Research Article
Print
Research Article
Systematics and evolution of the New Caledonian endemic genus Cazeresia (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae)
expand article infoJesús Gómez-Zurita, Anabela Cardoso
‡ Botanical Institute of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

In this work, we use a combined analysis of morphological and mtDNA sequence data to recognize and revise a group of species allied to the New Caledonian endemic leaf beetle genus Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005 of the Eumolpinae, considered monotypic before this work. We characterize and describe 20 new species allied to C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005 based on the recognition of morphological diagnostic traits and DNA-based species delimitation: C. australis sp. nov., C. clipeata sp. nov., C. corrugata sp. nov., C. globosa sp. nov., C. gracilis sp. nov., C. holosericea sp. nov., C. imperiosa sp. nov., C. impressicornis sp. nov., C. laevigata sp. nov., C. laticollis sp. nov., C. maquis sp. nov., C. ovata sp. nov., C. parentalis sp. nov., C. petitpierrei sp. nov., C. robusta sp. nov., C. spadicea sp. nov., C. subgeminata sp. nov., C. tibialis sp. nov., C. tricolor sp. nov. and C. wanati sp. nov. For C. globosa and C. spadicea we additionally describe the subspecies C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. and C. spadicea bruna ssp. nov. We also propose transferring to this genus the species Thasycles humboldtiana Heller, 1916, Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, 1864, Dematochroma thyiana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2008 and Dumbea striata Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007, as C. humboldtiana (Heller) comb. nov., C. kanalensis (Perroud) comb. nov., C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) comb. nov. and C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) comb. nov., respectively. At present, the genus Cazeresia includes 25 species, the vast majority distributed in the southern part of Grande Terre in areas characterized by ultramafic soils and we speculate that the adaptation to these environmental characteristics in lowland areas may be ancestral in this lineage. Two thirds of the species are only known from their type locality, thus treated as potential microendemics, and most other have reduced ranges generally spanning few tens of kilometres. Finally, the degree of species sympatry or parapatry exhibited by Cazeresia is noteworthy, which in the absence of marked morphological differences among species suggests the possibility of the interplay of ecological mechanisms to minimize competition and exclusion.

Keywords

Island radiation, leaf beetles, microendemicity, sympatry, ultramafic soils

1. Introduction

The description of the genus Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005 marked the revival of the interest in the fauna of Eumolpinae leaf beetles in New Caledonia, a group that had been neglected for nearly a century (Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023a). Cazeresia was described to characterize the species C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005, found close to the summit of Mt. Humboldt and showing a general appearance different to the other two genera known from the island at the time, Taophila Heller, 1916 and Dematochroma Baly, 1864 (Jolivet, Verma and Mille 2005). The large size and stocky appearance of C. montana were considered quite unique (Jolivet, Verma and Mille 2007a) and the genus remained monotypic ever since its description (Mille and Jolivet 2022; Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023a).

Our analysis of New Caledonian Eumolpinae in the past decade has revealed a good number of similar species that shared an interesting feature with C. montana, namely a very characteristic shape of the spermatheca, slender, hooked-shaped, with a recurved, thick, long and rather sclerotized spermathecal duct, with one thick distal coil, as well as a small ramus interstitial on nodulus (see Fig. 1). This feature alone allowed a tentative grouping of different morphospecies, which proved to be closely related to C. montana based on the analysis of mtDNA sequences (supported clade with species #15–#23 in Papadopoulou et al. 2013), and recovered later as a robust clade using also single copy nuclear gene sequences (Platania et al. 2024).

Figure 1. 

Spermathecae of Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. (a), C. parentalis sp. nov. (b), C. tricolor sp. nov. (c), C. wanati sp. nov. (d), C. clipeata sp. nov. (e), C. maquis sp. nov. (f), C. ovata sp. nov. (g), C. petitpierrei sp. nov. (h), C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) (i), C. holosericea sp. nov. (j), C. globosa sp. nov. (k), C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. (l), C. australis sp. nov. (m), C. tibialis sp. nov. (n), C. laevigata sp. nov. (o), C. imperiosa sp. nov. (p), C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille (q), C. robusta sp. nov. (r), C. corrugata sp. nov. (s), C. laticollis sp. nov. (t), C. gracilis sp. nov. (u), C. spadicea sp. nov. (v), C. spadicea bruna ssp. nov. (w), and C. humboldtiana (Heller) (x).

In this work, we present an expanded mtDNA phylogeny of New Caledonian Eumolpinae including several species with close phylogenetic proximity to C. montana, assigning this monophyletic group to the genus Cazeresia, which we redescribe taking into account the increased diversity of the genus. Moreover, we use the topology for objective DNA-based species delimitation and guiding the description of all the species we found belonging to this group so far, most of them sharing the very characteristic shape of spermatheca as the most recognizable attribute for the genus. The new conception of the genus reveals a general spatial pattern that is rather unique compared to other lineages of New Caledonian Eumolpinae studied so far, and these differences are discussed.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Sources of specimens

The specimens used for this work were obtained in an entomological campaign by the authors in New Caledonia during early 2008 (JGZC, CSIC) and material from the collection of the Wroclaw University Museum of Natural History (MNHW, Wroclaw, Poland) obtained between 2004 and 2011 and kindly loaned for study by Dr. Marek Wanat. Photographs of types relevant for the study were also obtained from the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN). Prior to the study, these specimens were sorted to morphospecies, also considering their geographic origin, and this initial classification was refined as new data were accrued. New taxa will be used in the text and figures for clarity, even before formal species descriptions.

2.2. Molecular analysis and data ­matrices

Sequence data were available from individuals of Cazeresia studied by Papadopoulou et al. (2013), and were added as much information as possible from dry museum specimens from different localities and collection events that were selected for non-destructive DNA extraction and sequencing of mtDNA genes as in previous studies (e.g., Gómez-Zurita 2018; Platania et al. 2020). Selected specimens were assigned a voucher number, split at the prothorax-mesothorax junction, soaked in tissue lysis buffers and subject to the DNA extraction protocol of the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen Iberia, Madrid). After the membrane binding step and centrifugation, body parts were retrieved, male genitalia or spermatheca dissected and everything prepared dry on a suitable mounting card for subsequent storage and study. An aliquot of genomic DNA was used as template for PCR of fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and the small subunit of the ribosomal RNA (rrnS) of the mitochondrial genome using the primers and amplification protocols of Gómez-Zurita (2018). Successful amplifications (Table S1) were sequenced in both directions using the Sanger method with BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit on a 3730×l DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City). Sequences were edited and contigs aligned using suitable tools of Geneious Prime 2024.0.5 (Dotmatics, Boston).

2.3. Genus monophyly and clade ­dating

The monophyly of the genus Cazeresia was assessed by selecting one representative of each recognized species for which DNA sequence data were available, preferably for both mtDNA markers, aligned with homologous data of all South Pacific species of Eumolpinae from Platania et al. (2024). Multiple sequence alignments of cox1 and rrnS sequences were obtained using the L-INS-i and Q-INS-i algorithms of MAFFT 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013), respectively, and resulting alignments concatenated using Geneious Prime. The evolutionary models best fitting these data were inferred using ModelTest-NG and the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Darriba et al. 2020). The corresponding dated mtDNA phylogeny was obtained using Bayesian inference (BI) in BEAST v2.7.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2019), considering each marker as a separate partition with unlinked models, but linked clock model and tree topology, and constraining the basal separation of two clades, one with the species from Lord Howe and New Caledonian Taophila and Tricholapita Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso, 2020, and the other with all the other South Pacific species of Eumolpinae (Platania et al. 2024). The clock model of choice was an optimized relaxed clock and tree calibration was assigning an age for the root based on a Weibull distribution with shape = 10.0, scale = 15.0 and offset = 22.0. This distribution represented a 95% HPD age interval prior ranging from 33.1 to 38.7 Ma, with a median value around 36.5 Ma, roughly corresponding to the crown age of South Pacific Eumolpinae as retrieved by Papadopoulou et al. (2013) and Platania et al. (2024). The MCMC search used a chain length of 150M steps, storing topologies and parameters every 10K steps. Adequate parameter convergence and mixing were assessed inspecting ESS values using Tracer v1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018). Data were analysed and summarized as a maximum clade credibility tree (based on common ancestor heights) after removing the initial 10% of retrieved trees and parameters using TreeAnnotator 2.7.6 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007), and the obtained topology was inspected with FigTree v1.4.4.

2.4. Ingroup phylogeny and species delimitation

A second molecular dataset consisting of all the cox1 and rrnS sequence data obtained from specimens of Cazeresia (Table S1) was analysed to investigate species phylogenetic relationships within Cazeresia and the support of DNA-based species delimitation strategies to species hypotheses based on morphological differences. These analyses used the homologous sequences of an unidentified New Caledonian Eumolpinae with voucher number NC667, recognised in previous analyses as sister to Cazeresia, as outgroup. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT as before, markers were concatenated and subject to partitioned maximum likelihood (ML) analyses in RAxML-NG (Kozlov et al. 2019) using specific best-fitting evolutionary models for first and second codon positions of cox1 combined, third codon positions of cox1, and rrnS as established with ModelTest-NG. Optimal tree search consisted in ten replicates starting from random topologies and branch support was based on 200 bootstrap (BS) pseudoreplicates.

Tree-based species delimitation used the Poisson Tree Processes (PTP) model with an estimation of Bayesian support (bPTP) values to delimited species (Zhang et al. 2013), as well as the R v4.3.1 (R Core Team 2023) implementation of the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model both with single and multiple thresholds between speciation and coalescent dynamics (Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013). The input tree for the PTP approach was the ML tree obtained in the previous step and the MCMC search used default parameters and 500K generations. GMYC approaches require an ultrametric tree as input and, in this case, it was obtained using clock-constrained BI in BEAST2 using a similar partitioned strategy as before but without topological or dating prior constraints, with 100M MCMC generations, sampling trees and parameters every 10K steps, and summarising the results as described above for dating analysis.

Congruence among species delimitation methods and with our morphospecies assessment was evaluated based on the taxonomic congruence and resolving power indices of Miralles and Vences (2013) and the match ratio of Ahrens et al. (2016), as implemented in Limes 2.0 (Ducasse et al. 2020).

Species distributions below and above 700 m a.s.l. were mapped as a discrete character on the ML tree topology and the resulting number of steps and consistency index compared to these parameters for 1000 character state randomizations in Mesquite 3.81 (Maddison and Maddison 2023) to simulate the lack of character structure on the phylogeny. The elevation threshold was set arbitrarily, but informed between the two most frequent site elevations clusters for the entire sample, either below 500 m or above 750 m, and taking into account that the few species with records between these intervals, closer to this arbitrary threshold (e.g., 620–630 m), were most commonly found at lower elevations.

2.5. Morphological characterization and species descriptions

Dry mounted specimens were studied and assigned to different morphospecies using a Leica M80 stereomicroscope allowing for relative measurements using a calibrated eyepiece. The drawings of habitus, anatomical details and the outlines of male and female sclerotized reproductive organs were based on digital pictures obtained using a Leica DFC420 camera. When the original series included specimens from several localities, paratypes were designated among those from the type locality only, to minimize the possibility of future potential confusions if new data reveals more than one species in the series defined here as conspecific. The generic redescription was highly detailed for both conserved and variable characters in the genus, but for the sake of brevity, considering that many new taxa were described here, species descriptions focused on traits that are more variable in the genus or characteristic of the species, avoiding to repeat descriptions of characters shared with most species in the genus. Holotype measures and species size ranges are given in the description, but the size variability of all species was also summarized in Table S2. A dorsal picture of holotypes of species described in this work is freely available in the repository Zenodo (https://zenodo.org), and accessible through the Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807166. The style and terminology used in the taxonomic descriptions was similar to previous revisions, with nomenclature based on Lindroth (1957), Wagner (2007) and Lawrence et al. (2010).

2.6. Representation of distributions

Most collection records had georeferenced collection data that was plotted on maps of New Caledonia using R v4.3.1 (R Core Team 2023) tools and resources, including Natural Earth data (https://www.naturalearthdata.com) and ggplot2 (Wickham 2016).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Monophyly and time of origin and diversification of Cazeresia

The mtDNA dataset of South Pacific Eumolpinae of Platania et al. (2024) together with the homologous sequences of one representative of each species putatively belonging to Cazeresia as recognized in this work, includes 90 terminals. The sequenced length of the dry collection specimens is 403 nt in the case of cox1, and 512–519 nt in the case of rrnS. The cox1 phylogenetic matrix of South Pacific Eumolpinae contains 817 aligned nt positions and 563 positions for rrnS. Best fitting models for these data are TPM2uf+I+G for cox1 and TIM1+I+G for rrnS. The obtained BI tree (Fig. 2) has an associated mean likelihood value = –33,375.144 and shows all representatives of species assigned to Cazeresia as monophyletic with high posterior probability (PP = 0.99), and sister to the unidentified New Caledonian Eumolpinae NC667, currently known from a single male sharing traits with the males of Dumbea striata Jolivet, Verma & Mille (transferred to Cazeresia in this work). Current data does not allow identifying the closest relative to this lineage, which evolved during the Oligocene, with an inferred crown age of 28.5 Ma (95% HPD interval = 24.4–32.3 Ma), well after the end of the Eocene obduction of the Peridotite Nappe conforming the New Caledonian ultramafic terrains where these species occur (Patriat et al. 2018). Five main lineages subtend this clade, one of them with 68% of the morphospecies considered in this group, including C. montana, the only known representative of the genus Cazeresia before this work. These results alone provide enough evidence to attempt the expansion of the genus Cazeresia from its current monotypy to include several new taxa and taxa previously described in other genera.

Figure 2. 

Clock-constrained ultrametric Bayesian tree of New Caledonian Eumolpinae based on partial cox1 and rrnS mtDNA sequences. Thicker branches within the box highlight the monophyletic group recognized in this work as the genus Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille. Confidence HPD95 age intervals for nodes receiving posterior probabilities > 0.85 are shown, together with their support.

3.2. Mitochondrial DNA ­phylogeny and tree-based species of ­Cazeresia

The ingroup cox1-rrnS multiple sequence alignment has 1365 characters and it includes representatives of 21 out of 27 putative taxa of Cazeresia. The evolutionary models best fitting these data are TrN+G for cox1 first and second codon positions combined, TIM2+I+G for third codon positions (or for the whole cox1 segment), and HKY+I+G for rrnS. The ML tree (Fig. 3) shows four main lineages, one of them with moderate support (BS = 79%) including 76% of putative taxa and a perfect agreement between morphospecies and monophyletic groups. Five putative species that failed to yield DNA sequences for analysis can be assigned to specific branches of the phylogenetic tree based on their morphological traits as shown in Fig. 3. Objective tree-based species delimitation approaches failed to predict these putative species limits in all cases (Fig. 3), with single-threshold GMYC being the most accurate, splitting into two a single putative species (C. parentalis sp. nov.), otherwise characterised by conspicuous morphological traits and without geographic separation of specimens assigned to different DNA-based species (PTP approaches retain this as a single putative species with low support, PP = 0.59). Multiple-threshold GMYC additionally split two allopatric populations of another putative species (C. imperiosa sp. nov.), and lumped two allopatric, genetically and morphologically different samples given subspecific rank in this study (subspecies of C. spadicea sp. nov.). PTP approaches are the less reliable for these data, splitting 2–3 additional putative species in 2–3 entities each, although with very low posterior probabilities (0.26 < PP < 0.75), with these splits affecting microendemic species known from a single locality and well characterized morphologically (C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, C. humboldtiana (Heller) and C. wanati sp. nov.). Congruence among objective species delimitation methods was high (0.73 < Ctax < 0.91; 0.60 < Match ratio < 0.86), as it was the resolving power of these tree-based methods (0.78 < Rtax < 0.89). But most importantly, the congruence of any individual method with morphospecies (and our final decision about species hypotheses) were very high (mCtax = 0.88; 0.83 < Ctax < 0.95; 0.78 < Match ratio < 0.93), with the best match, and also high overall congruence with alternative tree-based methods (mCtax = 0.85) corresponding to the single-threshold GMYC approach, as indicated above. The insight offered by the mtDNA phylogenies and the preliminary examination of morphology provide a sound basis for the revision of this natural group of New Caledonian Eumolpinae, transforming the monotypic genus Cazeresia into the most diverse genus so far.

Figure 3. 

Maximum likelihood tree of combined cox1 and rrnS data obtained from all individuals of Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille included in the study. Bootstrap values above > 70% are shown. The tree represents 19 out of 25 species. The phylogenetic proximity of some species for which no sequence data were available is indicated with discontinuous lines. The results of species delimitation based on single (s) and multiple (m) threshold GMYC and maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (h) PTP approaches are shown on the right with an indication of species found in high (> 700 m a.s.l.) and low (< 700 m a.s.l.) elevations.

When mapping species elevation ranges on the tree topology by distinguishing low and high elevation ranges (arbitrary boundary set at 700 m a.s.l.), the resulting pattern is non-random (P = 0.013, for number of steps; P = 0.016, for consistency index). This result suggests that the distribution in high elevations is a derived condition mainly characterizing a group of species originated in the Middle Miocene (95% HPD interval = 11.6–17.6 Ma), with reversals in the clade of C. australis sp. nov. and C. globosa sp. nov. in the Late Miocene. This event matches precisely one of the longer periods of drier tropical climate affecting the Pacific Southwest (Chamley 1986; Chevillotte et al. 2006), with aridification episodes typically invoked in the tropics to explain uphill species range shifts tracking suitable conditions (e.g., Pepper et al. 2011). The association of this trait to a single lineage of Cazeresia seems to rule out a priori that colonization of high elevation habitats from lowland areas and driven by climate change occurred several times independently. Alternatively, one may have to consider a widespread ancestor already adapted or pressed to higher elevations by aridifying or fragmenting lowland habitats, followed by in situ allopatric speciation once populations were isolated in different mountain tops.

3.3. Redescription of Cazeresia

Type species. Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005.

Males and females without marked external differences, except for usual sexually dimorphic traits and also facial structure (see Fig. 4a and 4b). Body elongate oval, with females proportionally larger and generally broader than males, moderately convex (Fig. 5b); males and females similarly coloured, dark brown or blackish, often with paler elytra, and legs and antennae usually testaceous.

Figure 4. 

Details of the heads of male (a) and female (b) Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov., and of the males of C. holosericea sp. nov. (c).

Figure 5. 

Dorsal (a), lateral (b) and ventral (c) views of the male of Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille from Mt. Humboldt.

Head short, broad posteriorly, deeply inserted into prothorax, narrowed anteriorly to relatively short or moderate mouth (Fig. 4). Vertex convex, microsculptured, alutaceous, unpunctured and glabrous, with fine longitudinal median furrow extended beyond middle of frons. Frontoclypeus weakly convex; frons relatively wide, generally 2.0–2.5× as wide as transverse diameter of eye, with few species (including C. gracilis sp. nov., C. laevigata sp. nov., C. parentalis sp. nov., C. tricolor sp. nov. and C. wanati sp. nov.) having relatively narrower frons, 1.4–1.8× as wide owing to larger eyes, or wider frons, 3.0× as wide owing to much smaller eyes (C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille (Fig. 5a) and C. robusta sp. nov.), microsculptured or microreticulated as vertex (very finely in C. gracilis and C. laticollis sp. nov.), glabrous, usually with few small punctures anteriorly at middle (except in C. clipeata sp. nov., C. maquis sp. nov. and C. ovata sp. nov., unpunctured) and slightly depressed above eyes with fine deep supraocular sulci extended medially at least to outer third and most generally to half of dorsal edge of slightly raised supraantennal calli; supraantennal calli transverse with very proximate dorsal inner angles in males [nearly touching in C. impressicornis sp. nov., C. spadicea sp. nov. and C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille)] and smaller and more separate in females, with wider transition between frons and clypeus (Fig. 4b); clypeus bell-shaped in males (somewhat subtriangular in C. maquis, C. petitpierrei sp. nov. and C. striata), much narrower basally than in females, slightly longer or about as long as wide in most species, only shorter than wide in C. montana and C. robusta, with anterior border between anterior lobes weakly or moderately emarginate in all females and in males of half of species, and more or less deeply incised in males of remaining species (Fig. 4c), coarsely microsculptured like frons, generally with few small punctures basally (punctures larger and interspersed with micropunctures in C. montana and C. robusta, or tiny on disc in C. corrugata sp. nov. and C. laticollis) and entirely glabrous. Eyes moderate or large in most species, slightly elongate dorso-ventrally and weakly emarginate on inner border, somewhat bulgier dorsally and posteriorly, only small and about as wide as long in sister species C. montana and C. robusta. Labrum relatively small, with round, sometimes densely setose anterior angles, weakly emarginate at middle, very finely microreticulate, with two median setigerous punctures closer to anterior border, before deflexed apical margin. Genae about half as long as transverse diameter of eyes, only relatively longer in species with small eyes (i.e., C. montana and C. robusta); finely microreticulate, unpunctured, with few tiny adpressed pale setae. Palpi slender, with elongate palpomeres, and fourth maxillary palpomere long and fusiform. Antennae long, slender, filiform, with robust antennomeres and reaching behind middle of elytra in males, slightly shorter and thinner in females; scape large, bulgy, subcylindrical, about 1.8–2.2× longer than wide, slightly enlarged in apical half and flattened and slightly bent posteriorly, very finely microreticulate, with sparse fine recumbent setae; pedicel cup-shaped, generally 1.1–1.3× longer than wide, but as long as wide or shorter in C. imperiosa sp. nov., C. montana, C. robusta, C. spadicea and C. subgeminata sp. nov., and 0.4–0.6× as long as scape, finely microreticulate, with sparse small recumbent setae; antennomeres 3–11 elongate, subcylindrical or feebly compressed, except in C. impressicornis, C. laticollis and C. spadicea, with 3–10 longitudinally compressed along antero-ventral half; antennomeres 3–6 slightly clavate and finely microreticulate, progressively more setose, with longer setae along anterior and terminal edges, 7–10 enlarged towards apex and 11 fusiform with long pointed apex, microsculptured and densely pubescent; relative dimensions of antennomeres conserved in all species: third antennomere about 1.5–2.0× longer than pedicel, fourth antennomere slightly longer than third, fifth longer than fourth, sixth longer than fourth but shorter than fifth, seventh longer than fifth, eighth longer than sixth but shorter than fifth (slightly longer in females), ninth slightly longer than eighth, tenth slightly shorter than eighth, and eleventh as long as, but usually longer than seventh.

Pronotum transverse, 1.6–1.7× as wide as long at middle, weakly cordiform and slightly longer (1.4–1.5× as wide as long) in C. montana (Fig. 5a), C. robusta and C. striata, weakly convex in sagittal plane and moderately convex transversally, with convexity increasing towards anterior angles; posterior border as wide as base of elytra, rather regularly convex with small short median lobe, with relatively thick, finely furrowed margin, with seamed tiny punctures laterally in C. clipeata, C. holosericea sp. nov., C. impressicornis, C. striata, C. subgeminata and C. ovata; posterior angles obtuse (or straight in C. montana and C. robusta), very feebly protruding laterally, with trichobothria dorsally at angles; sides nearly regularly curved (very shortly sigmoid at base in C. montana and C. robusta), widest more or less at middle or slightly in front of middle, more strongly curved anteriorly, with complete narrow explanate margin, wider, somewhat gutter-like in some species (C. humboldtiana (Heller), C. laevigata, C. laticollis, C. spadicea and C. striata), generally unpunctured or, in some cases, with series of small punctures along compressed border (in C. corrugata, C. holosericea, C. impressicornis, C. montana, C. spadicea and C. striata); anterior angles obtuse, blunt, with large trichobothria dorsally at angles; anterior border about 0.7× as wide as posterior border (slightly wider in C. impressicornis, C. spadicea and C. subgeminata, and much wider, about 0.9×, in C. striata), slightly concave at sides, near angles, and weakly advanced over vertex, with fine complete margin (only obsolete at middle in C. parentalis and C. tricolor); surface of pronotum of most species alutaceous, finely microreticulate, more superficially and slightly glossier than frons, with the exceptions of C. maquis, very finely and minutely reticulate and glossy, and of females of C. corrugata and C. striata, coarsely microreticulate, with sides of disc and lateral declivities wrinkled in the former; punctation generally small and sparse on disc, slightly larger on lateral declivities, interspersed with micropunctures and relatively broad anterior and posterior, and sometimes lateral margins mostly unpuctured. Hypomera weakly concave, rather coarsely shagreened, unpunctured and glabrous. Prosternum with anterior border regularly concave, following contour of anterior border of hypomera, finely margined, narrowly separated from anterior border of procoxae by distance only slightly wider than margin, or slightly longer in C. corrugata and in largest species (C. imperiosa, C. laticollis, C. montana and C. robusta), finely shagreened, with sparse fine punctures and long, fine yellowish setae; prosternal process relatively broad between procoxae, as wide or wider than transverse diameter of procoxae in C. clipeata, C. holosericea, C. maquis, C. montana, C. ovata, C. petitpierrei, C. robusta and C. tibialis sp. nov.; considerably narrower (about half as wide) in C. impressicornis, C. laticollis, C. spadicea, C. striata and C. subgeminata; and about 0.75× as wide in remaining species (proportionally broader in females relative to males in all species), strongly enlarged posteriorly, with straight posterior border, and usually alutaceous, with sparse shallow punctures and pubescence, or relatively strongly and densely punctured with dense, long dishevelled setae in C. montana (Fig. 5c) and C. robusta. Mesoventrite about as long as prosternum, with transverse process, shortly lobed at middle posteriorly and anterior to posterior border of mesocoxae, about as wide as median part of prosternal process (proportionally broader in females), relatively smooth, with few sparse punctures and scattered setae (or with stronger, dense punctures and pubescence in C. montana and C. robusta). Mesepimera and mesanepisterna shagreened, unpunctured, glabrous. Metanepisterna elongate, with narrow raised anterior and outer margins, and disc finely shagreened, unpunctured, with sparse tiny, translucent setae. Metaventrite about as long or slightly longer than prosternum in most species, shorter in C. laticollis and C. striata, and particularly short in C. montana (Fig. 5c) and C. robusta; metaventrite weakly produced anteriorly at middle, and with deep median notch in posterior border, separating relatively large metacoxal plates; surface finely shagreened, with sparse punctures and recumbent fine setae, sometimes glabrous posteriorly on disc (or strongly microsculptured with dense large punctures and pubescence in C. montana and C. robusta), with finely impressed discrimen, sometimes obsolete anteriorly.

Scutellum generally as long as wide at base, very rarely slightly shorter (0.9×) or sometimes longer (1.1–1.2×), with regularly round or arched apex, finely microreticulate, unpunctured and glabrous. Elytra transversely convex, depressed anteriorly on disc, elongate, length more or less ranging between less than 1.2× [in C. australis sp. nov., C. globosa sp. nov., C. montana, C. robusta or C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille)] and over 1.3× (in C. holosericea, C. imperiosa, C. impressicornis, C. laevigata, C. spadicea, C. striata and C. tricolor) ensemble width at widest point, with sides subparallel in basal half, widest immediately behind humeri and gradually tapering in posterior half to regularly round (or slightly acuminate in males of C. laticollis and clearly acuminate and apically produced in females of C. striata) apex in most species, or slightly curved and widest around middle in C. imperiosa, C. montana (Fig. 5a) and C. robusta, gradually tapering to slightly compressed (C. imperiosa) or produced (C. montana and C. robusta) round apex; margins weakly deflexed from humeral to sutural angles; humeri usually callous and prominent, but ­weak in C. impressicornis and C. tibialis, or effaced in C. montana and C. robusta, unpunctured; surface finely alutaceous or with shallow, fine microreticulation, shinier than pronotum, even glossy in some species (C. clipeata, C. humboldtiana, C. maquis and males of C. striata) or exceptionally microsculptured as pronotum (C. montana and C. robusta), entirely glabrous in most species or with few tiny setae in sutural angles (in C. corrugata, C. impressicornis, C. spadicea, C. striata and C. subgeminata); punctures on elytra smaller than intervals in most species, particularly in apical declivity, aligned near scutellum, along suture, in premarginal row behind humeri and often around humeri basally, variously arranged on disc in eight more or less regular rows (C. montana and C. robusta), in subgeminate rows (C. corrugata, C. petitpierrei, C. subgeminata and females of C. striata) or confused, and aligned in apical declivity as irregular rows (C. imperiosa, C. ovata and C. petitpierrei) or regular striae; premarginal interval convex in apical 2/3 in most species, relatively flat in C. imperiosa, C. laticollis, C. montana and C. robusta, with outer two intervals convex (C. corrugata and C. subgeminata), additionally all intervals apically convex (males of C. striata) or keeled in outer intervals (females of C. ­striata). Epipleura slanted ventrally, visible in lateral view, slightly narrowed prebasally and rather broad and subparallel throughout (clearly enlarged preapically in C. corrugata and C. subgeminata), strongly narrowed preapically without reaching sutural angle; surface finely shagreened, unpunctured and usually glabrous, except in some species with minuscule setae near apex, including C. clipeata, C. corrugata, C. impressicornis, C. petitpierrei, C. spadicea, C. striata and C. subgeminata. Hind wings fully developed. Legs slender, with femora, particularly profemora, enlarged medially, unarmed (but metafemora posteriorly enlarged at angle in males of C. robusta), covered with short recumbent pale brown setae; pro- and metatibiae about as long as corresponding femur, straight and slightly widened towards apex in most species, but protibiae strongly (C. montana) or abruptly (C. robusta and C. tibialis) expanded at apical 1/4 or 1/5 (see Fig. 6c); protibiae with sharp external keels, ventral keel usually with wide preapical weak emargination (not so much in C. imperiosa), longitudinal rows of semierect setae dorsally and relatively dense recumbent setae ventrally at apex; mesotibiae shorter than mesofemora (proportionally longer in C. montana and C. robusta), slightly bent ventrally and more prominently enlarged preapically than other tibiae in most species, particularly in C. montana, with sharp ventral keel (also dorsal in C. impressicornis), but strongly modified in males of C. tibialis, gradually widening before strong curvature and enlargement at apical quarter; tarsi always shorter than corresponding tibia, with male basitarsomeres enlarged to different degrees, at least as wide as third tarsomeres and often wider in protarsi (only narrower in C. imperiosa and the females of all species, with tarsi shorter and narrower), and generally shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi and as long or longer in metatarsi, but as long or longer in some species in pro- and/or mesotarsi; third tarsomere short and particularly small in C. impressicornis and C. spadicea; onychia clavate and slightly curved, generally shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined, bearing pair of divaricate, appendiculate claws.

Figure 6. 

Holotypes of Cazeresia globosa sp. nov., with detail of male protibia (a), C. robusta sp. nov. (b), C. tibialis sp. nov., with detail of male protibia (c), and C. subgeminata sp. nov. (d). Scale bar = 2.0 mm, except where indicated otherwise.

First abdominal ventrite of males longer than ventrites 2–4 and about middle of fifth ventrite combined (slightly longer than ventrites 2–4 in females of all species), only shorter in C. gracilis, C. montana (Fig. 5c) and C. robusta, with long anterior median apodeme, subtrapezoidal and about half as long or slightly longer than half ventrite in most species, but proportionally shorter in C. humboldtiana, C. montana, C. ovata, C. robusta and C. striata, or longer than half ventrite and rather acute in C. holosericea and C. petitpierrei, always relatively narrow, narrower than mesoventral process, except in C. montana (Fig. 5c) and C. robusta, as wide as process; abdominal ventrites 2–4 progressively shorter and fifth ventrite slightly longer than second, with wide concave or angulate apical emargination and longitudinally impressed at middle in males, or truncate at apex and uniformly convex in females; all ventrites with fine microreticulation and generally sparse fine punctures and posteriorly adpressed, relatively long pale yellow setae, but some species with dense fine punctation (e.g., C. corrugata, C. impressicornis or C. montana), or relatively large punctures (C. australis), or with strong, dense punctation at middle of first ventrite (C. robusta). Pygidium relatively narrow, with wide longitudinal furrow medially.

3.4. Diagnosis of Cazeresia

Considering that most diversity of Eumolpinae of New Caledonia is still ignored (Papadopoulou et al. 2013), particularly that of lineages that could be assimilated to genera around Cazeresia, and that most available genera require deep revisions in their limits and validity, it is very premature to propose an identification key of genera to diagnose Cazeresia. However, Cazeresia has some very distinctive traits that can at least help distinguishing it from other groups, described or undescribed. Although not exhaustive, we provide a list of rather distinctive characters that will assist recognizing the genus. The body of Cazeresia is oblong and it is usually dark, almost black, at least on head and pronotum, often with brown elytra and testaceous legs, with head and pronotum completely glabrous and elytra and/or epipleura with tiny translucent pubescence apically only in some species. The head and pronotum always have conspicuous microsculpture in the form of microreticulation that make their surfaces matt to some extent; elytra have microreticulation as well, but less apparent than pronotum and sometimes they are almost smooth. The shape and relative proportions of the pronotum are very characteristic, with thick posterior and thin anterior margins, and lateral margins often gutter-like, angles without lateral or anterior protrusions, including anterior angles, obtuse. Hypomera, mesepimera and mesanepisterna are always unpunctured, glabrous and markedly shagreened, and metanepisterna are quite characteristic as well, with thickened anterior border relatively narrow, unpunctured, with tiny, almost invisible appressed setae. The anterior apodeme of the first abdominal ventrite is about as wide as mesoventrite and prosternal process. Finally, the shape of the spermatheca is rather unique among all the studied Eumolpinae in New Caledonia (Fig. 1), as the morphological feature that first suggested close phylogenetic affinities among species originally described in different genera (Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso 2014), and only two of the studied species depart from its basic plan.

3.5. Taxonomy

Cazeresia australis sp. nov.

Figures 1m, 7b, 8f

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5096, Koghi Mts., humid forest, 22°11’S 166°30’E, 500–550 m, 21.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia australis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: 3 males and 2 females (one with: JGZC-5196), Koghi Mts., humid forest, 22°11’S 166°30’E, 500–550 m, 21.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia australis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW)

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 female, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, humid forest, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 26.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 2 females (one with: JGZC-5226), Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, humid forest, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 28.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5136, Hte. Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 190–330 m, 20.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 male, Bois du Sud, 22°10.5’S 166°45.8’E, 160 m, maquis, night coll. (lamp and beating), 23.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 2 males (JGZC-5130 and JGZC-5201), Forêt Cachée, -22.19085 166.78688, 250 m, sifting litter, 26.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5327, Col des Deux Tétons, -22.2059 166.6797, 220–250 m, humid forest, at light, 9.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.

Description.

Body elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, facial sutures, pronotum and scutellum blackish, with slight bronze metallic shine on pronotum; most of head, elytra and ventral surfaces very dark brown, with faint purple reddish metallic shine on head and very weak purple bluish shine on elytra; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and femora infuscate; palpi and apex of antennomeres 11 ochre. Length: 5.1 mm; width: 3.0 mm (range of male specimens: 4.4–5.1 mm long, 2.6–3.0 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes separate on frons by 1.9× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.5-1.0-1.9-2.0-2.7-2.4-2.9-2.8-2.8-2.7-3.2. Prosternal process about 0.75× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra slightly over 1.1× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface nearly smooth, shiny, with very shallow fine microreticulation and relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere in pro- and metatarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, narrow and acute, narrower than mesosternal process; ventrites 2–4 finely microreticulated, with sparse, relatively large punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7b) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with mucronate apex; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance about as long as maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1m) with cornu slightly shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and about as long or slightly longer than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Figure 7. 

Lateral and apical dorsal views of the penis of Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller) (a), C. australis sp. nov. (b), C. globosa sp. nov. (c) and C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. (d), C. tricolor sp. nov. (e), C. parentalis sp. nov. (f), C. impressicornis sp. nov. (g), C. spadicea sp. nov. (h) and C. spadicea bruna ssp. nov. (i), C. tibialis sp. nov. (j), C. gracilis sp. nov. (k), C. laevigata sp. nov. (l), and C. wanati sp. nov. (m).

Diagnosis.

This species is closely related to and it is almost indistinguishable from C. globosa sp. nov. and allies. Body L/W ratio < 1.8 assists separating it from other species in the genus, and the contrast between paler elytra and darker pronotum seems less apparent in this species compared to C. globosa. Male genitalia in these species show slight differences too, with the distal end of penis relatively longer in C. australis sp. nov., compared with C. globosa.

Derivatio nominis.

The name is the Latin adjective (f.) derived from the noun auster, meaning South, making reference to the distribution of the species in Southern parts of the island of Grande Terre.

Distribution.

This species is found in a number of relatively low elevation (250–550 m a.s.l.) humid forest localities east of Nouméa, in the south of Grande Terre (Fig. 8f).

Figure 8. 

Distribution maps of the species and subspecies of Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille in New Caledonia.

Cazeresia clipeata sp. nov.

Figures 1e, 8c, 9f

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5343, Mandjélia (subsummit), 20°23.9’S 164°32.0’E, 700–750 m, night beating, 11.i.2007, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia clipeata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 2 females (JGZC-5198 and JGZC-5459), Mandjélia (summit), 20°23.9’S 164°31.9’E, 750–780 m, night coll. (lamp and beating), 10.i.2007, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia clipeata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 males (JGZC-5340 and JGZC-5477) and 2 females (JGZC-5379 and JGZC-5450), Mandjélia (subsummit), 20°23.9’S 164°32.0’E, 700–750 m, night beating, 11.i.2007, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia clipeata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, scutellum, elytra, ventral thoracic surfaces and most of first abdominal ventrite dark reddish brown, with darker diffuse areas on dorsal surfaces and slight purplish metallic shine on pronotum and elytra; labrum, antennae, legs and posterior abdominal ventrites testaceous; palpi ochre. Length: 6.6 mm; width: 3.6 mm (range of males: 6.2–6.6 mm long, 3.4–3.6 mm wide).

Frons unpunctured with supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border with very deep arched emargination. Eyes large, separate on frons by 2.1× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-2.0-2.4-2.8-2.5-3.0-2.7-2.7-2.6-3.1. Posterior border of pronotum with tiny seamed punctures laterally on marginal furrow; narrow lateral gutter of pronotum slightly widened posteriorly; surface of pronotum apparently lacking micropunctures. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface glossy, with relatively large punctures, nearly as wide as intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Epipleura with sparse, minuscule setae near apex. Basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere in protarsi and narrower in meso- and metatarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and about as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; margins of abdominal ventrites 4 and 5 strongly serrate; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and short fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9f) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, slightly widened preapically; apex elongate oval, arched distally with short projecting blunt tip; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance shorter than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1e) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thick, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and slightly longer than nodulus, enlarged distally with one complete, elongate coil.

Figure 9. 

Lateral and apical dorsal views of the penis of Cazeresia robusta sp. nov. (a), C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille (b), C. imperiosa sp. nov. (c), C. laticollis sp. nov. (d), C. petitpierrei sp. nov. (e), C. clipeata sp. nov. (f), C. maquis sp. nov. (g), C. kanalensis (Perroud) (h), C. holosericea sp. nov. (i), C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) (j), and C. subgeminata sp. nov. (k).

Note.

Colour is apparently variable in both males and females of this species, ranging from reddish brown as in the type to dark brown, and with pronotum and elytra more or less concolor or with elytra paler.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the complex of C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille), species larger than 6.0 mm with wide prosternal process, and it is almost indistinguishable from its relatives. In this case, the species has tiny setae apically on epipleura, a trait only shared with C. petitpierrei sp. nov. and C. maquis sp. nov. (and some females of C. holosericea sp. nov.), but it can be distinguished from these species by the clearly serrate margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites in both males and females, while in the other species only the fifth is finely serrulate in females and the fourth also in males, but less strongly.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name is the participle (f.), clipeāta, of the verb clipeō, to protect with a shield, thus meaning shielded, but in this case just calling the attention to the clypeus of males with the peculiar deep anterior indentation of the species in this group (see Fig. 4c).

Distribution.

Species only known from relatively high elevations in the Mont Mandjélia, in the north of Grande Terre. It is the species of the genus with the northernmost range, isolated from the rest of species, mostly in the southern half of Grande Terre (Fig. 8c).

Cazeresia corrugata sp. nov.

Figures 1s, 8b

Material.

Holotype: Female, JGZC-5127, Pic d’Amoa (Povila), -20.95280 165.29135, 400 m, rainforest, sifting litter, 22.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia corrugata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW).

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Dorsum, venter, coxae and mandibles very deep brown, with faint bronze reflections dorsally; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and apical antennomeres except apex of eleventh antennomere infuscate; palpi ochre. Length: 4.1 mm; width: 2.2 mm.

Frons with sparse small punctures and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to half of dorsal edge of small supraantennal calli; clypeus with sparse small punctures except near anterior angles, sides parallel and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes large, separate on frons by 2.6× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.0-1.0-1.4-1. 7-2.0-1.8-2.2-2.1-2.1-2.0-2.7. Narrow explanate lateral margin of pronotum with tiny punctures on inner border; surface of pronotum coarsely microreticulate as on frons with relatively dense punctures, as large as intervals, interspersed with some micropunctures; sides of disc and lateral declivities wrinkled by shallow longitudinal or slightly oblique furrows connecting punctures. Prosternal process nearly as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.2× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface microreticulate, cells slightly larger than on pronotum, entirely glabrous except for very few short setae near sutural angles, with relatively large punctures, bigger than intervals on disc, tending to relatively regular geminate rows on first three rows; last two intervals convex in apical 2/3, other intervals weakly convex in apical third, and inner intervals in lateral declivities with transverse rugae. Epipleura notably enlarged preapically before apical constriction, with tiny setae in apical border. Basitarsomeres narrower than third tarsomere and shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in all tarsi. First abdominal ventrite longer at middle than four other ventrites combined, with median apodeme less than half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, relatively dense fine punctures and short fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Spermatheca (Fig. 1s) hook-shaped, with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu for short distance, recurved parallel and as long as nodulus, forming one complete, elongate coil. — Males. Unknown.

Diagnosis.

This species has punctures as big as intervals and tendency to gemination on disc of elytra, and epipleura strongly enlarged preapically with setose apex, traits only shared with C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) and C. subgeminata sp. nov. But they can be distinguished by the corrugation of pronotum and elytra of C. corrugata sp. nov., as well as the presence of extended punctation on frontoclypeus, nearly absent in C. subgeminata, and the apex of elytra with very few setae, compared with C. striata, showing abundant pubescence.

Derivatio nominis.

The name of the species refers to the wrinkled appearance of sides of pronotum and rugose sides of elytra, using the participle (f.), corrūgāta, of the verb corrūgō, to wrinkle.

Distribution.

At present, the species is known from a single female collected at moderate elevation (400 m a.s.l.) in Pic d’Amoa, being one of the species with a northernmost distribution in the island of Grande Terre (Fig. 8b).

Cazeresia globosa sp. nov.

Figures 1k, 6a, 7c, 8d

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 6a), JGZC-5101, Nyamié creek, at Comboui river, 21°45.9’S 166°25.5’E, 30–50 m, 31.xii.2006, night collecting, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Holotype Cazeresia globosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 10 males (two with: JGZC-5100 and JGZC-5224) and 6 females, Nyamié creek, at Comboui river, 21°45.9’S 166°25.5’E, 30–50 m, 31.xii.2006, night collecting, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia globosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. JGZC: 1 male (JGZC-5278) and 1 female (JGZC-5279), Nyamié creek, at Comboui river, 21°45.9’S 166°25.5’E, 30–50 m, 31.xii.2006, night collecting, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia globosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 female, JGZC-5335, Haute Rivière Bleue, track to La Tranchée, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 180–330 m, 22–23.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Hte Rivière Bleue, track La Tranchée-Hte Pourina, 22°04.0’S 166°37.4’E, 330–560 m, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5137, Gue de la Rivière Bleue, Pourina, 22°05.8’S 166°40.2’E, 140 m, 22.xii.2006, night coll., lamp and beating, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5114, Chute de la Madeleine, 22°14’S 166°52’E, 270 m, maquis, ad lucem, 13.ii.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, Pic du Pin, base, 22°14.9’S 166°49.7’E, 280 m, forest and plantation, 26.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5326, Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, plantation, 23.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5334, Pic du Grand Kaori, 22°16.8’S 166°53.5’E, 240 m, night coll. (lamb and beating), 26.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.

Description.

Body short elliptic, moderately convex. Dorsum, venter, coxae and mandibles very dark brown, almost black; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and femora infuscate; palpi and apex of antennomeres 11 ochre. Length: 5.5 mm; width: 3.1 mm (range of male specimens: 4.6–5.5 mm long, 2.7–3.1 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes large, separated by nearly 2.0× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 1.8-1.0-1.6-1.7-2.1-2.0-2.2-2.2-2.2-2.1-2.5. Prosternal process about 0.75× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.1× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, ordered in rows in apical half of elytra and rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; fourth ventrite with undulate margin and fifth ventrite irregularly serrulate; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7c) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with short projecting blunt tip; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance shorter than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1k) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and about as long or slightly longer than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

From most other species of Cazeresia with subparallel, completely glabrous elytra, and prosternal process narrower than procoxae, this species can be recognized by its shorter body proportions (L/W < 1.80), a trait only shared with C. australis sp. nov. (Table S2). C. australis, however, seems to be characterized by rather uniform dorsal colour, compared to slightly paler elytra as seen in C. globosa, and their male genitalia are slightly different, with the apical median tooth relatively shorter in C. globosa. C. tibialis sp. nov. has similarly short body shape, but the prosternum is as wide or wider than procoxae. The subspecies C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. is morphologically identical to the nominotypical form, except for the margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites of both sexes serrate in this subspecies, and they also differ in their distribution and ecological preference, occupying high elevations and lowlands, respectively.

Derivatio nominis.

The chosen name is a Latin adjective (f.) meaning spherical, referring to the relatively short, convex shape of the body of this species.

Distribution.

This species has been found in a group of low elevation (30–330 m a.s.l.) localities in the southern part of Grande Terre, north and east of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8d).

Cazeresia globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov.

Figures 1l, 7d, 8d

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5094, Humboldt (S track), Col du Vulcain (refuge), -21.90319 166.38305, 980 m, night beating, 9.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia globosa altitudinalis n. ssp. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: 1 male (JGZC-5220: mounted with female left hind leg in place of its missing left middle leg) and 4 females (JGZC-5095, JGZC-5221 to JGZC-5223), Humboldt (S track), Col du Vulcain (refuge), -21.90319 166.38305, 980 m, night beating, 9.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW).

Description.

Body short elliptic, moderately convex. Dorsum, venter, coxae and mandibles very dark brown, almost black; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and femora infuscate; palpi and apex of antennomeres 11 ochre. Length: 5.4 mm; width: 3.0 mm (male paratype: 5.1 mm long, 3.0 mm wide; female paratypes: 4.9–5.4 mm long, 2.9–3.3 mm wide).

These specimens are in principle indistinguishable morphologically from the nominal taxon, C. globosa sp. nov., and the same description given for the previous species applies, both to males and females, except in the case of the male genitalia. But they are given subspecific rank based on their genetic differentiation and phylogenetic species delimitation (Fig. 3), allopatric distribution, and supposed ecological divergence based on their distributions, with this subspecies being putatively adapted to high elevations in the southwestern part of the Massif du Sud and the nominal subspecies to lowlands northeast and east of this Massif.

Diagnosis.

The same diagnosis as for the nominal subspecies also applies in this case, with this subspecies presenting serrate margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites in both sexes, while the nominal subspecies has the fifth ventrite irregularly serrulate. The penis of C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. diverges from the nominotypical species in the distance between apex of gonopore and distal end of penis being longer than the width of gonopore (Fig. 7d), and it is more similar to that of C. australis sp. nov., although this species lacks serrate lateral margins of distal abdominal ventrites. The spermatheca of this subspecies (Fig. 1l) is similar to the spermathecae of C. australis and C. globosa, with long, thin duct gradually curved basally.

Derivatio nominis.

The name of the subspecies refers to the high elevation where it was found, by adjectivizing the noun (f.) altĭtūdo, elevation.

Distribution.

At present, C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov. is only known from high elevations (980 m a.s.l.) in the southwestern slopes of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8d).

Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov.

Figures 1u, 7k, 8c, 10d

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 10d), JGZC-5213, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, night, 18.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 male, JGZC-5104, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, night, 18.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. MNHW: 1 female, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, at light, 17.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male and 4 females (three with: JGZC-5105, JGZC-5214 and JGZC-5215), Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, night, 18.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male and 1 female, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, at light, 26.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia gracilis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 male, JGZC-5452, Pic du Pin, base, 22°14.9’S 166°49.7’E, 280 m, forest and plantation, 25.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera and prosternum very dark brown, with slight bronze reflection; elytra, scutellum and ventral surfaces chestnut brown; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with apical antennomeres infuscate; palpi ochre. Length: 4.8 mm; width: 2.4 mm (range of male specimens: 4.1–4.8 mm long, 2.2–2.4 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci shortly prolonged medially to outer quarter of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border of clypeus moderately emarginate. Eyes large, separate on frons by less than 1.7× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 1.8-1.0-1.5-1.8-2. 3-2.2-2.5-2.2-2.2-2.2-2.6. Surface of pronotum with scattered small punctures on disc and lateral declivities, more abundant in posterior half, without apparent micropunctures. Prosternal process about 0.75× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, slightly shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere in all tarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae on first ventrite, shorter elsewhere. Penis (Fig. 7k) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate elliptic, with long arched tip; gonopore short oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance much longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, as long as wide at apex, covering more than basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1u) J-shaped, with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent at acute angle relative to nodulus; nodulus subcylindrical, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, poorly sclerotized, inserted sublaterally at base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu in wide open arch, long, slightly enlarged distally from spermatheca with nearly four elongate coils.

Diagnosis.

This species is externally identical to the widespread C. parentalis sp. nov., with similar size and colouration, and they coexist in at least Bois do Sud. They have slight differences in pronotal microreticulation, with C. parentalis presenting finer microreticulation, with individual cells barely visible at 40× magnification, thus appearing slightly duller than in C. gracilis. However, the only safe way to distinguish these species is by examination of their male and female genitalia, since the apical end of penis in C. gracilis sp. nov. is not markedly mucronate (compare Figs 7f and 7k), and the spermatheca of this species is unlike any other of this group, J-shaped, with cylindrical nodulus and long, fine spermathecal duct with at least four coils (Fig. 1u), while that of C. parentalis is more typical of the group, with a very characteristic short duct and enlarged single, incomplete coil (Fig. 1b). Other almost indistinguishable species with arched apex of penis are C. laevigata sp. nov. and C. wanati sp. nov. The spermatheca assists in separating these species, but secondary micropunctation of pronotum in C. gracilis is more apparent, denser and more uniform than in the other species, and basal seam of punctures of pronotum are only shared with C. laevigata.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name, gracilis, is the Latin adjective (f.) meaning slender, in reference to the comparatively svelte profile of these beetles.

Distribution.

The species is only known from low elevations (160–250 m a.s.l.) in the small forest reserve of Bois du Sud, south from Lac de Yaté and the base of the nearby Pic du Pin, in the south of Grande Terre (Fig. 8c).

Cazeresia holosericea sp. nov.

Figures 1j, 4c, 8f, 9i, 10c

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 10c), JGZC-5478, Poro Plateau, -21.3483 165.6932, 620 m, forest, 28.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia holosericea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 1 male (JGZC-5558), Poro Plateau, -21.34832 165.69322, 620 m, forest, night, 27.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia holosericea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male (JGZC-5360) and 1 female (JGZC-5479), Poro Plateau, -21.3483 165.6932, 620 m, forest, 28.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia holosericea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, JGZC-5445, Poro Plateau, -21.3486 165.6938, 620 m, forest, sifting, 28.xi.2010, Paratype Cazeresia holosericea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Figure 10. 

Holotypes of Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov., with detail of female pronotum (a), C. parentalis sp. nov. (b), C. holosericea sp. nov. (c) and C. gracilis sp. nov. (d). Scale bar = 2.0 mm.

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Body dark reddish brown with pronotum, scutellum and most of elytra blackened depending on light incidence; palpi ochre. Length: 6.6 mm; width: 3.5 mm (range of male specimens: 6.1–6.6 mm long, 3.3–3.5 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli, continued as shallow furrow along inner half of dorsal edge; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border deeply emarginate medially (Fig. 4c). Eyes large and separate by 2.1× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-1.7-2.0-2.3-2.1-2.5-2.1-2.2-2.0-2.4. Posterior border of pronotum furrowed with seam of small punctures mostly at sides. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, acute, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9i) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate elliptic, round distally with short transverse, weakly bilobate blunt tip; gonopore oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1j) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct fully sclerotized, thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved oriented at acute angle with nodulus, shorter than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the group of C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille), characterized by relatively large size (length > 6.0 mm), wide prosternal process, as wide or wider than procoxae, clypeus deeply incised in males and elytra subparallel. Males have normal tibiae, unlike the sympatric C. tibialis sp. nov., and both males and generally females lack pubescence apically on elytra, which allow separating it from C. clipeata sp. nov., C. maquis sp. nov. and C. petitpierrei sp. nov. In principle, it is larger than C. ovata sp. nov., the only species in the group under 6.0 mm, and they are only easy to confuse with C. thyiana, although they show tiny differences in their genitalia, with sides of penis less convex around gonopore and spermatheca less bulbous basally, with relatively longer and more slender duct in C. holosericea.

Derivatio nominis.

One characteristic of the genus Cazeresia is the alutaceous texture of most teguments, particularly head, pronotum and ventral surfaces. In the case of C. holosericea sp. nov., this texture is particularly evident, and the name reflects this trait, by using the Latinization of the Greek prefix hólos-, derived from the adjective ὅλος, meaning complete, and the Latin adjective (f.), -sēricea, as suffix, meaning silky.

Distribution.

C. holosericea sp. nov. is a rather isolated species currently known from mid elevations of the Poro Plateau, near the northern coast of Grande Terre (Fig. 8f).

Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) n. comb.

Figures 1x, 7a, 8d, 11b

Thasycles humboldtiana Heller, 1916, p. 301.

Dematochroma humboldtiana: Jolivet et al., 2007a, p. 40.

Dematochroma humboldtiana: Gómez-Zurita, 2011, p. 39.

Species #20: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Dematochroma humboldtiana: Jolivet & Mille, 2022, p. 47.

Dematochroma humboldtiana: Platania & Gómez-Zurita, 2023a, p. 45.

Material. Lectotype.

(designated by: Gómez-Zurita 2011). Male (Fig. 11b), Mt. Humboldt, 1100 m, 17.ix.1911, F. Sarasin and J. Roux leg., humboldtiana Typus [red label], Staatl. Museum für Tierkunde, Dresden, Dematochroma humboldtianus Heller (MfT). —

Figure 11. 

Dorsal views of the holotypes of Cazeresia thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) (a), C. humboldtiana (Heller) (b), C. kanalensis (Perroud) (c), and C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille) (d).

Paralectotypes.

Male, Cotypus [red label], Mt. Humboldt, 1100 m, 17.ix.1911, F. Sarasin and J. Roux leg. (NMB); male, Cotypus [red label], Mt. Humboldt, Gipfel 1600 m, 18.ix.1911, F. Sarasin and J. Roux leg., Thasycles humboldtianus m. Det. K. M. Heller 1915 (MfT).

Other material examined.

JGZC: 1 male, JGZC-NC118, Mt. Kouakoué, -21.95758 166.53830, 1315 m, 17.iii.2008, J.A. Jurado-Rivera leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2012; 1 male (JGZC-5367) and 1 female (JGZC-5395), Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, 22°01.9’S 166°28.0’E, 900 m, night collecting, 28.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 1 female, JGZC-5471, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road jct., -22.03188 166.46738, 900 m, night beating, 29.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023. MNHW: 4 males and 4 females, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, 22°01.9’S 166°28.0’E, 900 m, night collecting, 28.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 12 males (one with: JGZC-5098) and 12 females (three with: JGZC-5099, JGZC-5192 and JGZC-5443), Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, -22.03188 166.46738, 910 m, night, 28.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 4 males (one with: JGZC-5193) and 2 females, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road jct., -22.03188 166.46738, 900 m, night beating, 29.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 2 females (one with: JGZC-5442), Dzumac Mts., road from jct to old mine, km. 0–1, -22.02051 166.46606, 850–910 m, 29.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 3 males and 1 female, Dzumac road, forest, -22.08783 166.44643, 670 m, night beating roadside, 31.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 2 males (one with: JGZC-5383), Mt. Ouin Rd, 0–0.5 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0318 166.4674, 900 m, night beating, 4.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 2 females (one with: JGZC-5110), Mt. Ouin Rd, 0–0.5 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0318 166.4674, 900 m, night beating, 5.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023; 4 females (two with: JGZC-5109 and JGZC-5382), Mt. Ouin Rd, 0.4–1.0 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0244 166.4706, 900 m, night beating, 6.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023.

Remarks.

This species was only known from males collected at elevations above 1100 m in Mt. Humboldt (Heller 1916) and since its description the only additional record of the species was yet another male collected near the summit of Mt. Kouakoué, also in the Massif du Sud, not far from Mt. Humboldt (Gómez-Zurita 2011). This specimen provided DNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses, which demonstrated the evolutionary proximity of this species to C. montana (Papadopoulou et al. 2013; Platania et al. 2024). Here, we report a large number of specimens from several localities in southern parts of the Massif du Sud. This series includes females for the first time, which revealed, as expected, a typical spermatheca of Cazeresia, thus supporting the phylogenetic conclusions and the new combination, Cazeresia humboldtiana (Heller, 1916) comb. nov. Spermatheca (Fig. 1x) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu, about as long or slightly longer than nodulus, forming characteristic bow before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil. The penis of C. humboldtiana (Fig. 7a) was described by Gómez-­Zurita (2011).

Distribution.

The species can be considered at present distributed in several areas of relatively high elevation (from 670 m to 1100 m a.s.l.) in the central part of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8d).

Cazeresia imperiosa sp. nov.

Figures 1p, 8c, 9c

Material. Holotype:

Male, JGZC-5356, Humboldt (S track), Col du Vulcain (refuge), -21.90319 166.38305, 980 m, night beating, 9.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia imperiosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 male (JGZC-5456) and 1 female (JGZC-5391), Humboldt (S track), Col du Vulcain (refuge), -21.90319 166.38305, 980 m, night beating, 9.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia imperiosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. MNHN: 2 specimens, Mt. Humboldt, 11.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg.; 1 specimen, Mt. Humboldt, 12.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg. MNHW: 13 males and 23 females (four with: JGZC-5454, JGZC-5455, JGZC-5481 and JGZC-5482), Humboldt (S track), Col du Vulcain (refuge), -21.90319 166.38305, 980 m, night beating, 9.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia imperiosa sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 2 males (one with: JGZC-5362), Mt. Do, -21.75585 166.00099, 900–1025 m, maquis and forest edge, 6.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia imperiosa Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso; 1 male, Mt. Do, -21.76674 166.00540, 820–920 m, roadside, night beating, 6.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia imperiosa Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso; 1 female, Mt. Do, -21.7606 165.9996, 850 m, subsummit forest, at light, 2.xi.2010, M Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Cazeresia ­imperiosa Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso; 1 male and 1 female, Mt. Do, -21.7574 166.0015, 850–950 m, night beating, 2.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia imperiosa Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso; 1 female, Mt. Do, -21.7574 166.0015, 850–950 m, day beating, 3.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia imperiosa Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera and prosternum very dark matt brown, almost black; scutellum, elytra and ventral surfaces very dark glossier reddish brown; labrum, antennae and legs, including coxae, dark reddish brown; apex of last antennomere and palpi ochre. Length: 6.7 mm; width: 3.6 mm (range of male specimens: 6.6–7.8 mm long, 3.5–4.1 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures medially and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to outer third of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes separate on frons by more than 2.4× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.0-1.0-1.8-2.1-2.6-2. 5-2.9-2.7-2.7-2.6-2.8. Microreticulation of pronotum only slightly finer and more superficial than on frons, with scattered fine punctures also behind eyes, interspersed with very subtle micropunctures. Prosternal process about 0.7× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, slightly enlarged behind humeri, with sides weakly curved, widest at middle and gradually tapering in apical half to slightly dorsally compressed round apex; surface finely alutaceous, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc; last interval weakly convex. Basitarsomeres slightly narrower than third tarsomere, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in all tarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite slightly less than half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae, rather uniform on first ventrite. Penis (Fig. 9c) slender, curved ventrally at base and nearly straight, flattened dorsoventrally at apex, perpendicular to base, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, slightly wider preapically than at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with acute median point blunt at apex; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end acute and separated from apex of penis by distance about as long as maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1p) shaped as question mark, with cornu shorter than nodulus, blunt at apex and bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus sinuous, bulbous and enlarged basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented perpendicularly to plane of spermatheca, and slightly curved, thinner and sclerotized near body of spermatheca and slightly enlarged and less sclerotized distally from spermatheca, with incomplete elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

In this species, the sides of elytra are weakly curved and they are widest around middle, a trait only shared with C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille and C. robusta sp. nov. However, C. imperiosa sp. nov. can be easily separated from the other two despite their similar size, colour and potential distribution because this species has strong humeral calli, making the overall shape of elytra very different from the other species.

Note.

See notes on C. montana. The type series of the generic type species includes some specimens of this species.

Derivatio nominis.

The name for this species is the Latin adjective (f.), imperiōsa, meaning powerful, mighty, since it is amongst the largest species of the genus.

Distribution.

The species is found in high elevations (above 850 m a.s.l.) of two separate peaks in the south of Grande Terre: Mt. Humboldt and Mt. Do (Fig. 8c).

Cazeresia impressicornis sp. nov.

Figures 7g, 8a

Species #22: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-NC693, Poya, Station de Beupré, -21.42392 165.14715, 26 m, 1.iv.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita and A. Cardoso leg., Holotype Cazeresia impressicornis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (JGZC). — Paratypes: JGZC: 5 males (JGZC-NC694–JGZC-NC698), Poya, Station de Beupré, -21.42392 165.14715, 26 m, 1.iv.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita and A. Cardoso leg., Paratype Cazeresia impressicornis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-NC284, Sarramea, -21.67005 165.80852, 37 m, 13.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita, J.A. Jurado-Rivera and A. Cardoso leg., Paratype Cazeresia impressicornis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera and prosternum blackish; scutellum, elytra and most ventral surfaces including coxae dark brown; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae infuscate; palpi and apex of antennomeres 11 ochre. Length: 4.9 mm; width: 2.4 mm (range of male specimens: 4.2–4.9 mm long, 2.2–2.4 mm wide).

Frons with sparse shallow micropunctures and few small but deep punctures medially and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli, nearly contiguous medially; clypeus with small, deep punctures in basal half, and anterior border with relatively deep semicircular emargination. Eyes moderate, separate on frons by 2.3× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.5-1.0-2.0-1.8-2.3-2.1- 2.4-2.2-2.2-2.2-3.0; antennomeres 3–8 compressed longitudinally at middle from base to apical enlargement, more apparent in antennomeres 4–7. Posterior border of pronotum with impressed furrow with regular series of small punctures; narrow explanate lateral margin of pronotum with regular series of impressed punctures along compressed border; anterior border of pronotum 0.8× as wide as posterior border; surface microsculptured, with relatively dense tiny punctures and sparser larger punctures on disc and lateral declivities. Prosternal process about half as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind weakly callous humeri; relatively smooth, shinier than pronotum, entirely glabrous except for few small setae around sutural angle, and with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Epipleura with fringe of short setae apically. Mesotibiae with rather sharp dorsal keels; basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere in protarsi, and as wide as third tarsomere in meso- and metatarsi; shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi, and as long as these in meso- and metatarsi; third bilobed tarsomeres relatively small. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, abundant fine punctures with long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7g) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate elliptical, arched distally with relatively prominent blunt median projection; gonopore short oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering slightly more than half of gonopore. — Females. Unknown.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the group of small (L < 6.0 mm), relatively elongate species (ratio L/W > 1.8), elytra parallel in basal half and bearing tiny setae apically, and males with moderately incised anterior border of clypeus, which also includes C. corrugata sp. nov., C. subgeminata sp. nov. and C. spadicea sp. nov. The male of C. impressicornis sp. nov. can be distinguished from C. subgeminata by the sparser and confused punctures anteriorly on disc of elytra and from C. corrugata by the relatively even surface of pronotum. This species shares with C. spadicea the laterally compressed antennomeres and they are almost indistinguishable, but they can be tentatively recognized by the rather uniform brown colour of body and appendages of C. spadicea, compared with the typical colour contrasts in C. impressicornis, with paler elytra and testaceous appendages.

Derivatio nominis.

The name for this species is a compound adjective derived from the Latin participle impressus of the verb imprimō, meaning to impress, to press, and the noun cornus, meaning horns, or in this case antennae.

Distribution.

Cazeresia impressicornis sp. nov. has been found in two inner low-elevation localities in central Grande Terre separated some 75 km away in the southern slopes of the central mountainous chain. It is the only known species of Cazeresia distributed in the dry littoral lowlands of the central region of Grande Terre (Fig. 8a).

Cazeresia kanalensis (Perroud, 1864)

Figures 8a, 9h, 11c

Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, 1864, p. 207.

Colaspis kanalensis: Fauvel, 1866, p. 206.

syn. Dematochroma laboulbenei: Lefèvre, 1885, p. 38.

syn. Dematochroma laboulbenei: Clavareau, 1914, p. 40.

Colaspis kanalense: Heller, 1916, p. 258.

Colaspis kanalensis: Jolivet et al., 2007b, p. 34.

Colaspoides kanalensis: Jolivet et al., 2013, p. 143.

Colaspoides kanalensis: Jolivet & Mille, 2022, p. 43.

Colaspis kanalensis: Gómez-Zurita & Pàmies-Harder, 2022, p. 34.

Material.

Lectotype (present designation). Male (Fig. 11c), Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, Kanala, Type, ex coll. B.-P. Perroud, Muséum Paris 1958 coll. M. Pic, Syntype, Syntype Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, 1864, MNHN, Paris EC17237 (MNHN). — Paralectotype. Female, ex coll. B.-P. Perroud, Muséum Paris 1958 coll. M. Pic, Syntype, Syntype Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, 1864, MNHN, Paris EC17238 (MNHN).

Other material.

MNHW: male, JGZC-5332, road Bonde-Mandjélia Mt., 20°28.6’S 164°15.6’E, 250 m, niaouli forest, 9.i.2007, at light, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.

Remarks.

In his comprehensive systematic catalogue of Eumolpinae, Lefèvre (1885) removed Colaspis kanalensis Perroud, 1864 from Colaspis Fabricius, 1801, a genus that he recognized as exclusive of the New World, but at the same time, this sound decision was accompanied by the synonymisation of the species with Dematochroma laboulbenei (Montrouzier, 1861), a radically different species. Neither Clavareau (1914) nor Heller (1916) questioned this decision, and it was nearly one century later that Jolivet et al. (2007b) rejected this synonymy, an opinion that was endorsed by Gómez-Zurita and Pàmies-Harder (2022). However, these authors did not propose an alternative systematic placement of the species, and their proposition would come a few years later, when the species was assigned to the genus Colaspoides Laporte, 1833, with the suggestion that it may be the only valid species of this genus in New Caledonia (Jolivet et al. 2013). The examination of the type specimens of Colaspis kanalensis for this work leads to a very different conclusion.

Perroud (1864) described Colaspis kanalensis without any indication of the number of specimens he used for the description, but providing an interesting character that already identifies the specimen as a male, namely the arched emargination of the anterior border of clypeus, a trait characteristic of the males of some species of Cazeresia. The MNHN collection preserves Perroud’s types, including two specimens identified and recognized unambiguously here as syntypes of C. kanalensis, clearly fitting the species description. One of the syntypes is a male, and proposed here as the species lectotype, and the other one is a female and proposed as paralectotype. These type specimens undoubtedly belong to the species complex of Cazeresia thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille), very uniform morphologically. In particular, they share more similarities with the pair C. thyiana and C. holosericea sp. nov., for example the lack of tiny stiff setae apically on epipleura. Therefore, we propose that the correct generic assignment of Perroud’s species is the genus Cazeresia, as Cazeresia kanalensis (Perroud, 1864) comb. nov.

The town of Canala, the type locality of C. kanalensis, is not far (slightly over 30 km apart) from the type locality of the very similar C. holosericea, but we are positive about these species being different based on the conspicuous dorsal purple metallic tinge of the types of C. kanalensis, lacking in all the other species of the group, including C. holosericea, but also the different conformation of the anterior incision of male clypeus, which in the male lectotype of C. kanalensis is shallower and more angulate than the deep subtrapezoidal and flanged apical incision of clypeus in male C. holosericea. The MNHW collection includes one male specimen from a very distant (~200 km), low elevation locality, in an ultramafic inland island not far from the southern shores of the northern tip of Grande Terre, which shares all the attributes of C. kanalensis, including the unique coloration, shape of clypeal emargination and facial structure in general, a shared marked tendency to regular arrangements of elytral punctation, as well as its size (5.7 mm long, 3.1 mm wide), only slightly below the 6.0 mm mark that characterizes most species in this group (except for C. ovata sp. nov.). This specimen, based on these rather distinctive attributes is tentatively considered to belong to C. kanalensis and used to illustrate the penis, which is quite different compared with the male genitalia in this group (Fig. 9h).

Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov.

Figures 1o, 7l, 8b

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5111, Mt. Ouin Rd, 0–0.5 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0318 166.4674, 900 m, night beating, 4.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 3 males (one with: JGZC-5561) and 2 females (one with: JGZC-5112), Mt. Ouin Rd, 0–0.5 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0318 166.4674, 900 m, night beating, 4.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 3 females (one with: JGZC-5447), Mt. Ouin Rd, 0.4–1.0 km N of Dzumac jct, -22.0244 166.4706, 900 m, night coll., 6.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-5457, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, -22.03188 166.46738, 910 m, night, 28.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-5190, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road jct., -22.03188 166.46738, 900 m, night beating, 29.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, JGZC-5472, Mt. Dzumac (base), km 1.5–3.0 E of Ouin rd jct., -22.0371 166.4957, 800 m, rainforest, 6.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laevigata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 female (JGZC-5097), Koghi Mts., humid forest, 22°11’S 166°30’E, 500–550 m, 21.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Apex of mandibles, facial sutures, pronotum and most of hypomera dark brown; base of mandibles, antennomeres 7–10 and base of 11, scutellum, elytra, ventral surfaces, including coxae and trochanters, base of tibiae and femora brown; labrum, palpi, basal six antennomeres, apex of antennomere 11, and most of legs pale testaceous to ochre. Length: 4.8 mm; width: 2.6 mm (range of male specimens: 4.4–5.3 mm long, 2.4–2.8 mm wide).

Frons with few small puntures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with several small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes separate on frons by 1.8× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 1.7-1.0-1.4-1.6-2.1-1.9-2.3-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.5. Pronotum rather shiny with abundant shallow micropunctures. Prosternal process about 2/3 as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.2× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface nearly smooth, shiny, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere, except on mesotarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in mesotarsi, and as long as these in pro- and metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; ventrites finely microreticulated, with sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7l) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with weakly concave sides in ventral view; apex markedly elongate, arched, with large triangular blunt tip at middle; gonopore relatively elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering slightly less than half of gonopore. — Females. In this species, apart from typical sexually dimorphic traits, females also have most of the anterior half of lateral declivity of elytra with uneven surface. Spermatheca (Fig. 1o) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved at acute angle with nodulus, and about as long or slightly longer than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

From other species smaller than 6.0 mm, with body proportions > 1.8, dark pronotum, glabrous brown elytra and pale testaceous legs, C. laevigata sp. nov. is recognizable based on the rather unique shape of penis, with elongate apex and large triangular blunt tip, not evidently mucronate (Fig. 7l). The only other similar species of Cazeresia without mucronate penis are C. gracilis sp. nov. and C. wanati sp. nov., and in these species the distance between distal border of gonopore and apex of penis is also much longer than width of gonopore. The basal margin of pronotum of C. laevigata is punctured throughout, a feature shared with C. gracilis, but not so apparent in C. wanati, which could assist identifying these species. Moreover, apart from this trait, the females of C. laevigata should be more easily confused with those of C. wanati (the spermatheca of C. gracilis is highly distinctive), and perhaps another way to try to distinguish them is based on the slight undulate lateral declivities of elytra in C. laevigata.

Derivatio nominis.

This species has the sculpture of pronotum smoother than most other species in the group, appearing almost glossy. This trait is highlighted in the name of the species, with the participle (f.) of the Latin verb lēvigō (= to polish), used as adjective, thus meaning polished or smoothed.

Distribution.

The species is known from a couple of mid to high elevation localities between Nouméa and the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8b).

Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov.

Figures 1t, 8c, 9d, 10a

Species #23: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Dematochroma thyiana: Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso, 2014, p. 121.

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 10a), JGZC-NC193, Aoupinié, refuge, -21.14780 165.32447, 413 m, 4.iv.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita, J.A. Jurado-Rivera and A. Cardoso leg., Holotype Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (JGZC). — Paratypes: MNHW: 4 males (one with: JGZC-5354) and 2 females, Aoupinié, road to sawmill, 21°09’S 165°19’E, 420–530 m, 7.ii.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, Aoupinié, refuge, 21°08.9’S 165°19.4’E, 420 m, at light, 18.i.2007, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, Aoupinié, refuge, -21.14890 165.32348, 400 m, at light, 25.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laticollis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 3 males and 3 females, Aoupinié, refuge, -21.14890 165.32348, 400 m, beating rainforest, 27.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laticollis n. sp. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male and 1 female (JGZC-5054), Aoupinié, refuge, -21.14890 165.32348, 400 m, beating rainforest, 29.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia laticollis n. sp. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

JGZC: 1 female, JGZC-NC015, Sarrameá, Col d’Amieu, 2–28.xii.2005, Cazères, Mille and Kataoui leg.; 1 male, JGZC-NC203, Col d’Amieu, 21°34.922’S 165°46.324’E, 630 m, 24.viii–20.ix.2007, Malaise trap, S. r. f. Pocquereux staff leg.; 3 males (JGZC-NC207, JGZC-NC208, JGZC-NC212), Col d’Amieu, 21°34.922’S 165°46.324’E, 630 m, 23.xi.2007–11.i.2008, Malaise trap, S. r. f. Pocquereux staff leg.; 1 female, JGZC-NC027, Farino, M. Barbou L., -21.61431 165.70066, 408 m, 16.xi.2004, on Scheffleria gabriellae, S. Cazères leg.; 1 female, JGZC-NC191, Farino, sawing mill, -21.61288 165.70209, 384 m, 11.iv.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita, J.A. Jurado-Rivera and A. Cardoso leg. MNHW: 1 male, Col d’Amieu, 3 km from gate, loc. 2, 21°35.1’S 165°47.8’E, 500 m, 6.i.2007, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, JGZC-5346, Col d’Amieu, 6.5–7.0 km to gate, -21.5868 165.7738, 450 m, 15.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males (one with: JGZC-5333) and 1 female (JGZC-5377), Farino, refuge and circuit track, 21°39.0’S 165°46.9’E, 220–300 m, 3.i.2007, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 male, JGZC-5352, Col des Roussettes, rainforest nr. refuge, -21.4074 165.5250, 530 m, 2.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera, prosternum, scutellum and elytra black, with slight bronze lustre on head and pronotum; labrum, antennae and legs dark testaceous, with 3–4 basal antennomeres and tarsi paler; palpi ochre. Length: 6.7 mm; width: 3.4 mm (range of male specimens: 5.6–7.8 mm long, 2.8–3.9 mm wide).

Frons alutaceous, unpunctured, finely microsculptured, with supraocular sulci reaching beyond middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus similarly microsculptured with few tiny punctures on disc, and anterior border with nearly semicircular small emargination. Eyes large, separate on frons by 2.1× their transverse diameter. Antennomeres 3–9 weakly impressed longitudinally and slightly compressed along ventral part; relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-1.6-1.8-2.1-2.0-2.3-2.2-2.2-2.1-2.6. Surface of pronotum finely alutaceous, with very dense tiny shallow micropunctures and sparse large punctures on disc and lateral declivities, glossier than frons. Prosternal process half as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri, gradually tapering to slightly acuminate apex in apical half; surface finely alutaceous, smoother and shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused on disc; last interval relatively flat. Basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere and nearly as long as second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi, and as wide as third tarsomere and slightly shorter than second and third combined in meso- and metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites finely alutaceous, with sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9d) thin and slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, slightly widened preapically; apex elongate, arched and slightly sinuous distally towards long blunt tip; gonopore short oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance much longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, shorter than wide, covering less than basal half of gonopore. — Females. In this species, elytra are also proportionally longer in females, the pronotum is not enlarged laterally and the marginal gutter is narrower (inset in Fig. 10a). Spermatheca (Fig. 1t) shaped like question mark, with cornu shorter and more bulbous than nodulus; nodulus sigmoidal slightly thicker basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct uniformly thin, longer than nodulus, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu, bent in wide curve towards cornu, often crossing body of spermatheca to curve in opposite direction, without coils.

Diagnosis.

This species is among the largest of the genus, most typically surpassing 6.0 mm in length, and it is rather characteristic, with males showing traits that are not shared with any other species in the group. They have elytra widest at level of humeri and a rather acuminate profile towards apex, together with a particularly enlarged pronotum, as wide or wider than elytra, with relatively wide gutter-like margin; females have subparallel elytra like several other species in the group and their pronotum is not particularly wide, but their size, only comparable to the species in the C. thyiana group, together with narrow prosternal process (always wider than coxae in females of the C. thyiana group) and lustrous dorsal appearance help recognizing them. This is the only known species of Cazeresia without coils in the spermathecal duct.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name is a Latin adjective (f.) resulting from combining the adjective latus, meaning wide, with the noun collum, meaning neck, thus describing the characteristic large pronotum of the males of the species.

Distribution.

The species has a relatively large range in moderate elevations (220–630 m a.s.l.) of the mountain ranges of the central part of Grande Terre (Fig. 8c).

Cazeresia maquis sp. nov.

Figures 1f, 8c, 9g

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5350, Chute de la Madeleine, 22°14.2’S 166°51.7’E, 240 m, maquis, night coll. (lamp and beating), 24.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Holotype Cazeresia maquis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 2 females (JGZC-5388 and JGZC-5446), Chute de la Madeleine, 22°14.2’S 166°51.7’E, 240 m, maquis, night coll. (lamp and beating), 24.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia maquis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material.

MNHW: 1 male, JGZC-5374, Rivière Bleue Parc, refuge, 22°05.9’S 166°38.3’E, 190 m, 20.xii.2006, night coll. (lamp and beating), M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Mandibles, anterior part of head, pronotum, scutellum, elytra, ventral surfaces and most of legs dark reddish brown, with pronotum darker and faint blue metallic shine on pronotum and elytra; labrum, antennae, frons and tarsi testaceous, with slight bronze metallic reflection on frons; palpi ochre. Length: 6.8 mm; width: 3.6 mm.

Frons unpunctured, with supraocular sulci prolonged medially over most of weakly raised supraantennal calli; clypeus subtriangular, with few small punctures basally and with anterior border with very deep arched emargination. Eyes large, separate on frons by 1.85× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.5-1.0-1.8-2.3-2.8-2. 6-3.0-2.7-2.7-2.6-3.0. Surface of pronotum very finely and minutely microreticulate, relatively glossy and lacking micropunctures. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface glossy, entirely glabrous except for tiny setae near sutural angle, with relatively large punctures, as wide as intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere and shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi, and slightly narrower than third tarsomere and as long as second and third tarsomeres combined in meso- and metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and short fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9g) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, slightly widened preapically; distal part elongate oval, round at apex, with weak transverse distal expansion; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance shorter than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Females show stronger punctation on clypeus and punctation more orderly aligned on disc of elytra. In C. maquis sp. nov., the frontoclypeus of females is not that different to that of males, unlike other species, where females have a wider transition between frons and clypeus. Spermatheca (Fig. 1f) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thick, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and oblique relative to nodulus, shorter than nodulus, enlarged distally and weakly sclerotized at level with elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

In this species of the C. thyiana group (size > 6.0 mm, subparallel elytra, prosternal process as wide or wider than procoxae), the apical intervals of elytra are not convex and the apical curvature is more or less continuous with apical margin, which is somewhat expanded and has tiny setae along margin in sutural area. In other species of this group, interval convexity and a relatively thick, glabrous margin delimit the apex of elytra. Among the species of this group with setae apically on epipleura, it can be distinguished from C. clipeata sp. nov. because it lacks conspicuously serrate margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites, and from C. petitpierrei sp. nov. because it is larger, and the shape of clypeus in females, similar to the clypeus in males in C. maquis sp. nov., may be useful to recognise this species too.

Derivatio nominis.

This species name is the noun maquis in apposition, derived from the name applied to a typical shrubland biome of the drier areas with ultramafic soils in New Caledonia, the maquis minier or mining maquis, where the species is found.

Distribution.

The species is known at present from three specimens collected within the Special Botanical Reserve of the Chutes de la Madeleine, and one in a nearby locality, all found at low elevation (Fig. 8c).

Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005

Figures 1q, 5, 8f, 9b

Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005, p. 70.

Species #19a: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Cazeresia montana: Jolivet & Mille, 2022, p. 42.

Cazeresia montana: Platania & Gómez-Zurita, 2023a, p. 44.

Material.

Holotype: male, Museum Paris Don. No. 1151 8 Juin 2005, Mt. Humboldt, 11.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg. (but C. Mille and S. Cazères, in original description) (MNHN). — Paratypes: Reported 22 paratypes in original description, of which two in JGZC collection (personal gift from P. Jolivet) and only six found in MNHN: JGZC: 1 male, JGZC-NC007, Mt. Humboldt, 12.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg., Paratype Cazeresia montana sp. nov. Jolivet, Verma & Mille; 1 female, JGZC-NC012, Mt. Humboldt, 11.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg., Paratype Cazeresia montana sp. nov. Jolivet, Verma & Mille. MNHN: 4 specimens, Mt. Humboldt, 11.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg., Paratype [orange label]; 2 specimens, Mt. Humboldt, 12.ii.2005, P. Jolivet leg., Paratype [orange label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 male, JGZC-5357, Mt. Humboldt, montane maquis, -21.8812 166.4177, 1400–1500 m, 13.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005 J. Gómez-Zurita det. 2023.

Remarks.

The type series of C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille in the MNHN collection includes representatives of two species, most of them belonging to this distinctive taxon, but also some representatives of the species that we recognize in this work as C. imperiosa sp. nov. Both species, among the largest in the genus and among New Caledonian Eumolpinae (Table S2), are easily recognizable by a suite of characters, of which most notable would be the presence of effaced humeri in C. montana (Fig. 5a), prominent in C. imperiosa, and a very short metaventrite in C. montana (Fig. 5c) compared to C. imperiosa. Distinguishing the species is not problematic, but at the time of the genus and species descriptions their differences were overlooked and mixed in a hybrid description highlighting characters of one or the other species, which is not useful to recognize any. For example, in the genus characterization, the description of thoracic ventrites corresponds to C. imperiosa, while that of elytra or the actual spermatheca fit C. montana, and the description of hind wings would represent the former, because the latter is most likely brachypterous.

The body plan of C. montana and its sister, C. robusta sp. nov., is rather different compared to most other Cazeresia, and the differences may be related to their adaptation to high elevation. They have typical features of apterous, lapidicolous species, including the absence of humeri and a very short metaventrite, a trait usually associated to brachyptery in Coleoptera (e.g., Smith 1964; Beutel 1992). In any case, their sclerotized reproductive organs have all the features typical of the genus. Here we illustrate for comparison the penis (Fig. 9b) and spermatheca (Fig. 1q) of C. montana. The first may be of assistance to distinguish this species from C. robusta, owing to the shorter apical blunt tooth in C. montana, apart from the generally finer dorsal punctation of this species.

Distribution.

The species was reported above 1450 m in the original description, in the rocky ascend to the summit of Mont Humboldt (Jolivet et al. 2005). The additional record reported here is also from the type locality (Fig. 8f).

Cazeresia ovata sp. nov.

Figures 1g, 8d

Material.

Holotype: Female, JGZC-5199, Aoupinié, 21°10.8’S 165°18.1’E, 650 m, 18.i.2007, night beating, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia ovata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW).

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, scutellum, elytra and ventral surfaces dark chocolate brown, with pronotum darker, almost black; labrum, femora and tibiae dark testaceous, and antennae and tarsi testaceous; palpi ochre. Length: 4.5 mm; width: 2.6 mm.

Frons unpunctured with supraocular sulci prolonged medially beyond middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes large, separate on frons by 2.2× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-1.5-1.8-2.1-1.9-2.4-2.3-2.3-2.2-2.6. Posterior border of pronotum with seam of few tiny punctures laterally on furrow. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, slightly shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, as big as intervals, rather confused elsewhere on disc. Basitarsomeres shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. First abdominal ventrite slightly longer at middle than ventrites 2–4 combined with median apodeme nearly half as long as ventrite, subtrapezoidal, much narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Spermatheca (Fig. 1g) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct relatively thick, inserted laterally near, but not at base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved oblique at acute angle relative to nodulus and longer than nodulus before enlarged elongate coil. — Males. Unknown.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the C. thyiana group, recognizable, among others, by the broad prosternal process, as wide or wider than transverse diameter of procoxae in females, and specifically to the subgroup lacking tiny setae apically on epipleura that, apart from C. ovata sp. nov., it includes the much larger C. holosericea sp. nov. and C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille).

Derivatio nominis.

Name derived from the Latin adjective (f.), ōvāta, derived from ōvum (= egg), meaning egg-shaped, ovate.

Distribution.

The only specimen available for study of this species was collected at moderate elevation (650 m a.s.l.) in Aoupinié (Fig. 8d).

Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov.

Figures 1b, 4a, 4b, 7f, 8b, 10b

Species #17: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 10b), JGZC-NC046, Monts Kwa Ne Mwa, on road btw Noumeá and Yaté, 2 km E Pic Mouirange, 22°12.356’S 166°40.798’E, 220 m, 19.i–17.ii.2007, Christine Pöllabauer leg., Holotype Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (JGZC). — Paratypes: JGZC: 5 females (JGZC-NC044, JGZC-NC045, JGZC-NC154, JGZC-NC834, and JGZC-NC835), Monts Kwa Ne Mwa, on road btw Noumeá and Yaté, 2 km E Pic Mouirange, 22°12.356’S 166°40.798’E, 220 m, 19.i–17.ii.2007, Christine Pöllabauer leg., Paratype Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, JGZC-NC039, Monts Kwa Ne Mwa, on road btw Noumeá and Yaté, 2 km E Pic Mouirange, 22°12.356’S 166°40.798’E, 220 m, 17.ii–16.iii.2007, R. Pöllabauer leg., Paratype Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 females (JGZC-NC049, JGZC-NC050), Monts Kwa Ne Mwa, on road btw Noumeá and Yaté, 2 km E Pic Mouirange, 22°12.356’S 166°40.798’E, 220 m, 16.iii–15.iv.2007, R. Pöllabauer leg., Paratype Cazeresia parentalis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

JGZC: 1 male, JGZC-5138, Haute Rivière Bleue, track to La Tranchée, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 180–330 m, 22–23.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5444, Rivière Bleue Park, forest near Grand Kaori, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 26.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, JGZC-5231, Rivière Bleue Parc, Kaori géant, 22°05.9’S 166°40.7’E, 160 m, 22.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5135, Rivière Bleue, Pont Germain to Kaori géant, 22°06.0’S 166°39.3’E, 160–180 m, 22.i.2007, M. Wanat leg. MNHW: 1 female, JGZC-5254, Port Boisé (Gite Kanua), 22°21’S 166°58’E, 0–40 m, forest at sea shore, 14.ii.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5453, Pic du Pin, base, 22°14.9’S 166°49.7’E, 280 m, 25.xii.2006, forest and plantation, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 3 males (two with: JGZC-5474 and JGZC-5475), Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, 22.x.2008, plantation, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, JGZC-5473, Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, 23.x.2008, forest, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5476, Pic du Grand Kaori, 22°16.8’S 166°53.5’E, 240 m, night coll. (lamp and beating), 26.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 2 males (one with: JGZC-5208) and 2 females (one with: JGZC-5207), Pic du Grand Kaori, -22.2843 166.8954, 220 m, 1.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg.; 2 females (JGZC-5129, JGZC-5200), Forêt Cachée, -22.19085 166.78688, 250 m, sifting litter, 26.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5122, forest patch 1 km E of Col de Mouirange, -22.2135 166.6655, 240 m, 9.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 2 males (JGZC-5125 and JGZC-5126) and 1 female, Col des Deux Tétons, -22.2059 166.6797, 220–250 m, humid forest, 9.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female, JGZC-5121, Col des Deux Tétons, -22.2059 166.6797, 220–250 m, humid forest, 10.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 4 males (three with: JGZC-5216, JGZC-5219 and JGZC-5448) and 2 females (JGZC-5106 and JGZC-5217), Bois du Sud, 22°10.5’S 166°45.8’E, 160 m, maquis, night coll. (lamp and beating), 23.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 male, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, at light, 17.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 males and 5 females (one with: JGZC-5218), Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, night, 18.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 2 females, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, maquis night beating, 20.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 2 females, Bois du Sud, -22.17288 166.76330, 220–250 m, beating along track entering forest reserve, 20.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 2 females, Bois du Sud, ‘Araucaria’ hut, -22.1740 166.7627, 220 m, at light, 8.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 2 males (JGZC-5107 and JGZC-5212) and 1 female (JGZC-5108), Bois du Sud, -22.1759 166.7625, 220 m, 10.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 male, JGZC-5115, Chute de la Madeleine, 22°14’S 166°52’E, 270 m, 13.ii.2004, maquis, ad lucem, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male (JGZC-5204) and 5 females (JGZC-5116, JGZC-5117, JGZC-5202, JGZC-5203 and JGZC-5205), Chute de la Madeleine, 22°14.2’S 166°51.7’E, 240 m, 24.xii.2006, maquis, night coll. (lamp and beating), M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 2 males and 1 female, Haute Rivière Bleue, track to La Tranchée, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 180–330 m, 22–23.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 24.i.2004, humid forest, M. Wanat leg.; 5 males, Rivière Bleue Park, Grand Kaori, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 190 m, 25.i.2004, humid forest, M. Wanat leg.; 3 males and 1 female, Rivière Bleue Park, forest near Grand Kaori, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 26.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchee-Sentier des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 26.i.2004, humid forest, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchee-Sentier des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 28.i.2004, humid forest, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males, Hte Rivière Bleue, La Tranchee-Sent. des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 190–330 m, 20.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 8 males and 1 female, Rivière Bleue Parc, Kaori géant, 22°05.9’S 166°40.7’E, 160 m, 22.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 4 males, Rivière Bleue, Pont Germain to Kaori géant, 22°06.0’S 166°39.3’E, 160–180 m, 22.i.2007, M. Wanat leg.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera and prosternum very dark brown, with slight bronze reflection; elytra and scutellum matt brown; ventral surfaces brown; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with apical antennomeres and base of tibiae infuscate; palpi ochre. Length: 4.4 mm; width: 2.3 mm (range of male specimens: 4.0–5.0 mm long, 2.0–2.5 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci shortly prolonged medially to outer third of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate (Fig. 4a). Eyes large, separate by 1.4× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-1.5-1.6-2.4-2.1-2.6-2.3-2.3-2.2-2.9. Fine anterior margin of pronotum obsolete at middle; surface of pronotum matt, similar to frons, with scattered small punctures on disc and lateral declivities, without micropunctures. Prosternal process about 0.7× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.2× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, slightly shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere in protarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi and as long as these in meso- and metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, subtrapezoidal, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7f) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with short blunt tooth; gonopore elongate oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance slightly longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Externally identical to males, with typical secondary sexual differences, also in facial structure, with clypeus broader basally and lacking apical emargination (Fig. 4b). Spermatheca (Fig. 1b) shaped as question mark, with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin and weakly sclerotized near insertion, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented obliquely opposite to cornu for short distance, markedly enlarged and sclerotized with less than one complete, elongate coil distally.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the group of small (length < 6.0 mm), relatively slender species (ratio length:width > 1.8) with prosternum narrower than transverse diameter of procoxae in males (nearly as wide in females) and completely glabrous elytra, and females provide a reliable character for its identification, namely the spermatheca with short, narrow duct, translucent, poorly sclerotized at base with strongly widened, sclerotized coil. The only other species with identical spermathecal duct is C. tricolor sp. nov., very similar in size, shape and proportions, but recognizable by the slight metallic green tinge on pronotum. The penis of this species is mucronate, which also helps distinguishing this species from others very similar in size and shape, particularly the parapatric C. gracilis sp. nov., where males have the apex of penis arched.

Derivatio nominis.

This species is dedicated with love to our parents, Catalina Frau Oliver and Esteban Gómez-Zurita Rodríguez, parents of J. Gómez-Zurita, and Maurília Grazina Piedade and Manuel de Oliveira Cardoso, parents of A. Cardoso, for their lifetime support, which allowed us to pursue our careers and contribute today to discover and describe the amazing biodiversity of this World. The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (f.) parentālis, derived from parēns (n.), meaning of or belonging to the parents.

Distribution.

This species has an ample distribution in maquis and humid forest of dry lowland areas (< 330 m a.s.l.) in the southern part of Grand Terre (Fig. 8b).

Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov.

Figures 1h, 8b, 9e

Species #21: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Dematochroma thyiana: Platania et al., 2024, p. 570.

Material.

Holotype: Male, Mt Do, -21.76527 166.00228, 800–850 m, forest, night beating, 5.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 female, JGZC-NC206, Mt. Do, 21°45.684’S 166°00.054’E, 795 m, Malaise trap, 9.viii–8.xi.2007, S. r. f. Pocquereux staff leg., Paratype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-5556, Mt Do, -21.76527 166.00228, 800–850 m, forest, night beating, 5.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. MNHW: 1 female, Mt Do, -21.76527 166.00228, 800–850 m, forest, night beating, 5.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, Mt Do, -21.7574 166.0015, 850–950 m, night beating, 2.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 3 males and 2 females (one with: JGZC-5557), Mt Do, -21.7636 166.0020, 800–850 m, night beating, 3.xi.2010, M Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia petitpierrei sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, hypomera, scutellum, elytra and anterior femora and tibiae dark brown with extensive black areas; labrum, antennae, mid and hind legs and most of ventral surfaces dark reddish brown; palpi ochre. Length: 6.4 mm; width: 3.5 mm (range of male paratypes: 5.8–6.6 mm long, 3.1–3.5 mm wide).

Frons unpunctured, with supraocular sulci prolonged slightly beyond middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus subtriangular, with anterior border deeply incised and few small punctures basally. Eyes large, separate on frons by twice their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.5-1.0-2.2-2.4-3.1-2.6-3.1-2.7-2.8-2.6-3.3. Surface of pronotum without apparent micropunctuation. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.25× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface relatively smooth, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, about as wide as intervals, with tendency to double in rows of apical declivity and rather confused elsewhere. Epipleura with sparse tiny setae near apex. Profemora and protibiae coarsely punctured at apex; mesotibiae with sharp anterior convex ventral keel at middle; basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide apically as third tarsomere and shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite more than half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; ventrites 4 and 5 with inconspicuously serrate margins; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9e) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, broadly arched distally with short and wide, slightly bilobate distal projection; gonopore elongate oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance shorter than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Clypeus with weak apical emargination. Spermatheca (Fig. 1h) with cornu shorter than nodulus, hooked and bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu, diagonally and parallel to distal part of nodulus, shorter than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one nearly complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

This species belongs to the group of C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille), thus showing characteristic deep incision of clypeus of males, paler tarsi (most typically in females) and other traits, including size typically over 6.0 mm and broad intercoxal process, about as wide as or wider than procoxae. Within this group, all species are very similar and C. petitpierrei sp. nov. could be recognized by presenting tiny apical setae in epipleura, a trait only shared with C. clipeata sp. nov. and C. maquis sp. nov., but they can be distinguished by inconspicuously serrate margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites (clearly serrate in C. clipeata) and its smaller size compared to C. maquis, which is generally longer than 7.0 mm.

Derivatio nominis.

This species is dedicated with fondness and gratitude to Prof. Dr. Eduard Petitpierre Vall, Full Professor of Genetics in the University of the Balearic Islands (1981–2010), and Professor Emeritus in the ­Biology Department of this institution since his retirement, internationally reputed specialist on the diversity and cytotaxonomy of Chrysomelidae, PhD supervisor and mentor for many years of the first author of this study, who inherited from Eduard his passion for Chrysomelidae.

Distribution.

This species is known from the subsummit of Mont Do only, an isolated ultramafic island north of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8b).

Cazeresia robusta sp. nov.

Figures 1r, 6b, 8f, 9a

Species #19b: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Cazeresia montana: Platania et al., 2024, p. 570.

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 6b), JGZC-NC180, Mont Kouakoué, open area near summit, -21.957585 166.53830, 1315 m, 17.iii.2008, J.A. Jurado-Rivera leg., Holotype Cazeresia robusta sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (JGZC). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 female, JGZC-NC650, Mt. Kouakoué, -21.95758 166.53830, 1315 m, 17.iii.2008, P. Jolivet leg., Paratype Cazeresia robusta sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 males (JGZC-NC178 and JGZC-NC179 and) and 1 female (JGZC-NC177), Mont Kouakoué, open area near summit, -21.957585 166.53830, 1315 m, 17.iii.2008, J.A. Jurado-Rivera leg., Paratype Cazeresia robusta sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate oval, moderately convex. Dorsum, venter, coxae and mandibles black with faint greenish metallic tinge on clypeus and pronotum, and purple reddish on frons and elytra; most of antennae and legs very dark reddish brown; labrum, scape and pedicel dark testaceous; palpi and apex of antennomeres 11 pale testaceous. Length: 7.3 mm; width: 4.2 mm (range of male paratypes: 7.8–8.0 mm long, 4.3–4.8 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to almost middle of dorsal edge of well-defined supraantennal calli; clypeus slightly shorter than wide at apex, with punctures basally, more abundant and larger than on frons, and uniformly distributed micropunctures on whole surface; anterior border weakly emarginate. Eyes relatively small and about as wide as long, separate on frons by 2.9× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.0-1.0-1.9-2.0-2.5-2.2-2.7-2.4-2.4-2.3-2.8. Pronotum 1.5× wider than long at middle, weakly sigmoid at base, widest in front of middle; surface punctured mostly on lateral declivities and lacking micropunctures. Prosternal process as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae and strongly punctured anteriorly, with dense long, dishevelled fine dark yellowish setae, denser in anterior half. Mesoventrite strongly punctured, with dense long, fine setae. Metaventrite very short, shorter than prosternum, strongly microsculptured, with relatively dense large punctures and dense long, fine adpressed dark yellow setae. Elytra less than 1.2× as long as ensemble width at widest point; sides weakly curved in basal half, widest at middle and gradually tapering to regular, slightly produced round apex in apical half; humeri obsolete; surface finely microreticulate, silky as pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, arranged in eight rows with additional short scutellar and subhumeral rows, slightly confused anteriorly on disc; marginal interval weakly convex at middle. Legs slender, robust, with femora fusiform, enlarged medially, posteriorly at angle in metafemora; protibiae abruptly widened ventrally in apical 1/5 and metatibiae very gradually widening towards apex; mesotibiae as long as mesofemora; basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in all tarsi. First abdominal ventrite shorter at middle than four other ventrites combined, with median apodeme less than half as long as ventrite, subtrapezoidal, about as wide as mesosternal process; ventrites with fine microreticulation, fine punctures and abundant long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae, except first ventrite, with strong, dense punctation at middle. Penis (Fig. 9a) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with long median tooth, longer than wide at base; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance as long as maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering less than basal half of gonopore. — Females. In this species, females lack the abrupt apical enlargement of protibiae characteristic of males. Spermatheca (Fig. 1r) with cornu shorter than nodulus, weakly curved, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin basally, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and slightly longer than nodulus, enlarged and unsclerotized close to base with slightly over half coil distally.

Diagnosis.

This species is almost identical to its sister C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, and they are the only species currently in the genus with maximum width of elytra at middle and weak humeri. However, there are several differences between these species, including the stronger punctation on frons and clypeus of C. robusta sp. nov., the stronger and more abundant punctures on pronotum, the stronger and more confused elytral punctation, the stronger, denser punctation of the first abdominal ventrite, and the considerably longer apical tooth of the penis of C. robusta.

Derivatio nominis.

The name of the species is the Latin adjective (f.) rōbusta, meaning literally robust, hard, making reference to the solid build of this species.

Distribution.

The species was collected near the summit (1315 m) of Mont Kouakoué, a high peak in the northern part of the Massif du Sud, some 13 km southeast from Mont Humboldt (Fig. 8f).

Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov.

Figures 1v, 7h, 8e

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5229, Haute Rivière Bleue, track to La Tranchée, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 180–330 m, 22–23.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 2 males, Hte Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sent. des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 190–330 m, 20.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. MNHW: 1 female (JGZC-5139), Haute Rivière Bleue, track to La Tranchée, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 180–330 m, 22–23.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, humid forest, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 24.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 males and 1 female, Rivière Bleue Park, Grand Kaori, humid forest, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 25.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 3 males, Rivière Bleue Park (N), Grand Kaori, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 26.i.2004, humid forest, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 males, Haute Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sentier des Kaoris, humid forest, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 280–330 m, 28.i.2004, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 13 males (one with: JGZC-5133) and 2 females (JGZC-5230, JGZC-5232), Hte Rivière Bleue, La Tranchée-Sent. des Kaoris, 22°05’S 166°38’E, 190–330 m, 20.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 5 males, Hte Rivière Bleue, track La Tranchée-Hte Pourina, 22°04.0’S 166°37.4’E, 330–560 m, 21.xii.2006, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea n. sp. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, Rivière Bleue, Gue de la Pourina, 22°05.8’S 166°40.2’E, 140 m, night coll. (lamp and beating), 22.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, Rivière Bleue Parc, Kaori géant, 22°05.9’S 166°40.7’E, 160 m, rainforest, 22.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-­Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 6 males and 1 female (JGZC-5134), Rivière Bleue, Pont Germain to Kaori géant (left river side), 22°06.0’S 166°39.3’E, 160–180 m, 22.i.2007, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, scutellum, elytra, ventral surfaces including coxae, femora and tibiae dark reddish brown; labrum, most of frons, antennomeres 6–10 and basal half of 11 brown; basal antennomeres, apex of antennomere 11, palpi and tarsi pale brown. Length: 4.5 mm; width: 2.3 mm (range of male specimens: 4.3–5.4 mm long, 2.2–2.6 mm wide).

Frons with very few small punctures anteriorly in median depressed area and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of narrowly separated supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally, and anterior border with deep semicircular median emargination. Eyes large, separate on frons by 1.9× longer diameter of eye. Antennomeres 3–10 slightly enlarged apically, longitudinally compressed on antero-ventral side basally before thickened apex; relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.5-1.0-1.7-2.0-2.6- 2.4-2.7-2.2-2.3-2.1-2.9. Pronotum with relatively broad lateral explanate margin with large impressed punctures along inner border; anterior border of pronotum 0.8× as wide as posterior border; surface alutaceous, with relatively dense double punctation, few shallow scattered small punctures on disc, more abundant, larger and deeper on lateral declivities, on more homogeneous background of tiny, shallow micropunctures. Prosternal process about half as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.4× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface smooth, glossy, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Epipleura with tiny setae along apical margin and sutural angle. Basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere in protarsi and as wide in mid and hind tarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi and about as long in meso- and metatarsi; third bilobed tarsomere relatively small, particularly in protarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7h) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with relatively large median blunt tooth; gonopore oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering more than half of gonopore. — Females. Females lack compressed antennomeres and have smaller and widely separated supraantennal calli, perhaps denser punctation on pronotum, and a trend to geminate punctures on elytra. Spermatheca (Fig. 1v) with cornu slightly shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus slightly sigmoidal, bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu, relatively short, completely sclerotized and gradually thickening distally from spermatheca, shorter than nodulus and with half elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

Species sharing important diagnostic traits with C. corrugata sp. nov., C. impressicornis sp. nov. and C. subgeminata sp. nov., in particular the presence of tiny setae apically on elytra and relatively deep anterior emargination of male clypeus. This species can be however recognized by its relatively uniform brown colour with pale tarsi, which is the main difference with C. impressicornis, apart from the evenly convex pronotum and sides of elytra compared with C. corrugata, and confused and sparser punctation anteriorly on disc of elytra compared with C. subgeminata. In some individuals of C. spadicea sp. nov., legs can be testaceous, paler than dorsal surfaces, but the species can be recognized, apart from the apical fringe of setae on elytra in both sexes, by the broad gutter-like margins of pronotum, with large impressed punctures along inner border and the deep anterior incision of male clypeus.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name is the Latin adjective (f.), spādicea, meaning chestnut- or date-coloured.

Distribution.

This species has been found in a small low-elevation area of dense humid forest in the valley of the Rivière Bleue (Fig. 8e).

Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov.

Figures 1w, 7i, 8e

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5324, Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, 2.xii.2008, beating, forest edge, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 male, Pic du Pin (base), 22°14.9’S 166°49.7’E, 280 m, forest and plantation, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 female, Pic du Pin (base), -22.2484 166.8288, 280 m, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg. MNHW: 2 females (JGZC-5210 and JGZC-5211), Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, forest 22.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, 22.x.2008, at light, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-5209, Pic du Pin (base), -22.24843 166.82883, 280 m, forest, 23.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 4 males, Pic du Pin (base), -22.2482 166.8285, 280 m, forest, 31.x.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia spadicea bruna ssp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material.

MNHW: 1 male and 2 females, Pic du Grand Kaori, -22.2843 166.8954, 220 m, night, 1.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, pronotum, scutellum, elytra, ventral surfaces including coxae, femora and tibiae dark reddish brown; labrum, most of frons, antennomeres 6–10 and basal half of 11, and distal end of femora brown; basal antennomeres, apex of antennomere 11, palpi and tarsi pale brown. Length: 4.1 mm; width: 2.1 mm (male paratype: 4.5 mm long, 2.3 mm wide; female paratypes: 4.1–4.8 mm long, 2.2–2.6 mm wide).

Note.

Objective coalescent-based species delimitation separated as different species the sequences obtained from individuals of C. spadicea sp. nov. from Pic du Pin and from the Haute Rivière Bleue. The specimens from both localities are morphologically very similar, including the atypical homogeneous brown colour of dorsal surfaces and also the overall shape and attributes of penis (Fig. 7i) and spermatheca (Fig. 1w). However, the difference in size and also their occurrence in apparently different biomes, drier in the case of the former and humid forests in the case of the latter, together with the results of objective species delimitation, compelled us to establish a taxonomic differentiation between these populations as different subspecies.

Diagnosis.

The individuals of this subspecies are fundamentally identical to the nominotypical species, but smaller in size. The studied series are small, but it appears as if in this subspecies the sides of the fifth abdominal ventrite had more defined serrate margins compared to the nominotypical subspecies.

Derivatio nominis.

The subspecies name is a Later Latin adjective (f.), bruna, meaning brown, to insist on the uncommon brown colouration of the specimens.

Distribution.

This species is at present only known from two nearby low elevation localities in the southeastern part of the Réserve naturelle du Pic du Pin and in Pic du Grand Kaori, in the south of Grande Terre (Fig. 8e).

Cazeresia striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007) n. comb.

Figures 8e, 11d

Dumbea striata Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007a, p. 80.

Taophila cancellata Samuelson, 2010, p. 49.

Species #16: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Dematochroma cancellata: Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso, 2014, p. 121

Dematochroma cancellata: Jolivet & Mille, 2022, p. 45.

Dumbea striata: Platania & Gómez-Zurita, 2023a, p. 46.

Dumbea striata: Platania et al., 2024, p. 570.

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 11d), Farino, -21.61454 165.70097 [label erroneously with 161.70097], 393 m, on Ficus sp., 4.xi.2004, S. Cazères leg. (MNHN). — Paratypes: 4 males, Sarramea, 3 m, on Syzygium jambos, 22–27.x.2006, J. Brinon and S. Cazères leg. (MNHN).

Type material of Taophila cancellata Samuelson.

Holotype: Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, -21.34694 165.46278, 489 m, 2.xii.2006, R. M’Bouen leg. (MNHN). — Allotype: Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, 2–25.xi.2005, S. Cazères, C. Mille and J.P. Kataoui leg. (MNHN). — Paratypes: 4 females, Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, -21.34694 165.46278, 489 m, 2.xii.2006, R. M’Bouen leg.; 1 female, Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, 6.xi.2004, C. Mille leg.; 1 female, Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, 17.x.2005, C. Mille and J. Brinon leg.; 9 males and 1 female, Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, 2–25.xi.2005, S. Cazères, C. Mille and J.P. Kataoui leg.; 1 female, Col d’Amieu, Sarramea, 10.v.2006, J. Brinon leg.; 1 male and 1 female, Col d’Amieu, Malaise trap, 21°34.903’S 165°48.376’E, 611 m, 8.ii–3.iii.2006, ICA personnel leg.; 2 males and 1 female, Reserve du Col d’Amieu, 21°35’33.97”S 165°48’14.39”E, 362 m, 23.xi.2007, S. Cazères leg.; 1 female, Station des recherches fruitières de Pocquereux, La Foa, -21.73393 165.89605, 23 m, 16.xi.204, on Syzygium cumini, Jamelonier and Cazères leg.; 1 male and 1 female, Station des recherches fruitières de Pocquereux, “Perrouquet”, -21.73393 165.89605, 23 m, 4.xii.2004, on Semecarpus atra, S. Cazères leg.; 1 female, Farino, -21.61198 165.70272, 362 m, 29.xi.2005, J. Brinon leg.; 1 female, Kanala, Dumbea cancellata Fvl., coll. et det. A. Fauvel (RBINS); 6 males, Sarramea, -21.66941 165.8172, 3 m, 22.x.2004, on Syzygium jambos, J. Brinon and J.P. Kataoui leg.; 1 male, Sarramea, -21.63411 165.89527, 465 m, 20.ii.2006, C. Mille and J.P. Katoui leg.; 1 male, Sarramea, -21.34694 165.46278, 489 m, 2.xii.2006, R. M’Bouen leg.

Other material examined.

JGZC: 2 females (JGZC-NC847 and JGZC-NC848), Col d’Amieu, 21°34.922’S 165°46.324’E, 630 m, Malaise trap, 8.viii–18.x.2006, SRFP staff leg.; 4 males (JGZC-NC741 to JGZC-NC744), Col d’Amieu, 21°34.922’S 165°46.324’E, 630 m, Malaise trap, 24.viii–20.ix.2007, SRFP staff leg.; 2 males (JGZC-NC753 and JGZC-NC754), Col d’Amieu, 21°34.922’S 165°46.324’E, 630 m, Malaise trap, 23.xi.2007–11.i.2008, SRFP staff leg.; 1 male (JGZC-NC260), Col d’Amieu, -21.61172 165.80805, 489 m, 7–8.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita and A. Cardoso leg.; 1 female (JGZC-NC509), La Foa, Station des Recherches fruitières de Pocquereux, -21.73331 165.85868, 18 m, 10.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita, J.A. Jurado and A. Cardoso leg.; 1 male (JGZC-NC268) and 4 females (JGZC-NC269-JGZC-NC272), Farino, refuge, -21.64877 165.78077, 261 m, 27–28.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita and A. Cardoso leg. MNHW: 25 males and 20 females, Farino, Parc des Grandes Fougères, Camp de la Houe, -21.61176 165.75406, 400 m, 13.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 5 males, Col des Roussettes, refuge, -21.4079 165.5249, 520 m, 1.xii.2010, at light, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female and 5 males, Col des Roussettes, rainforest E of river, -21.4080 165.5302, 520 m, 2.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 18 males and 5 females, Rivière Bleue Park, Grand Kaori, humid forest, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 26.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Rivière Bleue Park, Grand Kaori, humid forest, 22°06’S 166°41’S, 160 m, 26.i.2004, sifted litter, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males, Col d’Amieu, top of hill, 21°37’S 165°49’E, 450 m, 9.ii.2004, ad lucem, M. Wanat leg.; 6 males and 4 females, Farino, Parc des Grandes Fougères, Aire des Araucarias, -21.61859 165.75570, 400 m, 14.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, Koghi Mts., -22.17809 166.50569, 480 m, 24.x.2008, fogged log, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Canala, 4 km S of Mia, road end, river valley forest, -21.5779 165.9719, 380 m, 30.xi.2010, at light, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg.; 39 males and 29 females, Farino, refuge and circuit track, 21°39.0’S 165°46.9’E, 220–300 m, 3.i.2007, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 5 males and 6 females, Col d’Amieu, 1 km from gate, 21°35.1’S 165°47.7’E, 440 m, 6.i.2007, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 male and 1 female, Col d’Amieu, 3 km from gate, 21°35.1’S 165°47.8’E, 500 m, 6.i.2007, M. Wanat leg.; 5 males and 3 females, Col d’Amieu, 3.5 km from gate, 21°35.1’S 165°47.8’E, 490 m, 6.i.2007, M. Wanat leg.; 6 males and 2 females, Col d’Amieu, 6.5–7.0 km from gate, 21°35.2’S 165°46.4’E, 450–470 m, 6.i.2007, night coll., M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 5 males and 5 females, Col d’Amieu, 6.5–7.0 km from gate, 21°35.2’S 165°46.4’E, 450–470 m, 6–7.i.2007, day and night, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 2 males, Col d’Amieu, 1 km from gate, 21°35.1’S 165°47.7’E, 440 m, 7.i.2007, at light, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 5 males and 2 females, Col d’Amieu, 2.5–5.0 km from gate, -21.58536 165.79319, 400–550 m, 15.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 5 males and 3 females, Col d’Amieu, 7.6 km from gate, -21.57993 165.77128, 600 m, 15.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, Col d’Amieu, 6.5–7.0 km from gate, 21°35.2’S 165°46.4’E, 450–470 m, 5.i.2007, night, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 male, Col d’Amieu, 3 km from gate, -21.58536 165.79319, 500 m, 14.xi.2008, at light, M. Wanat leg.; 4 males and 5 females, 1 km W of Col d’Amieu, 21°37’S 165°49’E, 400 m, 10.ii.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Farino, Parc des Grandes Fougères, gate, -21.62803 165.76202, 450 m, at light, 30.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 1 male, Col des Roussettes, rainforest nr. refuge, -21.4074 165.5250, 530 m, sifting litter, 2.xii.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg.; 4 males and 2 females, Rivière Bleue Park, Grand Kaori, humid forest, 22°06’S 166°41’E, 160 m, 25.i.2004, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males and 1 female, Rivière Bleue Park, Kaori géant, rainforest, 22°05.9’S 166°40.7’E, 160 m, 22.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.; 1 female, Rivière Bleue Park, Kaori géant, rainforest, 22°05.9’S 166°40.7’E, 160 m, 22.i.2007, M. Wanat leg.; 2 males, Sarramea, rd to cascade, -21.6367 165.8649, 120–160 m, 8.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female, Sarramea, trail to Dogny, -21.6274 165.8647, 150–350 m, 8.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 3 females, Koghi Mts., roadside, -22.17631 166.50138, 340 m, 25.x.2008, M. Wanat leg. HNHM: 3 males, Col d’Amieu, 19.i.1977, J. Balogh leg.

Remarks.

Over its short existence, this taxon had a very unstable position, in part because of the remarkable sexual dimorphism that was not recognized in the initial description, a typical issue in the taxonomy of New Caledonian Eumolpinae (e.g., Gómez-Zurita 2017). The species was originally described in a newly proposed genus Dumbea Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007, based on male specimens from two close localities in the central part of Grande Terre (Jolivet et al. 2007a). Some years later, Samuelson (2010) described Taophila cancellata Samuelson, paying particular attention to females, but recognizing the marked sexual dimorphism of the species, and reporting the species from nearby localities in the Central Massif. This species would be removed from Taophila by Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso (2014) based on molecular phylogenetic evidence and tentatively placed in the genus Dematochroma Baly given its phylogenetic proximity to De. thyiana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2008. Interestingly, Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso (2014) hinted the correct association of T. cancellata with Cazeresia mentioning the similarity of the spermathecae of T. cancellata with that of C. montana, apart from recovering the close association of this species with De. thyiana, one of the species formerly in Dematochroma and transferred to Cazeresia in this work. Platania and Gómez-Zurita (2023a), upon examination of the type specimens of Du. striata and T. cancellata confirmed that they were conspecific, and the taxonomic journey of these taxa temporarily settled, but only briefly, until its final transfer to Cazeresia, as proposed here.

Cazeresia striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007) comb. nov. has been found particularly abundant in the Central Massif of Grande Terre, from Col des Roussettes to in and around the Reserve Speciale de Faune du Col d’Amieu, but we report some findings further south, from Les Koghis and the Parc Provincial de la Rivière Bleue (Fig. 8e), for which we have no genetic data and should be reassessed genetically to validate their conspecificity. Jolivet et al. (2013) reported the species from two localities in the Massif du Panié (La Guen and Dawenia), in the northern part of the island, which would also be interesting to assess genetically. The elevation range of the species seems to cover from sea level to 630 m in Col d’Amieu, thus among the largest recorded for the genus. Among available records, there is information about potential host-plants of this species, including captures on Syzygium jambos, S. cumini [Myrtaceae] and Semecarpus atra [Anacardiaceae] (Jolivet et al. 2007a; Samuelson 2010) and molecular inferences consistent with numerous angiosperm families (Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso 2014).

Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov.

Figures 1a, 6d, 8a, 9k

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 6d), JGZC-5113, Farino, Parc des Grandes Fougères, Aire des Araucarias, -21.61859 165.75570, 400 m, 14.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 1 male, Col d’Amieu, 6.5–7.0 km from gate, 21°35.2’S 165°46.4’E, 450–470 m, 6.i.2007, night coll., M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg., Paratype Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, JGZC-5272, Farino, Parc des Grandes Fougères, Aire des Araucarias, -21.61859 165.75570, 400 m, 14.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male, Farino, refuge, -21.6488 165.7812, 260 m, 4.xi.2010, at light, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 female, JGZC-5607, Sarramea, nr. cascade, -21.6372 165.8659, 160 m, 10.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia subgeminata sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Dorsum, venter, coxae and mandibles very deep brown, with faint bronze reflections mostly on head and pronotum; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and apical antennomeres except apex of eleventh antennomere infuscate; palpi ochre. Length: 4.5 mm; width: 2.3 mm (dimensions of paratypes: 4.5–4.7 mm long, 2.3–2.4 mm wide).

Frons with few tiny punctures basally and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to outer third of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few tiny punctures basally and anterior border of clypeus with subtrapezoidal median emargination. Eyes large, separate on frons by 1.9× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: ­2.2-1.0-1.9-2.1-2.4- 2.3-2.7-2.2-2.3-2.2-3.0. Pronotum with tiny punctures at sides of basal marginal furrow; anterior border of pronotum 0.8× as wide as posterior border; surface slightly less microgranulate than frons, with abundant, slightly aciculate punctures, as large as intervals at sides of median line and lateral declivities, interspersed with some micropunctures. Prosternal process about half as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.2× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely microreticulate, shinier than pronotum, entirely glabrous except for very few short setae near slightly projecting sutural angles; with relatively large punctures, as big as intervals and tending to relatively regular geminate rows on disc; last two intervals convex in apical 2/3, and other intervals weakly convex in apical third. Epipleura notably enlarged before narrowing apically, with tiny setae in apical border. Tarsi slender, with basitarsomeres enlarged, wider than third tarsomere and shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi, nearly as wide as third tarsomere apically and about as long as second and third combined in meso- and metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 9k) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate elliptic, arched distally with wide, short, subtrapezoidal apex; gonopore short oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance much longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering more than basal half of gonopore. — Females. The female of C. subgeminata sp. nov. shows typical differences with the males in the group, including differences in facial structure, with broader clypeus at base and lack of deep incision on anterior border of clypeus, shorter and thinner antennae and shorter and thinner basitarsomeres of all tarsi, and in this case, more apparent subgemination of elytral punctures, with outer intervals convex. Spermatheca (Fig. 1a) hook-shaped, with cornu about as long as nodulus, more or less regularly curved; nodulus strongly bulbous at base, with short interstitial ramus opposite to cornu, before basal enlargement of nodulus; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally at base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and bowed, relatively short before distal gradual enlargement with poorly sclerotized complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

The group of species with testaceous legs and antennae usually have elytral punctures smaller than intervals. In this species, punctures on disc of elytra are not bigger than in other species, but they are much more abundant, owing to subgemination, thus they are about as large as intervals. The other species with dense, subgeminate punctation on elytra is its sister, C. corrugata sp. nov., but they can be distinguished by the reduced punctation, almost absent in the frontoclypeus of C. subgeminata sp. nov., compared with sparse but extended punctation in C. corrugata, apart from the sparser punctation on a smoother, unwrinkled pronotum in C. subgeminata, compared with C. corrugata.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name reflects the tight punctation on the elytra of the type, tending to regular series of geminate punctures, thus using as suffix the participle (f.) of geminō (= to double), -gemināta, together with the prefix sub- derived from the same preposition, sub (= under), to qualify the adjective as an approximation, a trend.

Distribution.

At present, this species is only known from a group of nearby localities, in moderate elevation (160–470 m a.s.l.), deep in the forest of the Parc provincial des Grandes Fougères (Fig. 8a).

Cazeresia thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2008) n. comb.

Figures 1i, 8a, 9j, 11a

Dematochroma thyiana Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2007c [2008], p. 196.

Species #21: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Dematochroma thyiana: Platania & Gómez-Zurita, 2023a, p. 45.

Material.

Holotype: Female (Fig. 11a), Forêt de Thy, near Saint-Louis [22°12’36”S 166°32’38”E], 20.i.1978, J. Faimka leg. (MNHN).

Other material examined.

JGZC: 2 females, JGZC-NC041 and JGZC-NC042, Monts Kwa Ne Mwa, on road btw Nouméa and Yaté, 2 km E Pic Mouirange, 22°12.356’S 166°40.798’E, 220 m, 19.i–17.ii.2007, R. Pöllabauer leg. MNHW: 1 male, JGZC-5349, Bois du Sud, -22.17200 166.76111, 220 m, 18.x.2008, day beating, M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, Bois du Sud, -22.17288 166.76330, 220–250 m, beating along track entering forest reserve, 20.x.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 3 males (two with: JGZC-5123 and JGZC-5124), Bois du Sud, ‘Araucaria’ hut, -22.1740 166.7627, 220 m, at light, 8.xii.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 2 males (one with: JGZC-5376) and 1 female (JGZC-5449), Pic du Grand Kaori, 22°16.8’S 166°53.5’E, 240 m, night coll. (lamp and beating), 26.xii.2006, M. Wanat and R. Dobosz leg.

Remarks.

This species was described based on a single female specimen collected in the forest along the river Thi in the commune of Saint-Louis, not far from the capital of New Caledonia, Nouméa. The description included an illustration of the spermatheca that is the typical of this group (Jolivet et al. 2007c), therefore the adscription of the species to Cazeresia is granted (see Fig. 1i), and we propose the new combination Cazeresia thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2008) comb. nov. Interestingly, Jolivet et al. (2007c) also stressed the marked similarity of their new species with De. humboldtiana Heller, which is also transferred to Cazeresia in this work. The challenge for us was establishing if any of our unidentified samples of Cazeresia belonged to this species, because there were not many diagnostic characters available in the description and the type was not in the best conditions for sound comparisons (Fig. 11a). Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso (2014) erroneously mentioned this taxon in their molecular phylogeny using one specimen (JGZC-NC193) collected in Aoupinié and recognized here as a representative of C. laticollis sp. nov. This mistake was corrected in Platania et al. (2024), who alternatively identified as De. thyiana one specimen (JGZC-NC206) collected in Mont Do. While this identification proved significantly closer to the true C. thyiana according to their indistinguishable morphology and close phylogenetic proximity as established here (Fig. 3), the output of phylogenetic species delimitation approaches, the geographic gap between Mont Do and the area where C. thyiana occurs, as well as the strong elevation difference between localities, compelled us to consider the specimens from Mont Do a different species. Here we recognized two males from Bois du Sud and two females from Kwa Ne Mwa, localities 14 and 23 km away, respectively, eastwards from the type locality of C. thyiana, as conspecific. Thus, C. thyiana should be considered at present a low elevation (up to 240 m a.s.l.) species with a medium range in the forests east of Nouméa (Fig. 8a). The availability of males putatively belonging to this species allows recognizing the differences with females, mainly a subtrapezoidal clypeus with deep broad anterior emargination apart from typical sexually dimorphic traits, and description for the first time of the male genitalia. Penis (Fig. 9j) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, slightly widened preapically; apex elongate elliptical, arched distally with short bilobed broad distal projection; gonopore short oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance slightly longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering about half of gonopore.

Cazeresia tibialis sp. nov.

Figures 1n, 6c, 7j, 8e

Material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 6c), JGZC-5359, Poro Plateau, -21.3483 165.6932, 620 m, forest, night, 28.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Holotype Cazeresia tibialis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: JGZC: 1 male, JGZC-5605, Poro Plateau, -21.34832 165.69322, 620 m, forest, night, 27.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia tibialis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]. MNHW: 3 males and 1 female, Poro Plateau, -21.34832 165.69322, 620 m, forest, night, 27.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia tibialis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 2 males (one with: JGZC-5480) and 3 females (JGZC-5118, JGZC-5393 and JGZC-5451), Poro Plateau, -21.3483 165.6932, 620 m, forest, night, 28.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg., Paratype Cazeresia tibialis sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Description.

Body short elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles, head, scutellum, elytra and ventral surfaces, including coxae dark chocolate brown; pronotum, antennal calli and median line on frons blackish; labrum, legs and antennae testaceous, with infuscate base of tibiae and apical antennomeres, except apex of eleventh antennomere; palpi ochre. Length: 5.5 mm; width: 3.1 mm (range of male specimens: 4.8–5.5 mm long, 2.9–3.1 mm wide).

Frons with few tiny punctures near middle impression and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to slightly over middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few tiny punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes moderately big, separate on frons by 2.1× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: ­1.8-1.0-1.6-1.9-2.4-2.1-2.4-2.2-2.2-2.2-2.7. Surface of pronotum with scattered small, slightly aciculate punctures on disc and lateral declivities. Prosternal process nearly as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.2× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind weakly callous humeri; surface finely alutaceous, shinier than pronotum, with moderate punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Protibiae (inset in Fig. 6c) as long as profemur, weakly curved and gradually widened before strongly enlarged ventral apical quarter, with sharp external keels, ventral keel with wide preapical weak emargination, rows of recumbent setae dorsally and relatively dense recumbent setae ventrally; mesotibiae slightly shorter than mesofemora, slightly bent ventrally and gradually widening before strong bent and enlargement at apical quarter, with rather sharp anterior ventral keel; metatibiae as long as metafemora, straight and gradually widened towards apex, more markedly in apical quarter; pro- and mesobasitarsomeres enlarged, wider than and as wide as third tarsomere in pro- and mesotarsi, respectively, and narrower in metatarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in all tarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, subtrapezoidal, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7j) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, nearly as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, round distally with short projecting blunt tip; gonopore elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance shorter than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Females also have punctured frons and clypeus. Spermatheca (Fig. 1n) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and slightly longer than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

Among species with dark bicolour dorsum and testaceous appendages and wide prosternal process, as wide or wider than procoxae, C. tibialis sp. nov. has the shortest proportions, looking quite compact, and males show a very special conformation of front and middle tibiae allowing to recognize it from any other species of Cazeresia at once. Size (< 6.0 mm), shorter proportions (< 1.75) and male tibiae are particularly useful traits to distinguish it from sympatric C. holosericea sp. nov.

Derivatio nominis.

The species name focuses the attention on the peculiar shape of anterior and middle tibiae of males by using the Latin adjective (f.), tībiālis, applied to something of or pertaining to the tibia.

Distribution.

The specimens available for this species come from a single locality at moderate elevation (620 m a.s.l.) close to the northeastern coast of Grande Terre, north of the Central Massif (Fig. 8e).

Cazeresia tricolor sp. nov.

Figures 1c, 7e, 8a

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-5470, Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, -22.03188 166.46738, 910 m, night, 28.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Holotype Cazeresia tricolor sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (MNHW). — Paratypes: MNHW: 2 males and 4 females (two with, JGZC-5191 and JGZC-5225), Dzumac Mts., Mt. Ouin road junction, -22.03188 166.46738, 910 m, night, 28.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia tricolor sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label]; 1 male (JGZC-5458) and 1 female, Dzumac road, -22.08783 166.44643, 670 m, forest, night beating roadside, 31.x.2008, M. Wanat leg., Paratype Cazeresia tricolor sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label].

Other material examined.

MNHW: 1 female (JGZC-5694), Humboldt (S track), -21.90491 166.35391, 580 m, 9.xi.2008, sifting litter, rainforest, M. Wanat leg., Cazeresia tricolor sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso, J. Gómez-­Zurita det. 2024.

Description.

Body elongate elliptic, moderately convex. Mandibles and head black with faint bronze metallic reflection; pronotum and hypomera black with faint dark green metallic reflection; elytra and scutellum dark brown with faint blue metallic reflection; ventral surfaces dark brown; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with apical antennomeres except apex of antennomere 11 infuscate; palpi ocher. Length: 4.05 mm; width: 2.05 mm (range of male specimens: 4.0–5.3 mm long, 2.0–2.9 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci shortly prolonged medially to outer third of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate. Eyes large, separate on frons by 1.6× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 1.8-1.0-1.4-1.6-2.0-1.9-2.2-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.6. Very fine anterior margin of pronotum obsolete at middle; surface of pronotum similar to frons, without micropunctures. Prosternal process about 0.7× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.3× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface rather smooth, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere in protarsi, narrower in meso- and metatarsi, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in protarsi, about as long in mesotarsi, and longer in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, subtrapezoidal, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7e) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides slightly concave in ventral view, as wide preapically as wide at base; apex elongate oval, arched distally with short blunt tooth; gonopore oval, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance slightly longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subtrapezoidal, longer than wide, covering about basal half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1c) shaped as question mark, with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to nodulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin and weakly sclerotized near insertion, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented obliquely opposite to cornu for short distance, markedly enlarged and sclerotized with less than one complete, elongate coil distally.

Diagnosis.

Among the brown species with testaceous appendages, the very peculiar shape of the spermatheca of this species is only found in C. parentalis sp. nov., with which it shares many similarities and they are probably sister (unfortunately it was not possible to obtain DNA sequences of this species to prove it). However, they can be distinguished by the very weak metallic tinge and lustrous appearance of dorsal surfaces in this species compared to the dull, brownish tones of C. parentalis.

Derivatio nominis.

The three different faint metallic tonalities of the type and other specimens in the type series is reflected in the chosen name, the Latin adjective (f.), tricolor, meaning three-coloured.

Distribution.

This species has been recorded from relatively high elevations (670–910 m a.s.l.) in the southern part of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8a).

Cazeresia wanati sp. nov.

Figures 1d, 7m, 8e

Species #18: Papadopoulou et al., 2013, p. 481.

Material.

Holotype: Male, JGZC-NC813, Mt. Do, 21°45.684’S 166°00.054’E, 795 m, 9.viii–8.ix.2007, Malaise trap, S. r. f. Pocquereux staff leg., Holotype Cazeresia wanati sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso [red label] (JGZC). — Paratypes [all with red label: Paratype Cazeresia wanati sp. nov. Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso]. JGZC: 2 females (JGZC-NC123 and JGZC-NC552), Mt. Do, -21.76132 166.00007, 809 m, 6.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita leg.; 1 male, JGZC-NC150, Mt. Do, -21.75758 166.00157, 990–1000 m, 6.iii.2008, J. Gómez-Zurita and J.A. Jurado leg. MNHW: 8 males (one with: JGZC-5091) and 8 females, Mt. Do, -21.76527 166.00228, 800–850 m, forest, night beating, 5.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 9 males and 5 females (one with: JGZC-5560), Mt. Do, subsummit forest, -21.76674 166.00540, ca. 850 m, night, 5.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 6 males and 2 females, Mt. Do, -21.76674 166.00540, 820–920 m, roadside, night beating, 6.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 8 males (one with: JGZC-5559) and 5 females (one with: JGZC-5092), Mt. Do, -21.75706 165.99894, 900–1000 m, roadside, night beating, 6.xi.2008, M. Wanat leg.; 10 males (one with: JGZC-5093) and 6 females, Mt. Do, -21.7574 166.0015, 850–950 m, night beating, 2.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female, Mt. Do, -21.7636 166.0020, 800–850 m, night beating, 3.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female, Mt. Do, subsummit forest, -21.7606 165.9996, 850 m, at light, 2.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 1 female, Mt. Do, subsummit forest, -21.7606 165.9996, 850 m, at light, 3.xi.2010, M. Wanat and R. Ruta leg.; 2 males and 3 females, Mt. Do, -21.7574 166.0015, 850–950 m, 3.xi.2010, day beating, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg.; 1 female, Mt. Do, summit maquis, -21.7544 165.9995, 1025 m, 4.xi.2010, R. Ruta and M. Wanat leg.

Description.

Body elliptic, moderately convex. Antennal calli, temples, median depression on vertex, mandibles, pronotum and hypomera very dark brown, almost black with slight bronze shine; elytra, scutellum and most of ventral surface brown, with faint dark blue metallic shine on elytra and scutellum; most of frons and clypeus brown with slight bronze metallic shine; labrum, antennae and legs testaceous, with base of tibiae and femora infuscate; palpi and apex of eleventh antennomere ochre. Length: 5.2 mm; width: 2.7 mm (range of male specimens: 4.5–5.4 mm long, 2.4–2.9 mm wide).

Frons with few small punctures anteriorly and supraocular sulci prolonged medially to middle of dorsal edge of supraantennal calli; clypeus with few small punctures basally and anterior border moderately emarginate medially. Eyes large, widely separate on frons by 1.8× their transverse diameter. Relative proportions of antennomeres: 2.2-1.0-1.9-2.1-2.6- 2.3-2.7-2.4-2.4-2.3-2.9. Prosternal process about 0.75× as wide as transverse diameter of procoxae. Elytra about 1.25× as long as ensemble width at base, widest behind humeri; surface finely alutaceous, shinier than pronotum, with relatively large punctures, smaller than intervals, rather confused anteriorly on disc. Basitarsomeres enlarged, as wide as third tarsomere, shorter than second and third tarsomeres combined in pro- and mesotarsi, and as long as these in metatarsi. Median apodeme of first abdominal ventrite about half as long as ventrite, arched, narrower than mesosternal process; all ventrites with fine microreticulation, sparse fine punctures and long fine, posteriorly adpressed pale yellow setae. Penis (Fig. 7m) slender, regularly curved ventrally, with sides nearly parallel in ventral view; apex elongate, arched, projecting short blunt tip at middle; gonopore relatively small, elongate elliptical, with distal end separated from apex of penis by distance longer than maximum width of gonopore; dorsal flap subrectangular, longer than wide, covering slightly more than half of gonopore. — Females. Spermatheca (Fig. 1d) with cornu shorter than nodulus, bent more or less at right angle relative to no­dulus; nodulus bulbous basally, with short protruding insertion of spermathecal gland submedially, opposite to cornu; spermathecal duct thin, inserted laterally near base of nodulus, oriented opposite to cornu and recurved parallel and about as long or slightly longer than nodulus before gradual enlargement with one complete, elongate coil.

Diagnosis.

This species can be distinguished from other species with body proportion > 1.8, subparallel and completely glabrous brown elytra, testaceous legs and antennae and prosternum narrower than procoxae, by punctures on disc of elytra generally smaller than intervals and by the relatively even surface of anterior lateral declivity of elytra in females, compared to the females of C. laevigata sp. nov., which have slight rugosities. The penises of these two species show marked differences too.

Derivatio nominis.

This species is dedicated with affection to Prof. Marek Wanat (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław, Poland) for confiding us his excellent collection of New Caledonian Eumolpinae for study. This resource has been the key to most recent advances in the systematics of this group.

Distribution.

All the specimens of this species were collected near the summit of Mont Do, a high peak (1003 m a.s.l.) in an isolated ultramafic island northwest of the Massif du Sud (Fig. 8e).

3.6. Species identification key of Cazeresia

1 Sides of elytra convex, widest near middle. Large species, longer than 6.5 mm. 2
Sides of elytra subparallel widest behind humeri. Generally smaller species, although some can reach 7.0 mm. 4
2 Elytra with humeri very feebly marked, and sides clearly convex, with punctures more or less ordered; prosternum as wide or wider than transverse diameter of procoxae; male protibiae strongly enlarged apically. 3
Elytra with strong humeri, subparallel but widest at middle, with punctures confused on disc; prosternum narrower than transverse diameter of procoxae; male protibiae without modifications. L = 6.6–8.1 mm. W of Mt. Humboldt, Mont Do. Cazeresia imperiosa sp. nov.
3 Tiny punctures on frons; sparse punctation on pronotum; fine, aligned punctation on elytra. Penis with short blunt distal tooth. L = 7.7–8.1 mm. Mt. Humboldt. C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille
Strong punctation on frons; dense, strong punctation on pronotum; strong, slightly confused punctation on elytra. Penis with long blunt distal tooth. L = 7.3–8.0 mm. Mt. Kouakoué. C. robusta sp. nov.
4 Distal end of epipleura with fringe of tiny setae and sutural angle with sparse tiny setae or setae longer and more extended apically on elytra. Body length < 6.0 mm. 5
Elytra and epipleura completely glabrous or if with tiny sparse pubescence apically, body length > 6.0 mm 10
5 Anterior border of pronotum about 0.9× as wide as posterior border. Punctation on disc of pronotum fine but dense. Marked sexual dimorphism. L = 3.7–4.6 mm. Widespread. C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille)
Anterior border of pronotum about 0.7× as wide or slightly wider than posterior border. Punctation on disc of pronotum sparse. Subtle sexual dimorphism. 6
6 Punctation on elytra forming relatively ordered rows, subgeminate on disc and forming striae apically. Distal end of penis wide and short, slightly bicuspid, and gonopore poorly defined, longer than wide. 7
Punctation on elytra confused on disc (maybe slightly subgeminate in some females) and only clearly aligned and forming striae apically on elytra and in premarginal and sutural rows. Distal end of penis mucronate, and gonopore short, about as wide as long, with distance from gonopore to apex of penis much longer than width of gonopore. 8
7 Surface of pronotum and elytra even. Punctation on frontoclypeus nearly absent. L = 4.5–4.7 mm. Parc des Grandes Fougères. C. subgeminata sp. nov.
Surface of pronotum and elytra presenting rugae. Sparse punctation on frontoclypeus. L = 4.1 mm. Pic d’Amoa. C. corrugata sp. nov.
8 Pronotum, elytra and legs concolour, with paler tarsi. 9
Pronotum darker than elytra, both dark brown, and legs testaceous. L = 4.2–4.9 mm. Poya. C. impressicornis sp. nov.
9 Surface of pronotum with rougher microsculpture and denser double punctation. Outer interval of elytra weakly but apparently convex in females. L = 4.3–5.4 mm. Haute Rivière Bleue. C. spadicea spadicea sp. nov.
Surface of pronotum slightly glossier and with sparser punctation. Weak costa of last interval of elytron of females confused anteriorly. L = 4.1–4.8 mm. Pic du Pin, Pic du Grand Kaori. C. spadicea bruna ssp. nov.
10 Prosternal process as wide as or wider than procoxae. 11
Prosternal process narrower than procoxae, more clearly in males. 18
11 Males with protibiae modified and clypeus weakly emarginate anteriorly. Body length under 6.0 mm and relatively short (ratio L/W = 1.66–1.77 [males], 1.65–1.71 [females]). L = 4.8–5.8 mm. Poro Plateau. C. tibialis sp. nov.
Males with normal protibiae and anterior border of clypeus deeply incised. Body length typically over 6.0 mm and more oblong (ratio L/W = 1.82–1.89 [males], 1.72–1.85 [females]). 12
12 Apex of epipleura with fringe of tiny, translucent setae. 13
Apex of eplipleura and elytra completely glabrous. 15
13 Legs testaceous. Abdominal ventrites four and five with strongly serrate margin in both sexes. Distal end of penis slender, mucronate, with distance from gonopore to apex longer than width of gonopore. L = 6.2–7.2 mm. Man­djélia. C. clipeata sp. nov.
Legs concolour or testaceous. Abdominal ventrite five finely serrulate in both sexes and four less so also in males. Distal end of penis short and broad, slightly bicuspid, with distance from gonopore to apex as long or shorter than width of gonopore. 14
14 Size smaller (L = 5.8–6.9 mm). Legs nearly concolour with rest of body, very dark brown. Distance between distal end of gonopore and apex of penis as wide as gonopore. Mont Do. [Here, some females of C. holosericea sp. nov., with fringed apex of elytra.] C. petitpierrei sp. nov.
Size larger (L = 6.8–7.5 mm). Legs testaceous, paler than dorsal surfaces. Distance between distal end of gonopore and apex of penis shorter than width of gonopore. L = 6.8–7.5 mm. Chute de la Madeleine. C. maquis sp. nov.
15 Small size, possibly under 6.0 mm. L = 4.5 mm. Aoupinié. C. ovata sp. nov.
Larger size, above 6.0 mm. Species almost impossible to distinguish. 16
16 Dorsal surface with conspicuous slightly metallic purplish tinge, including scape and apical antennomeres dorsally. Anterior incision of male clypeus angulate. L = 5.7–6.0 mm. Canala. C. kanalensis (Perroud)
Dorsal surface dark brown, with antennae uniformly testaceous. Anterior incision of male clypeus deep, subtrapezoidal, with thickened margin. 17
17 Punctation on disc of pronotum with tendency to be sparser and more heterogeneously distributed. Punctation on disc of elytra somewhat sparser and less regular. L = 6.5–7.0 mm. Forêt de Thy, Pic Mouirange, Bois du Sud. C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille)
Punctation on disc of pronotum with tendency to be denser and more uniform. Punctation on disc of elytra appearing more dense and tending to regular alignments, particularly in females. L = 6.1–6.9 mm. Poro Plateau. C. holosericea sp. nov.
18 Large beetles, only exceptionally < 6.0 mm. Tarsi paler than tibiae. Males with large pronotum, as wide as elytra and sides of elytra converging posteriorly behind humeri, slightly acuminate. Apex of penis acuminate. L = 5.6–8.2 mm. Aoupinié, Col des Roussettes, Col d’Amieu, Farino. C. laticollis sp. nov.
Smaller beetles, only exceptionally > 6.0 mm. Tarsi concolour with tibiae. Pronotum of males not particularly widened, slightly narrower than elytra, and sides of elytra subparallel behind humeri. Apex of penis generally mucronate (acuminate in three closely related species; see couplet 23). 19
19 Body shorter, with length/width proportion generally < 1.8. 20
Body elongate, with length/width proportion generally > 1.8. 23
20 Margins of fourth and fifth abdominal ventrites serrate in both sexes, more markedly in males. Species living in high elevations (> 900 m a.s.l.). 21
Margin of fifth abdominal ventrite irregularly undulate or weakly serrate at base. Species living in low elevations (< 550 m a.s.l.). 22
21 Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis as long or longer than width of gonopore. Ductus of spermatheca curved proximally and divergent distally. L = 5.0–5.4 mm. Found at high elevation (more than 900 m) southwest of Humboldt Massif. Col du Vulcain. C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov.
Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis shorter than width of gonopore. Ductus of spermatheca characteristically bowed. L = 4.6–7.1 mm. Mt. Humboldt, Mt. Kouakoué, Dzumac Mts. C. humboldtiana (Heller)
22 Pronotum and elytra concolor. Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis about as long as width of gonopore. L = 4.4–5.7 mm. Monts Koghi, Haute Rivière Bleue, Col des Deux Tétons. C. australis sp. nov.
Pronotum darker than elytra. Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis shorter than width of gonopore. L = 4.6–6.4 mm. Nyamié Creek, Haute Rivière Bleue, Chute de la Madeleine, Pic du Pin. C. globosa globosa sp. nov.
23 Penis mucronate at apex. Spermathecal duct short, obliquely divergent from nodulus, weakly sclerotized in proximal part and sclerotized in thickened coil. 24
Penis arched at apex. Spermathecal duct relatively long, bowed or subparallel relative to nodulus, sclerotized throughout until coil. 25
24 Weak metallic tinge on dorsal surfaces with slightly different tones on head (bronze), pronotum (green) and elytra (blue). Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis as wide or slightly wider than gonopore. L = 4.0–5.3 mm. Dzumac Mts. C. tricolor sp. nov.
Dark brown head and pronotum, with or without bronze metallic luster, and pale brown elytra. Distance between distal end of gonopore and mucronate apex of penis much longer than width of gonopore. L = 4.0–5.5 mm. Pic Mouirange, Port Boisé, Pic du Pin, Pic du Grand Kaori, Forêt Cachée, Col des Deux Tétons. C. parentalis sp. nov.
25 Spermatheca J-shaped with thin long duct and several distal coils. L = 4.1–5.2 mm. Bois du Sud, Pic du Pin. C. gracilis sp. nov.
Spermatheca typical of the genus. 26
26 Seam of small punctures along basal margin of pronotum present. Females with anterior half of lateral declivity of elytra uneven. L = 4.4–5.4 mm. Dzumac Mts., Monts Koghi. C. laevigata sp. nov.
Punctures along basal margin of pronotum tiny, almost imperceptible. Females with anterior half of lateral declivity of elytra more or less regularly convex. L = 4.5–5.9 mm. Mont Do. C. wanati sp. nov.

3.7. Distributions and sympatry in ­Cazeresia

This study is remarkable for revealing the largest endemic genus of New Caledonian Eumolpinae to date, shifting from one to 25 species (and two subspecies), and also recognizing its interesting distribution. We are far from understanding the distribution patterns of most endemic genera of Eumolpinae from New Caledonia, because we are still building basic knowledge about their limits and composition. To date, we have reasonably good data for Dematotrichus Gómez-Zurita, Kumatoeides Gómez-Zurita, Taophila Heller, Tricholapita Gómez-Zurita & Cardoso, and Thasycles Chapuis (see references in Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023a), and Cazeresia shows remarkable differences in distribution patterns compared to the groups studied so far. Most of the diversity of this highly diverse genus concentrates in the central and southern parts of Grande Terre, with only two species found in typically humid biomes of the northern part of the island, namely C. clipeata sp. nov. in Mandjélia and C. corrugata sp. nov. in Pic d’Amoa, not far from Poindimié. Some of the species are found in medium elevations of the central massif and surrounding dry areas to the south of the massif and include C. impressicornis sp. nov., C. laticollis sp. nov., C. ovata sp. nov., C. striata (Jolivet, Verma & Mille), and C. subgeminata sp. nov. The remainder of the genus, the vast majority of species, are distributed in the south of Grande Terre, in areas close to the north coast between Houaïlou and Borindi or to the south coast near Tiebaghi, all of them associated to ultramafic terrains. Dematotrichus (13 species), Kumatoeides (9 species), Thasycles (14 species) and Tricholapita (12 species) are mainly distributed in the central part of Grande Terre with few species each in the southern, ultramafic part of the island (Gómez-Zurita 2018, 2022; Platania et al. 2020; Gómez-Zurita and Pàmies-Harder 2022). In Taophila (21 species), species diversity is more uniformly distributed latitudinally, with up to six species found in the south of Grande Terre (Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2022). Another important difference compared to the other genera of Eumolpinae is that a relatively high number of species show extended ranges beyond the type locality and nearby sites. Thus, up to ten species have registered ranges over 20 km, with C. kanalensis (Perroud) and C. striata reaching up to 200 and 150 km, respectively. The remaining 15 taxa (60%) have ranges usually limited to their type locality and surrounding localities, what we reported in previous works as microendemic (e.g., Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023b). The spatial pattern in the species ranges of Cazeresia may be also related in part to the characteristics of the lowland dry habitats that many species inhabit, more continuous, stable and homogenous than their rainforest, mountainous counterparts, rather than any intrinsic dispersal-related trait of the species in the genus. We cannot discard sampling bias effects in the reported distributions, and more work is needed to establish these species’ ranges; however, the reported patterns are consistent with what is known from other groups of animals in New Caledonia and definitely a sound basis to refine the knowledge about their distributions (Caesar et al. 2017).

As mentioned, the spatial segregation in southern Grande Terre is associated to the peculiar geology of these parts of the island, which in turn conditions the biota, chiefly the vegetation, but also potentially to the microorganisms and animals tightly associated with this vegetation (e.g., Pillon et al. 2010; Gourmelon et al. 2016; Isnard et al. 2016). To our knowledge, there are no compelling examples in the literature of animal adaptation to ultramafic terrains in New Caledonia or to these soils affecting the assemblage of animal communities, but in the case of Eumolpinae, their biology can inform ways in which this adaptation could be necessary. The larvae of Eumolpinae are blind, subterranean and feed on the roots of their host plants (Jolivet and Verma 2008), thus they develop in an intimate relationship with the soil. In turn, the adults are aerial, but feed and reproduce on plants that could be highly adapted to poor nutrient and high metal content of these soils, possibly triggering defence or tolerance physiological mechanisms against metal hyperconcentration in these plants (Mincey and Boyd 2018, and references within) or even specialization on these special resources (Mesjasz-Przybytowicz and Przybytowicz 2020). The idea of the importance of adaptation to these particular environmental conditions could be exemplified by the case of Tricholapita. The mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of Tricholapita allowed recognizing a small derived monophyletic group of species putatively associated to the ultramafic terrains, but embedded within the diversification of lineages found in other geological backgrounds, a pattern that was suggestive of an evolutionary and ecological transition (Platania et al. 2020; Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023b). While still speculative, given that most species of Cazeresia occur in ultramafic terrains, also in different ultramafic inland islands along the southern coast of Grande Terre, this genus may represent a lineage where this putative transition was at the base of its diversification. Apart from the DNA-based inference of several potential hosts in the case of C. striata (including representatives of six plant families; Gómez-Zurita and Cardoso 2014), the only reliable feeding observations are those of C. montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille on the Ericaceae Dracophyllum involucratum (Jolivet et al. 2005), a typical maquis floristic element. The lack of information on the host plants and degree of specialization of most species of Cazeresia limits our understanding about the potential extent, implications or even need for genetic, regulatory or physiological changes to adapt to high metal content in the environment or the food of these insects.

The accumulation of species in only one part of the island and in some cases with relatively large ranges also results in rates of range overlap higher than deduced in all other studied genera (except Taophila to some extent), where allopatry was rather the norm. C. tibialis sp. nov. and C. holosericea sp. nov. have sympatric microendemic ranges at mid elevations (620 m a.s.l.) not far inland from the coastal community of Poro, in the north central coast of Grande Terre. These species have marked morphological differences perhaps related to the development of reproductive barriers. The group of species C. subgeminata, C. impressicornis, C. laticollis, and C. striata, despite having different ranges, they cooccur in central Grande Terre, in the Farino and Sarraméa area, south of the Resérve Spéciale de Faune du Col d’Amieu. These are lowland species, some reaching mid elevations, up to 630 m, precisely in Col d’Amieu, and they belong to morphologically and genetically divergent lineages. Mont Do is a peak in a relatively isolated patch of ultramafic terrain in southern central Grande Terre off the route from Boulouparis to La Foa. This ecological island with the status of Natural Reserve, hosts many endemic plant and animal species, including three species of Cazeresia in turn isolated in the higher parts of this peak, above 800 m a.s.l. and up to the mountain summit. These are one population of C. imperiosa sp. nov. and the microendemic C. petitpierrei sp. nov. and C. wanati sp. nov., belonging to divergent phylogenetic lineages and well differentiated morphologically, starting with narrowly overlapping body size ranges, from the smaller C. wanati (4.5–6.0 mm) to the larger C. imperiosa (6.6–8.1 mm). A second population of C. imperiosa is known from Col du Vulcain, a high elevation (980 m a.s.l.) locality southwest from the Réserve Spéciale Botanique du Mont Humboldt, locality shared with the microendemic C. globosa altitudinalis ssp. nov., again belonging to divergent evolutionary lineages and very different morphologically. C. humboldtiana (Heller), C. laevigata sp. nov. and C. tricolor sp. nov. have been found in high elevations (above 800 m a.s.l.) in the same relatively small area in the central part of the Massif du Sud, north of Nouméa. These species are not so different morphologically (except in the case of C. humboldtiana, larger, stouter), but they belong to divergent phylogenetic groups (assuming a close relationship of C. tricolor with C. parentalis sp. nov.). Finally, a relatively large group of species occupy small or larger ranges in the lowland areas southeast of the Massif du Sud, south of Lac de Yaté, an area dominated by dry biomes, like the maquis minier. This group of sympatric species includes C. australis sp. nov., C. globosa sp. nov., C. gracilis sp. nov., C. maquis sp. nov., C. parentalis, C. spadicea sp. nov. and its subspecies C. s. bruna ssp. nov., the southernmost populations of C. striata, and C. thyiana (Jolivet, Verma & Mille). Among these, only C. gracilis, C. maquis and the two subspecies of C. spadicea show restricted ranges, and the others have relatively extended distribution areas, and all of them occur at low elevations, below 500 m a.s.l. Conversely to the previous cases of sympatry discussed, in this case, close relatives such as C. australis and C. globosa, or C. maquis and C. thyiana, and the genetically divergent but morphologically similar C. gracilis and C. parentalis, have potentially overlapping ranges, which suggests the possibility of ecological or other mechanisms to contribute to their reproductive isolation.

For Taophila and Tricholapita, genera with high rates of allopatry and microendemicity, we established that allopatric speciation with signs of slowed down diversification rates explained their diversity and ranges, which may be extensive to other evolutionary lineages of New Caledonian Eumolpinae with similar geographic patterns (Platania and Gómez-Zurita 2023b). Cazeresia, of similar age than Taophila and Tricholapita, has proportionally more species, and more with larger, overlapping ranges, which may suggest that its diversification could respond to different mechanisms. When information is available, we do not find evidence for sympatric species pairs, and as described earlier, coexisting species tend to belong to divergent phylogenetic lineages, so that allopatric speciation and secondary contacts still make a plausible explanation for the observed diversity and distribution patterns in Cazeresia (Bolnick and Fitzpatrick 2007). Nevertheless, generalized parapatry or sympatry in this genus is noteworthy and, interestingly, the degree of external or reproductive phenotypic differentiation in Cazeresia, also in sympatric species, is not so apparent as in other genera studied so far, so that interspecific competition and reproductive interference, usually regarded as drivers of phenotypic diversification (e.g., Schluter 2000; Gröning and Hochkirch 2008), may be effectively reduced by other means. In this case, specialization on different resources (e.g., different host plants), temporal segregation, or other forms of ecological character displacement evolved in sympatry or allopatry may favour species coexistence (Coyne and Orr 2004).

4. Acknowledgments

Marek Wanat (MNHW, Wroclaw) is acknowledged once again for the generous temporary loan of his collection of New Caledonian Eumolpinae, the basis for the revisionary work that we have been conducting for many years now. Meritxell Campos (http://www.xellcampos.cat) very beautifully illustrated for this work several species of Cazeresia and some of their anatomical details. Antoine Mantilleri (MNHN, Paris, France) kindly helped us to understand the taxonomic problem affecting Cazeresia montana Jolivet, Verma & Mille and its problematic description, and Christophe Rivier (MNHN) documented Colaspis kanalensis Perroud to help its recognition as a member of the genus Cazeresia. Leonardo Platania (IBB, Barcelona, Spain) helped with lab work for some of the specimens used in this study. Our deepest gratitude is also for the anonymous revision and for the work done by the editorial team of the journal and all the time they spend to help us polishing and publishing this work, especially considering that it was exceptionally long and arguably arid, as most taxonomic revisions. This work was possible thanks to grant PID2021-123668NB-I00 of the “Agencia Estatal de Investigación” (Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities).

5. References

  • Ahrens D, Fujisawa T, Krammer H-J, Eberle J, Fabrizi S, Vogler AP (2016) Rarity and incomplete sampling in DNA-based species delimitation. Systematic Biology 65: 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw002
  • Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N, ­Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Müller NF, Ogilvie HA, du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu C-H, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
  • Caesar M, Grandcolas P, Pellens R (2017) Outstanding micro-endemism in New Caledonia: more than one out of ten animal species have a very restricted distribution range. PLoS ONE 12: e0181437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181437
  • Chamley H (1986) Continental and marine paleoenvironments reflected by west Pacific clay sedimentation. Geologische Rundschau 75: 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01770193
  • Chevillotte V, Chardon D, Beauvais A, Maurizot P, Colin F (2006) Long-term tropical morphogenesis of New Caledonia (Southwest Pacific): importance of positive epeirogeny and climate change. Geomorpho­logy 81: 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.020
  • Clavareau H (1914) Chrysomelidae: 11. Eumolpinae. Pars 59. In: Schenk­ling S (Ed) Coleopterorum Catalogus. W. Junk, Berlin.
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA.
  • Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B, Flouri T (2020) ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz189
  • Fabricius JC (1801) Systema Eleutheratorum secundum Ordines, Genera, Species: adiectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Bibliopoli Academici Novi, Kiliae.
  • Fauvel A (1866) Catalogue des Coléoptères de la Nouvelle Calédonie et dépendances avec descriptions, notes et synonymies nouvelles. Bulletin de la Société linnéenne de Normandie 1: 172–209.
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62: 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
  • Gómez-Zurita J (2017) Insights on the genus Acronymolpus Samuelson with new synonymies and exclusion of Stethotes Baly from the fauna of New Caledonia (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae). ZooKeys 720: 65–75. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.720.13582
  • Gómez-Zurita J (2022) Integrative systematic revision of a new genus of Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) endemic to New Caledonia: Dematotrichus gen. nov. and its numerous new hairy species. Systematics and Biodiversity 20: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2084471
  • Gómez-Zurita J, Cardoso A (2014) Systematics of the New Caledon­ian endemic genus Taophila Heller (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae) combining morphological, molecular and ecological data, with description of two new species. Systematic Entomology 39: 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12038
  • Gómez-Zurita J, Pàmies-Harder M (2022) Phylogenetic restitution and taxonomic revision of the New Caledonian endemic genus Thasycles Chapuis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 297: 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.01.003
  • Gourmelon V, Maggia L, Powell JR, Gigante S, Hortal S, Gueunier C, Letellier K, Carriconde F (2016) Environmental and geographical factors structure soil microbial diversity in New Caledonian ultramafic substrates: a metagenomic approach. PLoS One 11: e0167405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167405
  • Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Quarterly Review of Biology 83: 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/590510
  • Heller KM (1916) Die Käfer von Neu-Caledonien und den benachbarten Inselgruppen. In: Sarasin F, Roux J (Eds) , Nova Caledonia, Zoologie, Vol. II, L. III. C. W. Kreidels Verlag, Wiesbaden, 229–364.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK (2008) Eumolpinae – a widely distributed and much diversified subfamily of leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Terrestrial Arthropods Reviews 1: 3–37.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK, Mille C (2005) New observations on the biology of Chrysomelidae of New Caledonia and description of two new species from the main island (Coleoptera). Revue française d’Entomologie 27: 63–72.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK, Mille C (2007a) New genera and species of Eumolpinae from New Caledonia (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Revue française d’Entomologie 29: 77–92.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK, Mille C (2007b) New species of Eumolpinae from the genera Dematochroma Baly, 1864 and Taophila Heller, 1916 from New Caledonia (Coleoptera, Eumolpidae). Revue française d’Entomologie 29: 33–47.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK, Mille C (2007c) [2008] New species of Dematochroma and Colaspoides from New Caledonia (Coleoptera, Chry­so­melidae, Eumolpinae). Nouvelle Revue d’Entomologie (N. S. ) 24: 195–200.
  • Jolivet P, Verma KK, Mille C (2013) New and known leaf beetles collected in Mont Panié in 2010 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae). Nouvelle Revue d’Entomologie (N. S. ) 29: 141–154.
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A (2019) ­RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35: 4453–4455. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
  • de Laporte FL (1833) Mémoire sur les divisions du genre Colaspis. Revue d’Entomologie 1: 18–25.
  • Lawrence JF, Beutel RG, Leschen RAB, Slipinski A (2010) Glossary of morphological terms. In: Leschen RAB, Beutel RG, Lawrence JF (Eds) , Handbook of Zoology. Arthropoda: Insecta. Part 38. Coleo­ptera, Beetles. Vol. 2. Morphology and Systematics (Elateroidea, Bo­stri­chi­formia, Cucujiformia Partim). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 9–20.
  • Lefèvre E (1885) Eumolpidarum hucusque cognitarum catalogus, sectionum conspectu systematico, generum sicut et specierum nonnullarum novarum descriptionibus adjunctis. Mémoires de la Société royale des sciences de Liège, ser. 2: 1–172.
  • Lindroth CH (1957) The principal terms used for male and female genitalia in Coleoptera. Opuscula Entomologica 22: 241–256.
  • Mesjasz-Przybytowicz J, Przybytowicz WJ (2020) Ecophysiology of nickel hyperaccumulating plants from South Africa – from ultramafic soil and mycorrhiza to plants and insects. Metallomics 12: 1018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9MT00282K
  • Mille C, Jolivet P (2022) Illustrated catalogue of the Leaf Beetles of New Caledonia (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Calédo Livres, Nou­méa.
  • Miralles A, Vences M (2013) New metrics for comparison of taxono­mies reveal striking discrepancies among species delimitation methods in Madascincus lizards. PLoS ONE 8: e68242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068242
  • Montrouzier X (1861) Essai sur la faune entomologique de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (Balade) et des îles des Pins, Art, Lifu, etc. Annales de la Société entomologique de France, ser. 4(1): 265–306.
  • Papadopoulou A, Cardoso A, Gómez-Zurita J (2013) Diversity and diversification of Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in New Caledonia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12039
  • Patriat M, Collot J, Etienne S, Poli S, Clerc C, Mortimer N, Pattier F, Juan C, Roest WR (2018) New Caledonia obducted Peridotite Nappe: offshore extent and implications for obduction and postobduction processes. Tectonics 37: 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004722
  • Perroud B-P, Montrouzier X (1864) La faune entomologique de Kanala (Nouvelle-Calédonie) et description de quelques espèces nouvelles ou peu connué. Annales de la Société Linnéene de Lyon 4: 1–212.
  • Platania L, Gómez-Zurita J (2023b) Analysis of intrinsic evolutionary factors leading to microendemic distributions in New Caledonian leaf beetles. Scientific Reports 13: 6909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34104-z
  • Platania L, Cardoso A, Gómez-Zurita J (2020) Diversity and evolution of New Caledonian endemic Taophila subgenus Lapita (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189: 1123–1154. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz119
  • Platania L, Cardoso A, Anderson M, Fikáček M, Gauthier J, Hendrich L, Mille C, Morii Y, Reid CAM, Seidel M, Morgan-Richards M, Trewick SA, Toussaint EFA, Gómez-Zurita J (2024) New Caledonian rovers and the historical biogeography of a hyper-diverse endemic lineage of South Pacific leaf beetles. Systematic Entomology 49: 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12632
  • R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Smith DS (1964) The structure and development of flightless Coleo­ptera: a light and electron microscopic study of the wings, thoracic exoskeleton and rudimentary flight musculature. Journal of Morphology 114: 107–183.
  • Wagner T (2007) Monolepta Chevrolat, 1837, the most speciose galerucine taxon: redescription of the type species Monolepta bioculata (Fabricius, 1781) and key to related genera. Journal of Natural History 41: 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930601127384
  • Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Tables S1, S2

Gómez-Zurita J, Cardoso A (2025)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: Table S1. Specimens of Cazeresia providing mtDNA sequences for analysis, including locality data and specimen and DNA sequence unique identifiers in the JGZC and MNHW collections and GenBank, respectively. — Table S2. Length and width ranges and L/W ratios for males and females of the species of Cazeresia Jolivet, Verma & Mille, 2005.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/­licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (247.11 kb)
login to comment