Fig. 5A). Nevertheless, the support for this clade was very low (18%), and many included groups had no support at all. Additionally, this clade was based only on a single discrete character and the contributions of landmarks. Therefore, we consider the evidence too weak to make conclusive taxonomic changes.
The morphofunctional aspects of the xiphocentronid genitalia are mostly unknown. Questions underlying the preanal appendage function during the copula and the selective forces related to its shape evolution have never been investigated. The copula was described to the sister group Psychomyiidae, in Tinodes the slender preanal appendages are looselyplaced across segment IX of the female while the grasping is primarily provided by a spiny harpago of the male inferior appendages, holding onto membranous pits of the female segment VIII, and additional grasping is provided by the spiny paraprocts that are inserted with the phallus (Fisher 1977). In Xiphocentron the only spiny structure is often the mesal region of male inferior appendages. The long and robust preanal appendage frequently crosses the inferior appendage harpago, which should help to lock the inferior appendages in position around the female segment IX, preventing lateral movements. The paraprocts seem to have no grasping role.
Therefore, we hypothesize that the long preanal appendage in Xiphocentronidae and its different shapes should be associated with evolutionary strategies to help with additional grasping and shoring of the inferior appendage around the female, while groups in which a strong grasping is provided by structures in the phallus, paraproct or inferior appendage may have slender or reduced preanal appendages. Further research is needed to clarify the morphofunctional aspects of the preanal appendage, and test this hypothesis.
5. Conclusion
After more than 40 years since the establishment of the subgenus Sphagocentron new species are described, and the monophyly and relationships within the subgenus were accessed through geometric morphometry and a morphological phylogeny. This study reported the following findings:
(1) The geometric morphometric analyses of the preanal appendage were consistent with the phylogenetic results regarding the non-monophyly of the Antillotrichia subgenus and the proximity of certain X. (Antillotrichia) species to the subgenus Sphagocentron.
(2) The monophyly of X. (Sphagocentron) was recovered, although with little support. X. (Antillotrichia) species having a narrow zone of dense spine-like setae on the inferior appendages and no mesal sclerite but longer setae may represent a monophyletic group together with X. (Sphagocentron) species.
(3) Phenotypic clusters fail to fully recover the phylogenetic groups, with preanal appendage shapes evolving independently in some species.
(4) The geometric morphometry was able to highlight preanal appendage subgeneric diagnostic traits, and partially distinguishing between each subgenus, but with a greater overlapping of X. (Antillotrichia) subgenus. Despite the shape overlapping, cross-validation test was able to correctly classify around 70% of the species to subgenera in better sampled groups. Therefore, the preanal appendage shape has a good informativeness for subgeneric classification.
(5) The preanal appendage shape in xiphocentronids is hypothesized to be associated to an auxiliary grasping function.
6. Data sharing and data accessibility
The data underlying this article, including: the discrete characters matrix (.ss), the combined discrete and morphometric characters matrix (.tnt) and the morphometric procrustes (.dat) are available at the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository and can be accessed at https://osf.io/trsy3/?view_only = ff4e70d072d4462895f5c641c510958f
7. Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Roger Blahnik who helped provide additional information about the specimens deposited at UMSP; and Dr Tobias Malm for helping with photos of the specimen deposited at NHRS. We also thank Dr Torsten Dikow and Dr Ralph W. Holzenthal for their support during the first author’s visit to the USNM and UMSP insect collections, respectively. We are grateful to Dr John Luhman and Dr Tácio Duarte for their valuable suggestions that significantly enhanced our manuscript draft. We thank the reviewers for their comments and suggestions on the manuscript. This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 (88887.803527/2023-00) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grant 205447/2017-1 for AV.
8. ReferencesArmitageBJBlahnikRJHarrisSCCornejoAArefina-ArmitageTI (2018) The Trichoptera of Panama. VII. Additional new country records for caddisflies from the Republic of Panama. Insecta Mundi 614: 1–7.Armitage BJ, Cornejo A (2015) Orden Trichoptera (Insecta) en Panamá: Listas de especies y su distribución por cuencas y unidades administrativas.Puente Biológico7: 175–199.ArmitageBJHarrisSCArefina-ArmitageTICorneA (2015b) The Trichoptera of Panama. III. Updated species list for caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) in the Republic of Panama.Insecta Mundi0442: 1–16.ArmitageBJHarrisSCHolzenthalRW (2015a) The Trichoptera of Panama I. New records for caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Republic of Panama.Insecta Mundi0435: 1–10.ArmitageBJHarrisSCRíos GonzálezTAÁlvarezEPérezEAguirreYCornejoA (2021) The Trichoptera of Panama. XVI. Evaluation of Trichoptera (Insecta) from Omar Torrijos Herrera General Division National Park. Aquatic Insects. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2021.1942496ArnqvistG (1998) Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection.Nature393(6687): 784–786.BálintMBarnardPCSchmittTUjvárosiLPopescuO (2008) Differentiation and speciation in mountain streams: a case study in the caddisfly Rhyacophilaaquitanica (Trichoptera).Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research46(4): 340–345.BanksN (1941) New neuropteroid insects from the Antilles. Mem. Soc. Cub. Hist. Nat. 15: 385–402, plates 343–345.BrauerF (1870) Über Xiphocentron, eine neue Hydropsychidengattung. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-königlichen Zoologischen-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 20: 66.BlahnikRJHolzenthalRWPratherAL (2007) The lactic acid method for clearing Trichoptera genitalia. In: Bueno-Soria J, Barba-Alvarez R, Armitage BJ (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Trichoptera. The Caddis Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 9–14.BooksteinFL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 pp.BooksteinFL (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape.Medical Image Analysis1(3): 225–243.BooksteinFLChernoffBElderRLHumphriesJM JrSmithGRStraussRE (1985) Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology, Special Publication 15, Academy of Natural Sciences Press, Philadelphia, 277 pp.BotosaneanuL (1988) Trichoptères de la Martinique.Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (NS)24: 215–228.Bueno-SoriaJVilarinoABarba-AlvarezRBallesteros-BarreraC (2022) Three new species of Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870 (Trichoptera, Xiphocentronidae) from Mexico. In: Pauls S.U., Thomson R., Rázuri-Gonzales E. (eds) Special issue in honor of Ralph W. Holzenthal for a lifelong contribution to Trichoptera Systematics.ZooKeys1111: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.73371CatalanoASGoloboffPA (2018) A guide for the analysis of continuous and landmark characters in TNT (Tree Analysis using New Technologies). Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23797.27360EberhardWG (1992) Species isolation, genital mechanics, and the evolution of species-specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae).Evolution46(6): 1774–1783.FisherD (1977) Identification of adult females of Tinodes in Britain (Trichoptera: Psychomyiidae).Systematic Entomology2(2): 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1977.tb00365.xFlintOS Jr. (1964) The caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Puerto Rico.University of Puerto Rica, Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Paper40: 1–80.FlintOS Jr. (1968) The Trichoptera (caddisflies) of the Lesser Antilles. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.125(3665): 1–86.García-RománJArmendáriz-ToledanoFValerio-MendozaOZúñigaG (2019) An Assessment of Old and New Characters Using Traditional and Geometric Morphometrics for the Identification of Dendroctonus approximatus and Dendroctonus parallelocollis (Curculionidae: Scolytinae).Journal of Insect Science19(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey131GoloboffPAFarrisJSKällersjöMOxelmanBRamirezMNJSzumikCA (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support.Cladistics19(4): 324–332.GoloboffPAMoralesME (2023) TNT version 1.6, with a graphical interface for MacOS and Linux, including new routines in parallel.Cladistics39(2): 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12524GorettiECeccagnoliDDi GiovanniMV (2005) Morphometric pattern and biometry of adult Trichoptera (Italian species).Italian Journal of Zoology72(1): 15–19.HammerØHarperDATRyanPD (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol.Electronica4(1): 1–9.HarrisSCArmitageBJ (2019) The Trichoptera of Panama. X. The Quebrada Rambala drainage, with description of 19 new species of microcaddisflies (Trichoptera: Hydroptilidae).Insecta Mundi0707: 1–54.HolzenthalRWCalorAR (2017) Catalog of the Neotropical Trichoptera (Caddisflies).ZooKeys654: 1–566. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.654.9516HoskenDStockleyP (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol.19(2): 87–93.IvanovVD (2005) Groundplan and basic evolutionary trends of male terminal segments in Trichoptera. In: Tanida, K. and Rossiter, A. (Eds.) Proceedings of the XIth International Symposium on Trichoptera. Tokai University Press, Kanagawa, Japan. pp. 207–218.JausetAMEdo-TenaEParés-CasanovaPMCastañéCAgustíNAlomarO (2017) Elliptic Fourier Analysis in the Study of the Male Genitalia to Discriminate Three Macrolophus Species (Hemiptera: Miridae).Insects8(4): 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8040120KlingenbergCP (2016) Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics.Development Genes and Evolution226: 113–137.MalmTJohansonKAWahlbergN (2013) The evolutionary history of Trichoptera (Insecta): A case of successful adaptation to life in freshwater.Systematic Entomology38(3): 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12016MoselyME (1948) Trichoptera. Expedition to South-West Arabia 1937–8.British Museum (Natural History)1: 67–86.MoselyMEKimminsDE (1953) The Trichoptera of Australia and New Zealand.Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 550 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.118696MorseJC (1975) A phylogeny and revision of the caddisfly genus Ceraclea (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae).Contributions of the American Entomological Institute11(2): 1–97.MutanenMPretoriusE (2007) Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: a comparison of moth genitalia.Systematic Entomology32(2): 371–386.NielsenA (1957) A comparative study of the genital segments and their appendages in male Trichoptera.Biologiske Skrifter, Danske Videnskabernes Selskab8(5): 1–159.NielsenA (1980) A comparative study of the genital segments and the genital chamber in female Trichoptera.Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter23(1): 1–200.NixonKC (2002) WinClada, v.1.00.08. Ithaca: Published by the author. Available at: http://www.diversityoflife.org/winclada (accessed Sept 2023).OláhJJohansonKA (2008) Reasoning an appendicular and functional caddisfly genital terminology. Braueria 35, 29–40.PanteEPuillandreNViricelAArnaud-HaondSAurelleDCastelinMChenuilADestombeCForcioliDValeroMViardFSamadiS (2015) Species are hypotheses: Avoid connectivity assessments based on pillars of sand.Molecular Ecology24: 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13048RohlfFJMarcusLF (1993) A revolution morphometrics.Trends in Ecology and Evolution8(4): 129–132.RohlfFJ (2017) tpsDIG, digitize landmarks and outlines. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.RohlfFJ (2021) tpsUTIL, file utility program. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.RossHH (1938) Description of Nearctic caddisflies (Trichoptera) with special reference to the Illinois species.Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin21(4): 101–183.RossHH (1949) Xiphocentronidae, a new family of Trichoptera. Entomol.News60: 1–7.RossHHUnzickerJD (1977) The relationships of the genera of American Hydropsychinae as indicated by phallic structures (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae).Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society12(4): 298–312.SchmidF (1982) La famille des Xiphocentronidae (Trichoptera: Annulipalpia).Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada121: 1–127. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm114121fvSchmidF (1970) Le genre Rhyacophila et la famille des Rhyacophilidae (Trichoptera). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 66: 230+LII plates.SchmidF (1979) On some new trends in Trichopterology.Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Canada11: 48–57.SchmidF (1989) Les Hydrobiosides (Trichoptera, Annulipalpia).Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie, Supplement59: 1–154.SchmidF (1998) The insects and arachnids of Canada Part 7. Genera of the Trichoptera of Canada and adjoining or adjacent United States.NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 289 pp.SgangaJVSgangaDEIglesiasMS (2022) Review and redescription of species in the brasiliana group of Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) (Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae, Smicrideinae): exploration of the utility of geometric morphometrics as a method for delimitation and characterization of species in the genus.ZooKeys1111(17): 389–412. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.80961ShapiroAMPorterAH (1989) The Lock-and-Key Hypothesis: Evolutionary and Biosystematic Interpretation of Insect Genitalia.Annual Review of Entomology34: 231–245.SvenssonBW (1975) Morphometric variation of adult Potamophylaxcingulatus (Trichoptera) reflecting environmental heterogeneity in a south Swedish stream. Oikos 365–377.TatsutaHTakahashiKHSakamakiY (2018) Geometric morphometrics in entomology: Basics and applications.Entomological Science21(2): 164–184.ThomasJAFrandsenPBPrendiniEZhouXHolzenthalRW (2020) A multigene phylogeny and timeline for Trichoptera (Insecta).Systematic Entomology45(3): 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12422UlmerG (1906) Neuer beitrag zur kenntnis aussereuropäischer Trichopteren.Notes from the Leyden Museum28: 1–116.VilarinoABispoPC (2020) New records and two new species of Xiphocentron Brauer 1870 (Trichoptera, Xiphocentronidae) from southern Atlantic Forest, Brazil.Zootaxa4851: 386–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4851.2.11VilarinoADiasESBispoPC (2022) Phylogeny indicates polyphyly in Cnodocentron (Trichoptera: Xiphocentronidae): biogeography and revision of New World species (Caenocentron).Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society194(4): 1341–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab077VilarinoASallesFFBispoPC (2023) Xiphocentronidae (Trichoptera: Psychomyioidea) from the Andean Machairocentron and Xiphocentron described in the Peruvian Amazon.European Journal of Taxonomy860: 62–80. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2051WichardWKraemerMMSLuerC (2006) First caddisfly species from Mexican amber (Insecta: Trichoptera).Zootaxa1378: 37–48. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1378.1.3Supplementary materials10.3897/asp.82.e112587.suppl1E15EC8E6-DEAD-5F6B-A691-564763372911
File S1
: .dat
: Preanal appendage aligned procrustes, PAST file (morphometric).
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1053153This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.Vilarino A, Calor AR (2024)10.3897/asp.82.e112587.suppl2ADD3F443-FBC9-5EEC-84F4-1BE717734C7F
File S2
: .ss
: Morphological data matrix, discrete characters only (phylogenetic matrix).
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1053154This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.Vilarino A, Calor AR (2024)10.3897/asp.82.e112587.suppl37027DBAD-6100-5207-B3ED-F78089039EDB
File S3
: .tnt
: Combined morphometric and discrete characters, TNT file (phylogenetic matrix).
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1053155This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.Vilarino A, Calor AR (2024)