103urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:77d0745d-c3a1-5248-81de-8cdc02bed84aurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F56F6CF9-7502-4001-A751-35D5F2EF6CA0Arthropod Systematics & PhylogenyASP1863-72211864-8312Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung10.3897/asp.84.e164719164719Research ArticleAuchenorrhynchaHemipteraHexapodaInsectaMembracidaeMembracoideaCladisticsMolecular systematicsPhylogenyTaxonomyIntegrative taxonomy of diversification treehopper Tricentrus (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Centrotinae) from China shed their phylogenomic relationship and the evolutionary historyLiFeng-Ehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-3302123Writing - original draftFormal analysisInvestigationYangLinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-5156123ConceptualizationData curationValidationLongJian-Kunhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4576-9919123Writing - review and editingInvestigationChangZhi-Minhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7247-9706123Writing - review and editingChenXiang-Shengchenxs3218@163.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-0343123Writing - review and editingProject administrationGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, P.R. ChinaGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Guizhou UniversityGuiyangChinahttps://ror.org/02wmsc916Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, P.R. ChinaInstitute of Entomology, Guizhou UniversityGuiyangChinahttps://ror.org/02wmsc916The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, P.R. ChinaThe Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou UniversityGuiyangChinahttps://ror.org/02wmsc916
202606032026842152331E898248-BA97-5A94-84CD-0EB3D0F89271096D7004C-DD21-42F6-9470-5D1865E5C1D51007202525122025Feng-E Li, Lin Yang, Jian-Kun Long, Zhi-Min Chang, Xiang-Sheng ChenThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.https://zoobank.org/96D7004C-DD21-42F6-9470-5D1865E5C1D5
Abstract
The treehopper genus Tricentrus is a widespread group of insects, characterized by typical spines and, in some species, sexually dimorphic suprahumeral horns. With 238 described species worldwide, Tricentrus represents the most species-rich genus in the subfamily Centrotinae. Currently, 72 species are documented in China, yet the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of this genus remain unknown. Here, we use an integrative approach to characterize and describe these treehoppers based on materials collected from China. We name three new species: Tricentrusallochrous Li & Chen sp. nov. and Tricentruspianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov. from Yunnan, Tricentrusdexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. from Xizang, with the revision of one synonym. Combined analysis morphological comparisons, species delimitation and phylogeny reliably separate these new species from known species, and sexual dimorphism with suprahumeral horns in three species is reported for the first time. Divergence time estimation indicates that the Tricentrus differentiated during the Early Cretaceous (110.41 Mya). Ancestral state reconstruction reveals that the most recent common ancestor possessed suprahumeral horns in both sexes and exhibited a short tubular pygofer apex. Our analyses demonstrate four evolutionary transformations in pygofer apex morphology and seven distinct transitions in suprahumeral horn development. These morphological diversifications likely resulted from multiple mechanisms, including sexual selection, life history strategies with associated behavioral adaptations, and incomplete lineage sorting.
phylogenysexual dimorphismtaxonomytreehopperThe National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32460397, 32470479).
The Science-Technology Program of Guizhou Province (ZSYS 2025024).1. Introduction
The treehopper family Membracidae (Hemiptera) comprises a widespread and species-rich group of insects. Its members exhibit not only remarkable morphological diversity in the pronotum but also significant pest attributes affecting agricultural and forestry. These insects cause direct damage by feeding on economic crops (Yuan et al. 1986; 1999; Chou 1975), and facilitate viral transmission (Yuan and Chou 2002). Globally, 3,491 extant treehopper species have been described, with the subfamily Centrotinae housing the greatest number (Dmitriev et al. 2022). Among the Centrotinae, the genus TricentrusStål 1866 was notable for its high species richness and prevalence (Dmitriev et al. 2022). The genus comprises 238 known species (Dmitriev et al. 2022). Within this total, 117 species have been reported from China, based on the work of Yuan and Chou (2002). Stål (1866) established the genus Tricentrus (commonly known as three-sharp-point bugs), designating Centrotusfairmairei Stål, 1859 as the type species. Subsequently, the period from 1908 to 2002 saw the description of numerous new species in this genus by researchers from various regions (Distant 1908, 1916; Bierman 1910; Matsumura 1912, 1938; Melichar 1914; Schmidt 1926; Lindberg 1927; Kato 1928, 1930, 1940, 1960; Jacobi 1944; Ishihara 1961; Ahmad and Yasmeen 1974, 1976, 1978, 1979; Ananthasubramanian and Ananthakrishnan 1975; Chou 1975; Yasmeen and Ahmad 1976a, b, 1978; Ananthasubramanian 1980, 1982, 1996; Thirumalai and Ananthasubramanian 1985; Sharma and Badan 1986; Thirumalai 1986; Yuan et al. 1986, 1992, 1997, 1999; Yuan 1987; Yuan and Cui 1988; Ahmad 1992; Liang and McKamey 1996; Yuan and Liang 1999; Yuan and Chou 2002). In addition, there are also cross regional researchers, e.g. Buckton (1903), Funkhouser (1914a, b, 1915, 1918a, b, 1919, 1920, 1927a, b, c, d, 1929, 1932, 1934, 1935a, b, c, 1937a, b, c, d, 1938, 1942), Metcalf and Wade (1965).
Following more detailed investigation, several former genera have been synonymized with Tricentrus, including Otaris Buckton, 1903 (Distant 1916), Taloipa Buckton, 1905 (Distant 1908), Centrotoscelus Funkhouser, 1914 (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1974), and Arisangargara Kato, 1928 (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1974). These taxonomic revisions were prompted by three distinct expressions of the suprahumeral horn within the genus: 1) both sexes present suprahumeral horns (Fig. 1A); 2) both sexes absent suprahumeral horns (Figs 1B, 3) sexually dimorphic expression of suprahumeral horns (Fig. 1C). The first two morphological types were commonly documented, whereas the sexually dimorphic form was seldom reported (Funkhouser 1919; Yasmeen and Ahmad 1976a; 1978; Yuan et al. 1997). Among dimorphic species, males lacking suprahumeral horns have often been confused with males with absent suprahumeral horns in morphological assessments. For instance, such confusion has occurred between the species T.apheliphallus (Yuan & Li, 2002) and T.walkeri Metcalf & Wade, 1965, T.arcifrontclypei (Yuan & Li, 2002) and T.camelloleifer Yuan & Cui, 1997 (Walker 1851; Yuan et al. 1997; Yuan and Chou 2002). Additionally, the lack of male morphological data represents an especially acute deficiency. The female specimens have predominantly been designated as types, while the male morphology of numerous species remained unknown in previous studies, as seen in some species recorded distributed in China by Funkhouser (1937a, d, 1938, 1942) previously, and monographs published by Yuan and Chou (2002). Among the 72 documented Tricentrus species in China, males of 34 species remain unknown (Yuan and Chou 2002). Are there any species with sexual dimorphism in suprahumeral horns among these unknown male species? It is currently unknown.
Photographs of species of the genus Tricentrus. A both sexes with suprahumeral horns, T. sp1. (photo by Xin-Yi Zheng); B both sexes without suprahumeral horns, T.davidi (photo by Xin-Yi Zheng); C sexually dimorphic with suprahumeral horns, T. sp2 (photo by Feng-E Li). The black and red arrows indicate females and males, respectively.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1555833
On the other hand, previous morphological and molecular evidence has consistently shown that this genus clusters with other genera of the tribe Gargarini into a single clade (Wallace and Deitz 2004; Bai et al. 2023; Li et al. 2023). Additionally, various species groups have been proposed based on morphology, such as the T.projectus, T.gibbosulus, T.fairmairei group (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1978, 1979; Ahmad 1992), and the T.fulgidus, T.acuticornis, T.brunneus, T.megaloplasius, T.curvicornis groups (Yuan and Chou 2002). The evolutionary relationships within this genus are still unresolved, stemming from limited species representation in existing studies. For Chinese Tricentrus in particular, whether morphological and molecular phylogenetic results are congruent is yet to be resolved.
Here, we present a detailed report of the genus Tricentrus in China using an integrative approach that combines taxonomy, phylogenetic analysis, and ancestral state reconstruction, based on the available morphological and molecular data. Our results indicated that the all examined species of the genus involved in the analysis formed a single clade, and samples of different sexes were confirmed to belong to the same species through species-definition analysis. We also describe three new species, namely Tricentrusallochrous Li & Chen sp. nov., T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov. from Yunnan, and T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. from Xizang, where T.dexingensis exhibits sexual dimorphism in suprahumeral horns. And, one new synonymy is proposed based on morphological evidence. Ancestral state reconstruction indicates that the presence of suprahumeral horns in both sexes and a short, tubular-shaped pygofer apex represent the ancestral condition in genus Tricentrus, with seven and four morphological transitions in these traits, respectively. Our study provides new insights on the evolution of Tricentrus.
2. Materials and methods2.1. Materials
For taxonomic and phylogenetic study, we examined species of Tricentrus and sampled from Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangdong, Guangxi, Xizang, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Fujian province respectively (Table S1). All the specimens examined are deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GUGC).
2.2. Morphology
General morphological terminology follows Deitz (1975) and Dietrich et al. (2001) except for the morphology of the female genitalia, which follows Mejdalani (1998). For the morphological study, habitus photographs were taken using Canon® EOS5D with camera shot MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1–5×, multiple layers were stacked using Helicon Focus 6. Forewings and hindwing photographs were taken using a KEYENCE® VHX-1000. The genital segments of the specimens examined were cleared in 10% NaOH and drawn from preparations in glycerin jelly using a Leica® MZ 125 stereomicroscope. The photographs and the illustrations were imported into Adobe Photoshop CS5 for plate composition and labeling.
2.3. DNA extraction, sequencing, and sequence assembly
The genomic DNA was extracted from the thorax of adults using a DNA Kit (TIANGEN®, Beijing, China). For sequencing of the mitochondrial genomes, a total amount of 1.5µg DNA per sample was used as input material. Sequencing libraries were generated using the Truseq Nano DNA HT Sample preparation Kit (Illumina USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations. These libraries constructed above were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform, 150bp paired-end reads were generated with an insert size around 350bp. Mitogenomes were assembled using MitoZ v2.4 (Meng et al. 2019) with Leptobelusgazella (Fairmaire, 1847) (NC_023219) as reference, followed by annotation in Geneious Prime 2021.1.1 (Kearse et al. 2012). A total of 13 protein-coding genes were predicted by determining their open reading frames using the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic codon; rRNA genes and AT-rich regions were identified by alignment with homologous genes from other treehopper species; the locations and secondary structures of tRNA genes were predicted using the MITOS web server (http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py) (Bernt et al. 2013).
2.4. Species delimitation analyses
Based on the mitochondrial COI sequences obtained, we used four DNA-based species delimitation approaches to define species partitions: automatic barcode gap discovery (ABGD; Puillandre et al. 2012) assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP; Puillandre et al. 2021), Poisson tree processes (bPTP; Zhang et al. 2013), and the generalized mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC; Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013). The ABGD and ASAP methods utilize predefined thresholds to discriminate between interspecific and intraspecific genetic variation, partitioning species by applying hierarchical clustering algorithms to pairwise genetic distances calculated from single-locus sequence data.
ABGD and ASAP analyses were performed on a COI multiple sequence alignment using the online portals (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/asapold.html; https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/abgdold.html; accessed April 25, 2025). As both websites are no longer accessible (as of February 20, 2026), the sequence data and results are provided in File S1. PTP can give a species delimitation hypothesis based on a gene tree inferred from molecular sequences. bPTP was a Bayesian implementation (BI) of the PTP model. In this analysis, the Newick-formatted BI tree from MrBayes was uploaded as input on the bPTP web-server (https://species.h-its.org/ptp). The GMYC model requires an ultrametric tree as input, estimated divergence times using the Birth-Death model with exponential priors (Monaghan et al. 2009; Michonneau 2015) on a consensus tree generated in BEAST v2.4.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014). This tree was then submitted to the GMYC web server (https://species.h-its.org/gmyc) for species delimitation analysis (Pons et al. 2006).
2.5. Phylogenetic analysis
The phylogenetic analysis included 53 samples, comprising 50 Tricentrus species and one representative each from the tribes Darthulini, Ceresini, Polyglyptini (Table S1). Sequence data were obtained from nine NCBI (the National Center of Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) accessions and 44 newly sequenced specimens (NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers: PV826162–PV826205).
The nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs were extracted using the introduction PhyloSuite v.1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2018). The alignment of 13 PCGs was based on amino acid sequences translated with the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic codon table using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) compiled in MEGA v.6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013). Individual gene (nucleotide sequences) alignments were concatenated into a database using SequenceMatrix v.1.7 (Vaidya et al. 2011). The best partition schemes (Table S2) and substitution models were estimated using PartitionFinder v.2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017). The final dataset was analyzed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) inferred analyses, respectively, using IQ-TREE v.1.6.8 (Nguyen et al. 2014) and MrBayes v3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The Edge-linked partition model for 10,000 ultrafast (Minh et al. 2013) bootstraps, as well as 1000 SH-aLRT (Guindon et al. 2010) replicates, were set in the ML analyses. The BI analysis was performed under the following conditions: four simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs of 30,000,000 generations, sampling every 1000th generation, and the first 25% discarded as burn-in. When the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01 and remained stable, stationarity was considered to have reached.
Furthermore, an effective sample size (ESS) value of more than 200 was used as a convergence diagnostic using TRACER v.1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2018). When the bootstrap percentage (BP) was >75% or the Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) was >0.9, the results were considered credible. Consensus trees were viewed and edited using FigTree v.1.4.2 (Mousavi et al. 2014).
2.6. Divergence time estimates, ancestral state reconstructions (ASRs)
The time scale of the diversification of Tricentrus was estimated by using BEAST v2.4.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014). The molecular dataset above and the topology resulting from the combined dataset based on the above BI analyses were used. The best partitions and models identical to those used for the above phylogenetic analyses in BEAUTI (Bouckaert et al. 2014). We used a relaxed molecular clock model (Drummond et al. 2006) and an exponential prior, with time tree and clock model linked across partitions. We applied a node-dating approach with a birth death tree prior (Kendall 1948). Based on the divergence time estimation by Dietrich et al. (2017), the treehopper lineage (Aetalionidae, Melizoderidae, and Membracidae) originated approximately 134 MYA, while crown group diversification commenced 18 million years later, with modern subfamilies emerging during the late Cretaceous to early Paleogene. To calibrate nodes on the phylogeny, we employed a well-constrained timeline based on inferred chronometric data (134 MYA) from Dietrich et al. (2017). This MCMC was run for 100 million generations; trees were sampled for every 1000 generations. Discarding the first 25% of the run, the maximum clade credibility tree with median heights coupled with 95% highest posterior density heights interval (95% HDP) was summarized in TreeAnnotator v.1.8 (Bouckaert et al. 2014). TRACER v.1.7 was used to assess convergence and estimate the effective sample size (ESS) of each parameter. The chronogram was viewed and edited using FigTree v.1.4.2.
To elucidate the evolution of morphological characters among Tricentrus and to evaluate their diagnostic value for higher-level classification, we examined two key characters and reconstructed their ancestral states on the molecular phylogenetic tree. The characters examined and their respective states were defined as follows (Table S3): Character 1 (Suprahumeral horns): (A) present in both sexes (B) absent in both sexes (C) sexually dimorphic with suprahumeral horns (present in female, absent in male); Character 2 (pygofer apex morphology): (A) pygofer apex short, tubular shape (ventral margins slightly exceed dorsal margins or both margins flush) (B) pygofer apex angular shape (dorsal margins exceed ventral margins obviously). Ancestral state reconstructions were performed on the Bayesian consensus tree generated by BEAST v2.4.7, employing the Bayesian Binary Markov Chain Monte Carlo (BBM) method as implemented in RASP v4.0 (Yu et al. 2015).
3. Results3.1. Phylogeny
The ML and BI analyses based on nucleotide and amino acid molecular dataset produced congruent tree topologies, with discrepancies limited to weakly supported internal nodes (Figs S1–S3). The phylogenetic analyses reveals that all examined species of this genus Tricentrus cluster within a single well-supported clade with high support (Fig. 2) (ML bootstrap = 100; BI posterior probability = 1) (Fig. S1). The four main branches of the genus Tricentrus were presented in the phylogenetic tree as sister groups to each other. The species, T.camelliae, as a single branch at the base of the tree.
Phylogenetic trees of treehoppers, inferred using MrBayes analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the 13 protein-coding genes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPPs) are indicated on branches. Black circles represent annotated branches. The boxes of different colors on the right represent the results of morphology and species definition.
Chronogram showing the ancestral state reconstructions and temporal divergences of the genus Tricentrus. Pie charts on nodes indicate most likely states only. Blue bars indicate time intervals for 95% probability of actual age (Fig. S4). The color and shape of nodes at the end of the tree and the color of letters in brackets correspond to states of the characters presence of the treehopper suprahumeral horn and pygofer apex morphology on the left box of the figure. Calibration nodes by the red star. The figure on the right is the frontal view of habitus of the treehoppers, and circles 1-6 lateral view sketch of apical pygofer morphology.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1555835
In clade 2, specimens of both sexes from T.obesus and T.walkeri (sampled across Guangdong, Guangxi, and Guizhou Provinces) formed a single, well-supported clade (ML bootstrap = 100; BI posterior probability = 1), demonstrating their conspecificity despite sexual dimorphism with suprahumeral horns. Phylogenetic analyses resolved these taxa as sister groups, with the topology ((T.obesus + T.walkeri) + T.folicornatus) under both BI (posterior probability = 1) and ML (bootstrap = 100) criteria (Fig. S1).
As well as T.obesus and T.walkeri, the species T.colligatoclypei, T.floripinnae, and T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. exhibit pronounced sexual dimorphism. The phylogenetic analyses showed these taxa as reciprocally monophyletic sister lineages, terminal of clade 4 (ML bootstrap = 100; BI posterior probability = 1). These species collectively formed a clade with T.quernales, yielding the topology ((T.colligatoclypei + T.floripinnae) + (T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. + T.quernales)) across all analyses.
Phylogenetic analyses placed the two new species, T.allochrous Li & Chen sp. nov. and T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov., within a strongly supported subclade of clade 4 with near central region (Fig. 2) alongside T.longus, T.lanpingensis, T.gammamaculatus, T.bibrunneifasciatus, and T.taurus. The consensus topology was resolved as: (((T.longus + T.lanpingensis) + T.allochrous Li & Chen sp. nov.) + T.gammamaculatus) + ((T.bibrunneifasciatus + T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov.) + T.taurus).
The clade 3 comprised eight species forming a basal polytomy in the phylogenetic tree, with sturdy support (ML bootstrap = 99.4; BI posterior probability = 0.97) (Fig. S1).
3.2. Molecular species delimitation analysis
Species boundaries of Tricentrus inferred from four delimitation methods (ASAP, ABGD, bPTP, and GMYC) using COI sequences with Tricentrus were illustrated (Fig. 2). Most of the four molecular delimitation methods yielded concordant results, delineating 38–41 species that correspond closely to well-supported phylogenetic clades recovered in both BI and ML analyses. Despite several instances of incongruence between the results of species delimitation methods, all consistently separated the three new species as a distinct entity respectively (Fig. 2), and both sexes were consistently recovered as conspecific across all delimitation analyses, with male and female specimens clustering within the same molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). The ASAP algorithm (Kimura 2-parameter model, K2P) recovered 38 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) at its optimal partition score (7.5). In contrast, ABGD produced discordant species delimitations among the three interspecific comparisons, T.curvicornis, T.hekouensis and T.obesus. The bPTP analysis delineated 41 MOTUs. Within the T.floripinnae, males and females were delimited as distinct evolutionary lineages. Congruently, the GMYC model corroborated all bPTP-delimited clades.
3.3. Divergence time estimation
The dated phylogeny (Fig. 3) based on nucleotide data showed the divergence between Tricentrus and the outgroup at 136.40 Mya [95% highest posterior density (HPD): 134.02–149.67] during the Early Cretaceous. The diversification within the genus Tricentrus was dated to the period from the Early Cretaceous 110.41 Mya (95% HPD: 93.85–128.52). The initial divergence between species T.obesus (TO) and T.walkeri (TW) and T.folicornatus was dated at 69.19 Mya (95% HPD: 57.05–82.76). The sexually dimorphic clade TO group was estimated to have diverged from the TW group at 40.36 Mya (95% HPD: 31.34–50.67). And other sexual dimorphism species (T.colligatoclypei, T.floripinnae, T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov., not T.quernales, since this species’ male is unknown) began to form in the Palaeocene at 60.96 Mya (95% HPD: 48.64–73.79), the T.colligatoclypei + T.floripinnae, T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. divergence in the Eocene, at 40.96 Mya (95% HPD: 29.61–52.34) and 45.73 Mya (95% HPD: 33.60–57.56) and the remaining two new species, T.allochrous Li & Chen sp. nov., T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov., showed divergences starting in the Palaeocene at 53.23 Mya (95% HPD: 41.95–65.05) and Eocene 45.69 Mya (95% HPD: 42.97–66.38), respectively. The differentiation time of the remaining species can be found in the Figure S4.
3.4. Ancestral state reconstructions
ASR analyses of suprahumeral horns variation in the treehopper genus Tricentrus indicated that the ancestral condition for this genus featured suprahumeral horns present in both sexes (Figs 3, S5). Our analyses revealed seven evolutionary transitions in this character, representing three distinct patterns of morphological change. ASR identified three independent evolutionary transitions from ancestral state A (suprahumeral horns present in both sexes) to state B (suprahumeral horns absent in both sexes), occurred along the branches leading to: T.sinensis, T.longus, and T.brunneifasciatus, while the other three evolutionary transitions from state A to state C (sexual dimorphism with suprahumeral horns) occurred in the following species branches: T.walkeri, T.obesus, T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov., T.floripinnae, and T.colligatoclypei. On the contrary, the evolutionary transition from state C to state A occurred only once, in the T.obesus group.
The ASR analyses of female pygofer apex morphology demonstrated that the ancestral condition for this genus was characterized by a short tubular shape (ventral margins slightly exceed dorsal margins or both margins flush) (Figs 3, S6). The analyses identified four evolutionary transitions in pygofer apex morphology, all following a single pattern of morphological change. All five morphological transitions are directed from the ancestral state A (short tubular shape) to the derived state B (angular shape: dorsal margins exceed ventral margins obviously), and occurred along the branches leading to: T.fulgidus, T.oedothorectus, T.hekouensis, T.curvicornis, T.amplicornis, T.altidorsus, T.davidi, T.sophorae, T.dinghushanensis, T.allochrous Li & Chen sp. nov., T.fuscovenationis, T.brunneifasciatus.
Modified from Wallace and Deitz (2004). Suprahumeral horns present or absent; posterior pronotal process straight at base, appressed against scutellum. Scutellum most apices visible. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex. Frontoclypeal lobes distinct or indistinct, not extending to apex of frontoclypeus. Metathoracic leg trochanter with very large spines. Forewing with R1, R2+3, R4+5, M1+2, M3+4, apex unfused (5 apical cells). Female second valvulae without significant broadening.
Pronotum rusty orange in female (Fig. S7A, B, E); male wine-red with darker margins (except metopidium and callosity, black in both) (Fig. S7C, D, F). Forewing smoke-yellow, bearing a transverse light brown band at mid-length (Fig. S7G).
Description.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 11): 6.7–6.9mm, females (n = 12): 7.1–7.3mm; forewing length: males (n = 11): 6.0–6.3mm, females (n = 12): 6.5–6.6mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 11): 2.3–2.5mm, females (n = 12): 2.6–2.7mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: males (n = 11): 2.7–3.0mm, females (n = 12): 3.2–3.6mm. — Coloration: Both sexes body orange-yellow, although males exhibit a darker overall coloration. Head black, eyes yellowish-brown, ocelli light yellow. Thorax black, legs femur with apical, tibia and tarsus orange, claw dark brown. Forewing veins concolorous with the membrane; male veins more deeply pigmented (Fig. S7G). — Head: Vertex with dorsal and ventral margins slightly arcuated and wave-shaped respectively (Fig. S7E, F). Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex and frontoclypeal lobes distinct not extending to apex of frontoclypeus (Fig. S7E, F). — Thorax: Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, the end extends upwards to the side, and apical blunt. Posterior pronotal process straight and extended, apex stays in the vein M3+4 base (Fig. S7A–D). Metathoracic leg trochanter with very large spines (Fig. S7I). — Male genitalia: Pygofer sub-rectangular in lateral view, tube shaped at the posterodorsal (Fig. S8A, B, D). Sternite IX with concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S8B). Lateral plate triangular in dorsal half, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S8G). Basal more than half of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S8B). Style clasp angled dorsally; distally end lateral recurved and slender, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S8C). Aedeagus in lateral view U-shaped, tapered distally with coarse denticles in distal half of dorsal margin; gonopore oval, near apex on posterior surface (Fig. S8E, F). — Female genitalia: Pygofer sub-rectangular in lateral view, densely covered with setae, its apex slightly curved ventrally (Fig. S9A, B). Sternite VII longer than width in ventral view, with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for two-thirds of the width (Fig. S9C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting gentle curvature; dorsal margin medially depressed, with fine longitudinal striae proximally and an acuminate apex (Fig. S9D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of the posterior half bearing contiguous denticles, with the base denticle distinctively isolated (Fig. S9E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S9F).
Material examined.
Holotype: CHINA • ♂; Yunnan Prov., Dehong City, Yingjiang County, Zhina Town (25°16'9.43"N, 98°2'4.44"E), 1850m; 25 May 2023; Min Li leg. Paratypes: CHINA • 10♂♂12♀♀; same locality as holotype; Min Li, Guang-Li Gou leg.
Type deposition statement.
The holotype and paratype specimens of the new species described herein have been deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GUGC).
Distribution.
China (Yunnan).
Etymology.
The word “allochrous” is a Latinized adjective, referring to sexual dichromatism, specifically differing pigmentation between males and females.
Remarks.
This species is similar to T.albomaculatus Distant, 1907, but differs from this in (1) forewing with a transverse light brown band at mid-length (absent brown band in T.albomaculatus); (2) forewing smoke-yellow (black brown on the terminus in T.albomaculatus); (3) metopidium uniform pigmentation, rusty orange or black (anterior margin of metopidium black and the remaining brown in female, male all black in T.albomaculatus).
Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, elongate sideways and upwards, dorsal side flattened; absence in male. Posterior pronotal process weak depression on the base, strongly expanded near middle not exceeding apex of suprahumeral horns (Fig. S10A–D). Forewing light brown, bearing two spacers of transparent and tawny band, tornus transparent; veins brown except area of transparent (Fig. S10H, I).
Description.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 2): 3.9–4.0mm, females (n = 2): 4.6–4.7mm; forewing length: males (n = 2): 3.5–3.7mm, females (n = 2): 4.0–4.1mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 2): 1.9–2.0mm, females (n = 2): 2.0–2.1 mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: females (n = 2): 2.3–2.5mm. — Coloration: Female body reddish brown with darker margins, male black (Fig. S10A–D). Eyes yellowish brown, male darker; ocelli tangerine yellow, male white (Fig. S10E, F). Legs coxae, trochanter, femur black; apical of femur, tibia, tarsus rusty brown, and claw yellow (Fig. S10G). — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins bow-shaped, slight depression in the center; ventral margins oblique and weakly wavy (Fig. S10E, F). Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex in a rectangle, on the same arc with the frontoclypeal lobes apex (Fig. S10E, F). — Thorax: Metathoracic leg trochanter with very large spines (Fig. S10G). — Male genitalia: Pygofer rectangular in lateral view, dorsal margins base convex (Fig. S11A, B, D). Sternite IX rectangular with slightly concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S11D). Lateral plate finger-like in dorsal half, base thick and sturdy, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S11G). Basal 2/3 of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S11D). Style clasp angled dorsally; apex laterally recurved, style shank slender, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S11C). Aedeagus uncinate, a quarter apical taper in lateral view, distally with coarse denticles in distal half of dorsal margin; gonopore oval at the apex (Fig. S11E, F). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with clearly angulate base and weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. S12A, B). Sternite VII U-shaped, triangular shaped on both sides, with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for nearly all of the width (Fig. S12C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting weak curvature; dorsal margin depressed, base convex, with fine longitudinal striae on about half of its length, and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. S12D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of nearly the posterior third bearing contiguous denticles (Fig. S12E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S12F).
Material examined.
Holotype: CHINA • ♂; Xizang Prov., Linzhi City, Motuo County, Dexing Town (29°19'52.482"N, 95°18'38.6784"E), 735 m; 11 August 2020; Yong-Jin Sui leg. — Paratype: CHINA • 1♂2♀♀; same data as holotype; Yongjin Sui, Xian-Yi Wang leg.
Type deposition statement.
The holotype and paratype specimens of the new species described herein have been deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GUGC).
Distribution.
China (Xizang).
Etymology.
The species is named after the type locality.
Remarks.
This species is similar to T.dorsocameloideus Yuan & Cui, 1997, but differs from this in (1) suprahumeral horns near quadrilateral in shape with blunt apical margins (triangular with acuminate apices in T.dorsocameloideus); (2) forewings dark brown to blackish; with a hyaline transverse band on the median, and fulvous transverse bands in the subapical area (yellowish-brown with brown on apex in T.dorsocameloideus); (3) leg coxae, trochanter, femur black; apical of femur, tibia, tarsus rusty brown, and claw yellow (trochanter, femur dark brown and the remaining brown in T.dorsocameloideus); (4) forewing veins dark brown (yellow in T.dorsocameloideus).
Pronotum and head reddish brown in female; male dark burgundy with darker margins (except metopidium, callosity and head black) (Fig. S13A–D). Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, nearly upright. Female forewing reddish brown, bearing brown at distal end; veins same colouration as forewing. Male forewing deeply smoke-yellow, veins deeply brown (Fig. S13G).
Description.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 9): 6.3–6.5mm, females (n = 8): 7.2–7.6mm; forewing length: males (n = 9): 5.4–5.6mm, females (n = 8): 6.4–6.7mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 9): 2.7–2.8mm, females (n = 8): 3.4–3.5mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: males (n = 9): 2.7–2.9 mm, females (n = 8): 3.6–3.7mm. — Coloration: Eyes dark yellowish brown with brown scattered patches, ocelli light orange (Fig. S13E, F). Thorax same pronotum, legs tarsus and claw brown in female; male black, legs reddish brown and black mix (Fig. S13I). — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins arcuate and ventral margins oblique. Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex and frontoclypeal lobes distinct, slightly above vertex, ventral margins not extending to apex of frontoclypeus (Fig. S13E, F). — Thorax: Posterior pronotal process straight and extended, apex stays in the anal angle (Fig. S13A–D). Metathoracic leg trochanter with very large spines (Fig. S13I). — Male genitalia: Pygofer rectangular in lateral view, dorsal margins base convex (Fig. S14A, B). Sternite IX with slightly concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S14B). Lateral plate finger-like in dorsal half, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S14G). Basal nearly half of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S14B). Style clasp angled dorsally; distally end lateral recurved, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S14C). Aedeagus in lateral view U-shaped, distally with coarse denticles in distal half of dorsal margin; gonopore oval, near apex on posterior surface (Fig. S14E, F). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with angulate base and weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. S15A, B). Sternite VII longer than width in ventral view, with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for nearly all of the width (Fig. S15C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting obvious curvature; dorsal margin depressed, with fine longitudinal striae exceeding two-thirds, and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. S15D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of the posterior third bearing contiguous denticles, with the base denticle distinctively isolated (Fig. S15E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S15F).
Material examined.
Holotype: CHINA • ♂; Yunnan Prov., Nujiang City, Lushui County, Pianma Town (26°03'17.69"N, 98°36'49.81"E), 2000 m; 6 August 2018; Feng-E Li leg. Paratypes: CHINA • 8♂♂8♀♀; same locality as holotype; 6 September 2023; Yong-Jin Sui, Li-Kun Zhong, Min Tang leg.
Type deposition statement.
The holotype and paratype specimens of the new species described herein have been deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GUGC).
Distribution.
China (Yunnan).
Etymology.
The species is named after the type locality.
Remarks.
This species is similar to T.oedothorectus Yuan & Cui, 1987, but differs from this in (1) coloration of body reddish brown, the presence of a lateral carina of suprahumeral horns (black; without lateral carina of suprahumeral horns in T.albomaculatus); (2) posterior pronotal process planar (tapered in T.albomaculatus); (3) forewing yellowish brown (veins and extremity brown in T.albomaculatus); (4) frontoclypeal lobes distinct (small and distinct in T.albomaculatus).
Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, elongate sideways and upwards; absent in male. Posterior pronotal process straight and extended, apex stays in the tornus (Fig. S16A–D). Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex, on the same arc with the frontoclypeal lobes apex. The frontoclypeus demonstrates coplanar alignment with the vertex ventral margins (Fig. S16E, F).
Redescription.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 2): 4.4–4.5mm, females (n = 2): 4.9–5.0mm; forewing length: males (n = 2): 3.4–3.5mm, females (n = 2): 3.7–4.5mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 2): 2.4–2.5mm, females (n = 2): 2.8–3.3mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: females (n = 2): 2.2–2.6mm. — Coloration: Female body black brown, male black (Fig. S16A–D). Eyes yellowish brown with brown scattered patches, ocelli yellowish brown (Fig. S16E, F). Legs coxae, trochanter, femur black; tibia, tarsus and claw brown. Forewing yellow-brown, tornus neighboring brown; veins R1 medial, r-m, m-cu, Cu apical, brown; male basal half transparent (Fig. S16G, H). — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins convex, slight depression in the center; ventral margins oblique and weakly wavy. Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. — Male genitalia: Pygofer rectangular in lateral view, dorsal margins convex (Fig. S17A, B, D). Sternite IX trapezoidal with slightly concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S17D). Lateral plate finger-like in dorsal half, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S17G). More than basal half of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S17D). Style clasp angled dorsally; apex laterally recurved, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S17C). Aedeagus uncinate in lateral view, distally with coarse denticles in distal half of dorsal margin; gonopore oval occupying a quarter of the aedeagus (Fig. S17E, F). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with angulate, obvious base and weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. S18A, B). Sternite VII with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for nearly all of the width (Fig. S18C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting weak curvature; dorsal margin depressed, with fine longitudinal striae on the one-third and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. S18D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of the posterior third bearing contiguous denticles, with the base denticle distinctively isolated (Fig. S18E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S18F).
Material examined.
CHINA • 2♂♂2♀♀; Xizang Prov., Linzhi City, Motuo County, Beibeng Town (29°15'14.857"N, 95°12'16.013"E), 935 m; 30 June 2022; Hong-Li He leg.
Distribution.
China (Xizang).
Remarks.
This species was initially documented based on a female specimen collected in Beibeng Town, Motuo County, China (Xizang). Following this original discovery, no further records were documented for over a century until our recent recollection at the type locality. Here, we provide the first comprehensive morphological description of male specimens, complemented by complete mitochondrial genome sequencing. These critical additions enable accurate identification and pairing of male specimens within this taxon.
AnimaliaHemipteraMembracidaeBC5A9337-B112-51BF-A943-4D357926F038TricentrusfloripinnaeYuan & Cui, 1987Tricentrusfloripinnae Yuan & Cui, 1987: 136; Yuan & Chou, 2002: 396–397; Li et al, 2020, 252, 254.Diagnosis.
Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, reaching out to the sides, not exceeding humeral angle in frontal view; absent in male. Posterior pronotal process gabled, apex stays in the tornus (Fig. S19A–D). Forewing darker tawny, veins R1, r-m, m-cu, cu dark brown, tornus transparent; blackish brown anteriorly and posteriorly near the tornus and at the extremity of the forewings (Fig. S19G).
Redescription.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 3): 4.5–4.6mm, females (n = 4): 5.0–5.4mm; forewing length: males (n = 3): 3.9–4.0mm, females (n = 4): 4.4–4.7mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 3): 2.1–2.2mm, females (n = 4): 2.4–2.8mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: females (n = 3): 2.4–2.8mm. — Coloration: Both sexes black. Eyes yellowish brown or silvery grey with black brown border; ocelli tangerine yellow (Fig. S19E, F). Legs black except apical of femur and tibia rusty brown; claw and tarsus tawny. — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins bow-shaped; ventral margins oblique and weakly wavy on the base. Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex in arcuate, on the same arc with the frontoclypeal lobes apex (Fig. S19E, F). — Male genitalia: Pygofer rectangular in lateral view, dorsal margins base convex, suffer with distinct lateral carina (Fig. S20A, B, D). Sternite IX rectangular with slightly concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S20D). Lateral plate finger-like in dorsal half, base thick and sturdy, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S20G). Basal two-thirds of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S20D). Style clasp angled dorsally; apex laterally recurved, style shank slender, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S20C). Aedeagus uncinate, apical with one-third narrow in lateral view, distally with coarse denticles in more than half of the dorsal margin; gonopore oval in the apical (Fig. S20E, F). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with angulate base and apex blunt; weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. S21A, B). Sternite VII U-shaped, triangular shaped on both sides, with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for nearly all of the width (Fig. S21C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting curvature; dorsal margin depressed, with fine longitudinal striae on nearly a half and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. S21D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsoposterior margin bearing arranged denticles along the distal third, with two enlarged basal denticles forming distinct intersegmental spacing structures (Fig. S21E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S21F).
Material examined.
CHINA • 3♂♂3♀♀; Xizang Prov., Linzhi City, Motuo County, Dexing Town (29°19'52.482"N, 95°18'38.6784"E), 735 m; 11 August 2020; Yong-Jing Sui leg. CHINA • 1♀; Xizang Prov., Linzhi City, Motuo County, Beibeng Town (29°14'36.3804"N, 95°10'12.774"E), 775 m; 11 August 2020; Yong-Jing Sui leg.
Distribution.
China (Xizang).
Remarks.
This species was originally described by Yuan and Cui (1987) based on female specimens collected in Xizang, China and subsequently came into the China faunal checklist (Yuan and Chou 2002). Both foundational records were based solely on female specimens, leaving male morphological characteristics undocumented until the recent work of Li et al. (2020), which provided the first confirmed description of diagnostic male features. However, through comparative analysis of morphology we confirm these specimens represent distinct taxonomic entities. The Tricentrusfloripinnae (Li et al. 2020) is hereby reclassified as a misapplied taxonomic concept within the genus Tricentrus, based on morphological incongruences between the material and newly acquired specimens from the original locality. Here, through integrated morphological and molecular analysis of newly collected type locality material, we validated it to be a sexually dimorphic species and confirmed males of this species.
Suprahumeral horns base thick and sturdy, elongate sideways and upwards; absence or presence in male (Fig. S23A–E3, a–e3). Forewing smoke-yellow, bearing four alternating transverse bands: two transparent (basal and medial) alternating with two light brown bands, brown at distal end; venation concolorous except veins most of the R2+3, R4+5, and r-m, m-cu; male base transparent; male with wing base transparent and veins more deeply pigmented. (Fig. S23A4–E4). Aedeagus uncinate in lateral view, dorsal margin bearing three paired spinose processes located in the medial, subapical, apical areas respectively; gonopore slender-elliptical, occupying half of the aedeagus (Fig. S23a5–6–e5–e6 and Fig. S24E, F).
Redescription.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 16): 6.2–6.4mm, females (n = 16): 7.2–7.8mm; forewing length: males (n = 16): 5.4–5.6mm, females (n = 16): 6.4–6.5mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 16): 3.1–3.4mm, females (n = 16): 3.7–4.0mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: males (n = 16): 2.8–4.5mm, females (n = 16): 4.5–5.0mm. — Coloration: Both sexes body black, brown, or dark brown (Fig. S23A1–E1, a1–e1). Eyes yellowish brown with brown scattered patches, ocelli orange-brown (Fig. S22A–C and Fig. S22A1–E1, a1–e1). Legs coxae, trochanter, femur, claw black; tibia, tarsus yellow brown (Fig. S23A2–E2, a2–e2). — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins convex, slight depression in the center. Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex and frontoclypeal lobes distinct, slightly above vertex, ventral margins reaching to the middle of frontoclypeus (Fig. S23A3–E3, a3–e3). — Thorax: Posterior pronotal process gabled, weak depression on the base, apex dorsal margins slightly deflexed ventrad (Fig. S23A3–E3, a3–e3). — Male genitalia: Pygofer narrow rectangular in lateral view, suffer with distinct lateral carina (Fig. S24A, B, D). Sternite IX with slightly concave ventral margin in ventral view (Fig. S24B). Lateral plate scalene triangle, right portion weakly depressed, margins setose (Fig. S24G). Basal three-quarters of subgenital plate fused (Fig. S24B). Style clasp angled dorsally; style shank arc, apex laterally recurved and margin exhibits a truncate configuration, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. S23a7–e7 and Fig. S24C). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with obvious angulate base and weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. S25A, B). Sternite VII with posterior margin deeply concave, accounting for nearly all of the width (Fig. S25C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting weak curvature; dorsal margin depressed, with fine longitudinal striae on nearly half and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. S25D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of the posterior third bearing contiguous denticles (Fig. S25E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. S25F).
Material examined.
CHINA • 1♂3♀♀; Guangxi Prov., Guilin City, Lingui District, Wantian Town (25°36'43.989"N, 109°57'39.131"E), 1600 m; 4 July 2023; Yongjin Sui, Feng-E Li leg. CHINA • 2♂♂6♀♀; Guangdong Prov., Ruyuan City, Shixing County, Luoba Town (24°50'36.230"N, 114°13'3.440"E), 261 m; 14 June 2023; Shasha Lv, Feng-E Li leg. CHINA • 11♂♂3♀♀; Fujian Prov., Jianou City, Fangdao Town (27°3'8.587"N, 118°9'27.080"E); 21 May 2012; Jian-Kun Long leg. CHINA • 1♂1♀; Guizhou Prov., Tongren City, Dejiang County, Fuxing Town (28°6'30.640"N, 107°54'3.797"E); 7 June 2021; Yin-Lin Mu leg. CHINA • 1♂3♀♀; Shandong Prov., Linyi City, Yinan County, Mamuchi Town (35°41'30.651"N, 118°16'50.623"E); 17 July 2020; Yong-Jin Sui leg.
Distribution.
China (Guangxi, Guangdong, Fujian, Guizhou, Sichuan, Shaanxi).
Remarks.
Specimens from four biogeographically distinct localities were examined, revealing all males completely lack suprahumeral horns. While sexual dimorphism has been documented in this genus Tricentrus, this discovery provides critical insights into evolutionary developmental pathways regulating sexual dimorphism. We have added the relevant morphological characters of the males and their mitochondrial genome sequences to make them correctly paired males. Examination of the type material (Fig. S22) indicates that Tricentrusaleuritis Chou, 1975 is conspecific with T.obesus Funkhouser, 1942; the former is consequently placed as a junior synonym.
Suprahumeral horns slim and short, apex blunt, elongate sideways and upwards, dorsal side flattened; absence in male. Aedeagus uncinate in lateral view, slender in posterior view; base with ventral margins slightly concavity, dorsal margin bearing two paired spinose processes located in the medial, and apical respectively, medial maximum development, subapical smallest; gonopore slender-elliptical, occupying nearly a half of the aedeagus (Fig. S27E, F).
Redescription.
Measurements: Body length: males (n = 4): 6.0–6.2mm, females (n = 10): 6.1–7.0mm; forewing length: male (n = 4): 5.4–5.5mm, females (n = 10): 5.1–6.2mm; width between humeral angles apices: males (n = 4): 3.1–3.2mm, females (n = 10): 3.1–3.5mm; width between suprahumeral horns apices: females (n = 10): 3.5–4.0mm. — Coloration: Body black-brown with gold hairs (Fig. 23A1–C1, a1–b1). Forewing smoke-yellow, bearing four alternating transverse bands: two transparent (basal and medial) alternating with two light brown bands, brown at distal end (Fig. 23A4–C4). Legs coxae, trochanter, femur black; tibia black- brown, tarsus orange, claw yellow brown. — Head: Vertex with dorsal margins bow-shaped obviously, slightly depression in the center; ventral margins oblique and weakly wavy. Ocelli slightly closer to inner margins of eyes than to each other. Frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards apex and frontoclypeal lobes distinct not extending to apex of frontoclypeus (Fig. 23A3–C3, a3–b3). — Thorax: Posterior pronotal process ridged, weak depression on the base, apex dorsal margins slightly deflexed ventrad (Fig. 23A2–C2, a2–b2). — Male genitalia: Pygofer narrow rectangular in lateral view, suffer with distinct lateral carina (Fig. 24A–B, D). Sternite IX rectangular with slightly concave ventral and lateral margin in ventral view (Fig. 24D). Lateral plate exhibits a scalene triangular configuration, with the dextral aspect demonstrating shallow concavity (Fig. 24G). Basal more than a half of subgenital plate fused (Fig. 24D). Style clasp angled dorsally; style shank arc, apex lateral recurved, and margins acuminate, inner surface with setae; connective n-shaped (Fig. 24C). — Female genitalia: Pygofer with elliptical base and weakly tubular distal portion in lateral view; surface densely setose throughout (Fig. 25A–B). Sternite VII exhibits V-shaped, with posterior margin deeply concave, account for near all of the width (Fig. 25C). First valvulae knife-shaped, exhibiting weakly curvature in the near medial; dorsal margin with fine longitudinal striae more than a half and terminating in an acuminate apex (Fig. 25D). Second valvulae similar in shape to the first valvulae, dorsal margin of the posterior thirds bearing contiguous denticles, and base denticle obvious (Fig. 25E). Third valvulae (gonoplac) broadly rounded distally (Fig. 25F).
Material examined.
CHINA • 4♀♀; Guangxi Prov., Guilin City, Lingui District, Wantian Town (25°36'43.989"N, 109°57'39.131"E), 1600 m; 4 July 2023, Yongjin Sui, Fenge Li leg. CHINA • 3♂♂4♀♀; Guangdong Prov., Ruyuan City, Shixing County, Luoba Town (24°50'36.230"N, 114°13'3.440"E), 261m; 14 June 2023; Shasha Lv, Yong-Jing Sui leg. CHINA • 1♂2♀♀; Guizhou Prov., Kaili City, Rongjiang County (26°18'19.867"N, 108°21'29.996"E), Ying-Jian Wang leg.
Distribution.
China (Anhui, Hubei, Fujian, Hunan, Guangxi, Guangdong); Philippines.
Remarks.
This species is similar to T.obesus Funkhouser, 1942 in morphological features of pronotum and forewing, but differs from the later in: (1) suprahumeral horns triangular in dorsal view, ungenerous in head and pronotum in anterior view (exhibits a sub-rectangular configuration in dorsal view, thick and sturdy in T.obesus); (2) aedeagus with medial spinose processes obviously longer, and slender in posterior view (medial spinose processes normality and not slender in T.obesus); (3) style clasp apex with margins acuminate (a truncate configuration in T.obesus).
4. Discussion4.1. Diversification history and ancestral characteristics of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Tricentrus">Tricentrus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>
Our molecular dating and ancestral state analysis (Fig. 3) provide new insights into the evolution of Tricentrus. The diversification of Tricentrus was dated to the Early Cretaceous (110.41 Mya, 95% HPD: 93.85–128.52), which is slightly older than the estimate by Li et al. (2023). The inconsistency is probably attributable to the insufficient materials of Tricentrus analysed in the study by Li et al. (2023). After the Early Cretaceous initial divergence, most of the Tricentrus species divergences took place during the Late Cretaceous, Eocene and Oligocene and a few in the Quaternary. The succession of Early Cretaceous ecological transitions, plate tectonic reorganizations, and the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction (Hu 2005; Wang 2006; Yang et al. 2024) led to a phase of high diversification, in which multiple animals and plants underwent rapid biotic radiations during the Paleogene recovery interval (Lowery et al. 2018; Lyson et al. 2019; Magallón et al. 2019; Dimitrov et al. 2023). It is interesting that the main divergence of treehoppers occurred at the same frequency as the main radiation of their angiosperm host plants during the Early Cretaceous (Foster et al. 2016; Dietrich et al. 2017). Our result of the molecular dating analysis of the genus Tricentrus was consistent with the above findings. Both nymphal and adult stages of treehoppers demonstrate consistent feeding preferences for angiosperm hosts, as documented across multiple field studies (Yuan and Chou 2002; Wallace and Deitz 2004). As a genus with a large number of taxa, Tricentrus, like other treehoppers, shares the typical treehopper preference for thermophilic habitats, utilizing semi-evergreen or evergreen angiosperms as primary host plants (Wood 1993; Yuan and Chou 2002; Wallace and Deitz 2004). Based on this, we infer that the Early to Mid-Cretaceous temperature variations (Xi et al. 2024) expanded thermally suitable habitats and coincided with an increase in potential host taxa (Foster et al. 2016) for the genus Tricentrus.
In addition, the results of the ASR analysis of the suprahumeral horns showed that the presence of suprahumeral horns in both sexes was the ancestral state in the genus Tricentrus (Fig. 3). This result was similar to previous research on the Tricentrus genus, in which suprahumeral horns underwent multiple morphological transformations, including from absent to present (Li et al. 2023). This morphological transformation likely represents the integrated outcome of multiple evolutionary factors. Firstly, incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) is one of the possible reasons for this. Multiple descendant species arose through rapid cladogenesis from a common ancestor, resulting in the stochastic segregation of ancestral polymorphisms during subsequent lineage divergence. The phenomenon where similar traits arise independently in different species due to the stochastic inheritance of ancestral characteristics has been documented across multiple animal groups, including insects (Fontaine et al. 2015) and marsupials (Feng et al. 2022). Second, complex life-history strategies, coupled with the pressure to make behavioral choices, may be another contributing factor. As commonly known, most treehopper species, with the exception of a small number of solitary species, have highly developed sub-social behaviors (Wood 1993; Yuan and Chou 2002), e.g. maternal care, aggregation and ant mutualism (Wood 1979; Lin 2006). This leads to a high proportion of females in the offspring (Wood 1984), thereby prolonging the entire life cycle and intensifying species competition.
On the other hand, the results of the ASR analysis of the pygofer apex morphology show that short and tubular was the ancestral state in the genus Tricentrus (Fig. 3). Similar to suprahumeral horns, the pygofer apex may have undergone morphological changes due to ILS. Furthermore, excluding the species T.fulgidus, T.allochrous, and T.fuscobenations, the clade of primary morphological transformations in pygofer apex structures emerged during the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction interval. Increased competition as a result of the mass extinction event may have contributed to this morphological transition. The pygofer apex was usually involved in reproduction and excretion, with honeydew secretion being the main metabolite of treehoppers, which was a sugar-rich waste product (Wood 1993). Honeydew usually attracts ants to feed on it and a symbiotic relationship formed (Yuan and Chou 2002; Nelson and Mooney 2022). The angular morphology of the pygofer may confer energetic benefits to cicadas by reducing metabolic costs during honeydew processing, and avoiding species competition.
Finally, the existing morphological groupings of Chinese Tricentrus were not fully supported by our molecular phylogenetic data. From the perspective of the character pygofer apex, only the majority of species with the angular shape of the pygofer cluster into one branch (the base in the fourth branch of Fig. 2), while a few species were dispersed. And the remaining species with tubular pygofer apices group on different branches of the phylogenetic tree. Most of the species were classified conform to the group T.brunneus (Yuan and Chou 2002). Besides, interestingly, the top branch (Fig. 2), i.e. ((T.colligatoclypei + T.floripinnae) + (T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. + T.quernales)), these species show frontoclypeal margins expanding gradually towards the apex in a rectangle, on the same arc with the frontoclypeal lobes apex. This important characteristic was the clustering feature of the group T.projectus (Ahmad & Yasmeen, 1979). And yet such discordance between morphological and molecular phylogenetic results was not uncommon in taxonomic studies (Fontaine et al. 2015; Feng et al. 2022).
4.2. Patterns of sexual dimorphism with suprahumeral horns and geographical variation
Our morphological and molecular analyses revealed three distinct species of Tricentrus inhabiting Yunnan and Xizang province. The three new species, T.allochrous Li & Chen sp. nov., T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov. and T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov., were clearly distinct in their morphology of the pronotum and female genitalia; our descriptions and illustrations (Figs S7, S10, S13) herein make their identification in the field straightforward. The three species exhibit a combination of morphological features, including metathoracic leg trochanters with very large spines, and straight, elongated posterior pronotal processes that cover most of the scutellum. This character suite was shared among known members of the genus Tricentrus (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1974). With the increase of the number of species, however, some species with these features were easy to confuse with the genus Centrotoscelus (Funkhouser 1914a) (without suprahumeral horns in the both sexes), which was later synonymized with Tricentrus based on evidence from morphology and phylogeny (Wallace and Deitz 2004). For the suprahumeral horns, this genus exhibits three distinct expression patterns: species with presence in both sexes, species with absence in both sexes, and species displaying sexual dimorphism. Although sexually dimorphic species constitute a small portion of the genus, new cases continue to be documented with ongoing research (Funkhouser 1919; Yasmeen and Ahmad 1976a, 1978; Yuan et al. 1997). This morphological convergence presents substantial challenges for species delimitation within the genus.
In our results, one newly described and three previously known species demonstrated pronounced sexual dimorphism in suprahumeral horn morphology (Figs S10, S16, S19, S22, S23, S26). Notably, this study provided the first documented records of male specimens for three of these species, enabling comprehensive intersexual comparisons. Actually, sexual dimorphism is phylogenetically widespread across insects, being well-documented in Diptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera (Hildreth 1965; Allen et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2022). The phenotypic divergence may stem from multiple evolutionary mechanisms: sexual selection and its key transcription factors, mating systems, the synergistic interplay between rapidly evolving and highly conserved elements (Andersson 1996; Chenoweth et al. 2008; Allen et al. 2011; Hopkins and Kopp 2021; Chikami et al. 2022; Laslo et al, 2023).
Cytogenetic analyses revealed that treehoppers generally possessed an XO sex-determination system, with the sexually dimorphic species T.acuticornis representing a derived exception with an XY chromosomal mechanism (Tian and Yuan 1995). Furthermore, the treehopper lineages defining modern subfamilies were estimated to have arisen during the late Cretaceous or early Paleogene (Dietrich et al. 2017). This derived sex-determination mechanism, combined with rapid Cretaceous diversification, likely drove the evolution of sexual dimorphism in this lineage.
Additionally, male specimens lacking suprahumeral horns were herein reported for T.obesus for the first time, representing a significant morphological variation within this species (Fig. S23a3–e3). Previous taxonomic treatments (Chou 1975; Yuan and Chou 2002) reported significant intraspecific variation in male suprahumeral horn morphology for this species, encompassing a continuum from rudimentary protuberances to fully developed suprahumeral horn structures, with the complete absence of suprahumeral horns representing the only exception to this morphological spectrum. Variation in the suprahumeral horns exhibits consistent morphological patterns across males of multiple species, e.g. T.bifurcus, T.pseudobifurcus, T.russellae, T.variabsilis (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1979, figs 10, 27, 31, 38, 46), T.obesus and T.walkeri (Figs S22, S23, S26). Interestingly, this morphological variation also exists in female individuals (female polymorphism), e.g. T.angularis (Yasmeen and Ahmad 1976, figs 7, 8), and females exhibit more variational modifications and morphological change in the suprahumeral horns ranging from small to large, e.g. T.bifurcus, T.pseudobifurcus, T.russellae, T.variabsilis, T.latiformis, and T.qadrii (Ahmad and Yasmeen 1979, figs 11, 31, 39, 47; Yasmeen and Ahmad 1976, figs. 18, 28). Such morphological variation of same-sex species was documented in other genera beyond the focal taxon, e.g. Oxyrhachistaranda (Ananthasubramanian 1987, figs 2–5), Membracismexicana (De-la-Mora and Pinero 2023, Fig. 1), and Hypsolyriumkempi (Yuan and Chou 2002, Fig. 43). In addition to variations in suprahumeral horns, there were also intraspecific variations in the male genitalia of the species T.obesus. Geographic variation was evident in the position, size, and arrangement of the three pairs of aedeagus spines among samples examined of the species T.obesus (Fig. S23a5–e5), and in the position of the style, equally with the connective (Fig. S23a6–e6). The species T.walkeri exhibits congruent geographical variation in these characters (Fig. S26a5–7, b5–7). This variation was shaped by genetics and the environment (Willmore et al. 2007), e.g. environmental gradients (Ji et al. 2024), host plants (Rebar and Rodríguez 2014; Gadelha et al. 2017), geographic distribution (Jamie et al. 2023). For treehoppers, different geographical distributions and ecological niches likely represent a primary driver of intraspecific morphological variation.
In summary, this study substantially improves the understanding of Tricentrus treehoppers from China and increases the known diversity by three new species. And sexual dimorphism in the presence of suprahumeral horns was reported in three species for the first time. Attached to the above study was a legend and discussion of the results using the synthesized methodology. We have no doubt that further investigations will reveal additional diversity in this genus and sexual dimorphism in suprahumeral horns, particularly in Xizang and Yunnan of China, where a combination of climatic and topographical heterogeneity appears to have resulted in extensive diversification in these animals (Fan et al. 2024).
5. Declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.
Data availability. Sequence data used in this study are all available via GenBank. New DNA sequences obtained during this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers: PV826162–PV826205. All examined specimens were deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University.
6. Acknowledgements
We first thank the collectors for their fieldwork. We are indebted to De-Yan Ge (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and Zheng-Xue Zhao (Anshun University) for their providing valuable revision suggestions. We thank Dr. Xin-Yi Zheng for providing exquisite ecological photographs. We also thank Gary Ouellette of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (USNM) for providing the holotype images of Tricentrusobesus Funkhouser, 1942. We wish to express our sincere appreciation to reviewer Dmitry Dmitriev (University of Illinois) and academic editors Christiane Weirauch for his expert suggestions, and to editors Anna Hundsdörfer for their meticulous revisions. Their collective efforts have greatly enhanced both the scientific content and readability of the manuscript.
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32460397, 32470479), the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2021YFD1601000) and the Science-Technology Program of Guizhou Province (No. ZSYS 2025024).
7. ReferencesAhmad I, Yasmeen N (1974) A new tribe of the subfamily Centrotinae Amyot & Serville with comments on its phylogeny. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 71: 175–191.Ahmad I, Yasmeen N (1976) Two new species of the genus Tricentrus Stål from Pakistan and northern Assam with notes on their zoogeography and phylogeny (Membracidae, Centrotinae, Tricentrini). Mushi 49(7): 73–81.Ahmad I, Yasmeen N (1978) An account of gibbosulus group of Tricentrus Stål (Homoptera: Membracidae: Tricentrini). Oriental Insects 12(4): 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.1978.10432536Ahmad I, Yasmeen N (1979) New species and records of the Tricentrusprojectus group (Homoptera: Membracidae: Tricentrini) from Pakistan, Azad Kashmir and Bangladesh, with phylogenetic considerations. Pacific Insects 20(2–3): 257–278.Ahmad I (1992) Cladistic analysis of fairmairei group of Centrotine treehopper’s genus Tricentrus Stål (Homoptera: Auchenrrhyncha: Membracidae) with new name for T.planicornis Yasmeen and Ahmad. Proceedings of Pakistan Congress of Zoology 12: 207–214.Allen CE, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2011) Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. The Annual Review of Entomology 56: 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144828Ananthasubramanian KS, Ananthakrishnan TN (1975) Taxonomic, biological and ecological studies of some Indian membracids (Insecta: Homoptera). Part I. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 68: 161–272. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v68/i1-4/1970/161437Ananthasubramanian KS (1980) Descriptions of a new genus and some new species of Membracidae (Homoptera) in the collections of the Zoological Survey of India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper 16: 1–36.Ananthasubramanian KS (1982) Taxonomic notes on a new species of Tricentrus Stål (Membracidae: Homoptera) and its immature stages. Entomon 7(4): 475–479.Ananthasubramanian KS (1987) Newer trends in the biosystematics of Membraciade. Proceedings Animal Sciences Indian Academy of Sciences 96: 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179606Ananthasubramanian KS (1996) Fauna of India. HomopteraMembracidae. Zoological Survey of India, India, 534 pp.Andersson M (1996) Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(2): 53-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1Bai HJ, Zhang JR, Dietrich CH, Li YP, Yuan XQ (2023) Structural characteristics of mitochondrial genomes of eight treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Centrotinae) and their phylogenetic implications. Genes14(7):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071510Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF (2013) MITOS: Improved de novo Metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(2): 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023Bierman CJH (1910) Homopteren aus Niederländisch Ost-Indien. II herausgegeben von D. MacGillavry und K. W. Dammerman. Notes from the Leyden Museum 33(1): 1–68.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2014) BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS computational biology 10(4): e1003537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537Buckton GB (1903) A monograph of the Membracidae. Lovell Reeve & Company Limited 81–296.Buckton GB (1905) Observations on some undescribed or little-known species of Hemiptera-Homoptera of the family Membracidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London Zoological 2(9): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1905.tb00457.xChenoweth SF, Rundle HD, Blows MW (2008) Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. The American Naturalist 171(1): 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/523946Chikami Y, Okuno M, Toyoda A, Itoh T, Niimi T (2022) Evolutionary history of sexual differentiation mechanism in insects. Molecular Biology and Evolution 39(7): msac145. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac145Chou I (1975) Two new species of Membracidae found on Aleurites from Szechwan (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Acta Entomologica Sinica 18(4): 425–427.Deitz LL (1975) Classification of the higher categories of the New World treehopper (Homoptera: Membracidae). Technical bulletin Agricultural Experiment Station of the North Carolina State College of Agriculture and Engineering and North Carolina Department of Agriculture 225: 1–177.De-la-Mora M, Pinero D (2023) Helmet Shape and Phylogeography of the Treehopper Membracismexicana. Insects 14(8):704. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080704Dietrich CH, Julie MA, Alan RL, Emily ML, Daniela MT, Olivia E, Kimberly KO, Patrick GSG, Kevin PJ (2017) Anchored Hybrid enrichment-based phylogenomics of leafhoppers and treehoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Membracoidea). Insect Systematics and Diversity 1(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixx003Dietrich, CH, McKamey SH, Deitz LL (2001) Morphology-based phylogeny of the treehopper family Membracidae (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Membracoidea). Systematic Entomology 26(2): 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.2001.00140.xDimitrov D, Xu X, Su X, Shrestha N, Liu YP, Kennedy JD, Lyu L, David NB, Rosindell J, Yang Y, Fjeldså J, Liu JQ, Schmid B, Fan JY, Rahbek C, Wang ZH (2023) Diversification of flowering plants in space and time. Nature Communications 14(1): 7609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43396-8Distant WL (1908) Rhynchota. IV. Homoptera and appendix (Pt.). In The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, London: Taylor & Francis, 419 pp.Distant WL (1916) Rhynchota - Vol. VI. Homoptera: Appendix. In A.E. Shipley & G.A.K. Marshall (Eds.). The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Published under the authority of the Secretary of State for India in Council. Taylor and Francis, London, 248 pp.Dmitriev DA, Angelova R, Anufriev GA, Bartlett CR. Blanco-Rodríguez B, Borodin OI, Cao YH, Cara C, Deitz LL, Dietrich CH, Dmitrieva MO, El-Sonbati SA, Evangelista de Souza O, Gjonov IV, Gonçalves AC, Gonçalves CC, Hendrix SV, McKamey S, Kohler M, Kunz G, Malenovský I, Morris BO, Novoselova M, Pinedo-Escatel JA, Rakitov RA, Rothschild MJ, Sanborn AF, Takiya DM, Wallace MS, Zahniser JN. (2022) Membracidae Rafinesque, 1815. World Auchenorrhyncha Database. 2025 TaxonPages. Retrieved on 2025-05-17 at https://hoppers.speciesfile.org/otus/48812/overviewDrummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4(5): e88. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340Fairmaire, LMH. 1847. Revue de la tribu des Membracides. (Suite et fin.). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (2 série), 4(4): 479–531.Fan HZ, Liu TY, Chen YH, Liao ZY, Chen, J, Hu YB, Qiao GX, Wei FW (2024) Geographical patterns and determinants of insect biodiversity in China. Science China Life Sciences 67(6): 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-023-2483-0Feng SH, Bai M, González IR, Li C, Liu SP, Tong, YJ, Yang, HD, Chen GJ, Xie D, Sears KS, Franco L, Gaitan-Espitia JD, Nespolo RF, Johnson WE, Yang, HM, Brandies PA, Hogg CJ, Belov K, Renfree MB, Helgen KM, Bopmsma JJ, Schierup MH, Zhang GJ (2022) Incomplete lineage sorting and phenotypic evolution in marsupials. Cell 185(10): 1646–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.034Fontaine MC, Pease JB, Steele A, Waterhouse RM, Neafsey DE, Sharakhov IV, Jiang X, Hall AB, Catteruccia F, Kakani E, Mitchell SN, Wu YC, Smith HA, Love RR, Lawniczak MK, Slotman MA, Emrich SJ, Hahn MW, Besansky NJ (2015) Mosquito genomics. Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science 347(6217): 1258522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258524Foster CSP, Sauquet H, van der Merwe M, McPherson H, Rossetto M, Ho SYW (2016) Evaluating the impact of genomic data and priors on Bayesian estimates of the Angiosperm evolutionary timescale. Society of Systematic Biologists 66(3): 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw086Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: A revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62(5): 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033Funkhouser WD (1914a) Some Philippine Membracidae. Pomona College Journal Entomology 6: 67–74.Funkhouser WD (1914b) New Membracidae from the East Indies. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 22: 234–239.Funkhouser WD (1915) Review of the Philippine Membracidae. Philippine Journal of Science 10: 365–405.Funkhouser WD (1918a) Notes on the Philippine Membracidae. Philippine Journal of Science 13: 21–39.Funkhouser WD (1918b) Malayan Membracidae. Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 79: 1–14.Funkhouser WD (1919) New records and species of Philippine Membracidae. Philippine Journal of Science 15: 15–29.Funkhouser WD (1920) New records and species of Malayan Membracidae. Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 82: 205–225Funkhouser WD (1927a) General Catalogue of the Hemiptera Fasc. I Membracidae. Smith College Northampton, Massachusetts, 158 pp.Funkhouser WD (1927b) Fauna sumatrensis. (Beitrag Nr. 30). Membracidae (Homoptera). Supplementa Entomologica 15: 1–22.Funkhouser WD (1927c) New Philippine Membracidae (Homoptera). Philippine Journal of Science 33: 109–125.Funkhouser WD (1927d). New Membracidae (Hemiptera: Homoptera) in the collection of the Zoological Museum of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Annual Museum Zoological Academy of Sciences 28: 145–157.Funkhouser WD (1929) New Archipelagic Membracidae. Philippine Journal of Science 40:111–131.Funkhouser WD (1932) Membracidae from Mount Kinabalu. Journal of the Federated Malay States Museums 17: 112–121.Funkhouser WD (1933) Entomological investigations on the spike disease of sandal. (3) Membracidae (Homoptera). Indian Forest Records Entomology 17: 1–10.Funkhouser WD (1934) Membracidae in Musee Heude Collection. Notes d’Entomologie Chinoise. Musée Heude 2: 17–23.Funkhouser WD (1935a) New records and species of Chinese Membracidae. Notes d’Entomologie Chinoise. Musée Heude 2: 79–84.Funkhouser WD (1935b) New records and species of Membracidae in the Buitenzorg Museum Collection. Treubia. Recueil de Travaux Zoologiques, Hydrobiologiques, et Océanographiques 15: 119–130.Funkhouser WD (1935c) Four new Malayan Membracidae. Journal of the Federated Malay States Museums 17: 717–721.Funkhouser WD (1936) New Membracidae in the Handschin Collection. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 43:189–198.Funkhouser WD (1937a) Membracidae of Hainan Island. Lingnan Science Journal 16: 237–246.Funkhouser WD (1937b) Fauna Javanensis. Membracidae (Homoptera). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 80: 121–126.Funkhouser WD (1937c) Three new Membracidae from Borneo. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 73: 100–102.Funkhouser WD (1937d) Four new Chinese Membracidae. Notes d’Entomologie Chinoise. Musée Heude 4: 29–33.Funkhouser WD (1938) New Membracidae from south China. Lingnan Science Journal 17: 199–208.Funkhouser WD (1942) Six new Chinese Membracidae. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 50: 61–66.Gadelha YA, Lange D, Dáttilo W, Lopes BC (2017) Phenological phases of the host plant shape plant–treehopper interaction networks. Ecological Entomology 42(6): 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12457Goding FW (1939) The Old World Membracidae. Journal New York Entomology Society 47: 315–349.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010Hildreth PE (1965) Doublesex, recessive gene that transforms both males and females of drosophila into intersexes. Genetics 51(4): 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/51.4.659Hopkins BR, Kopp A (2021). Evolution of sexual development and sexual dimorphism in insects. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 69: 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2021.02.011Hu XM (2005) Middle Cretaceous abnormal geological events and global change. Earth Science Frontiers 12: 222–230.Ishihara T (1961) Homoptera of Southeast Asia collected by the Osaka City University Biological Expedition to Southeast Asia 1957-1958. In T. Kira & T. Umesao (Eds.). Nature & Life in Southeast Asia 1: 225–257.Jacobi AFV (1944) Die Zikadenfauna der Provinz Fukien in Sudchina und ihre tiergeographischen Beziehungen. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 34: 5–66.Jamie MP, Luis YSR, Diego PB, Harms K (2023) A comprehensive natural history Review of Chlosyne lacinia (Geyer, 1837; (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): patterns of phenotypic variation and geographic distribution. The Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 77(4): 209–219. https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.77i4.a1Ji QQ, Xie Z, Wu Y, Wan ZM, Xu CY, Wu DH, Chen TW, Ordonez A (2024) Intraspecific trait variation of carrion beetle species and communities across elevations. Insect Conservation and Diversity 17: 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12772Kato M (1928) Notes on Formosan Membracidae, with descriptions of one new genus and some new species. Insect World 32: 37–52.Kato M (1930) The Japanese Membracidae. Dobutsugaku Zasshi Zoological Society of Japan 42: 281–306.Kato M (1940) Notes on Membracidae from Eastern Asia. The Entomological World 8: 1–21.Kato M (1960) Homoptera: Membracidae. Insects of Micronesia 6: 345–351.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199Kendall DG (1948) On the generalized ‘birth-and-death’ process. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19: 1–15.Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260Laslo M, Just J, Angelini DR (2023) Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution 340(2): 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.23125Li FE, Yang L, Long JK, Chang ZM, Chen XS (2020) First description of adult males of four species of the treehopper genus Tricentrus Stål from China (Hemiptera, Membracidae, Centrotinae, Tricentrini). Zootaxa 4894(2): 247–260. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4894.2.4Li FE, Yang L, Long JK, Chang ZM, Chen XS (2023) Revisiting the phylogenetic relationship and evolution of Gargarini with mitochondrial genome (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Centrotinae). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24(1):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010694Liang AP, McKamey SH (1996) New names and other taxonomic changes in the Oriental Membracidae (Homoptera: Membracoidea). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 103: 83–90.Lin CP (2006) Social behaviour and life history of membracine treehoppers. Journal of Natural History 40: 1887–1907. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930601046618Lindberg H (1927) Zur Kenntnis der paläarktischen Cicadina IV. Notulae Entomologicae 7: 23–30.Lowery CM, Bralower TJ, Owens JD, Rodríguez-Tovar FJ, Jones H, Smit J, Whalen MT, Claeys P, Farley K, Gulick SPS, Morgan JV, Green S, Chenot E, Christeson GL, Cockell CS, Coolen MJL, Ferrière L, Gebhardt C, Goto K, Kring DA, Lofi J, Ocampo-Torres R, Perez-Cruz L, Pickersgill AE, Poelchau MH, Rae ASP, Rasmussen C, Rebolledo-Vieyra M, Riller U, Sato H, Tikoo SM, Tomioka N, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Vellekoop J, Wittmann A, Xiao L, Yamaguchi KE, Zylberman W (2018) Rapid recovery of life at ground zero of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Nature 558: 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0163-6Lyson TR, Miller IM, Bercovici AD, Weissenburger K, Fuentes AJ, Clyde WC, Hagadorn JW, Butrim MJ, Johnson KR, Fleming RF, Barclay RS, Maccracken SA, Lloyd B, Wilson GP, Krause DW, Chester SGB (2019) Exceptional continental record of biotic recovery after the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction. Science 366: 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2268Magallón S, Sánchez-Reyes LL, Gómez-Acevedo SL (2019) Thirty clues to the exceptional diversification of flowering plants. Annals of Botany 123(3): 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy182Matsumura S (1912) Die Cicadinen Japans II. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 8: 15–51.Matsumura S (1938) Homoterous insects collected by Mr. Tadao Kano at Kotosho, Formosa. Insecta Matsumurana 12: 147–153.Mejdalani G (1998) Morfologia externa dos Cicadellinae (Homoptera, Cicadellidae): comparação entre Versigonalia ruficauda (Walker) (Cicadellini) e Tretogonia cribrata Meli char (Proconiini), com notas sobre outras espécies e análise da terminologia. Revista Bra sileira de Zoologia 15: 451–544. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751998000200015Melichar L (1914) Homopteren von Java, gesammelt von Herrn Edw. Jacobson. Notes from the Leyden Museum 36(1–2): 91–147.Meng G, Li Y, Yang C, Liu S (2019) MitoZ: A toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 47(11): e63 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz173Metcalf ZP, Wade V (1965) General catalogue of the Homoptera. A supplement to Fascicle I - Membracidae of the general catalogue of the Hemiptera. Membracoidea in two sections. Raleigh Press, North Carolina State College, 765 pp.Michonneau F (2015) Cryptic and not-so-cryptic species in the complex “Holothuria (Thymiosycia) imaptiens” (Forsskål, 1775) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea: Holothuriidae). BioRxiv 014225. https://doi.org/10.1101/014225Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, Haeseler AV (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(5): 1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst024Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, Fujisawa T, Balke M, Inward DJ, Lees DC, Ranaivosolo R, Eggleton P, Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2009) Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Systematic Biology 58(3): 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp027Mousavi SA, Österman J, Wahlberg N, Nesme X, Lavire C, Vial L, Paulin L, de Lajudie P, Lindström K (2014) Phylogeny of the Rhizobium-Allorhizobium-Agrobacterium clade supports the delineation of Neorhizobium gen. nov. Sys-Temat. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 37(3): 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.12.007Nelson AS, Mooney KA (2022) The evolution and ecology of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing Hemipteran insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 53: 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102220-014840Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2014) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55(4): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2021) ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(2): 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2012) ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 21(8): 1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.xRambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032Rebar D, Rodríguez RL (2014) Trees to treehoppers: genetic variation in host plants contributes to variation in the mating signals of a plant-feeding insect. Ecology Letters 17(2): 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12220Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029Schmidt E (1926) Neue Membraciden der Unterfamilie Centrotinae des indo-malayischen Faunengebietes. (Hemiptera-Homoptera). Wiener Entomologische Zeitung 43: 181–189.Sharma, B, Badan, P (1986) Two new species of genus Tricentrus Stål, infesting Dalbergiasissoo (Roxb.) in Jammu (J. & K., India), with a key to the Indian species of the genus (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Membracidae). Reichenbachia 232: 165–175.Stål C (1866) Analecta hemipterologica. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift. Berlin 10: 381–394.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197Thirumalai, G (1986) Further studies on the membracids from Silent Valley, Kerala (Insecta: Homoptera). Records of the Zoological Survey of India 84: 97–105. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v84/i1-4/1986/161084Thirumalai, G, Ananthasubramanian KS (1985) Taxonomic studies on the Membracidae of southern India (Homoptera: Insecta). I. Entomon 10: 223–233.Tian RG, Yuan F (1995) Karyotype and sexual dimorphism in Tricentrusacuticornis Funkhouser (Homoptera: Membracidae). Entomotaxonomia 17: 197–200.Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27(2): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.xWalker F (1851) List of the specimens of homopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part II. London: Edward Newman, 261–636.Wallace M, Deitz LL (2004) Phylogeny and systematics of the treehopper subfamily Centrotinae (Hemiptera: Membracidae). PhD Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 377 pp.Wang CS (2006) Coupling of the earth surface system: inferring from the cretaceous major geological events. Advances in Earth Science 21: 838–842. https://doi.org/10.11867/J.ISSN.1001-8166.2006.08.0838Wang Y, Rensink AH, Fricke U, Riddle MC, Trent C, van de Zande L, Verhulst EC (2022) Doublesex regulates male-specific differentiation during distinct developmental time windows in a parasitoid wasp. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 142:103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2022.103724Willmore KE, Young NM, Richtsmeier JT (2007) Phenotypic variability: its components, measurement and underlying developmental processes. Evolutionary Biology 34: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9008-1Wood TK (1979) Sociality in the Membracidae (Homoptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 11: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.4182/FGWZ3781.11-3.15Wood TK (1984) Sex Ratio in Umbonia crassicornis Amyot and Serville (Homoptera: Membracidae). The American Midland Naturalist 112(1): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425457Wood TK (1993) Diversity in the New World Membracidae. The Annual Review of Entomology 38: 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.002205Wu CF (1935) Catalogus insecyorum sinensium (Catalogue of Chinese Insects) Vol. II. The Fan Memorial Institute of Biology 51–66.Xi DP, Xiao ZY, Zhou ZH, Li XH, Huang TP, Shi ZY, Sun LX, Wan XQ (2024) The global warming process and terrestrial biota response during Early to Middle Cretaceous period (late Valanginian-early Turonian). Quaternary Sciences 44(5): 1174–1187. https://doi.org/10.11928/j.issn.1001-7410.2024.05.07Yang L, Gao Y, Wu ZX, Zhang Q (2024) Advances in research on terrestrial paleoclimate in the mid-Cretaceous hothouse earth. Quaternary Sciences 44(5): 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.11928/j.issn.1001-7410.2024.05.08Yang P, Chen XM, Liu WW, Feng Y, Sun T (2015) Transcriptome analysis of sexually dimorphic Chinese white wax scale insects reveals key differences in developmental programs and transcription factor expression. Scientific Reports 5:8141. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08141Yasmeen N, Ahmad I (1976a) Four new species of the genus Tricentrus Stål (Membracidae: Tricentrini) from East Bengal with reference to their phylogeny and zoogeography and notes on two already described species. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Staatsinstitut u. Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 5(9): 7–23.Yasmeen N, Ahmad I (1976b) New species of Tricentrus Stål from Pakistan, Azad Kashmir and East Bengal with phylogenetic considerations (Membracidae, Centrotinae, Tricentrini). Mushi 49(10): 95–125.Yasmeen N, Ahmad I (1978) Two aberrant species of the genus Tricentrus Stål from northern region of Pakistan (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Transactions of the Shikoku Entomological Society 14(1–2) 89–93.Yuan F, Cui ZX (1988) Homoptera: Membracidae. pp. 133-147. In Zhang, S. (ed.). Agricultural Insects, Spiders, Plant Diseases and Weeds of Xizang. Vol. 1. China: Xizang People Publishing House, 141–148.Yuan F, Liang AP (1999) Two new species of Membracidae from Burma (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadomorpha). Reichenbachia 33: 105–109.Yuan F (1987) Yunnan Forest Insects Membracidae. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, China, 296 pp.Yuan F, Chou I, Cui ZX (1992) Homoptera: Membracoidea. In S. Chen (Ed.). Insects of the Hengduan Mountains Region. The Comprehensive Scientific Expedition to the Qianghai-Xizang Plateau. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Science Press, Beijing, 192–219.Yuan F, Chou I, Cui ZX (1986) Note on the Tricentrusfulgidus group injuting Ficus spp. from China (Homoptera: Membracidae). Entomotaxonomia 8(4): 281–289.Yuan F, Chou Y (2002) Fauna Sinica. Insecta (Vol. 28). HomopteraMembracoidea. Science Press, Beijing, 546 pp.Yuan F, Fan XL, Cui ZX, Xu QY (1997) Studies on systematics of tribe Tricentrini (Homoptera: Membracidae: Centrotinae sic). I. Descriptions of eight new species of the genus Tricentrus from China. Entomotaxonomia 19: 91–103.Yuan F, Li H, Tian RG (1992) Living with Insects. Proceedings, XIX International Congress of Entomology, Abstracts. Beijing, China, 60.Yuan F, Yan JH, Zhang YZ (1999) A new species of Tricentrus (Homoptera: Membracidae) damaging Sophora japonica Linn. in Shandong province, China. Entomotaxonomia 21(2): 96–100.Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2018) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29(22): 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499Supplementary materials10.3897/asp.84.e164719.suppl11B88D78D-9436-5AEA-B6C2-F6B953B899A9
Figures S1–S28
: .docx
Figure S1. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using ML analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the 13 PCGs. — Figure S2. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using ML analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the AA. — Figure S3. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using MrBayes analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the AA. — Figure S4. The temporal divergences of the genus Tricentrus. — Figure S5. the results of the ASR for sexual dimorphism with suprahumeral horns morphology. — Figure S6. The results of the ASR for apical pygofer morphology. — Figures S7–9. Tricentrusallochrous Li & Chen sp. nov. habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S10–12. T.dexingensis Li & Chen sp. nov. habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S13–15. T.pianmaensis Li & Chen sp. nov. habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S16–18. T.colligatoclypei Yuan & Cui, 1988 habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S19–21. T.floripinnae Yuan & Cui, 1987 habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S22–25. T.obesus Funkhouser, 1942 habitus, male and female genitalia. — Figures S26–28. T.walkeri Metcalf & Wade, 1965 habitus, male and female genitalia.
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1555836This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Li F-E, Yang L, Long J-K, Chang Z-M, Chen X-S (2026)10.3897/asp.84.e164719.suppl20A525B7A-82BC-5608-95BC-8B4B98C23F2D
Tables S1–S3
: .docx
Table S1. Information on the 53 specimens included in this study. Abbreviated: F, Female; M, Male. — Table S2. Best partitioning schemes and models based on different datasets for phylogenetic analysis, Abbreviated: AA, amino acid sequences; PCG, protein-coding genes sequences. — Table S3. The character states of the two characters used for the ancestral state reconstructions in the genus Tricentrus. Abbreviated: F, Female; M, Male; GD, Guangdong; GZ, Guizhou; GX, Guangxi; XZ, Xizang.
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1555837This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Li F-E, Yang L, Long J-K, Chang Z-M, Chen X-S (2026)10.3897/asp.84.e164719.suppl3A1D0227C-A5A0-5FD1-84E4-6C305CCBFF2A
File S1
: .zip
COX1S. The COI gene alignment sequences from the 53 insect samples included in this study [.fas file]. — RS. ABGD and ASAP species delimitation Results [.txt file].
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1555838This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Li F-E, Yang L, Long J-K, Chang Z-M, Chen X-S (2026)