Research Article |
Corresponding author: Albane Vilarino ( albanevilarino@alumni.usp.br ) Academic editor: Monika Eberhard
© 2024 Albane Vilarino, Adolfo R. Calor.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
|
Geometric morphometric statistics have been employed to reduce the subjectivity of visual evaluations in taxonomy. Taxonomy in most insect groups relies strongly on male genitalia morphology which is often the structure with most data available, which is also true to caddisfly taxonomy. Here we revise the caddisfly subgenus Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) adding five new species after 40 years: X. dactylum sp. nov., X. eurybrachium sp. nov., X. tapanti sp. nov., and X. tuxtla sp. nov. Additionally, we describe a new X. (Antillotrichia): X. drepanum sp. nov. from French Guiana and provide new species records of Xiphocentronidae from Bolivia, Costa Rica and Ecuador. We performed exploratory geometric morphometric analysis on the male genitalia’s preanal appendage to characterize the shape differences among the species, and to investigate its utility to classify species to subgenera. In order to infer species relationship and assess if shape congruences are due to phylogenetic signal or convergence data from 100 landmarks and semilandmarks, and 30 discrete characters were used to generate a phylogenetic hypothesis. The morphometry partially supports the subgenera delimitations, but the Antillotrichia subgenus greatly overlapped with other subgenera. The discriminant analysis overall classification correctness was 64%. Some suggested phenotypic groups were due to convergence. According to the preanal appendage morphometry, X. (Antillotrichia) fuscum is a Sphagocentron species. The phylogenetic analysis recovered Sphagocentron as monophyletic, but not Antillotrichia. Sphagocentron subgenus was placed within a clade of several Antillotrichia species, with X. (A.) fuscum as the sister of the other Sphagocentron species, although support values were low.
Aquatic insects, Landmark, Morphology, Morphometry, Net-tube caddisfly, Taxonomy
Male genitalia features play an important role in insect taxonomy as they contain the principal traits used to delineate genera and delimit species in many insect groups, and often the male genitalia is the structure with most data available (
Since
Xiphocentronidae Ross, 1949 is a pantropical net-tube caddisfly family comprising 205 species, classified in eight genera: Abaria Mosely, 1948 with 40 species (Oriental and Afrotropical regions); Caenocentron Schmid, 1982 with nine species (southwestern USA to northern South America); Cnodocentron Schmid, 1982 with six species (India and Southeast Asia); Drepanocentron Schmid, 1982 with 43 species (Oriental region); Machairocentron Schmid, Schmid, 1982 with 10 species (Central America and northern South America), Melanotrichia Ulmer, 1906 with 30 species (eastern Palearctic and Oriental regions); Proxiphocentron Schmid, 1982 with five species (India and Southeast Asia), and Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870 with 62 species (Neotropical region, extending into Mexico, the southwestern USA, and the Greater Antilles) (Peng et al. 2022;
The majority of xiphocentronid species are found in small streams in the tropical zone, primarily in the Oriental region (with five genera) and the Neotropical region (with three genera), few species are also distributed in the Afrotropical, East Palearctic and Nearctic regions (
Currently, the New World fauna comprises 81 species, most of them belonging to the genus Xiphocentron, making it the most species-rich genus within the family with 62 species (
Characters described to each Xiphocentron subgenus according to
Subgenera | |||||
Characters | Antillotrichia Banks, 1941 | Glyphocentron Schmid, 1982 | Rhamphocentron Schmid, 1982 | Sphagocentron Schmid, 1982 | Xiphocentron Brauer, 1870 |
Male hind tibia, modified spur | absent | absent | present | absent | present |
FW fork I | absent | absent | absent | rudimentarily present (some species) | present |
FW thyridial cell | short | short | medium-sized | long | short |
FW anal veins | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Sternum IX posterior margin | indented | straight | with two small lobes | projecting and with two small lobes | with one or two prominent lobes (some species) |
Paraproct lateral points | absent | present | absent | absent | absent |
Preanal app. | moderately narrow | strong | robust and wavy | strong, pointed at apex | strong, wide and straight |
Inferior app. articles | fused, vestigial suture may be visible | segments well distinct | fused, vestigial suture may be visible | fused, no suture visible | segments well distinct |
Inferior app. coxopodite, zone of points | absent | present | absent | absent | absent |
Inferior app. harpago, ornaments | spiny structures weakly developed, mesal sclerite present in some species | long, narrow, with subbasal zone of strong spines | long zone of tubercles, mesal sclerite present | markedly contorted with well-defined area of strong setae | wide basal zone of dense and long setae |
Segments II and IV, abdominal vesicles | absent | absent | present in X. mexico group; absent in X. lavinia group | absent | absent |
All the five subgenera occur in Mesoamerica and Central America, while only speciesplaced within Antillotrichia occur in the Caribbean islands and South America (
In this study we revise the subgenus X. (Sphagocentron), providing identification key, the synopses of the two previously described, X. julus and X. evandrus, and the description of five new species, X. (Sphagocentron) dactylum sp. nov. and X. (S.) eurybrachium sp. nov. from Venezuela, X. (S.) tapanti sp. nov. from Costa Rica, and X. (S.) tuxtla sp. nov. from Mexico. In addition, we describe one species, X. (Antillotrichia) drepanum sp. nov., from French Guiana and include new distributional records of Xiphocentronidae from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Costa Rica.
We performed exploratory geometric morphometric analysis on the male genitalia’s preanal appendage characterizing the shape differences among the species described, as well as among the five subgenera, in order to investigate the utility of morphometrics to classify species to subgenera. Additionally, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of X. (Sphagocentron) species combining morphometric and discrete characters, to test Sphagocentron subgenus monophyly, new species placement, and to verify if the preanal appendage shape congruences are due to phylogenetic signal or convergence.
New species propositions are testable hypotheses of the distinction of separately evolving metapopulation lineages (
The morphological terminology for male genitalia followed
Types of the species described herein and other material examined are deposited, as indicated in the species descriptions, in the following institutions:
Geometric morphometry allows quantitatively evaluating the shape variation of morphological structures across a sample using standardized images and ‘landmarks’ (
Xiphocentron specimens used the morphometric analysis, country, location and depository.
Species | Country | Location | Depository/Source |
X. cubanum | Cuba | Pinar del Rio Soroa, 22°47.7′N 83°00.1′W |
|
X. borinquensis | Puerto Rico | El Yunque |
|
X. dactylum sp. nov. | Venezuela | Falcón, Quebrada del Toro 10°49.581′N, 69°07.990′W |
|
X. drepanum sp. nov. | French Guiana | Approuague-kaw: Kaw Mtn., 104 mao, 4°33.035′N, 52°11.661′W |
|
X. euryale | Costa Rica | San Jose, Res. Bio. Carara, Rio del Sur, 9°46′08.4″N, 84°31′51.6″W |
|
X. eurybrachium sp. nov. | Venezuela | Falcón, Mitare river, near San Luis, 11°07.930′N, 69°39.184′W |
|
X. evandrus | Costa Rica | Juan Vinas, Chiz river |
|
X. fuscum | Dominica | Brantridge |
|
X. guanacaste sp. nov. | Costa Rica | Guanacaste; Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Estacion San Gerardo |
|
X. haitiense | Dominican Rep. | Mulito river, 21 km N Perdernales, 18°09.5′N, 71°45.4′W |
|
X. ilionea | Brazil | São Paulo, Estação Boracéia, Pedreira |
|
X. julus | Mexico | Veracruz, Puente Nacional |
|
X. lavinia | Guatemala | Dept. Izabal, Matias de Galvez |
|
X. messapus | USA | Texas, Haysco, Fern Bank Spring, near Wimberley |
|
X. mnesteus | Venezuela | Lara, P.N. Dinira, Quebrada el Vino, 9°46.711′N, 70°02.045′W |
|
X. moncho | Costa Rica | Alajuela, Reserva Florestal San Ramón, San Lorencito river, 10.216°N, 84.606°W |
|
X. nesidion | Jamaica | St. Elizabeth Y.S. Falls, 18°09.3′N, 77°31.9′W |
|
X. numanus | Mexico | Oaxaca, Tamazulapan |
|
X. parentum | Martinique | Riviere Coco (Le Morn-Vert) |
|
X. piscicaldum | Venezuela | Sucre, P.N. Peninsula de Paria, 10°42.830′N, 61°57.661′W |
|
X. polemon | Mexico | Oaxaca, 8km S Valle Nacional |
|
X. regulare | Colombia | Dpto. Antioquia, 12 km N Fredonia |
|
X. sclerothix | Brazil | Amazonas, Presidente Figueiredo, 1°49′51″S, 60°04′15″W |
|
X. sturmi | Ecuador | Napo, Sebundoy |
|
X. surinamense | Suriname | Crokopondo District, Brownsberg Natuurpark, Mazaroni Plateau |
|
X. tapanti sp. nov. | Costa Rica | Cartago; Tapanti Reserve, quebrada palmitos and falls, 9.72°N, 83.78°W |
|
X. tarquon | Costa Rica | Guanacaste; Area de Conservacion Guanacaste |
|
X. tuxtla sp. nov. | Mexico | Veracruz; Los Tuxtlas area: Maquinas river |
|
The phylogenetic analysis used the same 29 taxa as the morphometric analyses (Table
List of morphological characters used in the cladistic analysis. Phylogenies that previously used the character and values of Consistency index (CI) of each character are shown.
1 | Hind tibia apical spur: (0) simple; (1) modified (conspicuously enlarged or shape distinct from the preapical spurs). [Character 3 from |
2 | Sternum V anterior margin, reticulate cuticular region: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 4 from |
3 | Sternum V reticulate region, elongate process: (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 64,8. |
4 | Forewing fork I (R2 and R3): (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 84,7. |
5 | Forewing fork II (R4 and R5): (0) rooted or sessile; (1) petiolate or with nygma isolated by cell. [Character 7 from |
6 | Forewing with nygma surrounded by a cell: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 6 from |
7 | Forewing anal vein 2A: (0) absent; (1) present.— CI = 100. |
8 | Discoidal cell relative length to thyridial cell: (0) longer than thyridial cell; (1) subequal shorter than thyridial cell.— CI = 100. |
9 | Tergum VIII produced posterad over tergum IX: (0) absent; (1) present.— CI = 100. |
10 | Tergum IX, shape, in dorsal view: (0) very narrow, subrectangular (1) elongated, with apical lobes, roof shaped. [Character 18 from |
11 | Tergum IX, posterior margin incision: (0) shallow or absent; (1) deep.— CI = 84,7. |
12 | Tergum IX, anterior margin incision: (0) shallow or absent; (1) deep.— CI = 40,9. |
13 | Sternum IX, apodeme shape: (0) narrow, forming ~90° angle with anterior margin; (1) broad and contiguous with sternum IX. [Character 11 from |
14 | Sternum IX, relative length, in lateral view: (0) short, slightly longer than high or shorter; (1) long, 2× as long as high or longer. — CI = 100. |
15 | Sternum IX posterior margin projecting mesally: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 12 ( |
16 | Sternum IX posterior margin projection, incision: (0) shallow incision or not divided; (1) divided by deep mesal incision. — CI = 84,7. |
17 | Sternum IX apical projection length: (0) short; (1) very elongate (about half inferior appendage length). — non-informative. |
18 | Sternum IX, in lateral view, dorsal margin incision near preanal appendage: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 17 ( |
19 | Inferior appendage, articles (coxopodite and harpago), fusion: (2) articles broadly fused, indistinct; (1) articles well evident by suture line. [Character 25 from |
20 | Coxopodite basal region, inner face setose or granulose: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 33 from |
21 | Harpago spine-like setae, length: (0) short or absent; (1) very long. [Character 45 from |
22 | Harpago spine-like setae, density: (0) few, sparse spines; (1) many dense spines. [Character 46 modified from |
23 | Harpago base, inner face setose area, shape: (0) narrow; (1) broad. [Character 46 modified from |
24 | Harpago, stalked, polype-like mesal sclerite: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 39 from |
25 | Harpago, group of conspicuously elongate setae in the same position of the mesal sclerite: (0) absent; (1) present. — CI = 100. |
26 | Mesal sclerite, spine-like setae, length: (0) short; (1) elongate. — CI = 100. |
27 | Mesal sclerite, stalk shape: (0) narrow, oblong; (1) wide, round. — CI = 100. |
28 | Harpago, subbasal region shape: (0) linearly contiguous with base and apex; (1) bent in an elbow-like shape (usually with a group of spines). — non-informative. |
29 | Paraproct dorsal band, spine-like setae: (0) absent; (1) present. — non-informative. |
30 | Paraproct, lateral points or spine-like setae: (0) absent; (1) present. [Character 20 from |
31 | Geometric morphometric characters, shape of preanal appendage, in lateral view: 100 landmark configurations. — CI = 97,2. |
The exploratory PCA resulted in 28 PCs. The distribution of the species in the morphospace was presented over the four first PC axes (90.59% of the total variance). The PC1 (49.74%) and PC2 (17.07%) could partially separate among Sphagocentron, Rhamphocentron and Xiphocentron subgenera, but Antillotrichia morphospace overlapped most of the species. Some Sphagocentron were highly separated from all other subgenera by the PC2, with a wide preanal appendage bearing an acute apex. The PC3 (13.51%) and PC4 (10.27%) strongly separate Xiphocentron subgenus from all other subgenera, with the species having preanal appendage mostly straight with wide base tapered to a narrow apex. The PC4 also separates Sphagocentron from Rhamphocentron, but with Antillotrichia overlapping with both subgenera. Showing that the preanal appendage morphology allows the sub-generic distinction between Sphagocentron, Rhamphocentron and Xiphocentron species, but not between Antillotrichia and most other subgenera, except Xiphocentron subgenus. The main contributors to the shape changes in each PC are presented in the thin-plate splines at Figure
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of preanal appendage shape, male genitalia. Showing the four major principal components (PCs) (90.59% of the total variance). The percentage of shape variance represented by each PC is presented along the axes. Thin-plate splines show the degree of shape deformation from the mean overall shape.
The shape similarities were summarized in the cluster analysis dendrogram from the 28PCs distances (Fig.
The divergence of the preanal appendage shape among subgenera with groups defined a priori was visualized through the discriminant analysis over the 10 first PCs (Fig.
The analysis ran for around four hours and examined 8,641,321 rearrangements, with one most parsimonious topology retained with a score of 3.91330. The tree topology and the distribution of the analyzed species are displayed at Figure
Phylogeny of Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) species and other subgenera, and distribution map. A Implied weighting parsimony of geometrical morphometric data and 30 discrete characters, unambiguous discrete characters states are shown at the branches. Representation of the preanal appendage is depicted to each species. Symmetric resampling support values are shown at the node boxes. B Corresponding distributions of the analyzed species are indicated in the map with the respective number as in the phylogeny.
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) evandrus Schmid, 1982, by original designation.
Holotype: VENEZUELA • ♂; Falcón, P. N. Cueva de la Quebrada del Toro, Quebrada del Toro, 10°49.581′N, 69°07.990′W, el. 530 m, 11.vi.2001, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Paprocki, Cressa leg., UMSP000075081. — Paratypes: VENEZUELA • 1♀; same data as holotype, UMSP000075082. • 1♂; Aragua, Tiara, 30.i.1983, Flint leg., USNMENT01518180.
Xiphocentron dactylum sp. nov. is particularly similar to Xiphocentron (S.) eurybrachium sp. nov. mainly by the shape of the preanal appendage (in lateral view, straight throughout length, apically wide). However, X. dactylum sp. nov. can be differentiated from its congener by the (1) shape of sternum IX in ventral view, elongate and about as wide basally as apically, subrectangular (trapezoid, conspicuously wider apically in X. eurybrachium sp. nov.), by (2) the posterior margin of sternum IX with wide shallow V-shaped incision (absent in X. eurybrachium sp. nov.) in ventral view.
Male
: Forewing length 3.0 mm (n = 2). Color overall dark brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated round region (Fig.
Genitalia (Fig.
From the Greek dáktulos, ‘finger’, in reference to the conspicuous digitate projection of preanal appendage curved mesad.
Venezuela.
Holotype: VENEZUELA • ♂; Falcón, Mitare river, near San Luis, 11°07.930′N, 69°39.184′W, el. 589 m, 07.vi.2001, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Paprocki, Cressa leg., UMSP000074031. — Paratypes: VENEZUELA • 6♂; same data as holotype, UMSP000074032, 000074033, 000074034, 000074035, 000074036, 000074037.
Xiphocentron eurybrachium sp. nov. is mostly similar to Xiphocentron (S.) dactylum sp. nov.. However, X. eurybrachium sp. nov. can be differentiated mainly by the presence of the following characters: (1) the preanal appendage in lateral view conspicuously wide subapically (2× wider than basal section), without narrow digitate projection; (2) inferior appendage basal region (coxopodite) with small spine-like setae in ventral view, apex curved dorsolaterally in dorsal view; (3) paraproct ventroapical lobe wide (as wide as preanal appendage basal section) (narrow or indistinct in the other species); (4) sternum IX trapezoid, posterior margin without incision; (5) sternum V with a digitate lateral projection.
Male
: Forewing length 3.5–3.8 mm (n = 7). Wing without spots. Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell 3/4 as long as thyridial cell, very conspicuous nygmata. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig.
Genitalia (Figs
From the Greek eurus, ‘wide’, and brakhíōn, ‘arm’ in reference to the preanal appendage shape in lateral view.
Venezuela.
COSTA RICA • ♂; Juan Vinas, Chiz river, 21.vi.1967, Flint and Ortiz leg.,
Xiphocentron evandrus can be differentiated by the combination of preanal appendage subapically wide, sternum IX posterior margin produced, overall deltoid, with shallow apical incision forming very small lobes; tergum IX with very deep, narrow, parallel sided mesal incision.
Adult male. Forewing length 4-4.25 mm (n = 2). Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks I, II and IV present; fork I petiolated, fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell (Fig.
Genitalia (Fig.
Costa Rica, Panama.
Type was fixed in a permanent slide and displayed in a dorso-lateral view.
Holotype: COSTA RICA • ♂; Guanacaste, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Estacion San Gerardo, 10°52′48.00”N, 85°23′20.40”W, el. 575 m, 26.viii. 2013, Malaise Trap, D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs leg., [BOLD: GMAAG1127-16] BIOUG28044-C01. — Paratypes: Same data as holotype, except 09.ix.2013. • 2♂; 09.ix.2013, [BOLD: GMACB1559-15] BIOUG19725-A07, [BOLD: GMACB1565-15] BIOUG19725-B01. • ♂; same data, except 26.viii.2013, [BOLD: GMAAG1127-16] BIOUG28044-C01. • ♂; same data, except 31.iii.2014, [BOLD: GMAAQ746-16] BIOUG28344-B02. • ♂; same data, except 11.ix.2013, [BOLD: GMACA1002-15]
The new species is most similar to X. tuxtla sp. nov. by sharing the prominent acute lobes at the posterior margin of sternum IX and the slightly divergent lobes of tergum IX posterior margin. The new species can be diagnosed in lateral view by (1) the preanal appendage with about the same width throughout length; (2) the spine-like setae of inferior appendage numerous and very dense (sparser basely in X. tuxtla sp. nov.); and (3) the shape of paraproct apicodorsaly round (truncate in X. tuxtla sp. nov.). In dorsal view (4) the tergum IX is longer than wide (about as long as wide in X. tuxtla sp. nov.).
Male
: Forewing length 4–4.2 mm (n = 3). Color overall pale brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig.
Genitalia (Fig.
Name in apposition; from the indigenous Nahuatl language: guaitil, ‘tree’, and nacaztli, ‘ear’. It is the popular name of the tree Entelorobium cyclocarpum and also the name of the conservation area where the species was collected.
Costa Rica.
MEXICO • ♂; Veracruz, Puente Nacional, 15.vi.1964, F.S. Blanton leg.,
Xiphocentron julus is particularly similar to X. tampati sp. nov. by the posterior margin of sternum IX mostly straight with very small mesal lobes; and can be differentiated from this and other species mainly by the uniform width of the preanal appendage, the posterior margin of sternum IX mostly straight with very small mesal lobes, and the paraproct apex oblique.
Male. Forewing length 4.0 mm. Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Genitalia (Fig.
Mexico, Panama.
Type was fixed in a permanent slide and displayed in lateral view.
Holotype COSTA RICA • ♂; Cartago; Tapanti Reserve, quebrada palmitos and falls, 9.72°N, 83.78°W, 24–25.iii.1991, el. 1400 m, Holzenthal, Muñoz, Huisman leg., UMSP000143451. — Paratypes COSTA RICA • 2♂; same data as holotype, UMSP000143450, 000143452. • 9♂; same data, except 23.viii.1990, Holzenthal and Huisman leg., UMSP000143453, 000143454, 000143455, 000143456, 000143457, 000143458, 000143462, 000143463, 000143464.
The new species is similar to Xiphocentron julus by the posterior margin of sternum IX with weakly produced mesal lobes. It can be differentiated from these and other species by the combination of the following characters: (1) the preanal appendage very wide subapically (narrow throughout length in X. julus); (2) shape of paraproct in lateral view, with apicodorsal margin truncate with conspicuously narrow ventral lobe (apicodorsal margin oblique, contiguous with the ventral lobe in X. julus); (3) tergun IX in dorsal view, posterior and anterior margins with wide deep mesal incisions.
Male
: Forewing length 3.6–4.4 mm (n = 12). Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal 3/4 as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig.
Genitalia (Fig.
Name in apposition; in reference to the Tapantí National Park where the species was collected.
Costa Rica.
Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Veracruz; Los Tuxtlas area, Maquinas river 4–14.v.1981, C.M. and O.S. Flint Jr leg., USNMENT01518157.
The new species is most similar to Xiphocentron guanacaste sp. nov. by having the sternum IX posterior margin with a deep mesal incision forming two prominent lobes and is similar to X. julus and X. evandrus by the paraproct shape without the round apicodorsal margin. The species can be diagnosed from this and other congeners mainly by: (1) the shape of tergum IX with the posterior margin with wide subtruncate lobes slightly divergent, (2) the inferior appendage with sparser spine-like setae at the proximal region, and the combination of (3) the sternum IX posterior margin forming prominent mesal projections divided by a narrow incision, (4) the paraproct in lateral view truncate without round apicodorsal lobe and (5) the preanal appendage subapically wide.
Male : Forewing length 4.0 mm (n = 1). Color overall pale brown, forewing overall dark brown (in alcohol). Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present, fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal half as long as thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated region.
Genitalia (Fig.
Name in apposition; named after the type locality, tuxtla comes from the nahuatl language: ‘tochtlán’, meaning place of rabbits.
Mexico.
1 | Preanal appendage width in lateral view, subequal throughout length (Figs |
2 |
1’ | Preanal appendage width in lateral view, conspicuously enlarged subapically (Figs |
3 |
2 (1) | Preanal appendage width in lateral view, narrow, less than half sternum IX width; sternum IX posterior margin in ventral view, with small, inconspicuous mesal lobes; paraproct apex in lateral view oblique (Fig. |
X. (S.) julus |
2’ | Preanal appendage width in lateral view more than half sternum IX width; sternum IX posterior margin in ventral view, with a pair of prominent acute mesal lobes; paraproct apex in lateral view rounded apically with narrow ventral lobe (Fig. |
X. (S.) guanacaste sp. nov. |
3 (1) | Tergum IX posterior margin with deep mesal incision (about as deep as half tergum length) (Figs |
4 |
3’ | Tergum IX posterior margin with shallow mesal incision (as deep as less than 1/4 tergum length) (Figs |
5 |
4 (3) | Sternum IX posterior margin substraight with inconspicuous mesal lobes (Fig. |
X. (S.) tapanti sp. nov. |
4’ | Sternum IX posterior margin acute mesaly or straight with prominent acute mesal lobes (Figs |
6 |
5 (3) | Abdominal sternum V with membranous, digitate lateral process (Fig. |
X. (S.) erybrachium sp. nov. |
5’ | Abdominal sternum V without lateral process (Fig. |
X. (S.) dactylum sp. nov. |
6 (4) | Forewing fork I (R2 and R3) present (Fig. |
X. (S.) evandrus |
6’ | Forewing fork I (R2 and R3) absent; tergum IX posterior margin lobes, oblique, truncate (Fig. |
X. (S.) tuxtla sp. nov. |
Antillotrichia cubana Banks, 1941, original designation. —
Holotype FRENCH GUIANA • ♂; Approuague-kaw, Kaw Mtn., 104 mao, 4°33.035′N, 52°11.661′W, Malaise trap, 23.i–7.ii.2007, FRG MF3, N. Jönsson leg., [BOLD: GBMIN18612-13; GenBank: JQ239839]
The new species can be diagnosed mainly by the sickle-shape of preanal appendage in dorsal view, in which the mesal margin has a strong concavity and the apex is wide with a mesal pointed projection. This character is unique to this species.
Male
: Body. Forewing length 3.5 mm (n = 1). Color overall brown, forewing pattern uniformly brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) < IV < V. Tibial spur formula 2:4:3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks II and IV present; fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal slightly shorter than thyridial cell. Hind wing forks II and V present (Fig.
Genitalia (Figs
From the Greek drepánē, ‘sickle’, in reference to the preanal appendage shape.
French Guiana
BOLIVIA • 3♂, 11♀; Santa Cruz Dept., PN and ANMI Amboró, Guarda Parque Mataracú, Q. Verde Uno, 17°33.136′S, 63°52.092′W, el. 374 m, 21–27.xi.2004, Malaise, Robertson, Garcia and Vidaurre leg.,
Argentina, Bolivia (new record).
ECUADOR • 8♂; Pichincha 7km E Pito, el. 2950 m, 26–28.ix.1990, Flint leg.,
Colombia, Ecuador (new record), Venezuela.
COSTA RICA. • ♂ Cartago, Reserva Tampati, Quebrada Palmitos and falls 9.72°N, 83.78°W, 2–3.vi.1990, el. 1400 m, Holzenthal, Blahnik, Muñoz leg. UMSP000143465. • ♂ Same data, except 1-2.viii.1990, UMSP000143460. ECUADOR: • 2♂ Napo, Sebundoy, el. 2600 m, 11–15.ix.1977, L.E. Pena G. leg.,
Colombia, Costa Rica (new record), Ecuador (new record).
COSTA RICA • 1♂; Guanacaste, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Estacion San Gerardo, 10°52′48.0”N, 85°23′20.4”W, el. 575 m, 14.iv.2014, Malaise Trap, D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs leg., [BOLD: GMACC652-15]
Costa Rica (new record), Mexico.
BOLIVIA • 2♂ Dept. La Paz, ANMI Madidi, Chalalan Ecolodge, Tuichi river at entrance to lodge and trib., 14°25.017′S, 67°54.378′W, el. 300 m, 29.vii.2003, Robertson and Blahnik leg.,
Bolivia (new record), Peru.
Machairocentron amahuaca
BOLIVIA • 9♂. 119♀; Santa Cruz Dept.: PN and ANMI Amboró, Guarda, Parque Mataracú, Q. Verde Uno, 17°33.136′S, 63°52.092′W, el. 374 m, 21–27.ix.2004, Malaise, Robertson, Garcia and Viduarre leg.,
Bolivia (new record), Peru.
In this study new species of Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) are described after more than 40 years. Now, the subgenus includes seven species from Central and South America. However, the preanal appendage morphometric analysis and the phylogenetic analysis suggest the inclusion of some Antillean species currently in Antillotrichia subgenus. Additionally, a species of X. (Antillotrichia) was also described sharing similarities with other species from northern South America. The new records expand the distribution of the genus with the first records of the family in Bolivia, which have a similar fauna to that of northern Argentina and the Peruvian Amazon. Also, the first species of Xiphocentron are identified in Ecuador showing a wider distribution range of X. mnesteus and X. sturmi along the northern Andean foothills, and with X. sturmi species occurring even in Central America.
The phenotypic groups defined by the cluster analysis (Fig.
The generalized shape patterns that could be recognized in the majority of the analyzed species within each subgenus are as follows: In the Xiphocentron subgenus species exhibit a straight preanal appendage that is wide at the base and progressively tapers to a narrow apex (indicated by the positive values of PC4). In the Rhamphocentron subgenus, most species have the preanal appendage conspicuously wide at the basal third, and becomes slightly wavy and equally subnarrow at the apical 2/3 with a round apex (indicated by the positive values of PC1). In the Sphagocentron subgenus, most species share an overall wide preanal appendage, which becomes enlarged subapically and narrows towards apex (indicated by the negative values of PC2) (Fig.
The Antillotrichia subgenus exhibited great morphological variation, with the cluster analysis (Fig.
Some species with less modified preanal appendage, such as X. (S.) julus and X. (R.) numanus were not grouped with other congeners in the morphometric analysis (Fig.
The morphofunctional aspects of the xiphocentronid genitalia are mostly unknown. Questions underlying the preanal appendage function during the copula and the selective forces related to its shape evolution have never been investigated. The copula was described to the sister group Psychomyiidae, in Tinodes the slender preanal appendages are looselyplaced across segment IX of the female while the grasping is primarily provided by a spiny harpago of the male inferior appendages, holding onto membranous pits of the female segment VIII, and additional grasping is provided by the spiny paraprocts that are inserted with the phallus (
Therefore, we hypothesize that the long preanal appendage in Xiphocentronidae and its different shapes should be associated with evolutionary strategies to help with additional grasping and shoring of the inferior appendage around the female, while groups in which a strong grasping is provided by structures in the phallus, paraproct or inferior appendage may have slender or reduced preanal appendages. Further research is needed to clarify the morphofunctional aspects of the preanal appendage, and test this hypothesis.
After more than 40 years since the establishment of the subgenus Sphagocentron new species are described, and the monophyly and relationships within the subgenus were accessed through geometric morphometry and a morphological phylogeny. This study reported the following findings:
(1) The geometric morphometric analyses of the preanal appendage were consistent with the phylogenetic results regarding the non-monophyly of the Antillotrichia subgenus and the proximity of certain X. (Antillotrichia) species to the subgenus Sphagocentron.
(2) The monophyly of X. (Sphagocentron) was recovered, although with little support. X. (Antillotrichia) species having a narrow zone of dense spine-like setae on the inferior appendages and no mesal sclerite but longer setae may represent a monophyletic group together with X. (Sphagocentron) species.
(3) Phenotypic clusters fail to fully recover the phylogenetic groups, with preanal appendage shapes evolving independently in some species.
(4) The geometric morphometry was able to highlight preanal appendage subgeneric diagnostic traits, and partially distinguishing between each subgenus, but with a greater overlapping of X. (Antillotrichia) subgenus. Despite the shape overlapping, cross-validation test was able to correctly classify around 70% of the species to subgenera in better sampled groups. Therefore, the preanal appendage shape has a good informativeness for subgeneric classification.
(5) The preanal appendage shape in xiphocentronids is hypothesized to be associated to an auxiliary grasping function.
The data underlying this article, including: the discrete characters matrix (.ss), the combined discrete and morphometric characters matrix (.tnt) and the morphometric procrustes (.dat) are available at the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository and can be accessed at https://osf.io/trsy3/?view_only = ff4e70d072d4462895f5c641c510958f
We thank Dr Roger Blahnik who helped provide additional information about the specimens deposited at
File S1
Data type: .dat
Explanation notes: Preanal appendage aligned procrustes, PAST file (morphometric).
File S2
Data type: .ss
Explanation notes: Morphological data matrix, discrete characters only (phylogenetic matrix).
File S3
Data type: .tnt
Explanation notes: Combined morphometric and discrete characters, TNT file (phylogenetic matrix).