Research Article
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- MapMap
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- Inst. CodeInst. Code
-
Article title
-
Abstract
-
Key words
-
1. Introduction
-
2. Methods
-
2.1. Specimens
-
2.2. Measurements, illustrations, terminology, and techniques
-
2.3. Character coding and phylogenetic integrity
-
2.4. Phylogenetic analyses
-
2.4.1. Maximum parsimony analyses
-
2.4.2. Model-based methods
-
-
2.5. Male genitalia character optimisation
-
-
3. Results
-
3.1. Systematics
-
Key to species of the Belostoma plebejum group sensu Nieser based on adult specimens (with new species included)
-
3.2. Phylogeny of the B. plebejum group sensu Nieser (1975)
-
3.3. Effect of progressively adding continuous characters
-
3.4. Congruence between different methods and the effect of homology accumulation
-
3.5. Evolution of characters based on male genitalia
-
-
4. Discussion
-
4.1. The monophyly of the B. plebejum group s.l. is corroborated and there is also some evidence of the monophyly of the B. plebejum s.s. and B. pygmeum groups
-
4.2. Belostoma micantulum is not supposed to have phylogenetic integrity
-
4.3. The effects of using different methods, in general, seem to be much more visible than using different combinations of continuous characters
-
-
5. Conclusion
-
6. Authors’ contributions
-
7. Funding
-
8. Competing interests
-
9. Acknowledgements
-
10. References
-
Supplementary materials
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories