logo
HomeArticlesAbout
Register | Login
Research Article
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 80: 523-539
https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e84114 (27 Sep 2022)
Other versions:
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Inst. CodeInst. Code
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Methods
    • 2.1. Taxon sampling
    • 2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
    • 2.3. Phylogenetic analysis
    • 2.4. Morphological study
  • 3. Results
    • 3.1. The subgenus Cryobius is recovered as a monophyletic group within Pterostichus
    • 3.2. The Pyreneo-Cantabrian Cryobius
    • 3.3. P. pumilio
    • 3.4. The P. abaxoides- and pusillus groups
    • 3.5. The P. cantabricus group
    • 3.6. Cryobius from the Alps
    • 3.7. The Nearctic and Eastern Oriental Cryobius
    • 3.8. P. cf. anatolicus
  • 4. Discussion
    • 4.1. The subgenus Cryobius
    • 4.2. Haptoderus and Pyreneorites
    • 4.3. The Pyreneo-Cantabrian Cryobius
    • 4.4. The Pyrenean Cryobius
    • 4.5. The Cantabrian clade
    • 4.6. The case of the widespread species P. pumilio
    • 4.7. The Eastern Cryobius
    • 4.8. The Nearctic Cryobius
  • 5. Conclusion
  • 6. Acknowledgements
  • 7. References
Powered by

This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy

OK