Research Article
Print
Research Article
Integrative delimitation of Apolygus (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) species known from Russia with the emphasis on Apolygus lucorum and Apolygus spinolae having trans-Palearctic distribution
expand article infoAnna A. Namyatova§, Polina A. Dzhelali§, Darya S. Bolshakova|
‡ Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
§ All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Russia
| Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Open Access

Abstract

Apolygus (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) is a large and taxonomically challenging trans-Palearctic genus comprising 74 species, and it has never been revised. The greatest diversity of this genus occurs in Asia, and 15 species have been recorded from Russia. Among them, Apolygus limbatus, Apolygus lucorum, and Apolygus spinolae are trans-Palearctic, and A. lucorum and A. spinolae are economically important as pests. Previous studies have shown that A. lucorum and A. spinolae are very similar in morphology and that the barcoding region might not be suitable for their identification. In this study a revision of the Apolygus representatives inhabiting Russia is provided based on morphological and molecular data. Mitochondrial (COI and 16S rRNA) and nuclear markers (ITS1 and 28S3 rRNA) were used for phylogenetic analyses and automatic species delimitation methods were applied. Apolygus lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens were treated as junior synonyms of A. spinolae because morphological and molecular data did not show differences between those species. Apolygus shikotan sp. nov. was described as new to science. Morphological data and the COI phylogeny show that A. limbatus might represent two separate species. However, additional specimens and nuclear markers for both groups are needed to test this hypothesis. The synonymy of A. syringae with A. hilaris was supported based on the morphological data. Apolygus gotorum and A. subhilaris are reported from Russia for the first time. The nuclear marker ITS1 is the most reliable marker for species delimitation and identification of Apolygus species.

Key words

Palearctic, widespread species, species delimitation, integrative taxonomy, morphology, molecular phylogenetics

1. Introduction

There is a growing number of studies addressing taxonomic problems using molecular data, which can help to reveal cryptic species and to test the status of species and subspecies described based on color and small morphological differences. This integrative approach is especially important for widespread species with considerable intraspecific variation (Daglio and Dawson 2019; Stork, 2018; Satler et al. 2021). The Palearctic is the largest biogeographic region and its insect fauna is considered relatively well known (e.g., Konstantinov et al. 2009). However, many species and genera have been treated using morphological data only, including economically important, widespread and abundant taxa.

The family Miridae, or plant bugs, is distributed worldwide and it is also diverse in the Palearctic (>2800 species) (Kerzhner and Josifov 1999). It comprises many widespread species, including trans-Palearctic and trans-Holarctic, and some of them are serious pests, e.g., representatives of the genus Lygus Hahn, 1833, Apolygus China, 1941, Polymerus Hahn, 1831 (e.g., Schwartz and Foottit 1998; Namyatova et al. 2013; Namyatova et al. 2023; Wheeler 2001). Apolygus is a large trans-Palearctic genus comprising 74 described species with the greatest diversity in East Asia. It is a member of the taxonomically challenging “Lygus-complex.” This group includes ~50 genera which are morphologically alike (Schwartz and Foottit 1998; Namyatova et al. 2021; Yasunaga et al. 2018). Previously Apolygus was treated as a subgenus of Lygocoris Reuter, 1875 (e.g., Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964; Yasunaga 1991a). However, Yasunaga (1991a) showed that Apolygus differs from the nominative subgenus in many male genitalic characters. Phylogenies based on molecular data demonstrated that Lygocoris is polyphyletic with the nominative subgenus being more closely related to Orthops Fieber, 1858, Nonlygus Schwartz & Foottit, 1998, Lygidea Reuter, 1875, Pachylygus Yasunaga, 1994, whereas Apolygus is more closely related to Apolygopsis Yasunaga, Schwartz & Cherot, 2002, Diomocoris Eyles, 1999, Micromimetus Eyles, 1999, Neolygus Knight, 1917, Poppiolygus Yasunaga, Schwartz & Cherot, 2018, Prolygus Carvalho, 1987, and Taylorilygus Leston, 1952 (Kim and Jung 2019; Namyatova et al. 2021; Oh et al. 2023).

Apolygus representatives are distributed from the boreal to tropical zones of Eurasia. Among them, Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür, 1843), A. limbatus (Fallén, 1807) and A. spinolae (Meyer-Dür, 1841) are trans-Palearctic, and A. lucorum is considered invasive in North America (Kelton 1971; Wheeler and Henry 1992). Apolygus nigronasutus (Stål, 1858) is only known from Siberia, Apolygus rhamnicola (Reuter, 1885) occurs in Northern and Central Europe, and other species inhabit the Russian Far East, East Asia and South Asia (Kerzhner and Josifov 1999; Vinokurov et al. 2010; Yasunaga 2023; Yasunaga and Duangthisan 2024). It was previously found that Apolygus lucorum, A. malaisei (Lindberg, 1925), A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens (Kerzhner, 1988) and A. spinolae are very similar to each other in structures and at least some of them cannot be separated using the barcoding region (Kerzhner 1988a; Jung et al. 2011; Kim and Jung 2018a). Yang et al. (2016) showed that A. lucorum and A. spinolae have different haplotypes, but specimens from a single locality in Korea were used for that study. The discordant results using the barcoding region demonstrate that other markers are needed to test the boundaries of those two species.

Currently, there are 15 Apolygus species known from Russia: Apolygus adustus (Jakovlev, 1876), A. fraxinicola (Kerzhner, 1988), A. furvus (Kerzhner, 1972), A. hilaris (Horváth, 1905), A. infamis (Kerzhner, 1977), A. limbatus (Fallen, 1807), A. lucorum, A. maackiae (Kulik, 1965), A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. spinolae, A. subpulchellus (Kerzhner, 1988), A. syringae (Kerzhner, 1988), and A. watajii Yasunaga & Yasunaga, 2000 (Kerzhner and Josifov 1999; Vinokurov et al. 2010, 2024). The Apolygus fauna of Japan and Korea has been studied recently including the description of numerous new species, which also might occur in Russia (Kim and Jung 2016; Oh et al. 2018; Yasunaga 2023). There was no recent taxonomic treatment of this genus for the Russian Far East.

The identification of Apolygus has applied importance, because both, A. lucorum and A. spinolae, are considered serious pests of different crops, including cotton, vegetables and fruit trees in Asia (e.g., Li et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2023; Xue et al. 2023; Xiong et al. 2024). Correct identification of these species is crucial for planning control measures against them. Representatives of Apolygus are generally considered to be herbivorous, and there are monophagous and polyphagous species (Yasunaga 2023). At least A. lucorum was recorded to feed on aphids and can be used in biocontrol (Liu et al. 2017; Lu et al. 2024). Our study has two main goals which are addressed using morphological and molecular data. First, we clarify the limits of two trans-Palearctic species, A. lucorum and A. spinolae. Second, we provide a revision of the Apolygus fauna in Russia.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Material

Specimens from the historical collection of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia (ZIN) and recently collected material were examined. Specimens were initially identified using the original descriptions and keys published in Meyer-Dür (1841), Meyer-Dür (1843), Stål (1858), Jakovlev (1876), Horváth (1905), Lindberg (1925), Kerzhner and Jaczewski (1964), Kulik (1965b), Kerzhner (1972, 1977, 1988a, 1988b), Kerzhner and Jaczewski (1964), Vinokurov and Kanyukova (1995), Yasunaga and Yasunaga (2000), and Yasunaga (1992b, 2023).

The diagnostic characters for Apolygus lucorum, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. malaisei and A. spinolae are inconsistent in some works (see Notes for A. spinolae in the Results section). Therefore, to test the species boundaries using the phylogeny we split the color morphs into species based on the original descriptions and the type specimens or their digital images we were able to examine. We applied the following criteria:

Apolygus lucorum: dorsum and head anteriorly green, without dark markings, cuneus entirely green (Meyer-Dür, 1943, paralectotype: Fig. 14A–D).

Apolygus nigronasutus: mostly pale green, at least half of clypeus dark brown to black, corium with distinct dark marking apically, extending to base of cuneus; apex of cuneus dark brown to black (Stål 1858; Kerzhner 1988a).

Apolygus spinolae: dorsum and head green, without dark markings, cuneus darkened apically (Meyer-Dür 1841, paralectotype: Fig. 14E–H).

Apolygus malaisei: body mostly dark brown to black, clypeus dark brown to black, pronotum dark brown to black, its posterior margin yellow medially, scutellum mostly dark brown to black with bases and apex yellow; clavus and corium mostly dark brown to black, cuneus green, without markings or with small dark brown to black marking apically (Lindberg 1925; Kerzhner 1988a).

Apolygus nigrovirens: less than third part of clypeus apically darkened, rarely entirely darkened or entirely pale, pronotum often with two or four brown markings, rarely entirely pale, sometimes posterior part mostly dark brown; scutellum often pale, sometimes mostly dark brown with pale apex; clavus mostly dark brown or at least with brown stripe; corium with dark brown marking near cuneus, sometimes other markings also present, its outer margin pale; cuneus with distinct dark marking apically (Kerzhner 1988a).

In some cases, we could not assign a specimen to particular species. See Notes for Apolygus spinolae in the Results section for the detailed discussion of the morphological characters.

In total ca. 3000 specimens of Apolygus were examined. The collection event data for all of them were entered into the Arthropod Easy Capture Database (https://research.amnh.org/pbi/locality/index.php) and are available through the Heteroptera Species Pages (https://research.amnh.org/pbi/heteropteraspeciespage/speciesdetails.php). For the widely distributed and abundant species (A. lucorum, A. spinolae, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. limbatus) at least 10 males and 10 females from different series for each species were dissected for examination of genitalia. For species which can be reliably identified using male genitalia, at least one male from each series was examined. The full list of all specimens examined is provided in File S1.

For molecular studies, 87 specimens from the following species were used: A. adustus, A. fraxinicola, A. furvus, A. hilaris, A. limbatus, A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. spinolae, A. subpulchellus. Some specimens from A. lucorum, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. malaisei, A. spinolae complex could not be positively identified using coloration and morphology. Three specimens outside this complex could not be reliably placed to any known species, but they were also included in the analysis. Specimens were collected from 2006 to 2023 in 25 Russian administrative divisions and four other countries (Armenia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, and Norway). Additionally, two specimens of Neolygus viridis and Taylorilygus apicalis were also processed for this study and used as outgroups. See Table SS1 for the full list of vouchers and sequences used for the analyses.

2.2. Dissections, drawings and terminology

To examine the male and female genitalia structures, abdomens were removed and boiled in 10% KOH for up to five minutes and washed in water. After this procedure, the abdomens were dissected in stored glycerol. The drawings were completed using a Leica DM2500 microscope with the drawing device attached. The terminology of genitalia follows Konstantinov (2000, 2003) for males and Schwartz (2011) for females.

2.3. Imaging

The digital images were taken in stacks using the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV camera. Partially focused images were combined using the Helicon Focus software. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken from uncoated specimens using the Hitachi TM1000 tabletop microscope.

2.4. Measurements

Measurements were completed using a LOMO microscope with a graticule and an 10× eyepiece, and they are provided in Table 1. At least seven males and seven females were measured in most cases. The scale bars for habitus images are equal to 1 mm, the scale bars for genitalia structures are equal to 0.1 mm.

Table 1.

Measurements for Apolygus species inhabiting Russia.

Length Width
Species Body Cun-Clyp Pronotum AntSeg1 AntSeg2 Head Pronotum InterOcDi
A. adustus ♂ (N = 7) Mean 5,25 3,50 0,90 0,52 1,47 0,92 1,61 0,34
SD 0,23 0,15 0,06 0,04 0,09 0,07 0,10 0,02
Range 0,50 0,42 0,18 0,10 0,27 0,18 0,31 0,05
Min 5,08 3,33 0,78 0,46 1,33 0,82 1,42 0,31
Max 5,58 3,75 0,96 0,56 1,60 1,00 1,73 0,36
♀ (N = 7) Mean 5,57 3,72 1,73 0,56 1,63 0,97 1,73 0,36
SD 0,15 0,13 0,08 0,03 0,06 0,06 0,08 0,02
Range 0,33 0,17 0,19 0,10 0,15 0,08 0,19 0,06
Min 5,42 3,58 1,67 0,50 1,58 0,90 1,67 0,33
Max 5,75 3,92 1,85 0,60 1,73 1,04 1,85 0,40
A. furvus ♂ (N = 7) Mean 5,71 3,99 0,84 0,48 1,35 0,83 1,54 0,33
SD 0,51 0,31 0,03 0,02 0,06 0,02 0,05 0,01
Range 1,53 0,97 0,08 0,04 0,17 0,07 0,12 0,03
Min 4,67 3,33 0,81 0,46 1,29 0,79 1,48 0,31
Max 6,20 4,30 0,90 0,50 1,46 0,86 1,60 0,34
♀ (N = 9) Mean 5,08 3,39 0,93 0,47 1,46 0,93 1,70 0,35
SD 0,24 0,18 0,05 0,01 0,07 0,04 0,07 0,02
Range 0,67 0,58 0,17 0,04 0,19 0,13 0,23 0,06
Min 4,83 3,17 0,88 0,46 1,35 0,88 1,63 0,31
Max 5,50 3,75 1,04 0,50 1,54 1,00 1,85 0,38
A. sp. nr. furvus ♂ (N = 1) Mean 5,58 3,75 0,96 N/A N/A 1,04 1,75 0,35
A. fraxinicola ♂ (N = 7) Mean 5,37 3,70 0,91 0,55 1,54 0,94 1,63 0,36
SD 0,13 0,14 0,05 0,02 0,06 0,05 0,10 0,02
Range 0,33 0,29 0,13 0,04 0,15 0,15 0,27 0,05
Min 5,17 3,50 0,88 0,52 1,48 0,90 1,56 0,34
Max 5,50 3,92 1,00 0,56 1,65 1,04 1,85 0,40
♀ (N = 7) Mean 5,28 3,53 0,88 0,56 1,56 0,91 1,62 0,37
SD 0,27 0,18 0,02 0,04 0,09 0,03 0,09 0,02
Range 0,67 0,50 0,06 0,08 0,25 0,09 0,26 0,07
Min 4,92 3,25 0,85 0,52 1,40 0,88 1,49 0,33
Max 5,58 3,75 0,92 0,60 1,65 0,97 1,75 0,41
A. kerzhneri ♂ (N = 3) M1 5,08 3,42 0,81 0,46 1,31 0,79 1,47 0,31
M2 4,67 3,25 0,94 N/A N/A 0,85 1,60 0,35
M3 5,42 3,58 0,96 N/A N/A 0,94 1,73 0,38
S. gotorum ♂ (N = 1) M1 N/A 4,50 5,10 N/A N/A 4,70 8,70 1,80
A. hilaris ♂ (N = 5) Mean 5,17 4,22 1,38 0,46 1,38 0,91 1,69 0,34
SD 0,63 0,50 0,11 0,04 0,11 0,03 0,22 0,02
Range 1,67 1,30 0,27 0,08 0,27 0,08 0,56 0,06
Min 4,42 3,60 1,19 0,40 1,19 0,88 1,50 0,31
Max 6,08 4,90 1,46 0,48 1,46 0,96 2,06 0,38
♀ (N = 1) F1 5,83 3,92 1,02 0,50 1,35 0,94 1,79 0,35
S. infamis ♂ (N = 2) M1 4,50 3,17 0,79 0,48 1,40 0,90 1,43 0,33
M2 4,83 3,33 0,85 0,52 1,65 0,94 1,58 0,35
A. limbatus European form ♂ (N = 7) Mean 5,08 3,38 0,78 0,48 1,45 0,93 1,48 0,39
SD 0,19 0,17 0,07 0,04 0,11 0,05 0,09 0,03
Range 0,58 0,50 0,19 0,13 0,27 0,13 0,27 0,06
Min 4,83 3,08 0,73 0,44 1,38 0,89 1,44 0,38
Max 5,42 3,58 0,88 0,56 1,63 1,00 1,60 0,42
♀ (N = 7) Mean 5,06 3,38 0,85 0,50 1,51 0,99 1,56 0,42
SD 0,18 0,21 0,06 0,03 0,07 0,04 0,09 0,02
Range 0,50 0,63 0,17 0,10 0,21 0,14 0,25 0,06
Min 4,67 2,92 0,77 0,46 1,40 0,93 1,42 0,40
Max 5,17 3,54 0,94 0,56 1,60 1,06 1,67 0,46
A. limbatus Asian form ♂ (N = 8) Mean 5,26 3,44 0,87 0,49 1,49 0,88 1,42 0,38
SD 0,17 0,11 0,07 0,03 0,11 0,88 1,40 0,38
Range 0,42 0,33 0,17 0,06 0,31 1,02 1,58 0,40
Min 5,08 3,25 0,77 0,46 1,33 0,96 1,58 0,42
Max 5,50 3,58 0,94 0,52 1,65 1,00 1,67 0,44
♀ (N = 7) Mean 5,26 3,51 0,87 0,51 1,56 0,98 1,62 0,43
SD 0,18 0,10 0,06 0,03 0,10 0,05 0,06 0,02
Range 0,58 0,33 0,17 0,08 0,25 0,13 0,19 0,06
Min 4,92 3,33 0,79 0,48 1,46 0,92 1,52 0,40
Max 5,50 3,67 0,96 0,56 1,71 1,04 1,71 0,46
A. maackiae ♂ (N = 7) Mean 4,40 2,93 0,69 0,45 1,26 0,72 1,21 0,27
SD 0,16 0,10 0,03 0,01 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,00
Range 0,42 0,33 0,08 0,02 0,06 0,05 0,06 0,01
Min 4,17 2,75 0,65 0,44 1,23 0,70 1,19 0,26
Max 4,58 3,08 0,73 0,46 1,29 0,75 1,25 0,27
A. shikotan ♂ (N = 4) M1 4,67 3,08 0,79 0,44 1,35 0,88 1,48 0,35
M2 4,42 3,08 0,73 0,46 1,29 0,83 1,38 0,31
M3 4,75 3,08 0,79 N/A N/A 0,85 1,90 0,31
M4 4,42 3,00 0,78 N/A N/A 0,85 1,94 0,33
♀ (N = 1) F1 N/A N/A 0,92 0,42 N/A 0,98 1,65 0,35
A. spinolae ♂ (N = 35) Mean 5,47 3,59 0,81 0,51 1,44 0,87 1,51 0,34
SD 0,31 0,18 0,05 0,04 0,12 0,04 0,07 0,02
Range 0,83 0,33 0,13 0,08 0,33 0,09 0,21 0,04
Min 4,83 3,33 0,71 0,44 1,21 0,78 1,38 0,31
Max 6,25 4,17 0,90 0,60 1,69 0,96 1,69 0,38
♀ (N = 35) Mean 5,41 3,57 0,82 0,50 1,37 0,87 1,54 0,36
SD 0,28 0,18 0,05 0,03 0,25 0,04 0,08 0,02
Range 1,67 1,17 0,23 0,15 1,27 0,17 0,38 0,10
Min 4,58 3,00 0,67 0,44 0,46 0,77 1,31 0,29
Max 6,25 4,17 0,90 0,58 1,73 0,94 1,69 0,40
A. subhilaris ♂ (N = 9) Mean 4,90 3,32 0,93 0,87 1,55 0,32 0,46 1,33
SD 0,22 0,19 0,10 0,07 0,12 0,03 0,02 0,05
Range 0,50 0,50 0,31 0,21 0,38 0,06 0,04 0,13
Min 4,67 3,08 0,77 0,77 1,38 0,29 0,44 1,25
Max 5,17 3,58 1,08 0,98 1,75 0,35 0,48 1,38
♀ (N = 2) F1 5,08 3,42 0,94 0,35 1,25 0,81 1,56 0,31
F2 0,00 3,33 1,06 0,00 0,00 0,94 1,79 0,38
A. subpulchellus ♂ (N = 7) Mean 4,62 3,06 0,73 0,43 1,28 0,81 1,33 0,27
SD 0,29 0,20 0,05 0,01 0,07 0,02 0,09 0,01
Range 0,58 0,50 0,17 0,04 0,21 0,06 0,23 0,01
Min 4,33 2,83 0,65 0,42 1,15 0,77 1,21 0,27
Max 5,08 3,33 0,81 0,46 1,35 0,84 1,44 0,28
♀ (N = 7) Mean 4,73 3,18 0,76 0,44 1,23 0,82 1,37 0,31
SD 0,28 0,21 0,07 0,03 0,10 0,04 0,08 0,01
Range 0,67 0,50 0,21 0,07 0,29 0,10 0,23 0,04
Min 4,33 2,92 0,65 0,39 1,02 0,76 1,23 0,29
Max 5,00 3,42 0,85 0,46 1,31 0,86 1,46 0,33
A. watajii ♂ (N = 7) Mean 5,27 3,46 0,82 0,48 1,43 0,87 1,49 0,32
SD 0,12 0,13 0,04 0,04 0,06 0,05 0,09 0,02
Range 0,42 0,42 0,10 0,10 0,21 0,13 0,22 0,05
Min 5,27 3,46 0,82 0,48 1,43 0,87 1,49 0,32
Max 5,50 3,67 0,88 0,52 1,52 0,94 1,58 0,35
♀ (N = 7) Mean 4,35 2,92 0,90 0,41 1,27 0,79 1,34 0,32
SD 1,95 1,30 0,06 0,19 0,58 0,35 0,59 0,14
Range 5,58 3,58 0,13 0,56 1,63 1,00 1,67 0,40
Min 4,35 2,92 0,90 0,41 1,27 0,79 1,34 0,32
Max 5,58 3,58 0,94 0,56 1,63 1,00 1,67 0,40

2.5. DNA protocols, sequencing and raw sequences processing

DNA was extracted from abdomens of ethanol-stored and dry specimens using the Evrogen Extract DNA Blood and Cells kit. Two modifications to the standard protocol were applied to obtain higher DNA concentrations. First, the abdomens were kept overnight in the lysis solution with proteinase K in the water bath. Second, 50 or 25 μl of the elution buffer was added at the final stage. After lysis, the abdomens were kept in glycerol for further examination. Previously three mitochondrial and two nuclear markers were used for the species delimitation within Miridae: COI, 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, ITS1, Ca-ATPase (Sanchez and Cassis 2018; Dzhelali and Namyatova 2024; Namyatova et al. 2023, 2024). Among them, COI and 16S rRNA were used in the Miridae and Mirini phylogenies including Apolygus species (Jung and Lee 2012; Kim and Jung 2019; Namyatova et al. 2021; Oh et al. 2023). The markers 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA were also used in those studies, however, exhibit slower mutation rates than the mitochondrial markers. Among them, 28S rRNA shows some variation within Apolygus, therefore, we decided to include it to our dataset. In studies on the subgenus Orthops and Liocoris (Dzhelali and Namyatova 2024; Namyatova and Dzhelali 2024), ITS1 showed genetic distances comparable with COI, and it can be used even to resolve the intraspecific relationships. Therefore, we also decided to use this marker for Apolygus species delimitation. Primers for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), 16S rRNA, ITS1 and 28S rRNA were taken from Vishnevskaya et al. (2016), Menard et al. (2014), and Hinomoto et al. (2004), respectively. See Table S2 for the full list of primers and PCR protocols. The PCR products were cleaned using Thermo Scientific Exonuclease I or Evrogen CleanMag DNA PCR Kit and sequenced in Evrogen (https://evrogen.ru) or using the genetic Analyzer Honor 1616 installed at ZIN. Most raw sequences for COI were between 800 to 830 bp, for 16S rRNA between 420 and 470 bp, for ITS1 between 600 and 670 bp, for 28S rRNA between 500 and 540 bp. The base pairs were trimmed at both ends if they were absent in more than half of the sequences in the alignment. The sequences were checked for contamination using the Blast algorithm (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

2.6. Alignments

Alignments for each marker were completed using the Geneious algorithm in Geneious v. 11 software. The Apolygus datasets included the following number of original sequences for each marker: 61 for COI, 83 for 16S rRNA, 63 for ITS1, and 64 for 28S rRNA. Additionally, the original sequences of Neolygus viridis and Taylorilygus apicalis were added to each alignment. Sequences were uploaded to Genbank. Sequences from Genbank were also added: 175 for COI, 29 for 16S rRNA and 21 for 28S rRNA, some of them were published in previous studies (Jung et al. 2011; Jung and Lee 2012; Raupach et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2016; Kim and Jung 2018a, 2019; Roslin et al. 2022). Sequences of three markers for Diomocoris nebulosus were also downloaded from Genbank and included in the analysis as an outgroup (Namyatova et al. 2021). The accession numbers of all sequences used in the analyses are listed in Table SS1.

2.7. Genetic diversity and haplotype network

P-values were calculated in MEGA X (Tamura et al. 2021) to estimate the genetic diversity within and between the clades. Haplotype networks were completed using POPART 1.7 (Leigh and Bryant 2015) with the TCS Network method (Templeton et al. 1995; Clement et al. 2000). To increase the number of positions available for networks, short sequences were excluded from the datasets (Table SS1). Haplotype networks were obtained for two datasets for each marker: (1) dataset comprising all species available for the particular marker; all specimens of A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae were assigned to the single group to test whether it has the shared haplotypes with other species; (2) dataset comprising the sequences belonging to the A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae specimens available for the examination to test whether the representatives of those species can have the shared haplotypes with each other. The lengths of the datasets are as follows: 511 bp for COI (dataset 1 – 231 sequences, dataset 2 – 46 sequences), 348 bp for 16S rRNA (dataset 1 – 92 sequences, dataset 2 – 49 sequences) and 539 bp for ITS1 (52 sequences – for dataset 1, 41 sequences – for dataset 2). The 28S rRNA was excluded from this analysis, because of the low genetic diversity.

2.8. Phylogenetic analyses and estimating divergence dates

Phylogenetic analyses were run for separate markers and different combinations of markers: (1) COI + 16S rRNA, (2) ITS1 + 28S rRNA, (3) 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA (4) 16S rRNA + ITS1, (5) COI + 16S rRNA + 28S rRNA, (6) COI + 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S3 rRNA. In each analysis only specimens having all sequences used in the particular dataset were included, because missing data can affect support values and topology (e.g., Simmons 2012). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using RAXML v. 8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) with 10000 bootstrap replicates. Models of nucleotide substitution for the Bayesian inference analyses were estimated using MRMODELTEST v2 (Nylander 2004). Bayesian analysis was performed using MRBAYES v. 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The burn-in was set for 25% and nchains was equal 4. The number of replications depended on the analyses and varied between 10 mln and 20 mln. Log files were checked to ensure that the standard deviation of split frequencies reached 0.01. All other settings were by default. Analyses with two or more markers were also performed using STARBEAST3 in BEAST2.7, because this method accounts for the different evolution of the genes (Bouckaert et al. 2019; Douglas et al. 2022). For the STARBEAST analyses, the sequences have to be assigned to the particular species before the analysis, and this was completed according to the results obtained in the MRBAYES and RAXML analyses and morphological characters. The results for all BEAST analyses were checked in TRACER v. 1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018) to make sure that all parameters had effective sampling size exceeded 200, which is considered adequate for convergence (https://beast.community/analysing_beast_output). For all the analyses Taylorilygus apicalis was used as a root, because it is more distant from Apolygus than Diomocoris nebulosus and Neolygus viridis (Kim and Jung 2019; Namyatova et al. 2021).

To estimate divergence dates, the STARBEAST2 package implemented in BEAST2.7 was used. Analyses were performed on three datasets 16S rRNA + ITS1, 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA and ITS1 + 28S rRNA, because the trees based on them showed the best resolution and their topologies corresponded most closely to morphology (see Results section). Parameters were set according to the manual of H.A. Ogilvie (https://taming-the-beast.org/tutorials/calibrated-species-trees/calibrated-species-trees.pdf). The evolutionary rates estimated for insects in the previous works were used for tree calibration: for COI—0.0177 per Myr, for 16S rRNA—0.0054 per Myr, and for ITS1—0.0085 per Myr, 28S3 rRNA—0.0006 per Myr (Gamerschlag et al. 2008; Ho and Lo 2013). To calibrate the root, the dataset from Namyatova and Tyts (2025) was applied and sequences of COI, 16S rRNA, 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA for Apolygus spinolae, Diomocoris nebulosus, Neolygus tiliicola, Taylorilygus apicalis used in the previous studies were included there (Namyatova et al. 2021; Oh et al. 2023). All settings, protocols and fossil data for this analysis are listed in Namyatova and Tyts (2025). Genbank accession numbers are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Bootstrap support values from the RAXML analyses are abbreviated as BS, posterior probabilities (PP) for MRBAYES, STARBEAST2 and STARBEAST3 analyses are abbreviated PPMB, PPSB2 and PPSB3, respectively.

2.9. Species delimitation

Species delimitation analyses were performed on the ITS1, ITS1 + 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA + 28S rRNA, and 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA datasets, because they were the most resolved and corresponded the morphological data the best (see Results section). Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach (bGMYC) (Reid and Carstens 2012; Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013) and Poisson tree process model (PTP and bPTP) (Zhang et al. 2013) were applied to the phylogenies obtained using STARBEAST. For bGMYC, PTP and bPTP analyses the duplicate sequences should be removed, because zero length branches can affect the results (Reid and Carstens 2012). In the combined datasets such cases were either absent or rare, therefore, the duplicates were removed only for the ITS1 using the sRNATOOLBOX (Aparicio-Puerta et al. 2022) available online (https://arn.ugr.es/srnatoolbox/helper/removedup). If the bGMYC, PTP and bPTP analyses are based on a single tree, the problems connected with the phylogenetic uncertainty can affect the results (Reid and Carstens 2012; da Silva et al. 2018). For the combined analyses the trees obtained from the STARBEAST3 results were used. For the ITS1 the phylogenetic analysis was performed separately using BEAST2.7 and standard template. The LOGCOMBINER application from the BEAST2.7 package was used to obtain 100 trees in each case. The GMYC analysis was performed in R using the bGMYC package with the parameters recommended in the instructions (http://nreid.github.io/assets/bGMYC_instructions_14.03.12.txt), mcmc were set for 100000. The PTP and bPTP analyses were performed using the scripts in Python (https://github.com/zhangjiajie/PTP accessed on 31/10/2021). For both analyses outgroups were removed. For PTP analysis the default settings were used, for bPTP analysis the number of iterations equalled 100000.

Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) analysis (Puillandre et al. 2012) can be used only for single marker datasets, therefore, it was performed for the ITS1 only. It was run through the online tool (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/abgdweb.html). The P range was chosen as 0.001–0.01 and Kimura (K80) model was used to estimate the matrix of pairwise distances.

The package speedemon in BEAST2.7.7 performs species delimitation under the multispecies coalescence (Douglas and Bouckaert 2022). This method tests whether the separated species has higher supports than the clade comprising combination of species. It was applied to the three datasets with two or three markers (16S rRNA + ITS1, 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA and ITS1 + 28S rRNA). The settings for BEAST2.7.7 with STARBEAST3 template (Douglas et al. 2022) corresponded to those provided in the manual (https://github.com/rbouckaert/speedemon). All analyses were run using the server Dell PowerEdge R7525 (Dell Inc., USA).

3. Results

3.1. Molecular phylogenetics

The supports for the main clades for all analyses are provided in the Table S3. None of the phylogenetic trees recover Apolygus lucorum and Apolygus spinolae as separate clades. The trees based on 28S rRNA only are unresolved, therefore, they are not described and discussed further (Figs S1, S19). Results show that COI is the least reliable among other markers used. First, the COI sequences of M46 (A. lucorum from Yakutia Republic, Russia) and M64 (A. lucorum from Leningrad Province, Russia) have gaps and many substitutions and can represent pseudogenes (see Discussion). Therefore, those sequences were removed from the combined analyses. Second, the specimens of Apolygus fraxinicola (M189, M190) collected during a single collection event, as well as sequences of Apolygus adustus and Apolygus subpulchellus never form clades based on the dataset comprising mitochondrial markers only (Figs 1, S2–S4, S20–S22, S25), however, they form clades with high supports in the analyses based on most of the datasets with nuclear markers (see Discussion) (Figs 2, 3, S5–S9, S26, S27). The dataset with combined COI and nuclear markers also contradict the morphological data (Figs S10, S11). However, the combination of 16S rRNA and nuclear markers led to the topology corresponding to that based on the nuclear markers only (Figs 2, S7–S9, S27). Therefore, the datasets with COI were not used for calibration and species delimitation analyses.

Figure 1. 

The phylogeny based on the COI + 16S rRNA dataset obtained from the STARBEAST3 analysis. The bootstrap supports are provided above the branches. The upper support is PPSB3, the lower left support is PPMB, and the lower right support is BS.

Figure 2. 

The phylogeny based on the 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S3 rRNA dataset obtained from the STARBEAST3 analysis. The bootstrap supports are provided above the branches. The upper left support is PPSB3, the upper right supports is PPSB2, the lower left supports is PPMB, and the lower right supports is BS. The results of the species delimitation analysis are provided on the right-hand side.

Figure 3. 

The phylogeny based on the ITS1 + 28S3 rRNA dataset obtained from the STARBEAT3 analysis. The bootstrap supports are provided above the branches. The upper left support is PPSB3, the upper right supports is PPSB2, the lower left supports is PPMB, and the lower right supports is BS. The results of the species delimitation analysis are provided on the right-hand side.

The greatest diversity from the East Asian species was included from Genbank, represented by COI, 16S rRNA and 28S rRNA markers. However, COI and 16S rRNA are compromised by possible hybridization (see Discussion), and 16S rRNA and 28S rRNA show low genetic variation. Therefore, interspecies relationships inferred based on the combination of these markers cannot be considered as reliable, and they are not described further (Figs 1, S10, S25).

Overall, the phylogenies based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 + ​28S rRNA show the most resolution and its results mostly correspond to the morphological data. They show that the specimens of A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae form a clade with high supports (BS = 73, PP = 0.92–1) (Figs 2, S9, S27). This clade appears in the Bayesian inference phylogenies based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 dataset (PP = 55–100), and the STARBEAST analyses based on the nuclear markers only (PP = 0.99–1) (Figs 3, S7, S8, S26). The two large trans-Palearctic subclades within this clade are present in all these phylogenies with medium to high supports. The phylogenies obtained with RAxML and MrBayes analyses based on all four markers also show this clade (BS = 93, PPMB = 1) (Fig. S11). None of them strictly correspond to any particular color pattern attributed to the described species. The first subclade comprises mostly specimens with the cuneus darkened apically, including most specimens identified as A. nigrovirens and A. spinolae. It appears in all the analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA, ITS1 + 28S rRNA, and four markers, as well as Bayesian inference analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 and ITS1 only (BS = 63–64, PP = 0.62–0.99) (Figs 2, 3 S5–S9, S11, S26, S27). The second subclade comprises most specimens identified as A. lucorum, but also includes the specimens of A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens and A. malaisei. It appears in all analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA and four markers datasets, Bayesian inference analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 dataset and STARBEAST2 and STARBEAST3 analyses based on ITS1 + 28S rRNA dataset (BS = 75–83, PP = 0.76–1) (Figs 2, 3, S7–S9, S27). The first subclade has a more pronounced phylogenetic structure and some of its clades retain even in the analysis based on the ITS1 only. Some of those clades include the specimens from very distant locations.

In the analyses based on the 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA and ITS1 + 28S rRNA, Apolygus adustus, A. fraxinicola, A. limbatus, A. subpulchellus, and A. sp. nr. furvus M199 were included (Figs 2, 3, S6, S9, S26, S27). In the analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 and ITS1 only, Apolygus furvus was also included (Figs S5, S7, S8, S24). In all those analyses, A. adustus always forms a well-supported clade (BS = 99, PP all analyses = 1). Two specimens of A. fraxinicola also form a well-supported clade (BS > 90, PP all analyses = 1). In the analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 + 28S rRNA and ITS1 + 28S rRNA, A. adustus, A. fraxinicola, and A. sp. nr. furvus M199 form a clade together (BS > 75, PP all analyses > 98). In the analyses based on 16S rRNA + ITS1 and ITS1, A. furvus was also included into this clade (BS > 75, PP all analyses > 98). The position of A. limbatus and A. subpulchellus was not resolved and can vary even between different analyses for the same dataset.

3.2. Species delimitation

The species delimitation results are summarized in Table S4. The PTP and bPTP analyses show more than five species within the A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae complex for all datasets, which is, apparently, incorrect, considering the low genetic variability (see below) and the lack of discrete morphological differences within this group. The results based on ITS1 only do not correspond to the morphospecies. In particular, ABGD does not split the sequences into the groups, and GMYC show more than five species within the A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae group. However, GMYC analyses for the combined datasets assigned all specimens according to the morphospecies (Figs 2, 3, S7) and all representatives of A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae were assigned to a single species. Speedemon analyses for all datasets grouped the clades within A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae together. However, it failed to delimit any clusters within the entire dataset.

3.3. Genetic diversity

The P-values are provided in the Table S5. The genetic diversity is similar for COI and ITS1, and it is significantly lower for 16S rRNA. The mean genetic diversity for the entire Apolygus dataset for COI is 0.026, for ITS1 – 0.02, for 16S rRNA – 0.01, and for 28S rRNA – 0.003. The mean diversity within A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, A. spinolae group for COI is 0.013, for ITS1 – 0.011, for 16S rRNA – 0.0058, and for 28S rRNA – 0.0016. Distances between this group and most other species are 4–5% for COI, 2–6% for ITS1, 1–3% for 16S rRNA, and 0.2–1.5% for 28S rRNA The exception is A. watajii, the mean distances between this species and A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae complex are 1.5% for COI, 0.3% for 16S rRNA and 0.08% for 28S rRNA

3.4. Haplotype networks

Haplotype networks are provided in Fig. 4, and the vouchers corresponding to each haplotype are provided in Table S6. These networks show different results depending on the markers. The network based on all available sequences of COI demonstrates that the putative pseudogene sequences of A. lucorum (M46 and M64) are close to the Apolygus species outside of the A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae complex, but are not identical with any of them. Both COI and 16S rRNA networks show that representatives of this group mostly differ from other Apolygus species in sequences, but A. watajii share haplotypes with this group. ITS1 haplotype network shows that the representatives from A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae complex differ from other congeners, but A. watajii was not included in this dataset.

Figure 4. 

The haplotype networks. With all Apolygus species available, including downloaded from Genbank. A Based on COI. B Based on 16S rRNA. C Based on ITS1. With the sequences of Apolygus lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae obtained for the current study. D Based on 16S rRNA. E Based on COI. F Based on ITS1.

Haplotype networks for the A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae group only show that specimens with different color morphs can have identical haplotypes. The haplotype networks for COI and 16S rRNA do not show any structure corresponding to the color morphs. However, the network based on ITS1 shows two haplogroups, one of them includes all specimens of A. spinolae and A. nigrovirens, as well as a single specimen of A. lucorum, the second haplogroup includes most specimens of A. lucorum, A. malaisei and A. nigronasutus.

3.5. Dating analysis

The three datasets showed different results. The phylogeny based on nuclear markers only showed the oldest node ages and the phylogeny based on the 16S rRNA + ITS1 dataset showed the most recent node ages. The diversification of Apolygus species could have started between 6–16 Mya (Miocene), A. spinolae may have split from the other species between 1.9–3.7 Mya (Pliocene – Pleistocene), and the two clades within A. spinolae diverged between 1.1–2.1 Mya (Pleistocene: Calabrian and Gelasian ages).

3.6. Taxonomy and morphology

3.6.1. General notes on the morphology of studied species

We mostly agree with the diagnosis of Apolygus provided by Yasunaga (2023). Species of Apolygus have very similar external morphological structures and measurements. SEM images were obtained for most species treated in this study and our data were compared with those provided in Yasunaga (2023). We could not find any interspecific differences in microstructures (Fig. 5). Female genitalia are also very similar within the genus and species also have intraspecific variation in shape of dorsal labiate plate and posterior wall (Figs 6, 7, 8). Although the examined specimens of some particular species have small differences in those structures, we avoid using them for the specimen diagnoses and identification. The genital capsule and theca are very similar in all examined species, and we do not use them for identification purposes but provide their images for future morphological studies of this genus (Fig. 9V, AK). Species differ mostly in coloration of head, hemelytron and legs (Figs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) and sclerotization of vesica (Figs 16, 17, 18). In some cases, the shape of the right paramere is also important (Figs 9, 19).

Figure 5. 

SEM images. A A. subpulchellus, head and pronotum, lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00003767. B A. limbatus, Europe, Head and pronotum, lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00016011. C A. limbatus, Europe, cuneus and membrane, ZISP_ENT 00015959. D A. limbatus Europe, head and pronotum, dorsal view, ZISP_ENT 00015959. E Pretarsus, dorsal view, A. spinolae, ZISP_ENT 00015686. F Pleura, A. limbatus, Europe, ZISP_ENT 00016011. G Pleura, A. maackiae, ZISP_ENT 00016248. H Pretarsus, ventral view, A. spinolae, ZISP_ENT 00015187. I Scutellum, clavus, corium, A. adustus, ZISP_ENT 00015920. J Labium, A. subpulchellus, ZISP_ENT 00015177. K Hind tarsus, A. maackiae, ZISP_ENT 00016246.

Figure 6. 

Female genitalia. A. adustus, ZISP_ENT 00016215. A Dorsal labiate plate. B Posterior wall. A. fraxinicola ZISP_ENT 00016592. C Posterior wall. D Dorsal labiate plate. A. furvus, holotype series, ZISP_ENT 00016298. E Dorsal labiate plate. F Posterior wall. A. furvus, paratype series, ZISP_ENT 00016055. G Dorsal labiate plate. H Posterior wall.

Figure 7. 

Female genitalia. A. hilaris ZISP_ENT 00014894. A Dorsal labiate plate. B Posterior wall. A. shikotan sp. nov. ZISP_ENT 00014895. C Posterior wall. D Dorsal labiate plate. A. limbatus Europe, ZISP_ENT 00016026. E Dorsal labiate plate. F Posterior wall. A. limbatus Asia. G Posterior wall, ZISP_ENT 00015935. H Dorsal labiate plate, ZISP_ENT 00014890. A. subpulchellus, ZISP_ENT 00003766. I Dorsal labiate plate. G Posterior wall.

Figure 8. 

Female genitalia. A. spinolae. A Dorsal labiate plate, ZISP_ENT 00014490. B Posterior wall, ZISP_ENT 00015712. A. subhilaris ZISP_ENT 000116157. C Posterior wall. D Dorsal labiate plate. A. sp. nr. subhilaris, ZISP_ENT 00014784. E Dorsal labiate plate. F Posterior wall. A. watajii, ZISP_ENT 0006039. G Dorsal labiate plate. H Posterior wall. I Ventral wall.

Figure 9. 

Left parameres. A. adustus ZISP_ENT 00014862. A dorsal view. B posterior view. A. fraxinicola. ZISP_ENT 00014862. С dorsal view. D. posterior view. A. furvus, holotype ZISP_ENT 00016303. E dorsal view. F posterior view. A. furvus, paratype ZISP_ENT 00015924. G dorsal view. H posterior view. AK genital capsule. A. gotorum ZISP_ENT 00016164. I posterior view. A. hilaris ZISP_ENT 00014891. J dorsal view. K posterior view. A. hilaris, holotype of A. syringae ZISP_ENT 00014891. L dorsal view. M posterior view. A. infamis ZISP_ENT 00014891. N dorsal view. O posterior view. A. maackiae ZISP_ENT 00014893. P dorsal view. Q posterior view. A. limbatus Europe, ZISP_ENT 00016012. R dorsal view. S posterior view. A. limbatus Asia, ZISP_ENT 00014886. T dorsal view. U posterior view. V theca. A. shikotan sp. nov. ZISP_ENT 00016047 holotype. W dorsal view. X posterior view. A. spinolae ZISP_ENT 00005858. Y dorsal view. Z posterior view. A. subhilaris ZISP_ENT 00016582. AA dorsal view. AB posterior view. A. sp. nr. subhilaris ZISP_ENT 00014867. AC dorsal view. AD posterior view. A. subpulchellus ZISP_ENT 00003765. AE dorsal view. AF posterior view. A. watajii ZISP_ENT 00003760. AG dorsal view. AH posterior view. A. sp. nr. furvus ZISP_ENT 00014869. AI dorsal view. AJ posterior view.

Figure 10. 

Habitus, dorsal view. A. adustus. A Male, ZISP_ENT 00016237. B Female, ZISP_ENT 00015922. A. fraxinicola. C Female, ZISP_ENT 00016596. D Male, ZISP_ENT 00015938. A. furvus. E Male, holotype. ZISP_ENT 00016303. F Female, ZISP_ENT 00016297. A. gotorum. G Male, ZISP_ENT 00016232. A. hilaris. H Male, ZISP_ENT 00015182. I Female, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00015184. A. infamis. J Male, ZISP_ENT 00016250, holotype.

Figure 11. 

Habitus, dorsal view. A. limbatus. A Europe, Female, ZISP_ENT 00015986. B Asia, Male, ZISP_ENT 00015917. C Europe, Male, ZISP_ENT 00016005. D Asia, Female, ZISP_ENT 00015918. A. maackiae. E Male, ZISP_ENT 00016046. A. shikotan sp. nov. F Male, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00016048. A. subhilaris. G Male, ZISP_ENT 00016193. H Female, ZISP_ENT 00016158. A. sp. nr. subhilaris. I Male, ZISP_ENT 00016162. J Female, ZISP_ENT 00014874.

Figure 12. 

Habitus, dorsal view. A. spinolae. Specimens initially identified as A. nigronasutus. A Male, ZISP_ENT 00014451. B Female, ZISP_ENT 00014477. Specimens initially identified as A. nigrovirens. C Male, ZISP_ENT 00014590. D Male, ZISP_ENT 00014604. E Female, ZISP_ENT 00014618. F Female, ZISP_ENT 00014738. Specimens initially identified as A. spinolae. G Male, ZISP_ENT 00014775. H Female, ZISP_ENT 00014766. Specimens initially identified as A. malaisei. I Female, ZISP_ENT 00015747. J Male, ZISP_ENT 00015764. K Male, ZISP_ENT 00015656. Specimens initially identified as A. lucorum. L Male, ZISP_ENT 00006565. M Female, ZISP_ENT 00006918.

Figure 13. 

Habitus, dorsal view. A. subpulchellus. A Male, ZISP_ENT 00016042, paralectotype, B Female, ZISP_ENT 00016044, paralectotypeю C Female, ZISP_ENT 00016045, paralectotype. A. watajii. D Male, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00016241. E Female, ZISP_ENT 00016243. F Female, ZISP_ENT 00016244.

Figure 14. 

The digital images of paralectotypes preserved at the American Museum of Natural History, New York. Capsus lucorum Meyer-Dür, 1843 (AMNH_IZC 00396564), female. A Dorsal view. B Frontal view. C Labels. D Left lateral view. Capsus spinolae Meyer-Dür, 1841 (AMNH_IZC 00396565), female. E Dorsal view. F Frontal view. G Labels. H Left lateral view.

Figure 15. 

Head, frontal view. A. adustus. A Male, ZISP_ENT 00016237. A. fraxinicola. B Female, ZISP_ENT 00016596. A. furvus. C Male, ZISP_ENT 00016303, holotype. A. gotorum. D Male, ZISP_ENT 00016232. A. hilaris. E Female, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00015184. A. infamis. F Male, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00016250, holotype. A. limbatus. G Asia, Male, ZISP_ENT 00015917. H Europe, Male, ZISP_ENT 00015986. A. maackiae. I Male, ZISP_ENT 00016046. A. shikotan sp. nov. J Male, holotype, ZISP_ENT 00016047 K Male, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00016047. A. subhilaris. L Female, ZISP_ENT 00016158. A. sp. nr. subhilaris. M Female, ZISP_ENT 00014874. A. subpulchellus. N Male, ZISP_ENT 00016042, paralectotype. A. watajii. O Male, paratype, ZISP_ENT 00016241. P Female, ZISP_ENT 00016243. A. spinolae. Q Specimen initially identified as A. lucorum, Male, ZISP_ENT 00006565. R Specimen initially identified as A. spinolae, Female, ZISP_ENT 00014766. S Specimen initially identified as A. nigronasutus, Male, ZISP_ENT 00014551. T Specimen initially identified as A. nigrovirens, Male, ZISP_ENT 00014590. U Specimen initially identified as A. nigrovirens, Female, ZISP_ENT 00014618. V Specimen initially identified as A. malaisei, Female, ZISP_ENT 00015747. W Specimen initially identified as A. malaisei Male, ZISP_ENT 00015764.

Figure 16. 

Vesica. A. adustus, ZISP_ENT 00014889. A Right lateral view. B Left lateral view. A. sp. nr. furvus (M199), ZISP_ENT 00014869. C Right lateral view. D Left lateral view. A. fraxinicola, ZISP_ENT 00014887. E Right lateral view. F Left lateral view. A. furvus (holotype), ZISP_ENT 00016303. G Right lateral view. H Left lateral view. A. gotorum, ZISP_ENT 00016232. I Right lateral view. J Left lateral view. A. furvus (paratype), ZISP_ENT 00003762. K Right lateral view. L Left lateral view.

Figure 17. 

Vesica. A. spinolae. A Right lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00006623. B Left lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00005851. C Right lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00015780. D Anterior view, ZISP_ENT 00005851. E Lateral and sublateral sclerites, left lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00005851. A. subpulchellus, ZISP_ENT 00016047. F Right lateral view. G Left lateral view. A. sp. nr. subhilaris, (M197) ZISP_ENT 00014867. H Right lateral view. I Left lateral view. A. subhilaris, ZISP_ENT 00016193. J Right lateral view. K Left lateral view. A. watajii, ZISP_ENT 00016193. L Right lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00016247. M Left lateral view, ZISP_ENT 00003760.

Figure 18. 

Vesica. A. hilaris, ZISP_ENT 00014891. A Right lateral view. B Left lateral view, A. infamis, ZISP_ENT 00016252. C Right lateral view. D Left lateral view. A. limbatus, Europe, ZISP_ENT 00016012. E Right lateral view. F Left lateral view. A. maackiae, ZISP_ENT 00016247. G Right lateral view. H Left lateral view. A. limbatus, Asia, ZISP_ENT 00014886. I Right lateral view. J Left lateral view. A. subpulchellus, ZISP_ENT 00003765. K Right lateral view. L Left lateral view.

Figure 19. 

Right parameres. A. adustus ZISP_ENT 00014862. A dorsal view. B posterior view. A. fraxinicola ZISP_ENT 00014862. C dorsal view. D posterior view. A. furvus, holotype, ZISP_ENT 00016303. E dorsal view. F posterior view. A. furvus, paratype ZISP_ENT 00015924. G dorsal view. H posterior view. A. gotorum ZISP_ENT 00016164. I dorsal view, J posterior view. A. hilaris ZISP_ENT 00014891. K dorsal view. L posterior view. A. hilaris, holotype of A. syringae ZISP_ENT 00015180. M dorsal view. N posterior view. A. infamis ZISP_ENT 00016250. O dorsal view. P posterior view. A. maackiae, ZISP_ENT 00014893. Q dorsal view. R posterior view. A. limbatus Europe ZISP_ENT 00016012. S dorsal view. T posterior view. A. limbatus Asia ZISP_ENT 00014886. U dorsal view. V posterior view. A. shikotan sp. nov. ZISP_ENT 00016047, holotype. W dorsal view. X posterior view. A. spinolae ZISP_ENT 00005858. Y dorsal view. Z posterior view. A. subhilaris, ZISP_ENT 00016582. AA dorsal view. AB posterior view. A. sp. nr. A. subhilaris ZISP_ENT 00014867. AC dorsal view. AD posterior view. A. subpulchellus ZISP_ENT 00003765. AE dorsal view. AF posterior view. A. watajii ZISP_ENT 00003760. AG dorsal view. AH posterior view. A. sp. nr. furvus ZISP_ENT 00014869. AI dorsal view. AJ posterior view.

As a result of this study, A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, and A. nigrovirens were synonymized with A. spinolae. The synonymy of A. syringae with A. hilaris was confirmed, Apolygus gotorum and Apolygus subhilaris were recorded from Russia for the first time. Apolygus shikotan sp. nov. is described as new to science. Therefore, 13 species of Apolygus are currently known from Russia. Here we provide an identification key and diagnoses for all those species. In some cases, only males can be used for reliable species identification.

3.6.2. Key to Apolygus species recorded from Russia

1 Dorsum mostly green or yellow, small brown to black markings often present at posterior part of corium, usually not reaching embolium and apex of clavus (Figs 12B, 12F–H, 12L, 12M, 13D–F, 14A, 14E); if this marking large and reaching embolium and clavus or corium mostly dark brown to black (Fig. 12A, C–E, I–K), then legs yellow or green without red tinge or outer margin of embolium brown to dark brown (see from lateral view); vesica without needle-shaped sclerite and sublateral sclerite either small, with one to three rows of teeth, or absent (Fig. 17A–E, L, M) 2
1’ Dorsum color ranging from yellow to entirely dark brown to black; if dorsum mostly yellow then corium with large brown to dark brown marking basally reaching clavus and outer margin of embolium (Figs 10A–D, 10G–I, 11G–J, 13B–C); if this marking not reaching embolium then outer margin of embolium yellow (see from lateral view) (Figs 11A–E, 13A), if dorsum mostly dark brown to black (Figs 10E, 10F, 10J, 11F), then legs with red markings or red; vesica with or without needle-shaped sclerite, sublateral sclerite present and distinct (Figs 16, 17F–K, 18) 3
2 Wing shaped sclerite elongate, 3–4× as long as wide (Fig. 17A, C) A. spinolae
2’ Wing shaped sclerite widened, twice as long as wide (Fig. 17L) A. watajii
3 Corium dark brown to black (Figs 10E, 10F, 10J, 11F) 4
3’ Corium at least with pale brown to yellow marking or mostly pale brown to yellow (Figs 10A–D, 10G–I, 11A–E, 11G–J, 13A–C) 6
4 Hind femur yellow, yellow with reddish tinge or red with distinct brown or dark red bands on the apical half of hind femur; outer margin of wing shaped sclerite straight; sublateral sclerite acute, narrower than secondary gonopore (Fig. 16G, H, K, L) A. furvus
4’ Hind femur mostly bright red, brown or dark red bands on the apical half of hind femur pale or absent; outer margin of wing-shaped sclerite in vesica distinctly concave medially; sublateral sclerite rounded, wider than secondary gonopore (Figs 17F, 17G, 18C, 18D) 5
5 Apical process of right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19W); wing-shaped sclerite 7–8× as long as wide (Fig. 17F) A. shikotan sp. nov.
5’ Apical process of right paramere subequal to paramere body (Fig. 19O); wing-shaped sclerite 5–6× as long as wide (Fig. 17C) A. infamis
6 Cuneus mostly yellow or green, its apical part yellow or with faint and small brown marking (Fig. 12A–D) A. limbatus
6’ Apical part of cuneus distinctly dark brown to black (Figs 10A–D, 10G, 10H, 10I, 11E, 11G–J, 13A–C) 7
7 Dark marking at corium base not reaching outer margin of embolium (Fig. 11E) and outer margin of embolium yellow (see from lateral view); legs yellow without red tinge A. maackiae
7’ Dark marking at corium base often reaching outer margin of embolium (Figs 10A–D, 10G, 10H, 10I, 11G–J) and outer margin of embolium brown to dark brown (see from lateral view); legs with red tinge or red 8
8 Clypeus mostly yellow, sometimes dark brown to black at very apex (Fig. 15D, L) 9
8’ At least half of clypeus dark brown to black (Fig. 15A, B, E, N) 10
9 Antennal segment I mostly yellow, vesica with needle-shaped sclerite very short, not reaching secondary gonopore, or indistinct (Fig. 17J, K) A. subhilaris
9’ Antennal segment I dark brown to black; vesica with needle-shaped sclerite surpassing secondary gonopore (Fig. 16I, J) A. gotorum
10 Antennal segment II either dark brown to black or with pale brown or yellow ring on basal half; wing-shaped sclerite small, subequal to 1/5 of ventral sclerite (Fig. 18A) A. hilaris
10’ Antennal segment II usually yellow to pale brown and darkened apically, sometimes mostly dark brown to black with basal 1/3–1/4 yellow to pale brown; wing-shaped sclerite subequal to at least 1/3 of ventral sclerite (Figs 16A, 16E, 18K) 11
11 Cuneus yellow with dark base and apex with red tinge or entirely brown to black (Fig. 10C, D), needle-shaped sclerite present (Fig. 16E) A. fraxinicola
11’ Cuneus yellow with dark base and apex, without red tinge; needle-shaped sclerite absent (Figs 16A, 16K) 12
12 Larger, total length ♂ 5.1–5.6 mm, ♀ 5.5–5.8 mm; scutellum yellow, brown to dark brown basally (Fig. 10A, B); wing-shaped sclerite ca 3–4× as long as wide, not reaching apex of lateral sclerite (Fig. 16A, B) A. adustus
12’ Smaller, total length ♂ 4.3–5.1 mm, ♀ 4.3–5.0 mm; scutellum either entirely yellow or with pale brown to brown subrectangular marking (Fig. 13); wing-shaped sclerite 7–8× as long as wide, reaching apex of lateral sclerite (Fig. 18K) A. subpulchellus

3.6.3. Diagnoses and descriptions

Apolygus adustus (Jakovlev, 1876)

Figures 5I, 6A, 6B, 9A, 9B, 10A, 10B, 15A, 16A, 16B, 19A, 19B

Lygus adustus Jakovlev 1876: 117 (original description).

Lygus adustus var. bicolor Lindberg 1934: 18 (new var., species list).

Lygocoris adustus Kulik 1965a: 47 (annotated list).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) adustus Carvalho 1959: 136 (catalogue); Josifov and Kerzhner, 1972: 159 (discussion, drawing of male genitalia); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species); Miyamoto et al. 1994: 249 (species list); Schuh 1995: 793 (catalogue).

Apolygus adustus Kuik 1974: 11 (annotated list); Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 62 (catalogue); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 78 (catalogue); Oh et al. 2018: 470 (species list, figure of habitus); Dubatolov 2023: 444 (annotated list); Yasunaga 2023: 20 (habitus image).

For the full list of references and synonyms see Carvalho (1959), Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010).

Material examined.

Type material. Lectotype: RUSSIA • ♂; Primorsky Terr.: Lesozavodsk [Ussuri], 45.46666°N, 133.41666°E, no date provided, V. Jakovlev coll., (ZISP_ENT 00016235) – Paralectotypes: RUSSIA • 2♂♂; Primorsky Terr.— Other material. RUSSIA, Khabarovsk Terr., Primorsky Terr. • many ♂♂, ♀♀ (see File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 5.1–5.6 mm, in female 5.4–5.8 mm. Head mostly yellow; clypeus mostly dark brown (Fig. 15A); antennal segment I yellow, sometimes with red tinge, antennal segment II yellow with apical 1/2–1/3 brown to dark brown; pronotum mostly yellow, sometimes posterior part brown to dark brown or pronotum mostly brown to dark brown with yellow marking anteriorly; scutellum mostly yellow, brown to dark brown basally; clavus mostly brown to dark brown, rarely mostly yellow with brown to dark brown markings; corium yellow, brown to dark brown anteriorly and posteriorly, sometimes mostly brown to dark brown; lateral margin of embolium dark brown; cuneus yellow, brown to dark brown basally and apically (Fig. 10A, B); pleura varying from mostly whitish yellow with brown markings to mostly brown to dark brown; metathoracic gland evaporative area whitish yellow; coxae whitish yellow to yellow; femora yellow with apical half red or femora entirely red, brown rings on apical part of femora absent or faint, rarely distinct; tibia with dark brown to black marking at base of spines, pale brown to brown marking at base of tibia present. — Male genitalia. Apical process of left paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19A, B); median and lateral sclerites of vesica present; wing-shaped sclerite elongate, ca 3–4× as long as wide, with lateral margin straight, subequal to 1/3 of ventral sclerite, wider than ventral and median sclerites; sublateral sclerite present, pointed apically, twice as long as wide; needle-shaped sclerite very short, placed at base of vesica (Fig. 16A, B).

Distribution.

Apolygus adustus is known from the Russian Far East: Amur Province – not confirmed, see Notes (Kulik 1965a), Khabarovsk Territory (Kulik 1965a; Kerzhner 1988b; Dubatolov et al. 2023; ZIN), Primorsky Territory (Jakovlev 1876; Lindberg 1934; Kulik 1965a; Kerzhner 1988b; Miyamoto et al. 1994; ZIN), Sakhalin Island – not confirmed, see Notes (Miyamoto et al. 1994). It was also recorded from Korea (Oh et al. 2018).

Host plants.

Apolygus adustus lives on broadleaf trees and bushes (Kulik 1965a). Kulik (1974) reported it from Maackia amurensis Rupr. (Fabaceae).

Notes.

Oh et al. (2023) mentioned that A. adustus is known from Japan, but Yasunaga (2023) did not include it to the checklist of the Japanese species, therefore, it is likely that A. adustus does not inhabit this country. Judging from the images and drawings of the genitalia structures and habitus (Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Oh et al. 2018), the specimens from Korea are conspecific with those that are preserved at ZIN. In Russia this species was previously recorded from Amur Province, Khabarovsk and Primorskiy Territories and the south of Sakhalin Island (Kulik 1965a; Miyamoto et al. 1994; Kerzhner 1988b; Dubatolov et al. 2023). Here we confirm that A. adustus is distributed in Primorsky and Khabarovsk Territories, but we did not have the specimens from the Amur Territory and Sakhalin Island. Among species known from the Far East, A. adustus is most similar to A. fraxinicola in coloration (Figs 10A–D), but the latter differs in the cuneus often with red tinge along its inner margin or mostly dark brown to black (Fig. 10C, D), its hind femur often has the distinct brown or red bands apically, and the vesica has the long needle-shaped sclerite (Fig. 16E).

Among the Japanese species, A. adustus is similar to A. amamicus Yasunaga, 2023 in the coloration and size (Yasunaga 2023). This species is known from females only. However, Yasunaga (2023) did not compare the new species with A. adustus, and further studies of male genitalia and molecular data are needed to confirm the status of A. amamicus.

Apolygus fraxinicola Kerzhner, 1988

Figures 6C, 6D, 9C, 9D, 10C, 10D, 15B, 16E, 16F, 19C, 19D

Lygocoris (Apolygus) fraxinicola Kerzhner 1988a: 28 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species); Yasunaga 1992a: 18 (description, figure of male genitalia, discussion); Yasunaga 1992b: 532 (key to species); Schuh 1995: 796 (catalogue).

Lygocoris fraxinicola Kerzhner and Marusik 1997: 24 (species list).

Apolygus fraxinicola Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 63 (catalogue); Kerzhner et al. 2004: 238 (species list); Kanyukova and Marusik 2006: 167 (species list); Kim and Jung 2018b: 256 (diagnosis, figure of habitus and male genitalia); Oh et al. 2018: 470 (species list); Yasunaga 2023: 10, 23 (species list, key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 78 (catalogue).

For the full list of references see Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010).

Material examined.

Type material: Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Primorsky Terr.: Kedrovaya Pad’ Nature Reserve, 43.067°N, 131.617°E, 29 Jun 1982, I. M. Kerzhner, Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance (Oleaceae), (ZISP_ENT 00016585) – Paratypes: RUSSIA • 9♂♂, 13♀♀; Primorsky Terr. — Other material. RUSSIA, Khabarovsk Terr., Primorsky Terr. • 4♂♂, ♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 5.2–5.5 mm, in female 4.9–5.6 mm. Head color varying from mostly yellow to pale brown with red tinge, rarely mostly brown to dark brown; clypeus often mostly dark brown to black or only dark brown to black apically (Fig. 15B); antennal segment I yellow to pale brown, sometimes with red tinge; antennal segment II mostly yellow, with brown to dark brown apical 1/4–1/5; pronotum usually yellow, rarely mostly brown to dark brown; scutellum usually brown to dark brown with yellow to pale brown apex, sometimes mostly yellow to pale brown with brown to dark brown base; clavus mostly brown to dark brown; corium yellow, usually brown apically and posteriorly, sometimes mostly brown to dark brown; lateral margin of embolium dark brown; cuneus yellow, often with red tinge, brown basally and apically, sometimes entirely brown (Fig. 10C, D); pleura brown, sometimes with yellow markings, metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow, sometimes red or brown; coxae whitish yellow, femora often yellow with red markings at least apically, sometimes mostly red or red brown; hind femora with brown to dark brown bands; tibia with dark brown to black markings at base of spines, bases of tibiae with red, brown to dark brown marking, sometimes this marking very pale. — Male genitalia. Apical process or right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19C, D); wing-shaped sclerite elongate, ca. 4× as long as wide with straight margin, subequal to half of ventral sclerite, wider than lateral and median sclerites; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, elongate and acute; needle-shaped sclerite present, exceeding apex of wing-shaped sclerite, but not reaching apex of ventral sclerite (Fig. 16E, F).

Distribution.

Apolygus fraxinicola is known from the Russian Far East: Primorsky Territory (Kerzhner 1988a, 1988b; ZIN), Kuril Islands – not confirmed, see Notes (Kerzhner 1988a, 1988b; Kerzhner and Marusik 1997; Kerzhner et al. 2004; Kanyukova and Marusik 2006), Khabarovsk Territory (ZIN). It was also recorded from Korea (Kim and Jung 2018b; Oh et al. 2018) and Japan (Yasunaga 1992a, 2023).

Host plants.

Specimens were collected from Fraxinus rhynchophylla and Fraxinus mandshurika (Kerzhner 1988a, 1988b), Syringa reticulata (Yasunaga 1992a), Syringa amurensis (ZIN) (Oleaceae).

Notes.

Kerzhner (1988a) recorded this species from Kunashir Island based on the single series from Dubovoe (Kunashir Is). We examined these specimens and found that there was only a single teneral male with very pale aedeagus. Therefore, their identification could not be confirmed. Apolygus fraxinicola was also listed by Kerzhner and Marusik (1997), Kerzhner et al. (2004), Kanyukova and Marusik (2006) from Kunashir Island, but it is unclear whether they referred to the works of Kerzhner (1988a) or recollected some specimens later. The drawing of vesica provided by Yasunaga (1992a) corresponds to that from the Russian Far East. We report this species from the Khabarovsk Territory for the first time. Among the species from the Russian Far East, A. fraxinicola is most similar to A. adustus, but the latter differs in the cuneus without red tinge (Fig. 10C, D) and very short needle-shaped sclerite (Fig. 16E). Among the Japanese species, A. fraxinicola is most similar to Apolygus horologiatus Yasunaga, 2023 externally, but the latter differs in the presence of two needle-shaped sclerites (Yasunaga 2023).

Apolygus furvus (Kerzhner, 1972)

Figures 6E–H, 9E–H, 10E, 10F, 15C, 16G, 16H, 16K, 16L, 19E–H

Lygocoris (Apolygus) furvus Kerzhner 1972: 287 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species); Yasunaga 1992a: 22 (diagnosis, drawings of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992b: 531 (key to species).

Lygocoris furvus Kulik 1974: 12 (species list as Lygocoris fulvus).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) hilaris Kerzhner 1977: 17 (new synonymy); Kerzhner 1978: 39 (species list); Schuh 1995: 797 (catalogue).

Apolygus furvus Kerzhner and Marusik 1997: 24 (species list); Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 64 (catalogue); Kerzhner et al. 2004: 238 (species list); Kanyukova and Marusik 2006: 267 (species list); Kanyukova and Kerzhner 2010: 553 (species list); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 78 (catalogue); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (list of species, key to species, figure of male and female genitalia, discussion).

For the full list of references see Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010).

Material examined.

Type material. Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Sakhalin Prov.: Tobuti, Siretoko Peninusla, Sakhalin Is., 46.5°N, 143.3°E, 04 Aug 1947, Dyakonov, (ZISP_ENT 00016303) – Paratypes: RUSSIA • 3♂, 3♀; Sakhalin Prov. — Other material. JAPAN, RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr. • many ♂♂, ♀♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.7–6.2 mm, in female 4.8–5.5 mm. Body brown to dark brown, head yellow to pale brown with dark brown to black markings, sometimes mostly dark brown to black; clypeus dark brown to black (Fig. 15C); antennal segment I mostly yellow to pale brown, often with brown to dark brown stripe ventrally; antennal segment II mostly dark brown, rarely with yellow to pale brown band in the basal half; pronotum, scutellum and hemelytron often uniformly dark brown to black, sometimes pronotum and scutellum at least partly pale brown and cuneus sometimes pale brown medially, rarely corium mostly yellow with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly (Fig. 10E, F); lateral margin of embolium brown to dark brown; pleura dark brown to black, sometimes with yellow markings, rarely yellow with brown markings; metathoracic gland evaporative area yellow; legs yellow, at least hind femur with red tinge and brown or red bands apically; bases of middle and hind femora brown; tibiae with markings at bases of spines. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere as long as paramere body (Fig. 19E–H); wing-shaped sclerite elongate, ca. 5–7× as long as wide with straight margin, 0.75× as long as ventral sclerite, its outer margin straight, narrower than lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, triangular with acute angle; needle-shaped sclerite present, extending beyond secondary gonopore and not reaching apex of wing-shaped sclerite.

Distribution.

Apolygus furvus inhabits Russian Far East: Amur Province – not confirmed, see Notes (Kerzhner 1972; Kulik 1974), Primorskiy Territory (ZIN), Sakhalin Island (Kerzhner 1972; Kulik 1974; Kerzhner 1977, 1978, 1988b; Kanyukova and Kerzhner 2010; ZIN), Kuril Islands (Kerzhner 1972; Kuik 1974; Kerzhner 1977, 1978, 1988b; Kerzhner and Marusik 1997; Kerzhner et al. 2004; Kanyukova and Marusik 2006; ZIN). Records from Khabarovsk and Primorskiy Territories (Kerzhner 1972; Kulik 1974) refer to A. infamis (see Notes). This species was also recorded from Japan (Yasunaga 1992a, 2023; ZIN).

Host plants.

Apolygus furvus was collected from Hydrangea paniculata (Hydrangeaceae) (Kerzhner 1977, 1978, 1988b). Yasunaga (1992a) also recorded this species from Polygonum cuspidatum (Polygonaceae), Actinidia polygama (Actinidiaceae), Ligustrum obtisifolium (Oleaceae). At least some of those records can refer to A. infamis or A. shikotan sp. nov. (see Notes).

Notes.

Kerzhner (1972) described A. furvus from the different regions of the Russian Far East (Primorskiy, Amur and Khabarovsk Territories, Sakhalin Island, Kuril Islands). He provided drawings of the vesica and parameres, however, these genital structures belonged to another species, A. infamis, which was described later from the paratypes of A. furvus (Kerzhner 1977) (see diagnosis for A. infamis). We examined the holotype of A. furvus including genitalia (Tobuty, Siretoko Peninsula, Sakhalin), and found that the specimen is teneral, and its sclerites are underdeveloped. For example, the median sclerite which is present in all species of Apolygus, is indistinct in this specimen (Fig. 16G, H). Additionally, we could not see the needle-shaped sclerite. It is unclear whether it is absent or soft and membranous. We dissected all other males of the specimens identified as A. furvus and found that all of them have distinct median and needle-shaped sclerites. Although there is a possibility that the holotype and paratypes belong to the different species, we consider them as conspecific. There were three specimens from the Primorskiy Territory originally assigned to this species by Kerzhner (1972). Two of them from Vinogradovka and Gorno-Taezhnaya Station are females, and their identification cannot be confirmed. The third specimen from Suchan now is a holotype for Apolygus infamis (Kerzhner 1977). However, we confirm that A. furvus lives in the Primorskiy Territory based on the specimens collected later and preserved at ZIN. The single specimen from Khabarovsk Territory originally assigned to A. furvus was also transferred to A. infamis. Apolygus furvus was recorded from a single location in Amur Province (Korsakovo). However, only females belong to this series, and we could not confirm the identification of those specimens. Kerzhner (1977) synonymised A. furvus with A. hilaris, however, later the same author treated those two species as separate (Kerzhner 1988b). According to the original description (Horváth 1905), A. hilaris is reddish yellow, and the posterior part of corium has black marking. This fits the description of the specimens currently assigned to A. hilaris, and A. furvus has brown to black corium.

In Yasunaga (2023) the vesica of paratype was depicted and it has needle-shaped sclerite shorter than the wing-shaped sclerite as in the specimens examined by us. However, in Yasunaga (1992a) the needle-shaped sclerite is longer than the wing-shaped sclerite, and those specimens can belong to another species. Among the voucher specimens used for the phylogenetic analyses, there is a specimen M199, which is similar to A. furvus in coloration, and its right paramere has a long apical process. However, it has two short needle-shaped sclerites at base, and might represent a new species (Fig. 16C, D).

Among the species known from the Russian Far East, A. furvus is most similar to A. infamis and A. shikotan sp. nov. These two species differ from A. furvus in the concave outer margin of wing-shaped sclerite (Figs 17F, 17G, 18C, 18D). Apolygus infamis also differs in the shorter wing-shaped sclerite, which is 4× as long as wide, and A. shikotan sp. nov. differs in the apical process of its right paramere shorter than the paramere body (Fig. 19W). Among other dark brown to black species of Apolygus, A. ater, A. furvellus, A. miyamotoanus, and A. nigricans have the needle-shaped sclerite longer than the wing-shaped sclerite, and A. ater also differs in having the dark brown femora. In A. atrobellus, A. miyamotoanus, A. nigricans and A. seonheulensis the apical process of the right paramere shorter than the paramere body, in A. miyamotoanus and A. seonheulensis the wing-shaped sclerite only 3–4× as long as wide and in A. ater the needle-shaped sclerite is absent (Wang and Zheng 1982; Oh et al. 2018; Yasunaga 2023).

Apolygus gotorum Yasunaga, 2023

Figures 9I, 10G, 15D, 16I, 16J, 19I, 19J

Apolygus gotorum Yasunaga 2023: 31 (original description).

Material examined.

Other material. RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr. • 2♂ (see File S1).

Diagnosis.

(based on the specimens from ZIN and the original description). Length in male 4.5–5.4 mm, in female 5.3–5.8 mm. Head pale brown, apex of clypeus dark brown to black (Fig. 15D); antenna dark brown, extreme apex of antennal segment III paler; pronotum pale brown, sometimes widely darkened; scutellum usually uniformly brown to dark brown, apex of scutellum sometimes pale; clavus mostly brown to dark brown, corium yellow with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly or almost entirely dark brown to black, lateral margin of embolium brown, cuneus yellow or with red tinge with brown base and apex (Fig. 10G); pleura yellow to pale brown, sometimes with reddish tinge, metathoracic gland evaporative area whitish yellow; legs pale brown, femora with red tinge, hind femur with reddish brown or brown rings in apical part; tibiae with or without dark brown markings at base of spines and with pale brown to brown marking basally. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19I, J); wing-shaped sclerite ca. 4–5× as long as wide with straight margin, 0.2–0.3× as long as ventral sclerite, as wide as ventral sclerite, and wider than median sclerite; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, acute apically; needle-shaped sclerite present, slightly exceeding apex of wing shaped sclerite (Fig. 16I, J).

Distribution.

Japan (Yasunaga 2023), Primorskiy Territory, Russia (ZIN).

Host plants.

The specimens were collected from the inflorescences of broadleaf trees (Yasunaga 2023).

Notes.

Among the specimens previously identified as Apolygus furvus and Apolygus hilaris, we found two males from Suchan (Primorsky Territory), which did not belong to those species. Both specimens are partially damaged but fit the description of Apolygus gotorum and their male genitalia are also very similar to those published by Yasunaga (2023). Therefore, we record A. gotorum for the first time from Russia (Primorskiy Territory). Among the specimens from the Russian Far East, A. gotorum is most similar to A. hilaris and A. subhilaris and pale representatives of A. furvus. However, all those species can be distinguished from A. gotorum externally. Apolygus furvus and A. hilaris differ from A. gotorum in the clypeus mostly dark brown to black (Fig. 15C, E), and A. subhilaris differs in the antennal segment I yellow.

Apolygus hilaris (Horváth, 1905)

Figures 7A, 7B, 9J–M, 10H, 10I, 15E, 18A, 18B, 19K–N

Cyphodema hilare Horváth 1905: 419 (original description); Carvalho 1959: 78 (catalogue).

Lygus adustus ssp. hilaris Linnavuori 1963: 81 (new synonym, discussion).

Lygocoris hilaris Kulik 1965a: 46 (species list); Kulik 1974: 11 (species list).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) hilaris Kulik 1965b: 1497 (key to species); Josifov and Kerzhner 1972: 158 (discussion, male genitalia); Kerzhner 1977: 17 (discussion, male genitalia); Kerzhner 1988a: 24 (figures of male genitalia); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species); Yasunaga 1992a: 16 (redescription, drawings of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992b: 532 (key to species); Schuh 1995: 797 (catalogue).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) syringae Kerzhner 1988a: 26 (description, male genitalia); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species); Yasunaga 1992a: 18 (new synonymy); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, figures of habitus and male genitalia, key to species, discussion).

Apolygus hilaris Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 64; Seong and Lee 2007 (key to species, digital images of male genitalia); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 78 (catalogue); Jung et al. 2011: 269 (molecular data); Kim and Jung 2016: 597 (key to species); Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus, molecular data); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (species list, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, figures of habitus and male genitalia, SEMs, key to species, discussion).

For the full list of references see Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010).

Material examined.

Other material. RUSSIA • 1♂; holotype of Lygocoris (Apolygus) syringae Kerzhner, 1988; Primorsky Terr.: Kedrovaya Pad’ Nature Reserve, 43.067°N, 131.617°E, 01 Jul 1982, I. M. Kerzhner, Syringa amurensis Rupr. (Oleaceae), (ZISP_ENT 00015180) • 3♂♂, 2♀♀; paratypes of Lygocoris (Apolygus) syringae Kerzhner, 1988; Primorsky Terr. • JAPAN, RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr. • ♂, ♀ (see File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.4–6.1 mm, in female 5.8 mm. Head yellow with dark brown to black clypeus (Fig. 15E); antennal segment I yellow with brown marking laterally and dorsally or mostly dark brown; antennal segment II mostly dark brown to black with yellow band at basal half or uniformly dark brown to black; pronotum yellow, scutellum brown, often with yellow apex; clavus yellow to brown; corium yellow with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly, lateral margin of embolium yellow to brown; cuneus yellow often with red tinge, with brown base and apex (Fig. 10H, I); pleura yellow to pale brown, sometimes with reddish tinge, metathoracic gland evaporative area yellow; coxae yellow sometimes with red tinge; femora yellow with red tinge in apical half or uniformly red, with dark red or reddish brown rings apically; tibia with dark brown markings at base of spines and with pale brown to brown marking basally. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19K, M); wing-shaped sclerite short, ca. 3–4× as long as wide with straight outer margin, ca. 0.2× as long as ventral sclerite, narrower than ventral sclerite and as wide as medial sclerite; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, acute; needle-shaped sclerite present, distinctly exceeding apex of wing-shaped sclerite but not reaching apex of ventral sclerite (18A, B).

Distribution.

Apolygus hilaris is known from the Russian Far East: Primorskiy Territory (Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Kulik 1974; Kerzhner 1988b; Yasunaga 1992a; ZIN), Amur Territory – not confirmed, see Notes (Kulik 1965a, 1974; Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Kerzhner 1988b), Khabarovsk Territory – not confirmed, see Notes (Kulik 1974; Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Kerzhner 1988b). It also inhabits Japan (Horváth 1905; Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Yasunaga 1992a, 2023; ZIN) and Korea (Josifov and Kerzhner 1972; Seong and Lee 2007; Oh et al. 2018).

Host plants.

Apolygus hilaris was recorded from Lonicera sp. (Caprifoliaceae) (ZIN), Syringae amurensis (Oleaceae) (Kerzhner 1988a, ZIN), Syringae reticulata (Oleaceae) (Yasunaga 1992a), Lespedeza sp. (Fabaceae) (Kulik 1965), Lespedeza bicolor (Fabaceae) (Kulik 1974; Kerzhner 1988a, 1988b), Maackiae amurensis (Fabaceae) (Kulik 1974).

Notes.

Apolygus syringae was described by Kerzhner (1988a), but he mentioned that it differs from A. hilaris by the clypeus color. Yasunaga (1992a) synonymized A. syringae with A. hilaris, but later the same author resurrected the status of this species (Yasunaga 2023) based on the shape of the right paramere, number of teeth in the wing-shaped sclerite and the antennal segment II/ segment I ratio. We studied the specimens identified as A. hilaris and A. syringae preserved at ZIN, including the holotype of the latter. We compared their genital structures with the published figures, and we could not find any differences between those two species. In particular, the parameres are very similar. Most probably, the images of the parameres of those two species in Yasunaga (2023) were completed in the different projections, as the shape of the parameres of the A. syringae holotype is very similar with those of the A. hilaris specimens (Figs 9J–M, 19K–N). Therefore, we support the previous synonymy of A. syringae with A. hilaris. In this case we confirmed the specimen identification if we had the male genitalia available for examination. Therefore, we could only assign seven specimens from Japan and Primorsky Territory to A. hilaris. The drawings and images of vesica provided in the previous papers have the same structure of vesica as in the specimens examined by us (Josifov and Kerzhner 1972 – Korea; Kerzhner 1977, 1988a – Russian Far East; Yasunaga 1992a, 2023 – Japan; Seong and Lee 2007 – Korea).

Apolygus hilaris is similar to a number of other species externally. Among the specimens found in the Russian Far East, A. hilaris is most similar with A. subhilaris, but the latter differs in the clypeus mostly pale and dark brown to black only apically (Fig. 15L) and its vesica lacks needle-shaped sclerite (Fig. 17J). Apolygus hilaris is similar with the pale representatives of A. furvus externally, but A. furvus differs in the apical process of the right paramere subequal to the paramere body (Fig. 19E, G), and the long wing-shaped sclerite in vesica, which is 5–7× as long as wide, and longer than the needle-shaped sclerite (Fig. 16K). Apolygus hilaris can be confused with A. gotorum, but the latter differs in the clypeus mostly pale brown with dark brown to black apex (Fig. 15D) and the needle-shaped sclerite only slightly surpassing wing-shaped sclerite (Fig. 16I).

Apolygus infamis (Kerzhner, 1977)

Figures 9N, 9O, 10J, 15F, 18C, 18D, 19O, 19P

Lygocoris (Apolygus) infamis Kerzhner 1977: 17 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 807 (key to species; figures of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 798 (catalogue).

Lygocoris infamis Kerzhner and Marusik 1997: 24 (species list).

Apolygus infamis Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 64 (catalogue); Miyamoto et al. 1994: 249 (species list); Kerzhner et al. 2004: 238 (species list); Seong and Lee 2007: 326 (key to species); Kanyukova and Marusik 2006: 167 (species list); Oh et al. 2018: 10 (list of species, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (list of species, key to species, figures of male and female genitalia, discussion; probably, this corresponds to Apolygus shikotan sp. nov.).

For the full list of references see Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010).

Material examined.

Type material. Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Primorsky Terr.: Suchan [Partizansk], 43.139°N, 133.141°E, 16 Sep 1934, Palshkov, (ZISP_ENT 00016250) – Paratype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Khabarovsk Terr. (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.5–4.8 mm. Head yellow to pale brown with brown markings and dark brown to black clypeus (Fig. 15F); antennal segment I yellow to pale brown, antennal segment II with yellow to pale brown basal half and its apical half brown to dark brown; pronotum dark brown to black; scutellum entirely dark brown to black or dark brown to black with pale brown apex; hemelytron including lateral margin of embolium uniformly dark brown to black (Fig. 10J); pleura dark brown to black, metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow; legs mostly yellow with red tinge, femora red, bands in apical half indistinct, markings at base of spines dark brown to black, at least bases of middle and hind femora brown. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere subequal to paramere body (Fig. 19O, P); wing-shaped sclerite ca. 5–6× as long as wide with concave outer margin, subequal to 0.3–0.35× of ventral sclerite, as wide as lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, rounded, needle-shaped sclerite present (Fig. 18C, D).

Distribution.

Primorskiy Territory (Kerzhner 1977, 1988b; Miyamoto et al. 1994; ZIN), Khabarovsk Territory (Kerzhner 1977, 1988b; ZIN), Kuril Islands – not confirmed, see Notes (Kerzhner 1988b; Kerzhner and Marusik 1997; Kerzhner et al. 2004; Kanyukova and Marusik 2006). Records from Kuril Islands by Kerzhner (1977, 1978) refer to A. shikotan sp. nov. This species was also recorded from Korea (Seong and Lee 2007; Oh et al. 2018) and Japan (Yasunaga 2023). However, at least some of the specimens collected in Japan belong to A. shikotan sp. nov. (see Notes), and the male genitalia of the specimens from Korea were not published.

Host plants.

Kerzhner (1988b) mentioned that Apolygus infamis was collected from Phyllodendron amurense Rupr. and Phyllodendron sachalinense (Fr. Schmidt) Sarg. (Araceae), but this information is absent on the labels currently assigned to this species and can be erroneous. Apparently, the record from Phyllodendron sachalinense refers to Apolygus shikotan sp. nov., because Kerzhner (1978) mentioned that the specimens from the type locality of this species (Malokurilskoe, Shikotan Island) were collected from this plant.

Notes.

Apolygus infamis was described from the paratypes of A. furvus by Kerzhner (1977). We found that in the type series there are at least two species from Shikotan Island which differ in the shape of the right paramere and wing-shaped sclerite. We describe the second species as new to science, Apolygus shikotan sp. nov. The records of A. infamis of Kerzhner and Marusik (1997) and Kanyukova and Marusik (2006) from Iturup, Kunashir and Shikotan Islands might also refer to A. shikotan sp. nov. Therefore, we could reliably assign only two specimens to A. infamis. The drawing of vesica in Kerzhner (1988b) is more similar to A. shikotan sp. nov. The genitalia illustrated in Yasunaga (2023) are also more similar to A. shikotan sp. nov., and the record of A. infamis from Japan can be erroneous. Seong and Lee (2007) and Oh et al. (2018) recorded A. infamis from Korea, however, they did not provide illustrations of male genitalia of this species, therefore, the distribution of this species in Korea cannot be confirmed.

Among the species known from the Russian Far East, Apolygus infamis is similar to A. furvus and A. shikotan sp. nov., but those two species differ in the wing-shaped sclerite, which is ca. 0.75× as long as ventral sclerite (Figs 16G, 16K, 17F). Apolygus shikotan sp. nov. also differs in the apical process of the right paramere subequal to the half of the paramere body (Fig. 19W). Among the black congeners, A. atrobellus, A. miyamotoanus, A. nigricans, and A. seonheulensis differ from A. infamis in the apical process of the right paramere shorter than the paramere body (Wang and Zheng 1982; Oh et al. 2018; Yasunaga 2023). Apolygus atrobellus can be also differentiated in the absence of the needle-shaped sclerite. Among the species with the elongate apical process of the right paramere, Apolygus ater differs in the femora mostly dark brown, and Apolygus furvellus differs in the longer wing-shaped sclerite, ca. 7–8× as long as wide (Yasunaga 2023). Apolygus sinicus also has dark coloration but differs in the presence of Y-shaped sclerite on scutellum (Zheng and Wang 1983).

Apolygus limbatus (Fallén, 1807)

Figures 5C–E, 7E–H, 9R–U, 11A–D, 15G, 15H, 18E, 18F, 18I, 18J, 19S–V

Lygaeus limbatus Fallén 1807: 85 (original description).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) limbatus Carvalho 1959: 137 (catalogue); Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 720 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Wagner and Weber 1964: 201 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Miyamoto et al. 1994: 11 (species list); Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 90 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 798 (catalogue).

Lygocoris limbatus Kulik 1965a: 46 (species list); Kulik 1974: 12 (species list).

Lygus (Apolygus) limbatus Wagner 1974: 401 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Kerzhner 1988b: 805 (key to species).

Apolygus limbatus Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 65 (catalogue); Seong and Lee 2007: 326 (key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2010 (list of species); Kim and Jung 2016: 597 (key to species); Oh et al. 2018: 10 (species list, key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2024: 247 (catalogue).

For the full list of references see Carvalho (1959), Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010), Vinokurov et al. (2024).

Material examined.

Other material. Belarus, Finland, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Mongolia, Poland, Serbia, Russia, Altai Terr., Amur Prov., Arkhangelsk Prov., Bryansk Prov., Irkutsk Prov., Jewish Prov., Khabarovsk Terr., Khanty-Mansi Distr., Leningrad Prov., Magadan Prov., Primorsky Terr., Pskov Prov., Ryazan Prov., Samara Prov., Tula Prov., Yaroslavl Prov., Zabaikalsky Terr. • many ♂♂, ♀♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.8–5.4 mm (European form), 5.1–5.5 mm (Asian form), in female 4.7–5.2 mm (European form), 4.9–5.5 mm (Asian form). Head yellow, clypeus entirely or mostly pale brown to dark brown (Fig. 15G, H); antennal segment I yellow; antennal segment II yellow with pale brown to brown apical half or less, sometimes basal 1/3 also pale brown to brown; pronotum yellow sometimes pale brown or brown basally and often with brown to dark brown markings around calli, sometimes mostly brown to dark brown; scutellum varying from uniformly yellow to mostly brown to dark brown with yellow apex; clavus pale brown to dark brown, corium yellow, with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly, usually not reaching embolium, rarely reaching embolium only posteriorly; lateral margin of embolium brown to dark brown; cuneus yellow, brown to dark brown basally, pale apically (Fig. 11A–D); pleura including metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow; legs mostly yellow, at least hind femur with red or brown rings apically, sometimes most part of hind femur with red tinge; tibia yellow with dark brown to black markings at bases of spines and dark brown or red brown marking basally. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere subequal to paramere body (Fig. 19S–V); sublateral sclerite present, toothed, acute apically; needle-shaped sclerite surpassing secondary gonopore and apex of wing-shaped sclerite, but not reaching apex of ventral sclerite; wing-shaped sclerite with straight outer margin, as wide as lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite. European form: wing-shaped sclerite ca. 4–5× as long as wide, needle-shaped sclerite subequal to wing-shaped sclerite (Fig. 18E, F). Asian form: wing-shaped sclerite ca. 2–3× as long as wide, distance between wing-shaped sclerite and needle-shaped sclerite apices 0.2–0.3× as long as needle-shaped sclerite (Fig. 18, J).

Distribution.

Apolygus limbatus can be considered as trans-Palearctic, but it does not live in the southern parts of Russia (Vinokurov et al. 2024). This species is known from the Russian Far East, i.e. Amur, Khabarovsk, Primorsky Territories (Kerzhner 1988b; Vinokurov et al. 2010) and East Asia, i.e. Korea (Kim and Jung 2016; Oh et al. 2018).

Host plants.

Apolygus limbatus lives on Salix spp. (Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964; Kulik 1965a; Kerzhner 1988b; ZIN), it was also recorded from Populus sp. (Kulik 1965b, 1974; Wagner 1974).

Notes.

According to Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Apolygus limbatus is known from Japan, but it is absent in the species list for Japan (Yasunaga 2023).

We found that the specimens identified as A. limbatus have two types of sclerotization in vesica and this corresponds to the distribution: Europe (reaching Ural Mountains) and Asia (Fig. 18E, F, I, J). The drawing of vesica in the key to the Heteroptera of the European part of the USSR (Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964) corresponds to the European form. Those groups can represent two separate species; however, we did not find any differences in the shape of the parameres and habitus between them, and the molecular data were insufficient to resolve this problem. More specimens from those groups and nuclear markers should be included in the analysis. Therefore, we refrain from any taxonomic decisions pending additional molecular data. Apolygus limbatus is most similar to A. maackiae in coloration, but the latter differs in the apex of cuneus dark brown to black, yellow outer margin of embolium and yellow legs without reddish tinge. Additionally, in A. maackiae wing-shaped sclerite is absent and its ventral sclerite has needle-shaped outgrowth (Fig. 18G, H).

Apolygus maackiae (Kulik, 1965)

Figures 5G, 5K, 9P, 9Q, 11E, 15I, 18G, 18H, 19Q, 19R

Lygocoris (Apolygus) maackiae Kulik 1965b: 1498 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 806 (key to species); Schuh 1995: 800 (catalogue).

Apolygus maackiae Kerzhner and Josifov, 1999: 65 (catalogue); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 79 (catalogue); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (list of species, key to species, figure of habitus).

Material examined.

Type material. Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Primorsky Terr.: Vladivostok, 43.11666°N, 131.9°E, 12 Aug 1964, Kulik, Maackia amurensis Rupr. (Fabaceae), (ZISP_ENT 00016249) Paratype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Primorsky Terr. Other material. RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr. • 5♂♂ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Body length in male 4.0–4.6 mm; head yellow with at least apical half of clypeus dark brown to black (Fig. 15I); antennal segment I yellow, often with dark brown stripe ventrally; antennal segment II mostly dark brown to black, usually with yellow to pale brown ring in basal half, sometimes entire basal half yellow to pale brown; pronotum with anterior part yellow and posterior part brown to dark brown, sometimes uniformly yellow; scutellum brown to dark brown; clavus mostly or entirely brown to dark brown; corium mostly yellow with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly, not reaching outer margin of hemelytron, sometimes corium mostly brown; lateral margin of embolium mostly yellow, pale brown to brown posteriorly; cuneus mostly yellow, with brown base and apex (Fig. 11E); pleura including metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow; legs yellow with dark brown markings at base of spines, bases of tibiae brown to dark brown. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19Q); wing-shaped sclerite absent; ventral sclerite bifurcate with one apex distinctly wider than needle-shaped sclerite, and second apex as wide as needle-shaped sclerite; needle shaped-sclerite surpassing sublateral sclerite; sublateral sclerite rounded; median sclerite present, small, distinctly narrower than secondary gonopore; basal sclerite present, not reaching secondary gonopore (Fig. 18G, H).

Distribution.

Apolygus maackiae is recorded from Primorsky Territory (Kulik 1965b, 1974; Kerzhner 1988b) and from Japan (Yasunaga 2023).

Host plants.

Apolygus maackiae was initially recorded from Maackiae amurensis Rupr. (Fabaceae) (Kulik 1965b, 1974; Kerzhner, 1988b; ZIN). Several specimens of this species were also collected from Polygonum sp. (Polygonaceae) (ZIN).

Notes.

This species is most similar to Apolygus limbatus in coloration. However, the latter differs in the legs often tinged with red, the cuneus not darkened apically (Fig. 11A–D) and the presence of the wing-shaped sclerite (Fig. 18E, I).

Apolygus shikotan sp. nov.

Figures 7C, 7D, 9W, 9X, 11F, 15J, 15K, 17F, 17G, 19W, 19X

Material examined.

Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Sakhalin Prov.: Malokurilskoe, Shikotan Mt., Shikotan Island, 43.85°N, 146.81666°E, 20 Aug 1973, I. M. Kerzhner, 1♂ (ZISP_ENT 00016047) (ZIN). Paratypes: RUSSIA • 4♂♂, ♀; Sakhalin Prov. (See Data S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.4–4.8 mm. Head pale brown with brown stripes and dark brown to black clypeus or mostly dark brown to black (Fig. 15J, K); basal half of antennal segment II pale brown to brown, apical half of antennal segment II dark brown to black; pronotum and scutellum dark brown to black; pleura dark brown to black; metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow; hemelytron mostly dark brown to black, lateral margin of embolium brown to dark brown; cuneus uniformly dark brown to black or pale brown medially (Fig. 11F); legs yellow; femora red; coxa yellow or red; markings at base of spines dark brown to black; bases of at least middle and hind femora brown; apical process of right paramere subequal to paramere body (Fig. 19W); wing-shaped sclerite surpassing sublateral sclerite, ca. 7–8× as long as wide with concave outer margin, 0.75× as long as ventral sclerite, as wide as lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; inner margin of lateral sclerite concave; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, rounded, wider than secondary gonopore width; needle-shaped sclerite present, as long as wing-shaped sclerite, surpassing secondary gonopore, not reaching apex of ventral sclerite (Fig. 17F, G).

Description.

MALE. Length in male 4.4–4.8 mm. — Coloration Head pale brown with brown stripes and dark brown to black clypeus or mostly dark brown to black (Fig. 15J, K); antennal segment I pale brown to brown, basal half of antennal segment II pale brown to brown, apical half of antennal segment II brown to dark brown, antennal segments III and IV dark brown, segment III with pale base; pronotum and scutellum dark brown to black, pleura dark brown to black, evaporatorium yellow; hemelytron mostly dark brown to black, cuneus uniformly dark brown to black or pale brown medially; membrane brown (Fig. 11F); legs yellow, femora red, coxa yellow or red, markings at base of spines dark brown to black, at least bases of middle and hind femora brown; tarsal segments I and II yellow to pale brown, segment III brown. Surface and vestiture. Dorsum shining, covered with pale simple setae. — Structure Body ca. 3.2× as long as wide, ca. 1.8–1.9× as long as pronotum width; head ca. 2.9–3.2× as wide as long, in lateral view head ca. 1.3–1.4× as long as high; antennal segment I 1.2–1.5× as long as vertex, ca. 0.5–0.6× as long as head width; antennal segment II ca. 2.8–3.1× as long as segment I, ca. 1.6× as long as head width, ca. 0.9× as long as pronotum width; pronotum ca. 1.6–1.8× as wide as head, ca. 1.8–1.9× as wide as long. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19W); wing-shaped sclerite surpassing sublateral sclerite, ca. 7–8× as long as wide with concave outer margin, ca. 0.75× as long as ventral sclerite, as wide as lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; inner margin of lateral sclerite concave; sublateral sclerite toothed, rounded, wider than secondary gonopore; needle-shaped sclerite present, as long as wing-shaped sclerite, surpassing secondary gonopore, not reaching apex of ventral sclerite (Fig. 17F, G). — FEMALE. Coloration. Similar to male. Cuneus mostly dark brown, pale brown medially. — Structure. Body 1.8× as long as pronotum width; head 3.6× as wide as long, in lateral view head ca. 1.5× as long as high; antennal segment I 1.2× as long as vertex, 0.4× as long as head width; pronotum ca. 1.7× as wide as head, ca. 1.8× as wide as long. — Genitalia. Dorsal labiate plate width subequal to its length, sclerotized ring of dorsal labiate plate ca. 4× as long as wide, distance between rings ca. 0.25× as long as sclerotized ring width (Fig. 7C, D).

Distribution.

Apolygus shikotan sp. nov. was recorded from a single location in the Kuril Islands, Russian Far East), however, at least some specimens of A. infamis from Japan can be attributed to this species too (see Notes for A. infamis).

Host plants.

The specimens of this species were collected from Phyllodendron sachalinense (Fr. Schmidt) Sarg. (Araceae) (Kerzhner 1978).

Etymology.

This species is named after Shikotan Island, where its specimens were collected.

Notes.

We found that there are two species in the type series of Apolygus infamis, and only two specimens from the same locality belong to A. infamis. We describe the second species as new to science, A. shikotan sp. nov., because it does not fit a description of any other species known from this genus. There are only a few species with dark brown to black color of hemelytron without any stripes or markings on clavus and corium, i.e., Apolygus ater, A. atrobellus, A. furvellus, A. furvus, A. infamis, A. miyamotoanus, A. nigricans, A. rubriceps, and A. seonheulensis. In A. ater, A. furvellus, A. furvus, and A. infamis the apical process of right paramere is subequal to the paramere body (Fig. 19E–H, O, P). In Apolygus atrobellus, A. furvellus, A. furvus, A. miyamotoanus, and A. nigricans sublateral sclerite diameter shorter than the secondary gonopore (Fig. 16K). Apolygus atrobellus differs in the absence of the needle-shaped sclerite, and in A. seonheulensis the needle-shaped sclerite does not surpass the secondary gonopore. In all those species, except for A. infamis and A. seonheulensis, the outer margin of wing-shaped sclerite is straight. Apolygus infamis, A. nigricans and A. seonheulensis additionally differ in the wing-shaped sclerite short, not surpassing the sublateral sclerite (Wang and Zheng 1982; Yasunaga 1992a; Oh et al. 2018; Yasunaga 2023).

Apolygus spinolae (Meyer-Dür, 1841)

Figures 5E, 5H, 8A, 8B, 9Y, 9Z, 12, 14, 15Q–W, 17A–E, 19Y, 19Z, S12–18

Capsus spinolae Meyer-Dür 1841: 86 (original description).

Capsus lucorum Meyer-Dür 1843: 46 (original description).

Deraeocoris nigro-nasutus Stål 1858: 184 (original description).

Lygus (Neolygus) malaisei Lindberg 1925: 4 (original description).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) lucorum Carvalho 1959: 138 (catalogue); Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 720 (key to species); Wagner and Weber 1964: 201 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Kelton 1971: 3 (diagnosis, key to species, discussion, illustration of male genitalia); Wagner 1974: 401 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992a: 13 (description, figure of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992b: 531 (key to species); Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 89 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 799 (catalogue).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) spinolae Carvalho 1959: 139 (catalogue); Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 720 (key to species); Wagner and Weber 1964: 201 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Wagner 1974: 401 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992a: 11 (description, figure of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1992b: 531 (key to species); Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 90 (key to species, figures of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 804 (catalogue).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) nigrovirens Kerzhner 1988a: 21 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 805 (key to species); Yasunaga 1992a: 15 (description, figure of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 801 (catalogue); Yasunaga 1992b: 531 (key to species).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) malaisei Kerzhner 1988b: 805 (key to species); Schuh 1995: 800 (catalogue).

Lygocoris (Apolygus) nigronasutus Carvalho 1959: 139 (catalogue); Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 90 (key to species, figures of male genitalia).

Apolygus lucorum Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 66 (catalogue); Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000: 83 (figure of habitus); Seong and Lee 2007: 325 (figures of habitus and male genitalia; key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 80 (catalogue); Jung et al. 2011: 269 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Yang et al. 2016: 1 (molecular data, discussion); Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (species list, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, key to species, discussion); Vinokurov et al. 2024: 247 (catalogue); junior synonym.

Apolygus malaisei Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 65 (catalogue); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 79 (catalogue); junior synonym.

Apolygus nigronasutus Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 66 (catalogue); Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000: 84 (figures of habitus); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 79 (catalogue); junior synonym.

Apolygus nigrovirens Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 66 (catalogue); Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000: 88 (figures of males genitalia); Seong and Lee 2007: 326 (key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 80 (catalogue); Jung et al. 2011: 269 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (species list, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, key to species); junior synonym.

Apolygus spinolae Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 67 (catalogue); Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000: 83 (figures of habitus and male genitalia); Seong and Lee 2007: 325 (figures of habitus and male genitalia; key to species); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 80 (catalogue); Jung et al. 2011: 269 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Yang et al. 2016: 1 (molecular data, discussion); Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (species list, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, key to species, SEM images, discussion); Vinokurov et al. 2024: 248 (catalogue).

For the full list of references see Carvalho (1959), Kelton (1971), Schuh (1995), Kerzhner and Josifov (1999), Vinokurov et al. (2010), Vinokurov et al. (2024).

Material examined.

Other material. RUSSIA • ♂; holotype of Lygocoris (Apolygus) nigrovirens Kerzhner, 1988; Sakhalin Prov.: Tret’yakovo, Kunashir Island, 43.98889°N, 145.64167°E, 03 Aug 1973, I. M. Kerzhner, 1♂ (ZISP_ENT 00015835) • 7♂♂, 4♀♀; paratypes of Lygocoris (Apolygus) nigrovirens Kerzhner, 1988; Primorsky Terr, Sakhalin Prov. • China, JAPAN, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, Ukraine, Russia • many ♂♂, ♀♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.8–6.3 mm, in female 4.7–6.3 mm. Head from uniformly yellow or green to mostly brown with yellow or green markings, clypeus from uniformly yellow or green to uniformly dark brown to black (Fig. 15Q–W); antennal segment I from uniformly yellow or green to brown; antennal segment II uniformly yellow or green, sometimes brown to dark brown apically and rarely also basally; pronotum from uniformly yellow or green to mostly brown with yellow or green posterior margin, calli often yellow to pale brown; scutellum from uniformly yellow or green to mostly brown with yellow to green apex, sometimes lateral angles also yellow to green; hemelytron often yellow to green with pale brown to brown marking on posterior part of corium and very apex of corium sometimes also brown to dark brown; sometimes clavus and corium with brown stripes or mostly brown to dark brown (Fig. 12); lateral margin of hemelytron pale brown to dark brown (see from lateral view); pleura, varying from uniformly yellow or green to mostly brown with yellow or green markings, metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow or green; sometimes coxae, femora and tibiae uniformly yellow to green, sometimes hind femora with pale brown to brown bands apically and spines on tibia with dark brown to black markings at base. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere ca. 0.2–0.25× as long as paramere body (Fig. 19Y). Wing-shaped sclerite ca. 4–5× as long as wide with straight outer margin, ca. 0.8× as long as ventral sclerite, as wide as lateral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; sublateral sclerite small and toothed or absent; median sclerite present, thin; needle-shaped sclerite absent (Fig. 17A, C).

Distribution.

Apolygus spinolae is a trans-Palearctic species, known from Western Europe to Kuril Islands and Japan. It was recorded from the Caucasus but was not recorded from Iran (Zamani and Hosseini 2020). In Central Asia A. spinolae was recorded from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan (Kerzhner and Josifov 1999). It is also abundant in China (Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1999; Zamani and Hosseini 2020; Zhang et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2024). The species is also known from Canada and the USA (Kelton 1971) and can be invasive.

Host plants.

Polyphagous. In particular, its specimens were collected from Thermopsis sp., Thermopsis lupinoides, Lespedeza sp. (Fabaceae), Artemisia spp., Tanacetum sp. (Asteraceae), Rosaceae, Urtica sp. (Urticaceae) (Kelton 1971; Kerzhner 1978, 1988a; Yasunaga 1992a). The species is considered as a pest of many plants, e.g., Camellia sinensis (tea plant), cotton, vegetables, fruits (Yasunaga 1992a; Zhang et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2024). It was also recorded as omnivorous (Lu et al. 2024).

Notes.

Meyer-Dür (1841) described the new species Capsus spinolae Meyer-Dür, 1841, and the same author (Meyer-Dür 1843) described Capsus lucorum Meyer-Dür 1843, both from Switzerland. He noted that C. lucorum is similar to C. spinolae but differs in the brighter coloration, absence of marking above cuneus and darker membrane. There were several specimens in the type series of the species described by Meyer-Dür (1941, 1943). Kerzhner (1996) designated lectotypes for both species, female in each case, preserved at the American Museum of Natural History. We requested digital images of the lectotypes, however, at this moment they are lost, and the paralectotypes of both species are very similar to each other, having uniformly yellow dorsum and clypeus, which also corresponds to the original description. However, paralectotype of A. spinolae have slightly darkened apex of cuneus (Fig. 14B, F), although it was not mentioned in the original description.

In the consequent keys those two species were differentiated using the presence and absence of the marking on cuneus apically (Wagner and Weber 1964; Wagner 1974; Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964; Yasunaga 1992a; Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995; Seong and Lee 2007). Kerzhner (1988a) and Vinokurov and Kanyukova (1995) also mentioned that two species can be differentiated in the mostly darkened or mostly pale clypeus in A. lucorum and A. spinolae respectively. Stål (1858) described a new species Deraeocoris nigro-nasutus from Siberia (Irkutsk), but he did not compare it with A. lucorum and A. spinolae. Lygus (Neolygus) malaisei was described by Lindberg (1925) from Kamchatka Peninsula, but he did not compare it with any species placed in Apolygus by that time. Kerzhner (1988a) described Lygocoris (Apolygus) nigrovirens from the Russian Far East and he mentioned that all five species were very similar to each other and differed in the coloration. In particular, A. nigrovirens differed from A. lucorum and A. spinolae in the dark markings on clavus and larger marking on the apex of cuneus. In A. nigronasutus the outer margin of corium was black and clypeus was mostly black, the pronotum, scutellum and hemelytron were generally paler, and tarsal segment III was entirely dark, whereas in A. nigrovirens the outer margin of corium was pale, the clypeus was mostly pale, the pronotum, scutellum and hemelytron were darker, and half of tarsal segment III was dark. Apolygus malaisei was darker than A. nigrovirens, but there were specimens assigned to both species which were very similar in coloration. He did not provide any characters in genitalic structures which can be used for the species differentiation. Yasunaga and Yasunaga (2000) mentioned that A. nigronasutus has the needle-shaped sclerite and they did not provide the illustration or any literature reference. We consider this a mistake, because Kerzhner (1988a) did not mention this character while comparing it with A. nigrovirens, and he noted that he could not find any differences in male genitalia in all five species. We also did not find any needle-shaped sclerite in the specimens identified as A. nigronasutus in the ZIN collection. Examination of the syntypes of this species cannot provide any additional information on the male genitalia structures, because they are females (Stål, 1858; Kerzhner and Jachewski, 1999). The characters in coloration were used in the keys of Kerzhner (1988b) and Vinokurov and Kanyukova (1995). Yasunaga (1992b), Seong and Lee (2007) and Kim and Jung (2016) additionally used labium length to differentiate A. spinolae and A. nigrovirens. According to Yasunaga (1992b) and Seong and Lee (2007), the labium reaches hind coxae in the former and does not reach them in the latter. However, in the key of Kim and Jung (2016) the labium reaches hind coxae in A. nigrovirens, whereas it is shorter in A. spinolae. We examined the large collection preserved at ZIN and dissected males belonging to numerous series of each species. We found that the coloration is very variable in all five species, and it is impossible to split them into the discrete morphs based on the characters mentioned by the previous authors. In particular, it was not possible to find the discrete states for the coloration of cuneus, which can be entirely green (Figs S12O, S15C, S16C, I, O, U, S17C, I, U), slightly darkened apically (Figs S12V, S14J, P, S17O, 18C, I) or having distinct dark brown marking apically of various size (Figs S12C, I, S13C, H, N, T, S14D, W, S18O). The same is true for the color of clypeus (Figs S12–S18). Additionally, the marking on clypeus cannot be used for the discrimination of A. lucorum from A. spinolae, because the representatives of type series of both species have entirely pale clypeus (Fig. 14B, F). The length of the labium cannot be used to separate A. nigrovirens and A. spinolae, because its position with respect to the middle and hind femora depends on the position of the head. Kerzhner (1988a) did not mention this character in the original description, and it is unclear how Seong and Lee (2006) and Kim and Jung (2016) associated the labium length with the characters provided in the original description.

Jung et al. (2011) and Kim and Jung (2018a) differentiated A. lucorum, A. nigrovirens, A. spinolae and A. watajii in the shape of sclerites in vesica. However, in those two papers the authors use different color criteria to separate the species and the characters in the sclerites corresponding to the color morphs are also different. In particular, according to Jung et al. (2011) in A. lucorum clypeus is mostly dark and the wing-shaped sclerite has teeth, whereas in A. nigrovirens and A. spinolae the clypeus is mostly pale and the wing-shaped sclerite is smooth. It is unclear from this work how they differentiated A. nigrovirens and A. spinolae from each other. According to Kim and Jung (2018a), A. lucorum and A. spinolae differ in the following characters: in the former, the apex of cuneus is pale, the wing-shaped sclerite is broad and the sublateral sclerite is present, whereas in the latter the apex of cuneus is darkened, the wing-shaped sclerite is slender and the sublateral sclerite is absent

The color morphs associated with the species names in Jung et al. (2011) were erroneous, because A. lucorum and A. spinolae do not differ in the clypeus color, which is confirmed by the images of the paralectotypes (Fig. 14B, F) and this character has not been mentioned in the original description. After examination of genitalia belonging to the different color morphs, we could not find any specimen having the wing-shaped sclerite without teeth, however, we agree that the teeth size is variable (Figs S12–S18). Additionally, the teeth are most obvious when the vesica is illustrated in the right lateral view, whereas in Jung et al. (2011) the image illustrating the smooth wing-shaped sclerite shows the vesica rotated towards the dorsal view (fig. 3F in Jung et al. 2011). We also imaged the vesica in the same rotated view and found that the teeth are less obvious in this position, even if they are distinct in right lateral view (Figs S12T, S14B, O). This character was also mentioned in Yasunaga (1992a) in the comparison of A. spinolae with A. lucorum, but he did not mention it in the key for Japanese Apolygus species published the same year (Yasunaga 1992b).

Although some authors used the shape of wing shaped sclerite to separate A. lucorum and A. spinolae, they did not provide any particular ratio, using the descriptive terms “broad” and “slender” (Yasunaga 1992; Kim and Jung 2019). Examination of the specimens from the large part of the Palearctic showed that the shape of this sclerite is variable and does not correspond to the color morphs (Figs S12–S18). Sublateral sclerite also vary and can be absent (e.g., Fig. S12B, H, U), pale (mostly membranous) (e.g., Figs S13M, 16B, T) and distinct (e.g., Figs S13B, S16I, N). The distinct sublateral sclerite was usually present in the specimens with pale apex of cuneus and without additional markings on dorsum (A. lucorum) (e.g., Figs S15B, S16H, S17H), but the representatives of the same color morph sometimes do not have this sclerite (Fig. S17N) and it is also present in other color morphs (Fig. S13B). The presence and absence of this sclerite also does not correspond to the clades in the phylogenetic trees. Additionally, the sublateral sclerite can be absent and present within A. watajii. It is depicted in the images provided by Seong and Lee (2007) and in the specimens examined by us (Fig. 17L, M), however, Kim and Jung (2019) reported its absence in the same species but did not comment on the previous work. In those two papers and the specimens examined by us the shape of the wing-shaped sclerite is the same for A. watajii, and it is very likely that all those specimens belong to the same species.

In the work of Kim and Jung (2019) the sequences of A. nigrovirens from Jung et al. (2011) were not included to the analysis without any explanation and it is unclear how they differentiate this species from A. lucorum and A. spinolae. Additionally, the specimen of A. spinolae in the image provided in Kim and Jung (2019), has a dark marking on clavus. According to the original description and the key to Far East (Kerzhner 1988a, 1988a), A. nigrovirens had this marking, whereas A. spinolae did not. Kim and Jung (2019) did not comment on this character.

Overall, we could not find any discrete characters in male genitalia in species group, comprising A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae. Both molecular and morphological characters indicate that the specimens previously identified as those five species represent a single polymorphic species. The examination of the previous literature shows that the criteria on how the researchers assign the specimens to those species are different in the different studies, and we should rely on the original descriptions and types to treat those species. The original description and the paralectotypes show only a single difference between A. lucorum and A. spinolae, which is the coloration of the apex of cuneus. The examination of the numerous specimens from the most part of the Palearctic shows that this character is variable and cannot be considered as discrete (Figs S12–S18). We could not examine the lectotypes and based on the original descriptions they should be mostly green with darkened membrane and the tarsi dark brown to black apically (Meyer-Dür 1941, 1943). The examination and dissection of those specimens will not provide any additional information, because they are females, and the differences in the female genitalia have never been reported for those two species, and we could not find them as well. The differences of the sclerite shapes are also not discrete and do not correspond to the color morphs.

Other species which have similar or the same male genitalia as A. spinolae and green or yellow coloration are Apolygus atrosignatus, A. halophilus, A. nepius, A. olivarius, A. rhamnicola, and A. watajii (Wagner and Weber 1964; Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000; Yasunaga 2023). All those species were previously separated using coloration, which is unreliable, considering the color variation range in A. spinolae. Among them A. watajii can be separated from A. spinolae in the wing-shaped sclerite 2–3× as long as wide, and A. nepius has wide ventral sclerite (Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000) (Fig. 17L). According to Yasunaga (2023) A. halophilus has the antennal segment III distinctly shorter than the head width whereas in A. spinolae it is as long as the head width (Yasunaga 2023). According to Yasunaga and Yasunaga (2000) A. atrosignatus, can be differentiated from A. spinolae in the longer antennal segment III. Apolygus olivarius differs from A. lucorum in the antennal segments II/IV ratio (Yasunaga 2023). However, antennal segments III and IV are sometimes shrunken, and it is impossible to measure their length correctly. Although A. rhamnicola is an European species, very little is known about its morphology. According to Wagner and Weber (1964), it differs from A. lucorum and A. spinolae in the presence of the dark markings at the bases of spines on tibiae, however, many specimens of A. spinolae also have them, but those specimens usually have darker coloration of dorsum (e.g., A. nigrovirens, A. nigronasutus, A. malaisei color morph). We dissected the specimen from the ZIN collection which was identified as A. rhamnicola with the coloration fitting the description of this species. The parameres and vesica are very similar to A. spinolae. The dissected specimen has a distinct sublateral sclerite with three rows of spines. However, this condition also occurs in the specimens of A. spinolae without markings at the base of the tibial spines. Therefore, we consider the status of A. rhamnicola as doubtful, and it should be tested using the nuclear markers.

Apolygus subhilaris (Yasunaga, 1992)

Figures 8C, 8D, 9AA, AB, 11G, 11H, 15L, 17J, 17K, 19AA, AB

Lygocoris (Apolygus) subhilaris Yasunaga 1992a: 20 (original description); Yasunaga 1992b: 531 (key to species); Schuh 1995: 805 (catalogue).

Apolygus subhilaris Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 68 (catalogue); Seong and Lee 2007: 323 (diagnosis, key to species, images of habitus and male genitalia); Kim and Jung 2016: 597; Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus, molecular data); Oh et al. 2018: 471 (species list); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, key to species, habitus images, SEM).

Material examined.

Non-type material. Japan, Russia: Amur Prov., Primorsky Terr. • 7♂♂, 3♀♀.

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.7–5.2 mm, in female 5.1 mm. Head yellow with yellow clypeus, sometimes clypeus brown apically (Fig. 15L); antennal segment I mostly yellow, often brown to dark brown apically and with brown to dark brown marking ventrally; antennal segment II brown to dark brown, sometimes with yellow to pale brown ring in basal half; pronotum yellow, scutellum varying from uniformly yellow to brown, corium yellow to pale brown with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly, sometimes mostly brown; lateral margin of embolium brown; cuneus yellow or with red tinge with brown base and apex; pleura yellow, sometimes with reddish tinge, metathoracic scent gland evaporative area whitish yellow; coxae yellow, sometimes with red tinge; femora yellow, often with red tinge, with red or brown rings in apical half; dark brown markings at base of spines on tibiae present; base of tibiae with small pale brown to brown marking. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere twice shorter than paramere body (Fig. 19AA); wing-shaped sclerite ca. 4–5× as long as wide with straight outer margin, surpassing sublateral sclerite, subequal to half of ventral sclerite, as wide as ventral sclerite and wider than median sclerite; sublateral sclerite present, toothed, triangular with acute angle; needle-shaped sclerite very short or indistinct (Fig. 17J).

Distribution.

Previously this species was recorded from Japan (Yasunaga 1992b, 2023) and South Korea (Seong and Lee 2007; Kim and Jung 2016; Oh et al. 2018). Here we report it for the first time from Russia: Primorsky Territory and Amur Province (ZIN).

Host plants.

In Korea this species was recorded from Lespedeza bicolor (Fabaceae) (Seong and Lee 2007).

Notes.

All specimens of this species included in this work were previously identified as Apolygus hilaris. The two species are very similar externally. Apolygus hilaris can be differentiated by the dark brown to brown clypeus (Fig. 15E). Additionally, its vesica has a long needle-shaped sclerite, which is distinctly longer than the wing-shaped sclerite (Fig. 18A, B). The vesica structure of A. subhilaris specimens examined by us corresponds to that depicted in Yasunaga (1992a) and Seong and Lee (2007).

Among the vouchers used for the molecular work, we found two specimens from Primorsky Territory which are very similar to A. subhilaris in coloration (M197, M124; Fig. 11I, J), however, they have the needle-shaped sclerite in the vesica reaching the secondary gonopore (Fig. 17H, I). There are several species which have similar coloration and illustrations of vesica were not published for them and those three specimens can belong to one of them, i.e., Apolygus angustus (Zheng & Wang, 1983), Apolygus kosempoensis (Poppius, 1915), Apolygus myittae (Distant, 1904), Apolygus triangulus (Zheng & Wang, 1983), Apolygus umbratus (Poppius, 1914), or can represent a new species. Therefore, we publish the illustration of habitus and male and female genitalia for those specimens which can be useful for the future revisions of Apolygus.

Apolygus subpulchellus (Kerzhner, 1988)

Figures 5A, 5J, 7I, 7J, 9AE, AF, 13A–C, 15N, 18K, 18L, 19AE, AF

Lygocoris (Apolygus) subpulchellus Kerzhner 1988a: 23 (original description); Kerzhner 1988b: 806 (key to species; figure of male genitalia); Yasunaga 1991b: 61 (redescription, figures of male genitalia); Schuh 1995: 805 (catalogue).

Apolygus subpulchellus Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 68 (catalogue); Seong and Lee 2007: 326 (key to species); Vinokurov et al. (2010): 80 (catalogue); Jung et al. 2011: 269 (molecular data); Kim and Jung 2016: 597 (key to species); Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus, molecular data); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (list of species, discussion); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (list of species, key to species, figures of habitus, male and female genitalia).

Material examined.

Type material. Holotype: RUSSIA • 1♂; Primorsky Terr.: Khasan Station, Golubiny Utes Tract, 42.417°N, 130.666°E, 24 Aug 1982, I. M. Kerzhner, Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. (Fabaceae), (ZISP_ENT 00015170) – Paratypes: JAPAN, RUSSIA, Primorsky terr • 55♂♂, 38♀♀, 5 unknown • Other material. Japan, South Korea, RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr • 5♂♂, ♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 4.3–5.1 mm, in female 4.3–5.0 mm. Head yellow, sometimes with pale brown to brown or red markings, clypeus dark brown (Fig. 15N); antennal segment I yellow to pale brown; antennal segment II often mostly yellow to pale brown and brown to dark brown apically, sometimes mostly brown to dark brown, yellow to pale brown basally; pronotum color varying from uniformly yellow to mostly brown with yellow to pale brown markings, often with dark brown marking around calli; scutellum mostly yellow, often with large subrectangular red or brown marking covering basal and medial parts, rarely mostly brown to dark brown with yellow apex; clavus varying from yellow to dark brown; corium varying from yellow with brown to dark brown marking posteriorly to mostly dark brown, often brown to dark brown with yellow marking medially; lateral margin of embolium brown to dark brown; cuneus yellow, brown to dark brown basally and apically, sometimes with red tinge (Fig. 13A–C); pleura yellow with red or brown markings, metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow; legs mostly yellow; femora with red tinge at least in apical half, often with pale brown to brown bands near apex; dark brown markings at base of spines on tibiae present; base of tibiae with small pale brown to brown marking. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere 0.3× as long as paramere body (Fig. 19AE, AF); wing-shaped sclerite present, concave, without teeth, ca. 7–8× as long as wide, reaching apex of lateral sclerite, wider than ventral and median sclerites; ventral sclerite slightly surpassing secondary gonopore, distinctly shorter than wing-shaped sclerite, as wide as median sclerite, inner margin of lateral sclerite straight; sublateral sclerite present, subrectangular, its inner margin toothed, needle-shaped sclerite absent (Fig. 18K, L).

Distribution.

Apolygus subpulchellus is recorded from Primorsky Territory (Kerzhner 1988a; ZIN), Korea (Oh et al. 2018; ZIN), Japan (Kerzhner 1988a; ZIN).

Host plants.

Lespedeza bicolor (Kerzhner 1988a, 1988b).

Notes.

Yasunaga (2023) described A. habilis, which is very similar to A. subpulchellus. The differences separating those species are very small, e.g., larger body, pale coloration, thicker parameres, tumid hypophysis of the right paramere, slender lateral sclerite and more developed wing-shaped sclerite that is more notched, vesica with denser field of spines below gonopore in A. habilis. Those differences can represent the intraspecific variation. We examined the male genitalia of all the series preserved at ZIN, including those collected in Japan and Korea, and found that all of them have wing-shaped sclerite more sinuate (more notched), similar to A. habilis, and we did not find any noticeable variation in the shape of lateral sclerites or parameres. Therefore, we did not find any discrete differences in the specimens assigned to A. subpulchellus preserved at ZIN, including those collected in Japan and Korea and treat all of them as this species. The status of A. habilis as a separate species is questionable.

Apolygus watajii Yasunaga & Yasunaga, 2000

Figures 8G–I, 9AG–AH, 13D–F, 15O, 15P, 17L, 17M, 19AG, AH

Apolygus watajii Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000: 87 (original description); Seong and Lee 2007: 324 (diagnosis, figures of habitus and male genitalia); Vinokurov et al. 2010: 80 (species list); Kim and Jung 2016: 597 (key to species); Kim and Jung 2018a: 5 (figures of habitus and male genitalia, molecular data, discussion); Oh et al. 2018: 469 (species list, key to species); Yasunaga 2023: 10 (species list, key to species).

Material examined.

Type material. Paratypes: JAPAN, RUSSIA, Primorsky Terr. • 6♂♂, 4♀♀ • Other material. China, Russia, Khabarovsk Terr., Primorsky Terr. • many ♂♂, ♀♀ (See File S1).

Diagnosis.

Length in male 5.1–5.5 mm, in female 5.3–5.6 mm. Head mostly yellow green or green, clypeus usually uniformly dark brown to black, sometimes only its apical half dark brown to black (Fig. 15O, P); apex of antennal segment II brown to dark brown; pronotum and scutellum yellow green or green, with brown paired markings on posterior part laterally; hemelytron yellow green or green, corium with brown marking posteriorly; lateral margin of embolium pale brown to dark brown; cuneus uniformly green, not darkened posteriorly (Fig. 13D–F); pleura, including metathoracic scent gland evaporative area yellow to green; legs yellow to green, without dark markings, spines on tibia without dark markings at base. — Male genitalia. Apical process of right paramere 0.3–0.4× as long as paramere body (Fig. 19AG). Wing-shaped sclerite ca. 2–2.5× as long as wide, subequal to half of ventral sclerite in length, wider than lateral and median sclerites; inner margin of lateral sclerite convex, outer margin of lateral sclerite concave; sublateral sclerite small and toothed; median sclerite present, thin, needle-shaped sclerite absent (Fig. 17L, M).

Distribution.

In Russia Apolygus watajii was recorded from Primorskiy Territory (Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000; ZIN). Here we report it from Khabarovsk Territory for the first time (ZIN). This species is also known from Japan (Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000; Yasunaga 2023; ZIN), South Korea (Yasunaga and Yasunaga 2000; Kim and Jung 2016; Oh et al. 2018), and we report it from northeast China (ZIN) for the first time.

Host plants.

In Korea this species was recorded from Persicaria spp. and Fagopyrum esculentum (Polygonaceae) (Seong and Lee 2007). In the ZIN collection the specimens were collected from Polygonum sp. (Polygonaceae) and Arthemisia vulgare (Asteraceae).

Notes.

Yasunaga and Yasunaga (2000) described A. watajii and mentioned that this species often cannot be separated from A. lucorum externally and examination of the vesica is needed for the correct identification. We examined the specimens preserved at ZIN and found that A. watajii differs from A. spinolae in the shape of wing-shaped sclerite, which is 4–5× as long as wide in the former (Fig. 17L) and 2–3× as long as wide in the latter (Fig. 17A, C). Although the present molecular data show ambiguous results on whether A. watajii falls within A. spinolae or not, the differences in the wing-shaped sclerite are consistent, therefore, we treat it as a separate species. Examination of the ZIN collection showed that numerous specimens of A. watajii were identified as A. lucorum, and this species inhabit not only Primorsky Territory, but Khabarovsk Territory as well. We also found a specimen of this species collected in China.

4. Discussion

4.1. Application of the genetic markers to the species identification and inferring the phylogenetic relationships within Apolygus

Previous studies on other genera of Mirinae showed that the barcoding region of COI can be used for species delimitation (Namyatova et al. 2024; Dzhelali and Namyatova 2024). However, the study of Lygus also showed that COI produces results which correspond to morphology less than 16S rRNA (Namyatova et al. 2023) but still can be used for the species identification, because most species differ in haplotypes. In a study on Orthops (Dzhelali and Namyatova 2024) two mitochondrial (COI and 12S rRNA and two nuclear markers (ITS1 and Ca-ATPase) were used for species delimitation. In that case, all of them were suitable for the species identification, however, mitochondrial and nuclear markers resulted in the different tree topologies. In case of Agnocoris, COI was not suitable for the species identification (Dzhelali and Namyatova 2025).

In the present study, we used two mitochondrial (COI and 16S rRNA) and two nuclear markers (ITS1 and 28S rRNA). It was found that 28S rRNA sequences have a small number of substitutions, and its application for species delimitation or intraspecific studies is very limited. However, COI, 16S rRNA, and ITS1 have distinct intraspecific variation. We concluded that mitochondrial markers should not be used alone for species delimitation and inferring phylogenetic relationships within Apolygus. Apparently, there are at least two processes affecting the phylogenetic topology and haplotype composition based on COI in this case. First, sequences belonging to specimens of Apolygus lucorum from Yakutia Republic (M46) and Leningrad Province (M64) have gaps and many substitutions in comparisons with other specimens of A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, A. nigrovirens, and A. spinolae. The sequences of another mitochondrial marker, 16S rRNA, belonging to the same specimens (M46 and M64), do not significantly differ from other sequences belonging to the same species group. This means that the process affecting COI does not affect the entire mitochondrion, and this cannot be hybridization or Wolbachia effect. Therefore, pseudogenes (numts) explain the differences in sequences of M46 and M64 the best, and they we reported for the representatives of other insect groups (e.g., Bertheau et al. 2011, Solovyev et al. 2022).

Hybridization is also possible within Apolygus. The phylogeny based on mitochondrial markers only shows that sequences of Apolygus fraxinicola (M189, M190) and Apolygus subpulchellus (M193, M217) do not form clades. However, in the trees based on ITS1, ITS1 + 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA + ITS1 and 16S rRNA + ITS + 28S rRNA those sequence pairs form clades with the highest supports. Additionally, Apolygus subpulchellus is monophyletic in the phylogeny based on four markers. This discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear markers can be explained by the current or historical hybridization, Wolbachia effect and incomplete lineage sorting. Incomplete lineage sorting is unlikely, because it would be expected that mitochondrial markers are sorted faster than nuclear markers because of the differences in the effective population size (e.g., Jiang et al. 2016). Wolbachia would result in the reduced variation of the mitochondrial markers or deep mitochondrial structure combined with the homogenous nuclear markers (e.g., Arthofer et al. 2010; Jäckel et al. 2013; Cariou et al. 2017), whereas in the case of Apolygus the variation of COI was slightly higher than that of ITS1. Therefore, current or past hybridization is the most plausible explanation. Possible cases of the current and historical hybridization were reported for other sympatric insect species, including plant bug species (Martin et al. 2013; Mende et al. 2016; Tonzo et al. 2020; Francusci et al. 2021; Namyatova and Dzhelali 2025). According to the COI phylogeny, A. fraxinicola can form hybrids with A. adustus, and A. subpulchellus can form hybrids with the species not included to the analysis. Therefore, among the markers used in this study, ITS1 is the most reliable for the species delimitation. The analysis shows that the combination of COI and one or two nuclear markers lead to the distortion of the interspecific relationships. However, combination of 16S rRNA and ITS1 increase the resolution and only slightly decrease supports for some clades. This can happen because COI has a higher number of substitutions than ITS1 and 16S rRNA has significantly lower intraspecific variation.

4.2. Species composition within Apolygus

Considering the synonyms and a species new to science proposed in this study, Apolygus currently includes 71 species, and, most probably, more new species are awaiting description. The most reliable set of characters for species identification is the vesica sclerotization. The shape of the right paramere also can be used for those purposes in some cases. Coloration is variable but often can be used for the identification purposes, especially in combination with the male genitalia structures. Female genitalia and other structures and ratios have very limited application for the species identification. Most species are very similar to each other externally and have the same set of sclerites in vesica and differ in their relative length and width. The needle-shaped sclerite is most often reduced.

Morphological studies and molecular-based analyses showed that A. lucorum, A. malaisei, A. nigronasutus, and A. nigrovirens are junior synonyms of A. spinolae. This species has extensive color variation, but it is not unique within Miridae. For example, the widespread Palearctic species of Lygus also have the significant variation in coloration combined with very low variation of the mitochondrial markers (Namyatova et al. 2023). This is consistent with the previous barcoding studies, where it was found that A. lucorum, A. spinolae and A. nigrovirens cannot be identified using COI (Jung et al. 2011; Kim and Jung 2019). Within this species there are two trans-Palearctic clades, which do not correspond to any particular color patterns. Most of the specimens of A. spinolae and A. nigrovirens belong to the first clade, and most specimens of A. lucorum, as well as A. malaisei and A. nigronasutus belong to the second clade. Two genetic lineages are consistent with the Yang et al. (2016) finding that A. lucorum and A. spinolae have different haplotypes. However, none of the species delimitation analyses showed that those clades can represent two different species.

Some other green-colored species are also potential synonyms of A. spinolae, which can be tested in the future. The first of them is A. watajii. Although there are COI, 16S rRNA and 28S rRNA known for this species, the molecular data showed ambiguous results regarding the relationship of A. spinolae and A. watajii. There is a COI sequence for A. rhamnicola in Genbank obtained for the barcoding project in Germany (Raupach et al. 2014) and it clusters within A. spinolae. Other species which can be potential synonyms of this widespread species are A. atrosignatus, A. halophilus, A. nepius, and A. olivarius (Yasunaga 2023). Nuclear markers are needed to test whether they represent a separate species or a synonym of A. spinolae.

Apolygus limbatus is also a trans-Palearctic species. Our studies showed that it can comprise two separate species, one of them inhabiting only the European part of Palearctic and the second one is distributed in Asia. Our morphological studies showed that they have slight but consistent differences in the sclerotization of vesica. The phylogeny based on COI also showed that European and Asian specimens do not cluster together, and the nuclear markers are needed to test the species boundaries in the future.

Molecular data have been generated for 15 species of Apolygus. However, for many of them only COI, 16S rRNA, 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA were obtained. We found that mitochondrial markers can show a misleading phylogenetic topology, and the number of substitutions for 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA is insufficient to reliably test species relationships. Therefore, more variable nuclear markers, such as ITS1, should be used for intra- and interspecific studies in this genus. The present work can be a background for further phylogenetic studies within Apolygus.

Currently we record 13 Apolygus species from Russia with 11 of them known from East Asia only. Apparently, this number will increase, because there are specimens from at least two species which we could not reliably place to any known taxon.

5. Declarations

Author Contributions. A.N.N. contributed to the conceptualization, data analyses, drawings, writing original draft and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the visualization, data processing, and manuscript editing.

Funding. The field trips and molecular work were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) grant 23-24-00417. The collection used for this study and facilities was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 125012901042-9 and 0665-2019-0014.

Conflict of interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

6. Acknowledgements

Laboratory work and SEMs were completed using the equipment in the Core Facility Centre “Taxon” (ZIN). The specimens for this molecular studies were collected in the Kandalaksha Nature Reserve (Murmansk Province), Belogorye State Nature Reserve (Belgorod Province), Beshtaugorskiy Reserve (Stavropol Territory), Lazovsky State Nature Reserve, Sikhote-Alin Nature Reserve (Primorskiy Territory), Bureinskiy Nature Reserve, Bolshekhekhtsirskiy Nature Reserve (Khabarovsk Territory), Curonian Spit National Park (Kaliningrad Province), Nalychevo Nature Park (Kamchatka Territory), Teberda Nature Reserve (Karachay-Cherkessia Republic), Yuganskiy Nature Reserve (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District), Shushenskiy Park, Sayano-Shushensky Nature Reserve (Krasnoyarsk Territory). We are grateful for the administration and stuff of those reserves for assisting us and our colleagues with the specimens collecting. We thank our colleagues who collected or loaned us the material for this study: Petr Kment (National Museum, Kunratice, Czech Republic), Dmitry Gapon, Maria Berlina, Kirill Fadeev, Fedor Konstantinov, Sergei Belokobylskij (ZIN), Nikolay Vinokurov (Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone, Yakutsk), Vasiliy Anikin (Saratov State University), Alexandra Tokareva (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences), Artyom Ryabinin (Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk), Yuriy Sundukov, Larisa Sundukova, Tatyana Markova (Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Science), Nikolay Simov (National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria), Viktor Golub (Voronezh State University, Voronezh Province), Vladimir Dubatolov (Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk), Dmitry Vitenko (Saint Petersburg State University), Viktor Aleksanov (State Budgetary Institution of Kaluga Region “Parks Directorate”, Kaluga, Russia). We are grateful to Ruth Salas and Jessica Ware (American Museum of Natural History, USA) for providing us the photographs of the Apolygus spinolae and A. lucorum paralectotypes. We also thank Veronica Tyts (University of California, Riverside, USA) for assistance with the molecular work and collection of specimens. We thank two reviewers whose comments and corrections helped to improve the manuscript. We are greatful for Michael Schwarts (Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Canada) for revising the paper.

7. References

  • Aparicio-Puerta E, Gómez-Martín C, Giannoukakos S, Medina JM, Scheepbouwer C, García-Moreno A, Carmona-Saez P, Fromm B, Pegtel M, Keller A, Marchal JA, Hackenberg M (2022) sRNAbench and sRNAtoolbox 2022 update: Accurate miRNA and sncRNA profiling for model and non-model organisms. Nucleic Acids Research 50(W1): 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac363
  • Arthofer W, Avtzis DN, Riegler M, Stauffer C (2010) Mitochondrial phylogenies in the light of pseudogenes and Wolbachia: re-assessment of a bark beetle dataset. ZooKeys 56: 269–280. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.56.531
  • Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N, Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Müller NF, Ogilvie HA, du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu C-H, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ, Pertea M (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS computational biology 15(4): e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
  • Cariou M, Duret L, Charlat S (2017) The global impact of Wolbachia on mitochondrial diversity and evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30(12): 2204–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13186
  • Carvalho JCM (1959) A catalogue of the Miridae of the world. Part IV. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro 48: 1–384.
  • Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657–1660.
  • Daglio LG, Dawson MN (2019) Integrative taxonomy: ghosts of past, present and future. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 99(6): 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315419000201
  • da Silva R, Peloso P, Sturaro MJ, Veneza I, Sampaio I, Schneider H, Gomes G (2018) Comparative analyses of species delimitation methods with molecular data in snappers (Perciformes: Lutjaninae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2: 1108–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1413364
  • Dzhelali PA, Namyatova AA (2024) Integrative Approach for the Identification and Delimitation of Orthops Species (Heteroptera, Miridae, and Mirinae) in the Palearctic. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2024(1): 5987677. https://doi.org/10.1155/jzs/5987677
  • Dzhelali PA, Namyatova AA (2025) Integrative taxonomy reveals mitochondrial introgression and Pleistocene diversification in Palearctic Agnocoris species (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Zootaxa 5706(4): 501–529. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5706.4.3
  • Douglas J, Jiménez-Silva CL, Bouckaert R (2022) StarBeast3: adaptive parallelized Bayesian inference under the multispecies coalescent. Systematic Biology 71(4): 901–916.
  • Fallén CF (1807) Monographia Cimicum Sveciae. C. G. Proft, Hafniae. 123 pp.
  • Francuski L, Ludoški J, Milutinović A, Krtinić B, Milankov V (2021) Comparative Phylogeography and Integrative Taxonomy of Ochlerotatus caspius (Dipera: Culicidae) and Ochlerotatus dorsalis. Journal of Medical Entomology 58(1): 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa153
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62(5): 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
  • Gamerschlag S, Mehlhorn H, Heukelbach J, Feldmeier H, D’haese J (2008) Repetitive sequences in the ITS1 region of the ribosomal DNA of Tunga penetrans and other flea species (Insecta, Siphonaptera). Parasitology Research 102: 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0743-0
  • Horváth G (1905) Hémiptères nouveaux de Japon. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 3: 413–423.
  • Jäckel R, Mora D, Dobler S (2013) Evidence for selective sweeps by Wolbachia infections: phylogeny of Altica leaf beetles and their reproductive parasites. Molecular Ecology 22(16): 4241–4255. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12389
  • Jakovlev BE (1876) New bugs, Hemiptera Heteroptera of the Russian fauna. Bulletin de la Societe des Naturalistes de Moscou 50–51: 85–124.
  • Jiang J, Yu J, Li J, Li P, Fan Z, Niu L, Li J (2016) Mitochondrial genome and nuclear markers provide new insight into the evolutionary history of macaques. PLoS One 11(5): e0154665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154665
  • Josifov M, Kerzhner IM (1972) Heteroptera aus Korea. I. Teil (Ochteridae, Gerridae, Saldidae, Nabidae, Anthocoridae, Miridae, Tingidae und Reduviidae). Annales Zoologici 29: 147–180.
  • Kanyukova EV, Kerzhner IM (2010) Additions to the fauna of terrestrial bugs (Heteroptera) of northern and central Sakhalin. Euroasian Entomological Journal 9(3): 550–560.
  • Kanyukova EV, Marusik YM (2006) A Checklist of Heteroptera of the Kuril Islands and Brief Zoogeographical Survey of the Fauna. Biodiversity and Biogeography of the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin 2: 161–174.
  • Kelton LA (1971) Review of Lygocoris species found in Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Miridae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 83: 1–87.
  • Kerzhner IM (1972) New and little known Heteroptera from the Far East of the USSR. Trudy Zoolologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 52: 276–295.
  • Kerzhner IM (1977) New and little-known species of Heteroptera from the Far East of the USSR. Trudy Zoolologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 62(1976): 6–35. [In Russian]
  • Kerzhner IM (1978) Heteroptera of Sakhalin and Kuril Islands, Proceedings of the Institute of Biology and Soil Science 50(153): 31–57. [In Russian]
  • Kerzhner IM (1988a) New and little known heteropteran insects (Heteroptera) from the Far East of the USSR. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Far Eastern Centre, Vladivostok, 84 pp. [In Russian]
  • Kerzhner IM (1988b) Infraorder Cimicomorpha. 21. Family Miridae (Capsidae). In: Ler PA (Ed) Keys to the identification of insects of the Soviet Far East, Vol. 2. Nauka, Leningrad, 778–857. [In Russian]
  • Kerzhner IM, Jaczewski TL (1964) Family Isometopidae. Family Miridae (Capsidae). In: Bei-Bienko GY (Ed) Keys to the Insects of the European part of the USSR 1. Nauka, Moscow and Leningrad, 700–765. [In Russian]
  • Kerzhner IM, Josifov M (1999) Cimicomorpha II. In: Aukema B, Rieger C (Eds) Catalogueof the Heteroptera of the Palearctic Region 3. Netherlands EntomologicalSociety, Amsterdam, 577 pp.
  • Kerzhner IM, Marusik YM (1997) Heteroptera (Insecta) of the Kurile Islands: revised checklist and new data on Middle Kuriles. Russian Entomological Journal 5(1–4): 21–29.
  • Kerzhner IM, Kanyukova EV, Marusik YM, Urbain BK, Nakamura M, Lelej AS (2004) Heteroptera of the Kuril Islands: material collected by the International Expedition 1994–1999 and updated checklist. Zoosystematica Rossica 12(2): 231–242.
  • Kim J, Jung S (2016) Two new species of the genus Apolygus China (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from the Korean Peninsula, with a key to Korean Apolygus species. Zootaxa 4137(4): 592–598. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4137.4.12
  • Kim J, Jung, S. (2018b) Three new records of the subfamily Mirinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) from the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 11(2): 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.04.003
  • Kim J, Jung S (2019) Phylogeny of the plant bug subfamily Mirinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha: Miridae) based on total evidence analysis. Systematic Entomology 44(4): 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12348
  • Konstantinov FV (2000) Structure of the male genitalia in plant bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) and its significance for suprageneric classification. PhD Thesis, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia. [In Russian]
  • Konstantinov FV (2003) Male genitalia in Miridae (Heteroptera) and their significance for suprageneric classification of the family. Part I: general review, Isometopinae and Psallopinae. Belgian Journal of Entomology 5(1–2): 3–36.
  • Konstantinov AS, Korotyaev BA, Volkovitsh MG (2009) Insect biodiversity in the Palearctic Region. In: Foottit R, Adler P (Eds) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, 107–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308211.ch7
  • Kulik SA (1965a) Blindwanzen Ost Sibiriens und des Fernen Ostens (Heteroptera-Miridae). Acta Faunistica Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 11: 39–70. [In Russian]
  • Kulik SA (1965b) New species of capsid-bugs (Heteroptera, Miridae) from East Siberia and from the Far East. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 44: 1497–1505. [In Russian]
  • Kulik SA (1974) Terrestrial true bugs (Heteroptera) of Eastern Siberia and the Far East. Insect fauna of Eastern Siberia and the Far East. Fauna of insects of the Eastern Siberia and the Far East 12(2) 3–41. [In Russian]
  • Li J, Yang F, Wang Q, Pan H, Yuan H, Lu Y (2017) Predation by generalist arthropod predators on Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae): molecular gut-content analysis and field-cage assessment. Pest Management Science 73(3): 628–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4346
  • Lindberg H (1925) Entomologische Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Kamtchatka-Expedition 1920–1922. Hemiptera. Arkiv for Zoologi 17a(34): 1–8.
  • Lindberg H (1934) Verzeichnis der von R. Malaise im Jahre 1930 bei Vladivostok gesammelten Heteropteren. Notulae Entomologicae 14: 1–23.
  • Linnavuori RE (1963) Contribution to the Miridae fauna of the Far East III. Annales Entomologici Fennici 29: 73–82.
  • Liu Y, Liu H, Wang H, Huang T, Liu B, Yang B, Yin L, Li B, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Jiang F, Zhang X, Ren Y, Wang B, Wang S, Lu Y, Wu K, Fan W, Wang G (2021) Apolygus lucorum genome provides insights into omnivorousness and mesophyll feeding. Molecular ecology resources 21(1): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13253
  • Martin SH, Dasmahapatra KK, Nadeau NJ, Salazar C, Walters JR, Simpson F, Blaxter M, Manica M, Mallet J, Jiggins CD (2013) Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome research 23(11): 1817–1828. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.159426.113
  • Menard KL, Schuh RT, Woolley JB (2014) Total-evidence phylogenetic analysis and reclassification of the Phylinae (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae), with the recognition of new tribes and subtribes and a redefinition of Phylini. Cladistics 30(4): 391–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12052
  • Mende MB, Bartel M, Hundsdoerfer AK (2016) A comprehensive phylogeography of the Hyles euphorbiae complex (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) indicates a ‘glacial refuge belt’. Scientific Reports 6(1): 9527. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29527
  • Meyer-Dür LR (1841) Identität und Separation einiger Rhynchoten. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 2: 82–89.
  • Meyer-Dür LR (1843) Verzeichnis der in der Schweiz einheimischen Rhynchoten (Hemiptera Linn.). Erstes Heft. Die Familie der Capsini. Jent und Gassmann, Solothurn, X + 11–116 + IV pp., 7 pls.
  • Miyamoto S, Yasunaga T, Saigusa T (1994) Heteroptera from the Russian Far East collected by T. Saigusa in 1990, with descriptions of two new mirine species. Japanese Journal of Entomology 62: 243–251.
  • Namyatova AA, Dzhelali PA (2024) Morphological and molecular variability within widespread Palearctic species Liocoris tripustulatus Fieber (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae). Journal of Insect Biodiversity 57(2): 32–57. https://doi.org/10.12976/jib/2024.57.2.1
  • Namyatova AA, Tyts VD (2025) Total-evidence phylogeny of the subfamily Cylapinae and the divergence dates for its subgroupings (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 203(1): zlae008. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae008
  • Namyatova AA, Dzhelali PA, Konstantinov FV (2024) Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data. ZooKeys 1209: 245. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
  • Namyatova AA, Schwartz MD, Cassis G (2013) First record of the genus Stenotus Jakovlev from Australia, with two new species, and a list of mirine species from Witchelina Nature Reserve (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae: Mirini). Journal of Natural History 47(13–14): 987–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2012.752049
  • Namyatova AA, Schwartz MD, Cassis G (2021) Determining the position of Diomocoris, Micromimetus and Taylorilygus in the Lygus-complex based on molecular data and first records of Diomocoris and Micromimetus from Australia, including four new species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae). Invertebrate Systematics 35(1): 90–131. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS20015
  • Namyatova AA, Tyts VD, Bolshakova DS (2023) Identification and delimitation of the trans-Palearctic Lygus species (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) using integrative approach. Insect Systematics & Evolution 54(2): 146–192. https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-bja10035
  • Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v.2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  • Oh M, Kim S, Lee S (2023) Revisiting the phylogeny of the family Miridae (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha), with updated insights into its origin and life history evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 184: 107796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107796
  • Oh M, Yasunaga T, Duwal RK, Lee S (2018) Annotated checklist of the plant bug tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with descriptions of three new species. European Journal of Entomology 115: 467–492. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2018.048
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior niversityon in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Raupach MJ, Hendrich L, Küchler SM, Deister F, Morinière J, Gossner MM (2014) Building-up of a DNA barcode library for true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany reveals taxonomic uncertainties and surprises. PloS one 9(9): e106940. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106940
  • Reid NM, Carstens BC (2012) Phylogenetic estimation error can decrease the accuracyof species delimitation: A Bayesian implementation of the general mixed Yule-coalescent model. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-196
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Roslin T, Somervuo P, Pentinsaari M, Hebert PD, Agda J, Ahlroth P, Anttonen P, Aspi J, Blagoev G, Blanco S, Chan D, Clayhills T, deWaard J, deWaard S, Elliot T, Elo R, Haapala S, Helve E, Ilmonen J, Hirvonen P, Ho C, Itämies J, Ivanov V, Jakovlev J, Juslén A, Jussila R, Kahanpää J, Kaila L, Kaitila JP, Kakko A, Kakko I, Karhu A, Karjalainen S, Kjaerandsen J, Koskinen J, Laasonen EM, Laasonen L, Laine E, Lampila P, Levesque-Beaudin V, Lu L, Lähteenaro M, Majuri P, Malmberg S, Manjunath R, Martikainen P, Mattila J, McKeown J, Metsälä P, Miklasevskaja M, Miller M, Miskie R, Muinonen A, Mukkala VM, Naik S, Nikolova N, Nupponen K, Ovaskainen O, Österblad I, Paasivirta L, Pajunen T, Parkko P, Paukkunen J, Penttinen R, Perez K, Pohjoismäki J, Prosser S, Raekunnas M, Rahulan M, Rannisto M, Ratnasingham S, Raukko P, Rinne A, Rintala T Romo SM, Salmela J, Salokannel J, Savolainen R, Schulman L, Sihvonen P, Soliman D, Sones J, Steinke C, Ståhls G, Tabell J, Tiusanen M, Várkonyi G, Vesterinen EJ, Viitanen E, Vikberg V, Viitasaari M, Vilen J, Warne C, Wei C, Winqvist K, Zakharov E, Mutanen M (2022) A molecular-based identification resource for the arthropods of Finland. Molecular Ecology Resources 22(2): 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13510
  • Sanchez JA, Cassis G (2018) Towards solving the taxonomic impasse of the biocontrol plant bug subgenus Dicyphus (Dicyphus) (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) using molecular, morphometric and morphological partitions. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 184(2): 330–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly005
  • Satler JD, Carstens BC, Garrick RC, Espíndola A (2021) The phylogeographic shortfall in hexapods: a lot of leg work remaining. Insect Systematics and Diversity 5(5): 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab015
  • Schuh RT (1995) Plant Bugs of the World (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Systematic Catalog, Host List, and Bibliography. New York Entomological Society, New York, 1329 pp.
  • Schwartz MD (2011) Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the North American genus Slaterocoris Wagner with new synonymy, the description of five new species and a new genus from Mexico, and a review of the genus Scalponotatus Kelton (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2011(354): 1–290. https://doi.org/10.1206/354.1
  • Schwartz MD, Foottit RG (1998) Revision of the Nearctic species of the genus Lygus Hahn, with a review of the Palaearctic species (Heteroptera: Miridae). Associated Publishers, Gainesville, Florida, 428 pp.
  • Solovyev VI, Dubatolov VV, Vavilova VY, Kosterin OE (2022) Estimating range disjunction time of the Palearctic Admirals (Limenitis L.) with COI and histone H1 genes. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 22(4): 975–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-022-00565-9
  • Stål C (1858) Beitrag zur Hemipteren-Fauna Sibiriens und des Russischen Nord-Amerika. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 19: 175–198.
  • Templeton AR, Routman E, Phillips CA (1995) Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 140: 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/140.2.767
  • Tonzo V, Papadopoulou A, Ortego J (2020) Genomic footprints of an old affair: Single nucleotide polymorphism data reveal historical hybridization and the subsequent evolution of reproductive barriers in two recently diverged grasshoppers with partly overlapping distributions. Molecular Ecology 29(12): 2254–2268. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15475
  • Vinokurov NN, Kanyukova EV (1995) True bugs (Heteroptera) of Siberia. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 237 pp. [in Russian]
  • Vinokurov NN, Kanyukova EV, Golub VB (2010) Catalogue of the Heteroptera of Asian Part of Russia. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 320 pp. [In Russian]
  • Vinokurov NN, Gapon DA, Golub VB, Zinovyeva AN, Kanyukova EV, Konstantinov FV (2024) Gapon DA (Ed) Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the European part of Russia and Ural. Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, 792 pp. [In Russian]
  • Vishnevskaya MS, Saifitdinova AF, Lukhtanov VA (2016) Karyosystematics and molecular taxonomy of the anomalous blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) from the Balkan Peninsula. Comparative Cytogenetics 10(5): 1. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v10i5.10944
  • Wagner E (1974) Die Miridae Hahn, 1831, des Mitelmeerraumes und der Makaronesischen Inseln (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Teil. 1. Entomologische Abhandlungen 37 (suppl.): 1–484.
  • Wagner E, Weber HH (1964) Hétéroptères Miridae. Fédération Française des Sociétés de sciences naturelles, Paris, 592 pp. [in French]
  • Wang X, Zheng LY (1982) Three new species of Lygus of the subgenus Apolygus from Fujian, China (Hemiptera: Miridae). Wuyi Science Journal 2: 118–123.
  • Wang X, Su H, Wang J, Li G, Feng H, Zhang J (2023) Monitoring of insecticide resistance for Apolygus lucorum populations in the apple orchard in China. Crop protection 170: 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106279
  • Wheeler AG (2001) Biology of the plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae): pests, predators, opportunists. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 507 pp.
  • Wheeler AG, Henry TJ (1992) A Synthesis of the Holarctic Miridae (Heteroptera): Distribution, Biology, and Origin, with Emphasis on North America. The Thomas Say Foundation, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, Maryland, 282 pp.
  • Yang CY, Kim SJ, Kwon SJ, Ahn SJ (2016) Molecular identification of closely related mirine plant bugs, Apolygus spinolae and A. lucorum (Heteroptera: Miridae) by PCR-RFLP markers. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 19(3): 729–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2016.06.015
  • Yasunaga T (1991a). A revision of the plant bug genus Lygocoris Reuter from Japan, Part I (Heteroptera, Miridae, Lygus-complex). Japanese Journal of Entomology 59(2): 435–448.
  • Yasunaga T (1991b) Two new species of the genus Lygocoris Reuter (Heteroptera, Miridae) from Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan, with notes on two allied species. Transactions of the Nagasaki Biological Society 38–39: 55–63.
  • Yasunaga T (1992a) A revision of the plant bug genus Lygocoris Reuter from Japan: Part IV (Heteroptera, Miridae, Lygus complex). Japanese Journal of Entomology 60: 10–25.
  • Yasunaga T (1992b) A revision of the plant bug genus Lygocoris Reuter from Japan, Part VI (Heteroptera, Miridae, Lygus complex). Japanese Journal of Entomology 60: 521–537.
  • Yasunaga T (2023) Descriptions of twenty-three new mirine species from Japan, with a key to genera of the tribe Mirini, updating the Japanese fauna (Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 166(1): 1–116. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119434-bja10024
  • Yasunaga T, Duangthisan J (2024) A new species of Apolygus China, 1941 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from Thailand. Heteropterus Revista de Entomología 24(2): 75–83.
  • Yasunaga T, Yasunaga M (2000) Eight new species of the mirine genus Apolygus China (Heteroptera: Miridae) from Japan. Biogeography 2: 81–92.
  • Yasunaga T, Schwartz MD, Chérot F (2018) Review of the plant bug genus Prolygus and related mirine taxa from eastern Asia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58(2): 357–388. https://doi.org/10.2478/aemnp-2018-0030
  • Xiong B, Li D, Zhang Q, Desneux N, Luo C, Hu Z (2024) Image detection model construction of Apolygus lucorum and Empoasca spp. based on improved YOLOv5. Pest Management Science 80(6): 2577–2586. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7964
  • Xue H, Zhu X, Wang L, Zhang K, Li D, Ji J, Niu L, Gao X, Luo J, Cui J (2023) Dynamics and diversity of symbiotic bacteria in Apolygus lucorum at different developmental stages. Journal of Cotton Research 6(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-023-00142-1
  • Zamani M, Hosseini R (2020) An illustrated taxonomic key to genera of Mirinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) with three new records from Iran. Russian Entomological Journal 29(1): 20–32. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.29.1.04
  • Zhang T, Mei X, Zhang X, Lu Y, Ning J, Wu K (2020) Identification and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae) in China. Pest Management Science 76(5): 1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5714
  • Zheng LY, Wang X (1983) New species of Lygus bugs from China. Entomotaxonomia 5: 47–59. [In Chinese with English summary]

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Figures S1–S27

Namyatova AA, Dzhelali PA, Boshakova DS (2026)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: This file includes Figures S1–S27 with the additional phylogenies and digital images of the vouchers for the molecular work.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (2.68 MB)
Supplementary material 2 

File S1

Namyatova AA, Dzhelali PA, Boshakova DS (2026)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: This file includes the list of collection events for all Apolygus specimens examined for this study.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (362.13 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Tables S1–S6

Namyatova AA, Dzhelali PA, Boshakova DS (2026)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: This file includes the Tables S1–S6 with the additional information: list of the genbank accestion numbes for all vouchers used for the molecular works, list of the primers used for PCR and PCR protocols, supports for the main clades in the resulted phylogenies, results of the species delimitation analyses, interspecific and intraspecific p-distances for the Apolygus species, list of the specimens corresponding to each haplotype revealed in this study.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.22 MB)
login to comment