<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">103</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:77d0745d-c3a1-5248-81de-8cdc02bed84a</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F56F6CF9-7502-4001-A751-35D5F2EF6CA0</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Arthropod Systematics &amp; Phylogeny</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">ASP</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1863-7221</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1864-8312</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">176547</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Culicidae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Phylogeny</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Phylogenetic relationships of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Diptera">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) based on mitogenomes</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>Yang</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sun</surname>
            <given-names>Ruoqian</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Cong</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>Ruyue</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>Liming</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">wanglm1990@126.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            <given-names>Ding</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">dyangcau@126.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            <given-names>Yuyu</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">wangyy_amy@126.com</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-303X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China</addr-line>
        <institution>College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Baoding</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/009fw8j44</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Beijing</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/04v3ywz14</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding authors: Liming Wang (<email xlink:type="simple">wanglm1990@126.com</email>); Ding Yang (<email xlink:type="simple">dyangcau@126.com</email>); Yuyu Wang (<email xlink:type="simple">wangyy_amy@126.com</email>)</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>84</volume>
      <fpage>293</fpage>
      <lpage>307</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/D46C5F3B-4477-5DAE-8912-170CF8C2BA16">D46C5F3B-4477-5DAE-8912-170CF8C2BA16</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/054AC4F3-DBE0-4048-BA43-FD5BFE95F1BD">054AC4F3-DBE0-4048-BA43-FD5BFE95F1BD</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Yang Liu, Ruoqian Sun, Cong Li, Ruyue Zhang, Liming Wang, Ding Yang, Yuyu Wang</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/054AC4F3-DBE0-4048-BA43-FD5BFE95F1BD</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>
          <bold>Abstract</bold>
        </p>
        <p>Mosquitoes rank among the most deadly organisms worldwide, facilitating &gt;700,000 human deaths annually through transmission of vector-borne pathogens. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are famous as vectors of multiple pathogens affecting both animals and humans. This study presents the first mitogenome sequencing and comparative analysis of seven species within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Our findings demonstrated conserved structural features and nucleotide composition across the mitogenomes of these species. This study performed phylogenetic analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> based on mitochondrial genome data under both homogeneous and heterogeneous models separately, and estimated the divergence times. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is paraphyletic, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nested within it. Both <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Neoculex">Neoculex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were non-monophyletic. The two species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Neoculex">Neoculex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were placed in separate lineages, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fergusoni">fergusoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as the sister group to all other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Meanwhile, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) was rendered paraphyletic by the inclusion of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) within its clade. Divergence time estimation placed the basal split of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in Late Triassic, followed by the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>-<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Anophelinae">Anophelinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> divergence in Late Jurassic (~147 Mya), with all speciation events within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> postdating these splits and clustering in Neogene. This study provides a fundamental basis for understanding the mitogenomic architecture and phylogenetic relationships within the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and also establishes a theoretical foundation for transmission mechanisms and control strategies of common mosquito-borne diseases.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Divergence time</kwd>
        <kwd>Mitochondrial DNA</kwd>
        <kwd>Molecular evolution</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <named-content content-type="funder_name">Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_identifier">501100003787</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_ror">https://ror.org/01h0zpd94</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_doi">http://doi.org/10.13039/501100003787</named-content>
          </funding-source>
        </award-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <named-content content-type="funder_name">National Natural Science Foundation of China</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_identifier">501100001809</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_ror">https://ror.org/01h0zpd94</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_doi">http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
          </funding-source>
        </award-group>
        <funding-statement>Basic Research Project of Shijiazhuang for University in Hebei Province&#13;
Science and Technology Planning Project of Baoding&#13;
Earmarked Fund for CARS-27</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="1. Background" id="sec1">
      <title>1. Background</title>
      <p>Mosquitoes are one of the deadliest organisms on Earth, facilitating over 700,000 deaths annually due to the transmission of various pathogens, such as malaria parasites and viruses that cause dengue, Zika, and yellow fever (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bhatt et al. 2013</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquitoes are known to be vectors of multiple pathogens that affect both animals and humans. Some examples of viral diseases transmitted by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquitoes include Usutu virus (<abbrev xlink:title="Usutu virus">USUV</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Busquets et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cook et al. 2018</xref>), West Nile virus (<abbrev xlink:title="West Nile virus">WNV</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Khan et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Leggewie et al. 2016</xref>), and Japanese encephalitis virus (<abbrev xlink:title="Japanese encephalitis virus">JEV</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Faizah et al. 2020</xref>). Japanese encephalitis is primarily prevalent in Asia and the Pacific region, putting over 3 billion people at risk of infection, the mortality rate of those infected with <abbrev xlink:title="Japanese encephalitis virus">JEV</abbrev> is estimated to be approximately 20–30% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Campbell et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Mulvey et al. 2021</xref>). After first emerging in New York City in the 1990s, West Nile Virus (<abbrev xlink:title="West Nile virus">WNV</abbrev>) rapidly spread across North America within just three years and has now become one of the most widely distributed mosquito-borne viruses globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Karim and Bai 2023</xref>). The virus causes a considerable number of infections worldwide each year, and its post-infection mortality rate (6%) ranks among the highest for infectious diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Tao et al. 2024</xref>). In addition, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquitoes can also transmit parasites such as nematodes that cause lymphatic filariasis and protozoans responsible for avian malaria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ferraguti et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Nchoutpouen et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Samy et al. 2016</xref>).</p>
      <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is the largest genus within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, with 26 subgenera and 772 known species worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Fu and Chen 2018</xref>). In China, eight subgenera (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Barraudius">Barraudius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Eumelanomyia">Eumelanomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Lophoceraomyia">Lophoceraomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Maillotia">Maillotia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Neoculex">Neoculex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) comprising 77 species have been recorded, all of which are distributed across the country (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Fu and Chen 2018</xref>). Based on mitogenome studies, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has been demonstrated to be monophyletic and the sister group to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sun et al. 2019</xref>). Phylogenetic analyses based on <italic>ITS-1</italic> and <italic>ITS-2</italic> also yielded the same results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Miller et al. 1996</xref>). Phylogenetic analyses based on protein coding genes (<abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>) from 149 mitogenomes demonstrated that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was the sister group to other examined taxa within <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen et al. 2024</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Tian et al. 2020</xref> demonstrated that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Mansonia">Mansonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are sister groups to each other based on complete mitogenomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Tian et al. 2020</xref>). Although some phylogenetic studies have been conducted on certain <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Demari-Silva et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Harbach 2012</xref>; Luo 2016; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Miller et al. 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Sun et al. 2017</xref>), little is known about the phylogenetic relationships across the entire genus. Besides, the phylogenetic relationships at the subgenus level within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remain unclear.</p>
      <p>With the rapid development of molecular systematics, molecular biology techniques have provided new opportunities for taxonomy and have gradually become indispensable methods in the study of mosquito systematics. The insect mitogenome is usually a circular double-stranded DNA molecule ranging from 15 to 18 kb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cameron et al. 2011</xref>). It has been widely used in research on phylogenetics and population genetics because of its characteristics such as stable gene structure, conserved coding components, maternal inheritance, rapid evolutionary rate, absence of repetition, and high copy numbers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cheung et al. 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Tian et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhu et al. 2024</xref>).</p>
      <p>In this study, we report the sequence and annotation of mitogenomes for seven species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="harrisoni">harrisoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigropunctatus">nigropunctatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torrentium">torrentium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="huangae">huangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudovishnui">pseudovishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The nucleotide composition and codon usage are analyzed, the secondary structures of transfer RNAs (<abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev>) and ribosomal RNAs (<abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev>) are predicted, and a comparative analysis of the composition and structure of published <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes is performed. Additionally, the phylogenetic relationships are explored by incorporating 30 previously published <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes. This research contributes new mitogenome data for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and provides a foundation for further phylogenetic studies of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="2. Materials and methods" id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="2.1. Sampling and genomic DNA ­extraction" id="sec3">
        <title>2.1. Sampling and genomic DNA ­extraction</title>
        <p>Adult specimens were sampled during 2012–2022 from Yunnan, Chongqing, Guangxi, Jilin and Hubei Province (Table S1). The specimens were preserved in 95% alcohol and at –20°C before the DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) from the thoracic muscle tissue. The DNA concentration was measured using a nucleic acid protein analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="2.2. Genome sequencing and analysis" id="sec4">
        <title>2.2. Genome sequencing and analysis</title>
        <p>Whole genomes were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 and Illumina X plus. Raw reads were checked by FastQC 0.11.9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Brown et al. 2017</xref>) and lo w-quality reads were filtered using Trimmomatic 0.32 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bolger et al. 2014</xref>) with an average quality threshold of Q15. The mitogenomes were assembled by IDBA-UD 1.1.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Peng et al. 2012</xref>). Annotations were conducted using MitoZ 2.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Meng et al. 2019</xref>) with the “invertebrate mitochondrial code 5” as genetic code and “<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum" reg="Arthropoda">Arthropoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>” as clade. Then, the sequence was checked by manual proofreading according to related species. The circular maps of mitogenomes were drawn using OGDRAW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Greiner et al. 2019</xref>), and the base composition and codon usage were analyzed using MEGA 7.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kumar et al. 2016</xref>). The calculation formulas of base composition asymmetry were AT-skew = (A−T)/(A+T) and GC-skew = (G−C)/(G+C) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Perna and Kocher 1995</xref>). The relative synonymous codon usage (<abbrev xlink:title="relative synonymous codon usage">RSCU</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> were calculated using MEGA 7.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kumar et al. 2016</xref>). Sequences of 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of all <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (including downloaded from Genbank and the seven newly sequenced mitogenomes) were individually aligned via the L-INS-i algorithm using MAFFT 7.313 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Katoh and Standley 2013</xref>) with the “invertebrate mitochondrial” as code table, “codon” as alignment mode and “auto” as strategy. Then, nucleotide diversity (<abbrev xlink:title="Nucleotide diversity">Pi</abbrev>) and non-synonymous/synonymous substitution ratios (Ka/Ks) were calculated using DnaSP 6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Rozas et al. 2017</xref>) with the “first site” as protein coding regions and the “mtDNA <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Drosophila">Drosophila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>” as genetic code. The secondary structures of <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev> were predicted using the MITOS Web Server (<ext-link xlink:href="http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py" ext-link-type="uri">http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py</ext-link>) and checked through manual proofreading (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bernt et al. 2013</xref>), and the secondary structures of <italic>rrnS</italic> and <italic>rrnL</italic> were predicted using RNA Structure (<ext-link xlink:href="http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb/" ext-link-type="uri">http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb</ext-link>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="2.3. Phylogenetic analysis" id="sec5">
        <title>2.3. Phylogenetic analysis</title>
        <p>There were 50 specimens of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in the ingroup and two specimens of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Simuliidae">Simuliidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> were used as outgroup representatives to reconstruct the phylogeny in this study (Table S2). Sequences of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev> were aligned using MAFFT 7.313 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Katoh and Standley 2013</xref>). Each rRNA gene alignment was conducted using the G-INS-i algorithm by MAFFT 7.313 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Katoh and Standley 2013</xref>) with the “invertebrate mitochondrial” as code table, “normal” as alignment mode and “auto” as strategy. The ambiguous regions in the alignments of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev> were removed using Gblocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Talavera and Castresana 2007</xref>). Maximum Likelihood (<abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev>) trees were inferred using IQ-TREE v.1.6.10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Nguyen et al. 2015</xref>) with 1000 ultrafast bootstraps. Bayesian Inference (<abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev>) analyses were conducted using MrBayes v.3.2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003</xref>) under the best substitution models selected by ModelFinder 2.1.10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017</xref>). Finally, the phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree 1.4.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Rambaut 2009</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="2.4. Divergence time estimation" id="sec6">
        <title>2.4. Divergence time estimation</title>
        <p>Divergence times in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> were estimated using MCMCTree v4.9e (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Yang 2007</xref>). The topology obtained through <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> analysis of the PCGAA dataset was incorporated as the input file. Three fossil calibrations were selected: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Toxorhynchites">Toxorhynchites</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mexicanus">mexicanus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Zavortink and Poinar, 2000) (16 million years ago Mya) as the earliest fossil record of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Toxorhynchites">Toxorhynchites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="winchesteri">winchesteri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Cockerell, 1908 (34 Mya) as the earliest fossil of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Priscoculex">Priscoculex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="burmanicus">burmanicus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Zavortink &amp; Brown, 2009 (89 Mya) as the earliest fossil of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Anophelinae">Anophelinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<ext-link xlink:href="https://mosquito-taxonomic inventory.myspecies.info" ext-link-type="uri">https://mosquito-taxonomic inventory.myspecies.info</ext-link>). The independent rate clock model (clock = 2) was used for further calculation. Two independent MCMC chains were conducted for 20 million generations with 25% discarded as burn-in. The convergence of the MCMC chains was evaluated using Tracer v1.7.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Rambaut et al. 2018</xref>), ensuring that the ESS values exceeded 200.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="3. Results" id="sec7">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="3.1. Genome organization and base composition" id="sec8">
        <title>3.1. Genome organization and base composition</title>
        <p>The complete mitogenomes of the seven newly sequenced species (Fig. S1) range from 15,564 to 15,971 bp in length, exhibiting the typical gene content for the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>, 22 <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev>, two <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev>, and a control region (<abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev>). Gene strandedness were conserved, with 23 genes (nine <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>, 14 <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev>) encoded on the heavy strand (J-strand) and 14 genes (four <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>, eight <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev>, and two <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev>) on the light strand (N-strand) (Tables S3–S9).</p>
        <p>There are 34 complete mitogenomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> including those published on GenBank (<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank</ext-link>), ranging from 15,564 bp (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) to 16,052 bp (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chidesteri">chidesteri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in length. Across these mitogenomes, the content of C is higher than G and the content of A is higher than T, with A + T content ranging from 77.98% to 79.57% (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, Table S10). The length of complete <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> ranges from 11,199 bp (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) to 11,232 bp (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="huangae">huangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). AT content in <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> ranges from 78.17% (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lygrus">lygrus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) to 76.11% (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fergusoni">fergusoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, Table S11).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">E30AB2FC-5EFB-5D7A-8A1F-FAFE99DF2965</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>AT% vs. AT-Skew and GC% vs. GC-Skew in complete mitogenomes and <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g001.jpg" id="oo_1670624.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670624</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>For complete mitogenomes, AT-skew values range from 0.00 to 0.01, and GC-skew values range from –0.19 to –0.15. In <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> specifically, AT-skew ranges from –0.17 to –0.15, and GC-skew ranges from 0.03 to 0.07 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, Tables S10, S11), a pattern consistent with previous reports in mosquitoes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Krzywinski et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Martinez-Villegas et al. 2019</xref>). Notably, base composition analysis at the three codon positions reveals that variation is most pronounced at the third position (Table S12). Due to codon degeneracy, this nucleotide variation doesn’t alter the encoded amino acid sequences (Table S13; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Reetz et al. 2008</xref>).</p>
        <p>This pattern indicates that purifying selection acts primarily at the protein level, while synonymous substitutions accumulate at the nucleotide level – a feature that makes mitochondrial <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> informative for phylogenetic studies across different taxonomic scales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zardoya and Meyer 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Simon et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="3.2. Protein-coding genes and codon usage" id="sec9">
        <title>3.2. Protein-coding genes and codon usage</title>
        <p>Start and stop codon usage across the 34 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes is largely conserved, with some gene- and species-specific exceptions (Tables S14, S15). While most <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> initiate with the canonical ATN start codon, two notable deviations are observed: the <italic>ND1</italic> gene initiates with TTG in 11 species, and the <italic>ATP6</italic> gene in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="vishnui">vishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> also utilizes TTG. The recurrent use of the non-canonical TTG start codon for <italic>ND1</italic> across multiple lineages suggests either a shared ancestral feature or a conserved mechanism of translational initiation within the genus (similar non-canonical starts have been reported in other insect mitogenomes) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cameron 2014</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>COX1</italic> consistently employs TCG as the start codon across all 34 species. Stop codon usage also varies. Most <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> (<italic>ATP6</italic>, <italic>ATP8</italic>, <italic>ND1</italic>, <italic>ND2</italic>, <italic>ND4L</italic>, <italic>ND5</italic>, <italic>ND6</italic>) use the complete TAA stop codons in all species examined, with the exceptions of <italic>ND2</italic> in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="harrisoni">harrisoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (TAG) and <italic>ND6</italic> in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="vishnui">vishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (TA-tRNA). Incomplete stop codons (T-- or TA-), completed via post-transcriptional polyadenylation, are observed in <italic>COX1</italic>, <italic>COX2</italic>, <italic>COX3</italic>, <italic>CYTB</italic>, <italic>ND3</italic>, and <italic>ND4</italic>, with the specific type varying by species.</p>
        <p>Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) in the seven newly sequenced mitogenomes are presented in Figure S2 (Tables S16–S22). The most frequently used codons are UUU (Phe), UAU (Tyr), AUU (Ile), AUA (Met), AAU (Asn) and AAA (Lys). Notably, CAA (Gln) is not used in these seven mitogenomes. This codon bias reflects the high A + T content of the genomes, favoring codons rich in A and T.</p>
        <p>Nucleotide diversity (<abbrev xlink:title="Nucleotide diversity">Pi</abbrev>) and the rate of nucleotide substitution (Ka/Ks) are calculated for the 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). <abbrev xlink:title="Nucleotide diversity">Pi</abbrev> values range from 0.041 (<italic>ND4L</italic>) to 0.080 (<italic>CYTB</italic>). The Ka/Ks ratios for all 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> are less than 1, indicating that these genes evolve under purifying selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hurst 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hurst 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Mori and Matsunami 2018</xref>). Among them, <italic>COX1</italic> exhibits the lowest Ka/Ks ratio (0.170), suggesting the strongest purifying selection and the slowest evolutionary rate, while <italic>ATP8</italic> shows the highest ratio (0.170), indicating a relatively faster evolutionary rate.</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">E56686BE-68F7-54D9-A8E6-CEA34FA8F35A</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>The nucleotide diversity (<abbrev xlink:title="Nucleotide diversity">Pi</abbrev>) and non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitution rates of 13 protein-coding genes of the mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g002.jpg" id="oo_1670625.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670625</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The strong purifying selection on <italic>COX1</italic> reinforces its suitability as a reliable marker for deep phylogenetic relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Folmer et al. 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hebert et al. 2003</xref>), while the elevated evolutionary rate of <italic>ATP8</italic> may provide greater resolution for separating closely related species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gissi et al. 2010</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="3.3. The control region and overlapping regions" id="sec10">
        <title>3.3. The control region and overlapping regions</title>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev>, located between <italic>tRNA</italic><sup>Val</sup> and <italic>tRNA</italic><sup>Ile</sup> in all seven newly sequenced mitogenomes, is the most variable region of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. Across the 34 species, <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev> length ranges from 580 to 1195 bp (Table S23), with A + T content varying from 87.89% to 91.56%. AT-skew ranges from –0.13 to 0.02, and GC-skew from –0.46 to –0.24. Two long tandem repeats (&gt;200 bp) are identified in the <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and their predicted secondary structures are shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>. Additionally, numerous microsatellite-like sequences, such as (TA)n repeats, are present in the <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev> of all 34 species (Table S24). These sequences may facilitate the completion of DNA replication and transcription, and may serve as useful markers for geographical studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Tian et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zhao et al. 2017</xref>). The extensive length polymorphism and presence of variable microsatellite motifs in the <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev> suggest this region may contain sufficient population-level variation to resolve phylogeographic structure within widely distributed <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Simon et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">84676A44-ED99-5B9F-A221-36F5712CA471</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>The structure and likely secondary structures of the control region in the mitogenome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g003.jpg" id="oo_1670626.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670626</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="3.4. Transfer RNAs and ribosomal RNAs" id="sec11">
        <title>3.4. Transfer RNAs and ribosomal RNAs</title>
        <p>Secondary structures of all 22 <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev> are predicted and compared for the seven newly sequenced mitogenomes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). Most <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev> are highly conserved. The greatest difference is observed in <italic>trnD</italic> (11 variable sites), while <italic>trnQ</italic>, <italic>trnH</italic>, <italic>trnI</italic>, <italic>trnL1</italic>, <italic>trnK</italic>, <italic>trnM</italic>, <italic>trnS1</italic>, and <italic>trnM</italic> each exhibit only one variable site. Almost all <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev> fold into typical cloverleaf structures, except <italic>trnS2</italic>, in which the dihydrouridine (<abbrev xlink:title="dihydrouridine">DHU</abbrev>) arm forms a simple loop. This feature is widely documented in metazoan mitogenomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Wolstenholme 1992</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">7CE05A9E-27F9-5159-92A0-919AB04D6AA8</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Inferred secondary structures of 22 <abbrev xlink:title="transfer RNAs">tRNAs</abbrev> of the complete mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g004.jpg" id="oo_1670627.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670627</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The <italic>rrnL</italic> is located between <italic>trnL1</italic> and <italic>trnV</italic>, with length ranging from 1,279 to 1,360 bp across the 34 species. A + T content varies from 82.49% to 83.76%, and G + C content from 16.24% to 17.51%. The content of T is higher than A, and the content of G is higher than C (Table S25). The predicted secondary structures of <italic>rrnL</italic> contain four canonical domains (I–II, IV–V) and 46 helices (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), with domains III and VI absent, a typical structure in arthropods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cannone et al. 2002</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">BA272531-B178-520A-A762-56CDAFAA8656</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Inferred secondary structures of <italic>rrnL</italic> of the complete mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g005.jpg" id="oo_1670628.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670628</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The <italic>rrnS</italic> is located between <italic>trnV</italic> and the <abbrev xlink:title="control region">CR</abbrev>, with lengths ranging from 783 to 819 bp and A + T content from 80.46% to 81.89%. The content of T is higher than A, and the content of G was higher than C (Table S26). The predicted secondary structure of <italic>rrnS</italic> contains three domains and 34 helices (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure6</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0A032CC1-5EC6-5D14-BA1F-057394604D8E</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Inferred secondary structures of <italic>rrnS</italic> of the complete mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g006.jpg" id="oo_1670629.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670629</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="3.5. Phylogenetic analyses" id="sec12">
        <title>3.5. Phylogenetic analyses</title>
        <p>There ar e five different types of datasets used in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, Figs S3–S11). The PCG123RNA dataset (13,222 sites) incorporates all codon positions of 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> and two <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev>; the PCG123 dataset (11,160 sites) contains three codon positions for all 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>; the PCG12RNA dataset (9,502 sites) includes only the first and second codon positions of 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> along with two <abbrev xlink:title="ribosomal RNAs">rRNAs</abbrev>; the PCG12 dataset (7,440 sites) comprises only the first two codon positions from all 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>, while the dataset PCGAA contains 3,720 sites including all amino acids of 13 <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev>.</p>
        <fig id="F7">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure7</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">4242D847-67E2-5B52-991A-A3A759BEDA6B</object-id>
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Phylogeny of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inferred based on the dataset PCGAA. <bold>a</bold> The topological structure of Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood trees. Subsequent Bayesian probabilities (BP) (before slash) and values of support for bootstrapping (BPP) (after slash) shown at each node. <bold>b</bold> The parts of the <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> tree that differ from the <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> tree.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g007.jpg" id="oo_1670630.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670630</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>There are 10 phylogenetic trees reconstructed based on <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analyses in this study (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, S3–S11). The phylogenetic results demonstrate that both the subfamily Anopheline and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> are monophyletic.</p>
        <p>Across all phylogenetic topologies examined, the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is consistently recovered non-monophyletic, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fuscana">fuscana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> invariably neste within it. With the exception of the <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analysis using the PCG123 dataset, all topologies support the monophyly of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Lophoceraomyia">Lophoceraomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Neoculex">Neoculex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) are recovered as paraphyletic. Notably, the <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analyses based on the PCGAA dataset reveal that subgenera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) are nested within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), which is consistent with <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analyses of all datasets except PCG12RNA. Based on the PCGAA dataset, both <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> phylogenetic analyses consistently support the monophyly of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Lophoceraomyia">Lophoceraomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and its position as the sister group to a clade containing <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), and several other subgenera nested within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). This result is consistent with the <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analyses based on the PCG12, PCG123, and PCG123RNA datasets. The <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> analysis of PCG12 dataset and both <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analyses of PCG12RNA demonstrate that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) is the sister group to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) nested within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), while <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> analyses of PCG123 and PCG123RNA datasets consistently recover <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) being the sister group to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) with both <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) nested within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) clade.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="3.6. Divergence time estimation" id="sec13">
        <title>3.6. Divergence time estimation</title>
        <p>The divergence time is estimated based on the phylogeny of dataset PCGAA and the chronogram is shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>. Mean age values and 95% high posterior density (<abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev>) intervals for each node are presented in Table S27.</p>
        <fig id="F8">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.figure8</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">AD7F32D9-567C-5F44-8D34-06B6AFC19448</object-id>
          <label>Figure 8.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Divergence time estimation of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> based on the phylogeny of dataset PCGAA.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-g008.jpg" id="oo_1670631.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670631</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> diverged during Late Triassic (~219.34 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 129.57–305.38 Mya). Within this family, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> diverged from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Anophelinae">Anophelinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in Late Jurassic (~147.45 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 87.03–216.38 Mya). The clade <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Sabethini">Sabethini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> + <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Mansoniini">Mansoniini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> split from other lineages during mid-Cretaceous (~119.90 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 69.43–177.94 Mya), followed by the divergence of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Mansoniini">Mansoniini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Sabethini">Sabethini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> later in mid-Cretaceous (~98.67 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 49.99–153.91 Mya). The lineage comprising <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Aedeomyiini">Aedeomyiini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> + <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Toxorhynchitini">Toxorhynchitini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> emerged during mid-Cretaceous (~106.60 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 61.96–161.42 Mya), while <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Culisetini">Culisetini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> + <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Culicini">Culicini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> diverged from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Aedini">Aedini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> later in Cretaceous (~86.42 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 47.41–131.23 Mya). Significant Neogene divergences include the separation of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Toxorhynchitini">Toxorhynchitini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Aedeomyiini">Aedeomyiini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in the Early Neogene (~22.00 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 14.23–33.20 Mya). Additionally, the split between <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Culicini">Culicini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe" reg="Culisetini">Culisetini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> occurred during the Late Cretaceous (~67.12 Mya; 95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 35.79–102.36 Mya).</p>
        <p>Within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the clade <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) + <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> diverged from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Lophoceraomyia">Lophoceraomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) at ~28.62 Mya (95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 15.07–44.73 Mya), with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) differentiating from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> at ~22.69 Mya (95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 13.13–35.15 Mya). The subgenera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) diverged at ~11.09 Mya (95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 4.54–18.23 Mya) and ~11.65 Mya (95% <abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev> = 6.61–17.71 Mya), respectively.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="4. Discussion" id="sec14">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>Gene composition and structural characteristics of the seven <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes were consistent with other published <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aragao et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">da Silva et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hao et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lorenz et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sun et al. 2019</xref>) and other reported insect groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dai et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Jiang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang et al. 2017</xref>). In the complete mitogenomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the content of A + C was higher than that of G + T. This is consistent with previous studies based on the genera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Anopheles">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Demari-Silva et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Martinez-Villegas et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Oliveira et al. 2016</xref>). Similar results have also been observed in other groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Jiang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Wei et al. 2010</xref>). The use of ATN as the start codon is common in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Demari-Silva et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hao et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sun et al. 2019</xref>) and has also been observed in studies of other groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ji et al. 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Liu et al. 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Tian et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xu et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zhang et al. 2024</xref>).</p>
      <p>The phylogenetic status of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has long been controversial. Initially classified as a subgenus within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was proposed for elevation to generic rank as early as 1932 due to its distinctive biological characteristic of larval predation on other mosquito species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Edwards 1932</xref>). Subsequently, Sun et al. reached the same conclusion based on mitochondrial gene evidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sun et al. 2019</xref>). However, subsequent phylogenetic analyses have consistently recovered <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was nested within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Chen et al. 2024; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Zadra et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Pierce et al. 2025</xref>), which is congruent with our results. Within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Neoculex">Neoculex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) was found to be non-monophyletic. Our results revealed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) is non-monophyletic, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oculeomyia">Oculeomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) nested within it. These fin dings are consistent with previous studies employing both mitogenome and nuclear gene datasets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Han et al. 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Koh et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Li et al. 2023</xref>). However, a recent whole-genome-based study showed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culiciomyia">Culiciomyia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) was the sister group to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), which included <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Pierce et al. 2025</xref>). Given the instability observed at deeper nodes and the well-known limitations of mitochondrial data for resolving ancient rapid radiations (Rubinoff and Holland 2005), the phylogenetic relationships presented here should be regarded as a working hypothesis that requires further testing with additional data, particularly from nuclear genomes.</p>
      <p>Our divergence time estimates based on the PCGAA dataset indicated that the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> originated in Late Triassic (~219 Mya), which was consistent with the known fossil evidence demonstrating the existence of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Culicoidea">Culicoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> as early as Late Triassic (210 Mya) (Chen et al. 2024). This esti mate is also broadly congruent with recent phylogenomic analyses based on whole-genome data, which placed the crown age of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> at approximately 188–250 Mya (Late Triassic to Early Jurassic) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Soghigian et al. 2023</xref>). The subfamily <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> diverged from <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Anophelinae">Anophelinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> during Late Jurassic (~147 Mya), this aligns with the results of Hao et al. from the mitochondrial PCG123 dataset (~145.03 Mya) and is corroborated by Krzywinski et al.’s divergence time estimates based on mitochondrial data (rRNA, protein-coding genes, and J-strand protein genes) (~145–200 Mya) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hao et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Krzywinski et al. 2006</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Soghigian et al. (2023)</xref> similarly estimated the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Anophelinae">Anophelinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>-<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily" reg="Culicinae">Culicinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> split at approximately 147–213 Mya, further supporting the robustness of this divergence timing across different data types and analytical approaches. The Cretaceous period marked the primary diversification of major mosquito lineages at both the family and tribe levels, coinciding with three pivotal evolutionary developments, i.e: the origin of flowering plants (angiosperms), the diversification of birds (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Aves">Aves</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), and the ecological expansion of mammals (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Mammalia">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). This temporal overlap suggests an ecological interdependence, in which mammals became key vertebrate hosts for hematophagous mosquito species, while contemporaneously evolving angiosperms provided essential nutritional resources (e.g., plant exudates) and suitable microhabitats for the immature stages of mosquitoes (Chen et al. 2024; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Lyimo and Ferguson 2009</xref>). The consi stency between our mitogenome-based estimates and those derived from phylogenomic analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Soghigian et al. 2023</xref>) demonstrates that mitochondrial data, despite representing a smaller fraction of the genome, can recover reliable divergence patterns when combined with appropriate fossil calibrations. To better understand the phylogenetic relationships within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as well as subgenera and to estimate their divergence times, more comprehensive samplings and the whole genomic data will be needed in the future studies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="5. Conclusions" id="sec15">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study provides the first comprehensive mitogenome characterization and comparative analysis of seven <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species, offering new insights into the structural conservation, nucleotide composition, and phylogenetic relationships within the genus. The mitochondrial genomic features are largely conserved across the analyzed species, supporting their close evolutionary affinities. Phylogenetic analyses revealed a non-monophyletic <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lutzia">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nested within the clade, as well as paraphyletic relationships among several traditionally recognized subgenera. Divergence time estimation suggests that the major splits in the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Culicidae">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> family occurred during Late Triassic and Late Jurassic, preceding most speciation events within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which were concentrated in the Neogene. These findings corroborate previous nuclear gene-based studies but also highlight the complex evolutionary history and unresolved systematics within the genus. To better resolve these relationships and refine divergence time estimates, future studies should incorporate more comprehensive sampling and integrate nuclear and mitochondrial genomic data. This work lays a foundational framework for further investigations into the molecular evolution, systematics, and evolutionary history of the medically important <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquitoes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="6. Declarations" id="sec16">
      <title>6. Declarations</title>
      <p><bold>Availability of data and materials</bold>. The genome sequencing data of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="PQ213471" xlink:type="simple">PQ213471</ext-link>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="PQ213468" xlink:type="simple">PQ213468</ext-link>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="harrisoni">harrisoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="PP818790" xlink:type="simple">PP818790</ext-link>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="huangae">huangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="OR074506" xlink:type="simple">OR074506</ext-link>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigropunctatus">nigropunctatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="PQ213469" xlink:type="simple">PQ213469</ext-link>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudovishnui">pseudovishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="PQ213470" xlink:type="simple">PQ213470</ext-link>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Cx.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torrentium">torrentium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="OR127146" xlink:type="simple">OR127146</ext-link>) that support the findings of this study are openly available in the GenBank of NCBI at <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</ext-link> (accessed on 6 October 2024).</p>
      <p><bold>Competing Interests</bold>. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      <p><bold>Funding</bold>. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170451), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (C2025204080), the Basic Research Project of Shijiazhuang for University in Hebei Province (241791137A), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Baoding (2472P018), and the Earmarked Fund for CARS-27.</p>
      <p><bold>Authors’ Contributions</bold>. Yang Liu: Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft preparation, Writing – review and editing, Visualization. Ruoqian Sun: Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft preparation, Visualization. Cong Li: Investigation, Resources. Ruyue Zhang: Methodology, Software. Zimeng Zhang: Formal analysis, Data curation. Liming Wang: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Supervision. Ding Yang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Supervision. Yuyu Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft preparation, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>7. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We are grateful to the Entomological Museum of China Agriculture University for the loan of specimens. We thank Xulong Chen, Qicheng Yang, Liang Wang and Zhifei Li for collecting and providing the specimens.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>8. References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Aragao AD, Neto JPN, Cruz ACR, Casseb SMM, Cardoso JF, da Silva SP, Ishikawa EAY (2019) Description and phylogeny of the mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sabethes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">chloropterus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sabethes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">glaucodaemon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sabethes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">belisarioi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Genomics 111(4): 607–611. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.03.016" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.03.016</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF (2013) MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(2): 313–319. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, Myers MF, George DB, Jaenisch T, Wint GRW, Simmons CP, Scott TW, Farrar JJ, Hay SI (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496(7446): 504–507. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nature12060" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12060</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: Aflexible trimmerfor Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114–2120. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA (2017) FQC Dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics 33(19): 3137–3139. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Busquets N, Alba A, Allepuz A, Aranda C, Núñez JI (2008) Usutu virus sequences in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14(5): 861–863. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3201/eid1405.071577" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1405.071577</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Cameron SL, Yoshizawa K, Mizukoshi A, Whiting MF, Johnson KP (2011) Mitochondrial genome deletions and minicircles are common in lice (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraorder">Phthiraptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). BMC Genomics 12(1): 1–15. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1471-2164-12-394" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-394</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Cameron SL (2014) Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annual Review of Entomology 59: 95–117. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162007" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162007</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Campbell GL, Hills SL, Fischer M, Jacobson JA, Hoke CH, Hombach JM, Marfin AA, Solomon T, Tsai TF, Tsu VD, Ginsburg AS (2011) Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89(10): 766–774. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2471/BLT.10.085233" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.10.085233</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D’Souza LM, Du YS, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Müller KM, Pande N, Shang ZD, Yu N, Gutell RR (2002) The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 2. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1471-2105-3-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-3-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>C hen DH, He SL, Fu WB, Yan ZT, Hu YJ, Yuan H, Wang MB, Chen B (2024) Mitogenome-based phylogeny of mosquitoes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Insect Science 31(2): 599–612. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1744-7917.13251" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13251</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Cheung K, Amos TG, Shine R, Devore JL, Ducatez S, Edwards RJ, Rollins LA (2024) Whole-mitogenome analysis unveils previously undescribed genetic diversity in cane toads across their invasion trajectory. Ecology and Evolution 14(3): e11115. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.11115" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11115</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Cook CL, Huang YJS, Lyons AC, Alto BW, Unlu I, Higgs S, Vanlandingham DL (2018) North American <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">quinquefasciatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are competent vectors for Usutu virus. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12(8): e0006732. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pntd.0006732" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006732</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>da Silva FS, Cruz ACR, Medeiros DBD, da Silva SP, Nunes MRT, Martins LC, Chiang JO, Lemos PD, Cunha GM, de Araujo RF, Monteiro HAD, Neto JPN (2020) Mitochondrial genome sequencing and phylogeny of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Haemagogus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">albomaculatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Haemagogus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">leucocelaenus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Haemagogus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">spegazzinii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Haemagogus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">tropicalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Scientific Reports 10(1): 16948. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-020-73790-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73790-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Dai LS, Kausar S, Abbas MN, Wang TT (2018) Complete sequence and characterization of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ectropis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">oblique</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitochondrial genome and its phylogenetic implications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 107: 1142–1150. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.093" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.093</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Demari-Silva B, Foster PG, de Oliveira TM, Bergo ES, Sanabani SS, Pessoa R, Sallum MAM (2015) Mitochondrial genomes and comparative analyses of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">camposi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">coronator</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">usquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">usquatissimus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), members of the coronator group. BMC Genomics 16: 831. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s12864-015-1951-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1951-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Edwards FW (1932) Genera Insectorum: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, Family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Desmet-Verteneuil, Brussels, vol. 194 (258 vols.).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Faizah AN, Kobayashi D, Isawa H, Amoa-Bosompem M, Murota K, Higa Y, Futami K, Shimada S, Kim KS, Itokawa K, Watanabe M, Tsuda Y, Minakawa N, Miura K, Hirayama K, Sawabe K (2020) Deciphering the virome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">vishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> subgroup mosquitoes, the major vectors of Japanese encephalitis, in Japan. Viruses 12(3): 264. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/v12030264" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/v12030264</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Ferraguti M, Heesterbeek H, Martínez-de la Puente J, Jiménez-Clavero MA, Vázquez A, Ruiz S, Llorente F, Roiz D, Vernooij H, Soriguer R, Figuerola J (2021) The role of different <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquito species in the transmission of West Nile virus and avian malaria parasites in Mediterranean areas. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 68(2): 920–930. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/tbed.13760" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13760</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294–299.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Fu WB, Chen B (2018) Taxonomy and fauna of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: history and current knowledge. Acta Entomologica Sinica 61(1): 122–138. <ext-link xlink:href="10.16380/i.kexb.2018.01.014" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.16380/i.kexb.2018.01.014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Gissi C, Pesole G, Mastrototaro F, Iannelli F, Guida V, Griggio F (2010). Hypervariability of ascidian mitochondrial gene order: exposing the myth of deuterostome organelle genome stability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27(2): 211–215. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msp234" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp234</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Greiner S, Lehwark P, Bock R (2019) OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 47: W59–W64. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/nar/gkz238" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz238</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Han SL, Miot EF, Liao YS, Somboon P, Harbach RE, Sze-To KM, Tang LTW, Guenard B, Lam TTY (2024) Updated checklist with new records and molecular data for the mosquitoes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of Hong Kong. Journal of Medical Entomology 62(1): 99–111. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/jme/tjae125" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjae125</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Hao YJ, Zou YL, Ding YR, Xu WY, Yan ZT, Li XD, Fu WB, Li TJ, Chen B (2017) Complete mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">stephensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">An.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">dirus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and comparative evolutionary mitochondriomics of 50 mosquitoes. Scientific Reports 7(1): 7666. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-017-07977-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07977-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Harbach RE (2012) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: species versus species complex taxonomic history and perspective. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 28(4): 10–23. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2987/8756-971X-28.4.10" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X-28.4.10</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rspb.2002.2218" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Hurst LD (2002) The Ka/Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends in Genetics 18(9): 486–487. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02722-1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02722-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Hurst LD (2009) Genetics and the understanding of selection. Nature Reviews Genetics 10(2): 83–93. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nrg2506" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2506</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Ji LP, Jia ZC, Bai XS (2024) Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of three species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Yangiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Aradidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and the phylogenetic implications of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Aradidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Insects 15(7): 533. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/insects15070533" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15070533</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Jiang F, Pan X, Li X, Yu Y, Zhang J, Jiang H, Dou L, Zhu S (2016) The first complete mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Dacus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">longicornis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Tephritidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) using next-generation sequencing and mitochondrial genome phylogeny of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Dacini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> tribe. Scientific Reports 6(1): 36426. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/srep36426" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36426</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/NMETH.4285" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.4285</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Karim S-U, Bai F (2023) Introduction to West Nile Virus. Methods in Molecular Biology 2585: 1–7. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-1-0716-2760-0_1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2760-0_1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/mst010" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Khan SA, Chowdhury P, Choudhury P, Dutta P (2017) Detection of West Nile virus in six mosquito species in synchrony with seroconversion among sentinel chickens in India. Parasites &amp; Vectors 10: 13. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s13071-016-1948-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1948-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Koh C, Frangeul L, Blanc H, Ngoagouni C, Boyer S, Dussart P, Grau N, Girod R, Duchemin JB, Saleh MC (2023) Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences from 33 globally distributed mosquito species for improved metagenomics and species identification. Elife 12: e82762. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.82762" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82762</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Krzywinski J, Grushko OG, Besansky NJ (2006) Analysis of the complete mitochondrial DNA from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">funestus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: An improved dipteran mitochondrial genome annotation and a temporal dimension of mosquito evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39(2): 417–423. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Krzywinski J, Li C, Morris M, Conn JE, Lima JB, Povoa MM, Wilkerson RC (2011) Analysis of the evolutionary forces shaping mitochondrial genomes of a Neotropical malaria vector complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58(3): 469–477. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2011.01.003" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.01.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msw054" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Leggewie M, Badusche M, Rudolf M, Jansen S, Borstler J, Krumkamp R, Huber K, Kruger A, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Tannich E, Becker SC (2016) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torrentium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> populations from central Europe are susceptible to West Nile virus infection. One Health 2: 88–94. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.04.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.04.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Li L, Deng Y, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Fu Y, Liu G, Liu J (2023) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">vishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), one of the major vectors of Japanese encephalitis virus. Parasitology Research 122: 1403–1414. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00436-023-07840-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07840-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Liu WB, Wang CY, Wang JY, Tang YN, Pei WX, Ge XY, Yan CC (2024) Phylogenetic and comparative analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cryptochironomus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Demicryptochironomus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Harnischia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inferred from mitogenomes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Chironomidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Insects 15(9): 642. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/insects15090642" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090642</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Lorenz C, Alves JMP, Foster PG, Sallum MAM, Suesdek L (2019) First record of translocation in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) mitogenomes: evidence from the tribe <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Sabethini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. BMC Genomics 20(1): 721. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s12864-019-6069-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6069-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Luo Q, Hao YJ, Meng FX, Li TJ, Ding YR, Hua YQ, Chen Bin (2016) The mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">pallens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">tritaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and comparison analysis with two other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species. Parasites &amp; Vectors 9(1): 406. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s13071-016-1694-z" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1694-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Lyimo IN, Ferguson HM (2009) Ecological and evolutionary determinants of host species choice in mosquito vectors. Trends in Parasitology 25(4): 189–196. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.pt.2009.01.005" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2009.01.005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Martinez-Villegas L, Assis-Geraldo J, Koerich LB, Collier TC, Lee Y, Main BJ, Rodrigues NB, Orfano AS, Pires A, Campolina TB, Nacif-Pimenta R, Baia-da-Silva DC, Duarte APM, Bahia AC, Rios-Velásquez CM, Lacerda MVG, Monteiro WM, Lanzaro GC, Secundino NFC, Pimenta PFP (2019) Characterization of the complete mitogenome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aquasalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and phylogenetic divergences among <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from diverse geographic zones. Plos One 14(9): e0219523. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0219523" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219523</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Meng GL, Li YY, Yang CT, Liu SL (2019) MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 47(11): e63. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/nar/gkz173" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz173</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Miller BR, Crabtree MB, Savage HM (1996) Phylogeny of fourteen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquito species, including the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pipiens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex, inferred from the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. Insect Molecular Biology 5(2): 93–107. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00044.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00044.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Mori S, Matsunami M (2018) Signature of positive selection in mitochondrial DNA in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Cetartiodactyla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Genes &amp; Genetic Systems 93(2): 65–73. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1266/ggs.17-00015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.17-00015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Mulvey P, Duong V, Boyer S, Burgess G, Williams DT, Dussart P, Horwood PF (2021) The ecology and evolution of Japanese Encephalitis Virus. Pathogens 10(12): 1534. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/pathogens10121534" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121534</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Nchoutpouen E, Talipouo A, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Djamouko-Djonkam L, Kopya E, Ngadjeu CS, Doumbe-Belisse P, Awono-Ambene P, Kekeunou S, Wondji CS, Antonio-Nkondjio C (2019) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species diversity, susceptibility to insecticides and role as potential vector of Lymphatic filariasis in the city of Yaounde, Cameroon. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13(4): e0007229. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pntd.0007229" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007229</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msu300" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Oliveira TMP, Foster PG, Bergo ES, Nagaki SS, Sanabani SS, Marinotti O, Marinotti PN, Sallum MAM (2016) Mitochondrial genomes of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anopheles</tp:taxon-name-part> (<tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Kerteszia</tp:taxon-name-part>)</tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Journal of Medical Entomology 53(4): 790–797. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/jme/tjw001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjw001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL (2012) IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28(11): 1420–1428. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Perna NT, Kocher TD (1995) Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41(3): 353–358. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF01215182" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215182</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Pierce MP, Worthington BM, Han S, Ni X, Liao Y, Shum MH, Guan Y, Holmes EC, Lam TT (2025) Phylogenomics redefines the evolutionary history of mosquitoes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 122 (42): e2519291122. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.2519291122" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2519291122</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Rambaut A (2009) ‘FigTree’. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syy032" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Reetz MT, Kahakeaw D, Lohmer R (2008) Addressing the numbers problem in directed evolution. ChemBioChem 9(11): 1797–1804. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/cbic.200800298" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200800298</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12): 1572–1574. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(12): 3299–3302. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msx248" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Samy AM, Elaagip AH, Kenawy MA, Ayres CFJ, Peterson AT, Soliman DE (2016) Climate change influences on the global potential distribution of the mosquito <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">quinquefasciatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, vector of West Nile Virus and Lymphatic Filariasis. Plos One 11(10): e0163863. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0163863" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163863</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Simon C, Buckley TR, Frati F, Stewart JB, Beckenbach AT (2006) Incorporating molecular evolution into phylogenetic analysis, and a new compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers for animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 545–579. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110018" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>Soghigian J, Sither C, Justi SA, Morinaga G, Cassel BK, Vitek CJ, Livdahl T, Xia SY, Gloria-Soria A, Powell JR, Zavortink T, Hardy CM, Burkett-Cadena ND, Reeves LE, Wilkerson RC, Dunn RR, Yeates DK, Sallum MA, Byrd BD, Trautwein MD, Linton YM, Reiskind MH, Wiegmann BM (2023) Phylogenomics reveals the history of host use in mosquitoes. Nature Communications 14:6252. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41467-023-41764-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41764-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Sun L, Li T, Fu W, Yan Z, Si F, Zhang Y, Mao Q, Bruna DS, Chen B (2019) The complete mt genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">halifaxia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lt.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fuscanus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pallidothorax</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and comparative analysis of 16 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lutzia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mt genome sequences. Parasites &amp; Vectors 12: 368. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s13071-019-3625-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3625-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>Sun Z, Yang CG, Zhang RL (2017) Research on the phylogenetic relationships of subgenus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) based on its mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Pathogen Biology 16(3): 297–300. <ext-link xlink:href="https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=Klkw5nWhgJF1-E0vtpB7XTHL38PuH_rt2Bt1EnKBzC8Cg4f8bMkdbDDMeT5xWDGxv5C4Phe3hj3mgg8kzh60H2lbpJRU2RdbEIT1oyfi1qo5P1jnu-oA5ERjV2qfPBHFbaYvPFkgrxom2BT-Wwsr1kUja8FKbxp21qfHFb6ys5pi3k-Qk2yQD9ij31dvW0I_&amp;uniplatform=OVERSEA&amp;language=CHS" ext-link-type="uri">https://doi.org/10.13350/j.cjpb.210311</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56(4): 564–577. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/10635150701472164" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Tao KS, Kang L, He C, Zhang T, Chen ML, Li ZJ, Shao DH, Li BB, Wei JC, Qiu YF, Ma ZY, Liu K (2024) Analysis of epidemic risk factors for West Nile Virus. Chinese Journal of Animal Infectious Diseases: 1–8. <ext-link xlink:href="10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.20240930.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.19958/j.cnki.cn31-2031/s.20240930.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation>Tian JH, Yu B, Shi XF, Liang H, Wang DH, Ge MH (2020) Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mansonia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">uniformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Culicidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 5(1): 498–499. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/23802359.2019.1704638" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1704638</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Tian S, Jiang YL, Lai Y, Wang ST, Liu XY, Wang YY (2023) New mitogenomes of the green lacewing tribe <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="tribe">Ankylopterygini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Neuroptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Chrysopidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Chrysopinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and phylogenetic implications of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Chrysopidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Insects 14(11): 878. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/insects14110878" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110878</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>Wang K, Li XK, Ding SM, Wang N, Mao M, Wang MQ, Yang D (2016) The complete mitochondrial genome of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Atylotus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">miser</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Diptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraorder">Tabanomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Tabanidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with mitochondrial genome phylogeny of lower <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Brachycera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraorder">Orthorrhapha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Gene 586(1): 184–196. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Wang YY, Liu XY, Garzón-Orduña IJ, Winterton SL, Yan Y, Aspöck U, Aspöck H, Yang D (2017) Mitochondrial phylogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of Neuropterida. Cladistics 33(6): 617–636. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/cla.12186" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12186</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>Wei SJ, Shi M, Chen XX, Sharkey MJ, van Achterberg C, Ye GY, He JH (2010) New views on strand asymmetry in insect mitochondrial genomes. Plos One 5(9): e12708. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0012708" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012708</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Wolstenholme DR (1992) Animal mitochondrial DNA: structure and evolution. International Review of Cytology 141: 173–216. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62066-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62066-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Xu H, Wu YF, Wang YJ, Liu ZQ (2020) Comparative analysis of five mitogenomes of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Osmylinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Neuroptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Osmylidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and their phylogenetic implications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 164: 447–455. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.150" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbimac.2020.07.150</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Yang ZH (2007) PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24(8): 1586–1591. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msm088" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm088</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Zadra N, Rizzoli A, Rota-Stabelli O (2021) Chronological incongruences between mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus">Aedes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mosquitoes. Life 11(3): 181. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/life11030181" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030181</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Zardoya R, Meyer A (1996) Phylogenetic performance of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13(7): 933–942. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025661" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025661</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang R, Jiang Y, Zhong M, Wang S, Wang Y (2024) New mitochondrial genomes of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ithonidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Neuroptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and higher phylogenetic implications. Insects 15(12): 933. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/insects15120933" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/isects15120933</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Zhao YY, Zhang HL, Zhang YH (2017) Complete mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Neochauliodes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">parasparsus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Megaloptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Corydalidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with phylogenetic consideration. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 70: 192–199. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.bse.2016.12.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2016.12.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Zhu Y, Yan S, Ma P, Zuo C, Ma X, Zhang Z (2024) Complete mitochondrial genomes and population genetic analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Brachidontes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">variabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Krauss, 1848) in China. Marine Biology 171: 197. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1007/s00227-024-04516-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-024-04516-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">872735E2-3F37-5B1C-B607-A4A5DFC46423</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Figures S1–S10</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .zip</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold>Figure S1</bold>. Mitochondrial maps. Genes outside the map are transcribed counterclockwise, whereas those inside are transcribed clockwise. — <bold>Figure S2</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of protein-coding genes in the complete mitochondrial genomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Figure S3</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Bayesian Inference analysis based on the PCG12 dataset. — <bold>Figure S4</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on the PCG12 dataset. — <bold>Figure S5</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Bayesian Inference analysis based on the PCG12RNA dataset. — <bold>Figure S6</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on the PCG12RNA dataset. — <bold>Figure S7</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Bayesian Inference analysis based on the PCG123 dataset. — <bold>Figure S8</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on the PCG123 dataset. — <bold>Figure S9</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Bayesian Inference analysis based on the PCG123RNA dataset. — <bold>Figure S10</bold>. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on the PCG123RNA dataset.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-s001.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1670632.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1670632</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Liu Y, Sun RQ, Li C, Zhang RY, Zhang ZM, Wang LM, Yang D, Wang YY (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/asp.84.e176547.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">F20DE37D-8355-5A52-BBE3-468BAC33C10A</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Tables S1–S27</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .zip</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold>Table S1</bold>. Mitogenome-sequenced <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> specimens in this study. — <bold>Table S2</bold>. List of taxonomic groups used for the phylogenetic analyses in this study. — <bold>Table S3</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S4</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S5</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="harrisoni">harrisoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S6</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="huangae">huangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S7</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigropunctatus">nigropunctatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S8</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudovishnui">pseudovishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S9</bold>. Organization of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torrentium">torrentium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenome. — <bold>Table S10</bold>. Nucleotide composition and skews in the complete mitogenomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S11</bold>. Nucleotide composition and skews in the <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of complete <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mitogenomes. — <bold>Table S12</bold>. Nucleotide composition at the three codon sites in the complete <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S13</bold>. Encoded amino acids composition in the complete <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S14</bold>. Start codons of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S15</bold>. Stop codons of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S16</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bitaeniorhynchus">bitaeniorhynchus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S17</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="harrisoni">harrisoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S18</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigropunctatus">nigropunctatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S19</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="huangae">huangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S20</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torrentium">torrentium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S21</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pseudovishnui">pseudovishnui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S22</bold>. Relative synonymous codon usages (<abbrev xlink:title="Relative synonymous codon usages">RSCUs</abbrev>) of <abbrev xlink:title="protein coding genes">PCGs</abbrev> of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bicornutus">bicornutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S23</bold>. Nucleotide composition and skews in the complete control regions of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S24</bold>. The count of microsatellite-like sequence in the complete control regions of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Culex">Culex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. — <bold>Table S25</bold>. Nucleotide composition and skews in the <italic>rrnL</italic>. — <bold>Table S26</bold>. Nucleotide composition and skews in the <italic>rrnS</italic>. — <bold>Table S27</bold>. Mean divergence times and 95% high posterior density (<abbrev xlink:title="high posterior density">HPD</abbrev>) intervals for each node of the topology presented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="arthropod-systematics-84-293-s002.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1670633.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1670633</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Liu Y, Sun RQ, Li C, Zhang RY, Zhang ZM, Wang LM, Yang D, Wang YY (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
