Research Article
Research Article
A new cryptic species of Dichotrachelus from the Bergamasque Prealps, a late Miocene centre of speciation for the alpine fauna (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Cyclominae)
expand article infoMassimo Meregalli, Manfred Kahlen§, Riccardo Monguzzi|, Valentina Marzia Rossi, Alfredo Santovito
‡ University of Torino, Torino, Italy
§ Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck, Austria
| Unaffiliated, Milano, Italy
¶ Italian National Research Council Institute of Geosciences and Georesources, Pavia, Italy
Open Access


Dichotrachelus orobicus, a new species from the Bergamasque Prealps, is described. It is closely related to D. grignensis from the Grigna Massif, from which it differs mainly in the COI and ITS2 sequences, and minute morphological characters. Remarks on the possible epoch of speciation between the two taxa, with an analysis of the biogeographic scenario that may have led to the disjunction, are discussed.

Key words

Alpine fauna, cryptic species, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1, internal transcribed spacer 2, molecular clock, new species, phylogeny, speciation

1. Introduction

Dichotrachelus grignensis Barajon, 1946, was described based on some specimens found on Mt. Grigna, in western Lombardy (northern Italy). It belongs to a group of species whose host plant is Saxifraga caesia L. and represents the westernmost species of the D. grignensis group, as defined in Meregalli et al. (2013). Remarks on phylogeny and distribution of the Dichotrachelus associated with Saxifraga caesia were given by Meregalli et al. (2013). Dichotrachelus grignensis appeared to be restricted to the Northern and Southern Grigna Massifs, until, quite recently, a few specimens morphologically referable to this species were found in a few calcareous outcrops of the Bergamasque Prealps. These collections were at first investigated through analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene I (COI). Limitations of the application of the COI sequences in evaluating species-differentiation are well known (Sbordoni 2010), often determined by horizontal gene exchanges or hybridization, that cannot be disclosed with the mitochondrial genome. In the case of these isolated high-altitude, wingless, scarcely vagile and highly specialized weevils it seems quite unlikely that these phenomena can occur. However, in order to strengthen the signal given by COI, we added a nuclear gene to the study, namely the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). The newly found populations from the Bergamasque Prealps proved to be reciprocally quite homogeneous, and clearly differentiated for both the COI and ITS2 sequences from those from the Grigna, and are thus deemed to belong to a new species, described here as Dichotrachelus orobicus Meregalli, Monguzzi & Kahlen, sp. n. (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Dichotrachelus orobicus. Holotype.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Specimen collection

Most of the specimens used in this study were sampled during a specific research expedition carried out in July 2018 by two of the authors (M.M. and M.K.), with the addition of several previously collected specimens, mainly conserved in coll. Monguzzi. Specimens were collected usually at night, by searching on the limestone rocks near plants of Saxifraga caesia. Some more specimens were sifted from the same plants, and larvae were found in the roots of the saxifrage. Fresh imagoes and larvae were stored in vials with alcohol 95° immediately after collection and conserved at minus 23°C until they were processed. Specimens from previous collections had been conserved dry on card in entomological drawers and an attempt at DNA extraction from these specimens, not always successful, was made after a short rehydration.

2.2. Morphological analysis

Body length was measured in profile from anterior border of eyes to apex of elytra, excluding rostrum. Length/width ratios were measured from digital photographs, and were always taken at the maximum length and width of the respective parts in dorsal view. Genitalia were cleared with 10% KOH and carefully dissected; female genitalia and male genital sclerite were embedded in resin, male genitalia were mounted dry on the same card as the respective specimen. Photographs were taken using a Nikon P 6000 digital camera mounted on a Leica 6SE stereomicroscope, combining image stacks with Zerene Stacker. All images were cleaned and enhanced as necessary in Adobe Photoshop CS3.

2.3. Phylogenetic analysis

Total DNA was extracted by placing the entire animal body in 400 μl of 5M guanidine-isothiocyanate, after separating the head + prothorax from the rest of the body, or cephalic capsule from the rest of the body for the larvae, to maximize DNA extraction. DNA extraction was destructive for the larvae; adult specimens were conserved as much as possible. Two different regions of the mitochondrial COI gene were amplified and independently analysed. One region was amplified with primers based on Hughes and Vogler (2004): fw C1-J-2183 (Jerry), 5’-CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG-3’ and rev L2-N-3014 (Pat), 5’-TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA-3’. The other region was amplified with primers based on Folmer et al. (1994) modified as in Astrin and Stüben (2008): fw: LCO1490-JJ, 5’-CHACWAAYCATAAAGATATYGG-3’; rev: HCO2198-JJ, 5’-AWACTTCVGGRTGVCCAAARAATCA-3’. In addition, sequences corresponding to the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA were amplified using primers based on Vahtera and Muona (2006): fw: 5’-GGGTCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3’; rev: 5’-ATATGCTTAAATTCAGCGGG-3’. Amplification of DNA was done as follows: 15 min of initial denaturation (95°C) followed by 10 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 45 sec at 60°C to 50°C (lowering the annealing temperature in each cycle 1°C), 2 min at 72°C followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 45 sec at 50°C, 2 min at 72°C and a final extension cycle of 15 min at 72°C. The reaction products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and successive purification from the gel. Sequencing was performed by an external service (Genechron, Roma). Both strands were sequenced. Forward and reverse chromatograms were checked with Chromas ( using default parameters, and ambiguities were corrected manually. The COI sequences had no indels after alignment, no stop codons were detected and the translation to the amino acids was congruent with the protein sequence known for the other species of the genus. This was considered as a sufficient evidence to exclude NUMT pseudogenes. Multiple sequence alignment of both strands for both COI regions and ITS2 was performed with MEGA-X (Kumar et al. 2018), after reversing and complementing the reverse strand, with the Muscle alignment option. The COI sequences of the fragment amplified with the Jerry/Pat primers were aligned with those of other species of the genus used for inferring phylogeny of Dichotrachelus by Meregalli et al. (2018). The sequences of the fragment amplified with the Folmer primers were aligned with the few other Dichotrachelus Folmer sequences available, with the inclusion of one species of Cyclominae and one of Entiminae as outgroups. The ITS2 sequences were aligned with those of a few other species of Dichotrachelus kindly provided by C. Germann, with a species of the Molytinae genus Aclees as the outgroup. All the sequences were trimmed at the extremes to exclude the part corresponding to the primers and the final sequences were, respectively, 826 and 658 bp long for the two regions of COI and 702 bp long for ITS2 (including gaps for this last one, ITS2 634 bp long for the D. grignensis complex only). In the two regions of COI amplified, the first codon of the translated amino acid chain corresponded to the second site. In order to apply a model that allows for different substitution probabilities according to the position of the nucleotide in the codon, the first nucleotide was also trimmed and the analyses were therefore conducted on fragments of, respectively, 825 and 657 bp. All the sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis were deposited in GenBank.

Pairwise distance was calculated for the COI sequences with MEGA-X, implementing Tamura-Nei substitution model (Tamura and Nei 1993) with Γ-distributed rates between sites.

Bayesian Inference was estimated using MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2009). Two runs with 4 chains were run for 2 million generations, sampling every 500 generations. The chains were left free to sample all the models of the GTR family using reversible jump Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) (Huelsenbeck et al., 2004). Heterogeneity of substitution rates among different sites was modelled with a 4-categories discretized Γ distribution, with a proportion of invariable sites. For the two regions of COI, the matrix was partitioned so that substitution rates could vary according to the nucleotide position in the codon. A basic approach, with no constraints to the substitution rate for each site, was applied to ITS2. The first 25% generations were discarded (burn-in) and convergence was evaluated with the average standard deviation of split frequencies. Goodness of mixing was assessed looking at the acceptance rate of swaps between adjacent chains, following Ronquist et al. (2009). After a first analysis, the parameter “temperature” was set to 0.05 in order to improve swaps between chains for the COI sequences. The resulting consensus tree was examined with Figtree (Rambaut 2014).

2.4. Molecular clock

An attempt to estimate the epoch of the splitting event between the two D. grignensis clades that resulted from the Bayesian inference, and within the Bergamasque Prealps populations, was carried out by applying a molecular clock to the results of the COI analyses. Criticism of molecular clocks has often been expressed, in particular because variation among taxa and intrinsic theoretical limits of the procedure have been evidenced (Bromham and Penny 2003; Schwartz and Maresca 2006; Gibbons 2012; etc.). However, the theoretical bases of the molecular clock have been thoroughly discussed (Ho and Lo 2013) and nowadays the Bayesian clock dating methodology has become a standard tool for estimating the timeline of the Tree of Life (dos Reis et al. 2015). Some peculiarities of Dichotrachelus must be considered. Firstly, it is impossible to calibrate the clock based on known age of independent events, let apart fossils, never recorded for these weevils, which would allow a more precise tree node dating. Moreover, the weevils’ generation time should be considered, since the overall rate of evolution is ultimately constrained by the turnover rate of individuals in populations, as reflected in generation time: species with lower generation turnover obviously tend to have lower substitution rates per site per million years (‘My’) (Thomas et al. 2010). Also the effect of metabolism may have influence (Gillooly et al. 2004), even though this last assumption has been criticized (Lanfear et al. 2007). The contrasting opinions underline uncertainties in the application of the molecular clock, which should be always taken with a margin of doubt. These Dichotrachelus have only a few months a year of active life, due to the harsh climate in their high altitude alpine habitats, and their life cycle seems to be at least two years long (Meregalli 1980). Various studies suggested that in Coleoptera the nucleotide substitution rate ranges around 0.015–0.018 substitutions per site per My (as, respectively, in Pons et al. 2010 and Papadopoulou et al. 2010), and this value was used here, but it cannot be excluded that indeed the true substitution rate is lower than 0.015 substitutions per site per My because of the metabolic constraints. As a consequence, this would increase the time of divergence between the phylogenetic lines.

Three different molecular clock models were tested with Bayes factor (B10): no-clock model, strict clock model, and uncorrelated gamma rate relaxed clock model (Lepage et al. 2007). MrBayes 3.2 was used to compute the marginal likelihood of the three models with the stepping stone algorithm (Xie et al. 2012): a 50 steps 2.5 million generations analysis sampling every 500 generations was performed using 2 runs with 4 chains, each under the GTR model. The Ln marginal likelihood for the no-clock, strict clock, and uncorrelated gamma rate model was respectively: = –2760, –2785, –2752 (825 bp fragment); –2642, –2622, –2612 (657 bp fragment). According to Kass and Raftery (1995) this is a very strong evidence in favour of the uncorrelated gamma rate relaxed clock, that we eventually used for dating.

Table 1.

There is individual variation among the specimens, so that occasionally one of the characters indicated overlaps between the species. The field of variation increases considering the entirety of the populations from the Bergamasque Prealps and only the shape of the male genital sclerite appears to be constantly different. This structure was demonstrated to be a highly reliable character in the taxonomy of the genus (Meregalli 1987; Meregalli et al. 2013).

Character Dichotrachelus grignensis Dichotrachelus orobicus
Rostrum: ratio width at base/width at antennal insertion 1.37–1.83 mean 1.61; median 1:59 1.07–1.75 mean 1.43; median 1.46
Rostrum: ratio length/width at base 1.28–1.61 mean 1.37; median 1.34 1.31–1.93 mean 1.58; median 1.53
Pronotum, sides: usually linearly weakly broadened from base to apical quarter, not strongly narrowed before apex usually slightly curved outwards, with maximum width at midlength, strongly narrowed before apex
Protarsus, tarsomere 3: ratio length/width 0.67–1.06 mean 0.89; median 0.91 0.91–1.10 mean 1.04; median 1.00
Metatarsus, tarsomere 3: ratio length/width 0.72–1.16 mean 0.99; median 1.00 1.01–1.56 mean 1.20; median 1.17
Penis, apical part: ratio length from base of ostium to apex/maximum width of ostium 2.15–2.32 (n=3) 2.45–3.31 (n=5) mean 2.84; median 2.65
Penis, apical lamella: shape sides feebly convergent, apex slightly elongated sides subparallel, apex broadly rounded
Male genital sclerite, valve: anterior valve broadly oval, scarcely longer than wide; outer margin of posterior valve scarcely curved, oval anterior valve oblong, narrow, much longer than wide; outer margin of posterior valve strongly curved, semicircular

Node ages were calculated with a rate of 0.018 nuclear substitutions per site per My per lineage, according to Papadopoulou et al. (2010). Uncertainty of the substitution rate is evaluated in Bayesian inference by changing the rate with a proposal mechanism at every generation. A Bayesian analysis with the same parameters of the phylogenetic analysis was performed (except the model and the parameters related to the clock).

3. Results

3.1. Morphological analysis

The two taxa are extremely similar, and each population shows some morphological peculiarities; moreover, the very limited number of specimens available does not allow evaluation of the stability of the few distinctive characters; due to the paucity of specimens, no statistical analysis of possible biometric variation can be implemented. The following scheme was drawn from the specimens of D. orobicus from the type locality, Pizzo Camino, and surroundings, vs 8 specimens from the Grigna (Figs 2, 3).

Figure 2. 

Dichotrachelus grignensis, Northern Grigna. Rostrum, dorsal (a). Antenna (c). Pronotum (e). Protarsus (g). Rostrum, profile (i). Apical part of penis (k). Metatarsus (m). Dichotrachelus orobicus, holotype. Rostrum, dorsal (b). Antenna (d). Pronotum (f). Protarsus (h). Rostrum, profile (j). Apical part of penis (l). Metatarsus (n).

Figure 3. 

Male genital sclerite. Dichotrachelus orobicus, paratype (a). Dichotrachelus grignensis, Northern Grigna (b).

3.2. Molecular analysis

The Bayesian inference gave phylogenetic trees with comparable topology for all the primer sets. All populations belonging to the D. grignensis complex clustered in a fully supported clade. Within this clade all the specimens from the Bergamasque Prealps formed a monophyletic group with respect to the specimens from the Grigna Mts with full, or almost full, support for both the regions of COI and the ITS2 (Figs 4, 5, 6).

Figure 4. 

Bayesian Inference consensus tree based on COI, fragment 825 bp, of the relationships among several species of Dichotrachelus, with emphasis on the Dichotrachelus grignensis complex. Branch post probability support is indicated on the branches, in percentage. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.

Figure 5. 

Bayesian Inference consensus tree based on COI, fragment 657 bp, of the relationships among a few species of Dichotrachelus, with emphasis on the Dichotrachelus grignensis complex. Branch post probability support is indicated on the branches, in percentage. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.

Figure 6. 

Bayesian Inference consensus tree based on ITS2 of the relationships among a few species of Dichotrachelus, with emphasis on the Dichotrachelus grignensis complex. Branch post probability support is indicated on the branches, in percentage. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.

3.3.1. COI sequences

Several nucleotide variations were detected.

825 bp fragment. 781 sites are constant among all specimens (94.6%); of the 44 sites that vary, 40 are phylogenetically informative, i.e., they are constant in all specimens of each of the two clades and vary between the two clades: they are thus considered as molecular synapomorphies. The majority of the variations are T->C or A->G transitions (39 sites), with only a few A->C or A->T transversions (5 sites). All but 5 of these substitutions are synonymous; the variations in the 275 aa long chain in D. orobicus are the following: a valine replacing a methionine in position 47, a valine replacing an isoleucine in position 75, a leucine replacing a phenylalanine in position 95, an alanine replacing a threonine in position 272 and an histidine replacing an asparagine in position 274.

657 bp fragment. 614 sites are constant among all specimens (93.3%); of the 43 sites that vary, 30 are phylogenetically informative. The C->T and A->G transitions are 22, whereas the A->C, A->T and G->C transversions are 8. All but 3 of these substitutions are synonymous; the variations in the 219 aa long chain in D. orobicus are the following: a glycine replacing a lysine in position 33, a methionine replacing a valine in position 139 and an isoleucine replacing a valine in position 172.

3.3.2. ITS2 sequences

In the sequences of the specimens of the D. grignensis complex the first 228 sites are constant, then limited variation occurs. The main variation regards a series of repeated GAC sequences, starting from position 244, that can be from 4 to 7, depending on the population. The remaining part of the chain is again rather constant, with a few replacements of single nucleotides and a few occasional gaps in one or another of the populations.

3.4. Molecular clock

According to our analysis, the two clades of the D. grignensis complex separated around 5 million years ago (‘Mya’), with similar results for both the 825 and 657 fragments; the median in-clade divergence among the populations of D. orobicus indicates that they became reciprocally isolated at most around 0.5 Mya, but probably in more recent times (Fig. 7).

Figure 7. 

Molecular clock. Bayesian consensus tree from molecular analysis of COI, fragment 825 bp, with substitution rate 0.018 substitutions per site per My. Node labels indicate the median of node age estimations. Blue bars indicate 95% credible interval. Scale unit are My.

3.5. p-distance

The p-distance between the specimens of D. orobicus and those of D. grignensis is, for the 825 fragment, about 0.06 (6%), whereas the interpopulation p-distance for D. orobicus is always below 1%, varying between 0.004 and 0.008; for the 657 fragment the p-distance between D. orobicus and D. grignensis is 0.07 and among the various populations of D. orobicus it is lower than 0.01.

4. Discussion

4.1. Taxonomic status of the two clades

Theoretically, the two clades could be classified as two distinct species or two distinct subspecies in D. grignensis. An analysis of the concept and application of the subspecies is beyond the scope of this paper. It is known that subspecies have no place in the schema of the phylogenetic species concept, so adherents to that concept are predisposed to a finding of “no subspecies” because below the generic level a taxon is either a species or it is nothing (Patten 2015). Nevertheless, subspecies are still broadly used, even in papers dealing with cladistic analyses. They also have an importance for conservation issues (Zink et al. 2013), albeit their definition inevitably suffers from a certain arbitrary subjectivity (a charge that could be levied to any rank, of course). Thresholds have been suggested to determine species and subspecies limits with more objectivity (Haig et al. 2008), but in most cases they have been based on a statistical analysis of morphological variation; this has often played a leading role in the definition of a subspecies, indicated as “heritable geographic variation in phenotype.” (Patten 2015). However, morphology does not always seem to be a valid criterion in evaluating taxonomic differences, as demonstrated by the large number of cryptic species that mainly differ in non-morphological traits (Korshunova et al. 2019).

In our opinion, a comprehensive approach to establish the rank to be assigned to allopatric populations should evaluate equally the entire set of morphological, biogeographical and molecular data.

The two clades of the D. grignensis complex differ by several molecular synapomorphies. Any approach to delimit a threshold in interspecific differentiation in genetic divergence is somewhat arbitrary, since it can vary to a great extent among different taxa. A limit of 5% was roughly considered to be a good indicator (Hebert et al. 2003), and a limit of 3% is relatively well working to separate species that are the result of geographic speciation events driven by gradual accumulation of diverging mutations (Sbordoni 2010). This is the case of the two taxa of Dichotrachelus of the D. grignensis complex. Several cases of even lower variation between allopatric, or marginally sympatric yet genetically separated, cryptic species are known, among which the Southern festoon butterflies [Zerynthia polyxena (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1826) and Z. cassandra Geyer, 1828], whose genetic divergence for COI is 1.4% (Zinetti et al. 2013). In previous studies on Dichotrachelus, intraspecific divergence was usually lower than 1%, and reached a maximum of 2.8% for specimens of D. maculosus at the extremes of its range (Meregalli et al. 2018).

Moreover, not all the nucleotide differences between the two groups of populations of the D. grignensis complex are synonymous. The two regions of the COI that were amplified, out of a total of 494 amino acids, differ for 8 between the two taxa (variation of 0.016%). The intraspecific amino acid variation usually peaks near zero (i.e., median divergence is 0.009 for Drosophila flies, Shih et al. 2015), and in the populations at the extremes of the range of D. maculosus Fairmaire, 1869 (Switzerland and Maritime Alps, reciprocally distant several hundred km) only 1 amino acid differs out of 275 in the 825 bp fragment (Meregalli et al. 2018, sequences re-examined). The variation in the COI sequences of the two clades of the D. grignensis complex is relevant, and is confirmed by the variation that is present in the ITS2.

The molecular clock places the disjunction between the demes from the Grigna mountains and those from the Bergamasque Prealps at about 5 Mya. Time for speciation cannot be standardized in any way, since it depends on a number of geographical, ecological and genetic factors (Raboski 2011, and references therein). Several approaches evaluated number of generations and genetic distance required for speciation, discussed by Yamaguchi and Iwasa (2013), even though in most cases speciation was associated with reproductive isolation, which is a simplification of the process (Hausdorf 2011). However, even considering that these species of Dichotrachelus may have a biennial generation time, the more than two million generations in total isolation – a time span determined by the geological events that occurred in the area (see below, chapter 4.2) – would be sufficient for achieving a genetic distance compatible with speciation (Yamaguchi and Iwasa 2013).

We could not evidence any clear-cut morphological trait to separate the two taxa, excluding a minute variation in the shape of the genital sclerite; nevertheless, these minimal differences give an indication that supports the molecular data.

Based on this multi-data approach, we consider the two taxa to be distinct species, even though they are barely distinguishable based on morphology only.

4.2. Historical biogeography

Two main scenarios can be considered. One, the ancestral species was distributed across the entire area from Mount Camino to the Grigna massifs, and then, around 5 Mya, the Grigna population remained isolated from the others. Alternatively, a second scenario supposes that the ancestral species was distributed only in the Bergamasque area, and then, around 5 Mya, it colonized the Grigna massifs, where it remained isolated from the parent population. Some remarks on orogeny and paleoclimatology of the area may help understanding the distribution pattern of the D. grignensis complex. Bioecology of these weevils must be also taken into account. The Dichotrachelus of the D. grignensis group are strictly associated with calcareous rocks; they are, nowadays, apparently exclusive to heights above 1500 m a.s.l., where they are monophagous on Saxifraga, usually S. caesia. Their vagility is very limited and consequently their dispersion capability is scarce, at least in the short term, and it can occur only in suitable habitats with limestone rocks and the presence of Saxifraga caesia. Their present distribution in the Alps was determined by orogeny of the chain as well as paleoclimatic events.

The southern Alps, separated from the Alpine axial zone by the Insubric line, experienced several deformation phases mainly of Late Eocene-Oligocene age (Laubscher 1985; Bersezio et al. 1993). In the Lago di Lecco area, the Grigna Mountains are characterized by thrusted Triassic carbonates (Laubscher 1985). A pre-existing transfer fault zone separates the Grigna block from the Valtorta section, passing through Ballabio and the upper Valsassina (Laubscher 1985).

The southward propagation of thrusting towards the foreland, as recorded in the Po Plain subsurface, continued to occur throughout the Miocene (5.3–7.2 Mya) (Fantoni et al. 2001; Fantoni et al. 2004). Seismic and well data in the Po plain show that shelf margins associated with fluvio-deltaic systems were established at least since the middle Miocene, suggesting an important uplift of the chain and the development of a well-established drainage system linked to the uplifted mountains to the north (Dalla et al. 1992). In addition, there is evidence of Messinian incisions for all the southern Alpine lakes, caused by the relative base-level fall of the Messinian Salinity Crisis (Audra et al. 2007; Rossi et al. 2015). These paleovalleys delivered sediments to fluvio-deltaic systems basinward (Rossi et al. 2015; Rossi et al. 2018), and were later filled following the Pliocene transgression event (Hsü et al. 1977; Rossi et al. 2015). Neoalpine compression in the western Southern Alps likely ended in the Messinian to early Pliocene (Fantoni et al. 2004).

The present Lago di Como topography originated from a deeply incised Messinian canyon during the Messinian Salinity Crisis (Bini et al. 1978), so that uplift and valley deepening preceded the onset of global cooling and Pleistocene glaciations (Audra et al. 2007). In the Como branch of the Lago di Como, the Messinian entrenchment followed a previous paleovalley, whereas the Lecco branch is younger and more significantly imprinted by glaciers (Bini et al. 1978). The Valsassina valley was also incised as a Messinian canyon, which separated the Grigna massifs from the Resegone (Monzini 2013).

The divergence between the Grigna and the Bergamasque Prealps populations of the D. grignensis complex can be roughly dated to around 5 Mya, and there does not seem to be any evidence of a sudden possibility of range expansion westbound towards the Grigna in that epoch. The most likely scenario proposes that the ancestral forms were already present in the entire region during the Miocene, before the Messinian, and became isolated following the Messinian incisions of the Valsassina that separated the Grigna from the Resegone and the other calcareous mountains east of the Introbio valley. Consequently, this primary disjunction between the two lineages of D. grignensis-complex appears to be related to tectonic events.

This pattern of disjunction, with sister species present on the two sides of the Valsassina, is not exclusive to the two species of Dichotrachelus but it occurs also in other scarcely vagile steno-endemisms. Examples are Boldoriella manzoniana Monzini, 1995, from the Grigna massif, with its vicariant B. carminatii (Dodero, 1917) from the Bergamasque Prealps (Monzini 2013), and B. grignensis Monzini, 1987, from the Grigna, with B. focarilei (R. Rossi, 1965) on the east of the Valsassina valley. These, and other, cases probably share the same biogeographical origin.

The populations of D. orobicus present on the limestone outcrops between the Valsassina and the Valcamonica, and probably exclusive to the montane and alpine region, show a limited reciprocal molecular differentiation. Their apparent isolation in the calcareous massifs has undoubtedly a more recent origin, and was likely determined by the Pleistocene climatic oscillations, when glaciers acted as barriers that prevented gene exchange among the populations remained isolated in the nunattaker (Fattorini 2004).

5. Taxonomy

Dichotrachelus orobicus Meregalli, Monguzzi & Kahlen, sp. n.

Type locality

Italy, Lombardy, Prov. Bergamo, Val di Scalve, Pizzo Camino

Derivation of the name

Named after the Prealpi Orobie, the Bergamasque Prealps, a mountain range in the Italian Alps, located in northern Lombardy.

Diagnostic description

A cryptic species vicariant of Dichotrachelus grignensis, morphologically extremely similar, only different for the shape of the male genital sclerite (Figs 13) (in parenthesis the comparison of the same characters in D. grignensis, see also table of morphological characters in Results, Morphological analysis, 3.1).

Body length of the holotype: 6.85 mm. Rostrum narrow, ratio length/width at base 1.65, with sides in dorsal view subparallel, weakly convergent anteriad, with deep interantennal longitudinal groove (rostrum broad, mean ratio length/width at base 1.37; dorsal sides linearly convergent from base to antennal insertion, longitudinal groove very shallow). Pronotum small, slightly constricted near apex with sides moderately curvilinear (pronotum robust, not constricted near apex, sides usually slightly linearly broadened from base to apical third). Elytral shape very similar between the two species. Tarsomere 3 of protarsus as long as wide, lobes slightly developed (tarsomere 3 of protarsus shorter than wide, lobes not developed); tarsomere 3 of metatarsus as long as wide (tarsomere 3 of metatarsus shorter than wide). Sides of body of penis smoothly restricted anteriad, lamella with parallel sides, broadly rounded at apex (sides of body of penis sharply restricted anteriad, distinctly sinuate before lamella, lamella with sides feebly convergent anteriad, slightly elongated at apex). Anterior valve of male genital sclerite (terminology as in Meregalli et al. 2013) in lateral view oblong, much longer than wide, posterior valve small, semicircular, external margin strongly curved (anterior valve oval, broadly expanded, scarcely longer than wide, posterior valve large, oval, external margin scarcely rounded).


The specimens from Pizzo Camino area are relatively uniform, particularly in the discriminating characters. Those from Pizzo Arera have the rostrum slightly shorter and broader. Those from Presolana have the rostrum similar to those from Pizzo Camino. The specimen from Resegone has the apex of the penis more similar to those of the Grigna massifs, but the genital sclerite has the typical shape of D. orobicus.

Type material

(approximate georeference, when not indicated on label, in square parenthesis). Labels reported verbatim; /: different line. Holotype ♂. “Val di Scalve, Schilpario / (BG) Pizzo Camino [45.9867°, 10.1810°] / m 2000 22.VII.2002 / R. Monguzzi leg.” (deposited at Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milano, Italy). Paratypes: coll. Monguzzi: same data as the holotype, 1♂, 1♀; “Pizzo Camino / Val di Scalve, Schilpario – BG / m 2000 5.VIII.1979 / Leg. R. Monguzzi” 1♀; “Pizzo Camino (BG) / Schilpario m 2000 / 4.VIII.2000 / R. Monguzzi” 1♀; “Pizzo Camino / (Schilpario) / m 2100 17.VIII.2014 / R. Monguzzi” 1 fragment; “Val di Scalve (BG) / Cimone d. Bagozza [46.0214°, 10.2662°] / m 2100 6.09.2014 / R. Monguzzi leg.” 3♀; “Val di Scalve (BG) / Mass Presolana / M. Ferrante m 2200 [45.9744°, 10.0288°] / 13.9.14 R. Monguzzi” 1♀; “Prealpi Orobie (BG) / M Ferrante m 2300 / vers. Est Gruppo della / Presolana 19.07.2014 / R. Monguzzi leg.” 1♀; “Pizzo Arera (BG) / Mandrone m 2100 [45.9305°, 09.8067°] / R. Monguzzi” 1♀; “M. Arera / BG m 2200 / 11.7.81 Rosa” 1♂; “Prealpi Bergamasche / Val Brembana Cima / di Menna [45.9254°, 09.7595°] m 2100 / 20.08.2013 R. Monguzzi”; “Prealpi Bergamasche / Zuccone dei Campelli [45.9580°, 09.5133°] / Vers. Valsassina (LC) / Valle dei Camosci m 2100 / R. Monguzzi” 2♀.

Coll. Kahlen: “Prov. Bergamo, Pizzo Arera, Mandrone 2000m 45°56′04″N, 9°48′13″E, 7.7.1990 Saxifraga caesia”, 2♂ 2♀; “Prov. Bergamo, Pizzo Arera, SW-Kar 2050m 45°55′50″N, 9°48′24″E, 20.7.1992, Saxifraga caesia” 2♂ 1♀; “Prov. Brescia, Passo di Baione 2155m 46°01′17″N, 10°15′59″E, 30.7.2018 Saxifraga caesia” 1♀.

Coll. Szallies: “I Alpi Bergam. / Pizzo Arera Ost- / grat Nordkar / 23-/2500 m 3.6.2015 / leg. Szallies” 1♂; “I. Bergam. Alpen / Valle Camonica / Passo di Baione [46.0213°, 10.2666°] / 2150 m 27.7.2016 / leg. Szallies” 3♂; I. Bergam. Alpen / Valle Camonica / Cima dei Ladrinai [46.0165°, 10.2790°] / 2300 m 27.7.2016 / leg. Szallies” 1♀.

Coll. Meregalli: “Val di Scalve, Schilpario / (BG) Pizzo Camino / m 2000 22.VII.2002 / R. Monguzzi leg.” 1♂ 1♀.

Non-type material. “I Bergamask Alpen / Lecco Resegone / 1800 m / 1.7.2016 / leg. Szallies” 1♂ (aedeagus only, body mistakenly destroyed during DNA extraction).


Dichotrachelus orobicus is present in all the calcareous mountains between Valsassina and Valcamonica, where it is usually found above 1800 m asl. (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. 

Dichotrachelus orobicus and D. grignensis, distribution map. Map data: Google Earth, Maxar Technologies, used according to Google Earth Terms of Service.


The species is monophagous on Saxifraga caesia. The larvae develop among the roots of Saxifraga, often on clumps growing on the soil (Zuccone Campelli, Presolana). The adults feed on the same plant. Their activity is nocturnal, when they can be found in trophic activity on the plants and walking on the surrounding rocks; during the day they shelter below stones and in rock crevices.

Conservation status

Dichotrachelus orobicus does not seem to be endangered at present and it does not fully meet any of the criteria required for inclusion in the categories at risk (IUCN 2001, 2012). It would be classified as Vulnerable according to Crit. B2(a): severely fragmented species known in between 5 and 10 populations, but none of conditions (b) or (c) (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2019) appear to be applicable, at least at present. However, possible effects of global warming and rainfall rate variation may influence vegetation in the near future, and these weevils, so highly stenoecious and ecologically very specialized, are probably incapable of adaptation to changes of their niche. Single populations might indeed be at risk, in particular that from Resegone, a mountain that reaches only 1875 m a.s.l. and has suitable habitats of very limited extension.

Table 2.

Table of localities.

Species Type categorie Locality Georeference
Dichotrachelus orobicus holotype, paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Pizzo Camino 45.9867′N, 10.1810′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Passo di Baione 46.0213′N, 10.2666′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Cima dei Ladrinai 46.0165′N, 10.2790′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Cimone della Bagozza 46.0214′N, 10.2662′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Massiccio della Presolana 45.9744′N, 10.0288′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Pizzo Arera 45.9305′N, 09.8067′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Cima di Menna 45.9254′N, 09.7595′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus paratypes Italy, Lombardy, Zuccone dei Campelli 45.9580′N, 09.5133′E
Dichotrachelus orobicus non-type specimens Italy, Lombardy, Monte Resegone 45.8581′N, 09.4694′E
Dichotrachelus grignensis non-type specimens Italy, Lombardy, Monte Grigna, Rif. Brioschi 45.9477′N, 09.4012′E

6. Acknowledgments

We wish to thank our colleague A. Szallies for the kind loan of the specimens from his collection and C. Germann for sharing the ITS2 sequences of a few species of Dichotrachelus. C. Lyal (Natural History Museum, London) kindly checked the English text.

7. Author’s contributions

M.M., M.K and R.M.: general structuring of the research, field sampling and preparation of the paper; V.R.: remarks on geological aspects; M.M.: phylogenetical analyses; A.S.: laboratory work. The authors declare not to have conflicts of interest.

8. References

  • Astrin JJ, Stüben PE (2008) Phylogeny in cryptic weevils: molecules, morphology and new genera of western Palaearctic Cryptorhynchinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Invertebrate Systematics 22: 503–522.
  • Audra P, Bini A, Gabrovsek F, Hauselmann P, Hoblea F, Jeannin PY, Kunaver J, Monbaron M, Sustersic F, Tognini P, Trimmel H, Wildberger A (2007) Cave and karst evolution in the Alps and their relation to paleoclimate and paleotopography. Acta Carsologica 36: 53–68.
  • Barajon M (1946) Le specie italiane del Gen. Dichotrachelus Stierl. (Col. Curculionidae). Atti della Società italiana di Scienze naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia naturale di Milano 85: 112–129.
  • Bersezio R, Fornaciari M, Gelati R, Napolitano A, Valdisturlo A (1993) The significance of the Upper Cretaceous to Miocene clastic wedges in the deformation history of the Lombardian southern Alps. Geologie Alpine 69: 3–20.
  • Dalla S, Rossi M, Orlando M, Visentin C, Gelati R, Gnaccolini M, Papani G, Belli A, Biffi U, Catrullo D (1992) Late Eocene-Tortonian tectono-sedimentary evolution in the western part of the Padan basin (northern Italy). Paleontologia i Evoluciò 24: 341–362.
  • dos Reis M, Donoghue P, Yang Z (2015) Bayesian clock dating methodology has become the standard tool for integrating information from fossils and molecules to estimate the timeline of the Tree of Life. Nature Reviews Genetics 17: 71–80.
  • Fantoni R, Bersezio R, Forcella F (2004) Alpine structure and deformation chronology at the southern Alps-Po Plain border in Lombardy. Italian Journal of Geosciences 123(3): 463–476.
  • Fantoni R, Massari F, Minervini M, Rogledi S, Rossi M (2001) Il Messiniano del margine subalpino-padano: relazioni tra contesto strutturale e stratigrafico-deposizionale. Geologia Insubrica 6(1): 95–108.
  • Folmer O, Black M, Wr H, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular marine biology and biotechnology 3: 294–299.
  • Gillooly J, Allen AP, West GB, Brown J (2004) Metabolic Rate Calibrates the Molecular Clock: Reconciling Molecular and Fossil Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence.
  • Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM, Draheim HM, Dugger BD, Dunham S, Elliott-Smith E, Fontaine JB, Kesler DC, Knaus BJ, Lopes IF, Loschl P (2006) Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20: 1584–1594.
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 270: 313–321.
  • Hsü KJ, Montadert L, Bernoulli D, Cita MB, Erickson A (1977) History of the Mediterranean salinity crisis. Nature 267: 399–403.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Alfaro ME (2004) Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Molecular Ecology and Evolution 21(6): 1123–1133.
  • Hughes J, Vogler AP (2004) The phylogeny of acorn weevils (genus Curculio) from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences: the problem of incomplete data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32(2): 601–615.
  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN The World Conservation Unit. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 30 pp.
  • Korshunova T, Picton B, Furfaro G, Mariottini P, Pontes M, Prkic J, Fletcher K, Malmberg K, Lundin K, Martynov A (2019) Multilevel fine-scale diversity challenges the ‘cryptic species’ concept. Scientific Reports 9: article 6732.
  • Kumar S, Stecher L, Li M, Knyaz K, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549.
  • Lanfear R, Thomas JA, Welch JJ, Brey T, Bromham L (2007) Metabolic rate does not calibrate the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2007 104(39):15388–15393.
  • Lepage T, Bryant D, Hervé P, Lartillot N (2007) A General Comparison of Relaxed Molecular Clock Models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24(12): 2669–2680.
  • Meregalli M (1980) Osservazioni preliminari sulla biologia dei Dichotrachelus (Coleoptera Curculionidae). Atti XII Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia (2): 125–133.
  • Meregalli M (1987) Revisione delle specie iberiche del genere Dichotrachelus Stierlin, 1853 (Coleoptera Curculionidae). Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino 5(2): 335–418.
  • Meregalli M, Menardo F, Klass K-D, Cervella P (2013) Phylogeny of the Saxifraga-associated Dichotrachelus (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with remarks on their radiation in the Alps. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 71(1): 43–68.
  • Meregalli M, Germann C, Bernasconi MV, Cervella P (2018) Phylogeny of the Genus Dichotrachelus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Cyclominae). Diversity 10(66): 28 pp.
  • Monzini V (2013) Note su Boldoriella del gruppo carminatii: Boldoriella silvanae stat. nov. e osservazioni sistematiche sulle specie affini (Coleoptera Carabidae Trechinae). Bollettino della Società Entomologica Itaiana 145(1): 3–8.
  • Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP (2010) Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Molecular Ecology and Evolution 27: 1659–1672.
  • Pons J, Barraclough TC, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP (2006) Sequence-Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects. Systematic Ecology 55(4): 595–609.
  • Rambaut A (2014) Figtree. Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 1.4.2. Institute of Evolutionary Ecology. University of Edinburgh. Available from: (accessed Jan 30, 2021).
  • Ronquist F, van der Mark P, Huelsenbeck JP (2009) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MrBayes. In: Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M (Eds.) The phylogenetic handbook. A practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 210–266.
  • Rossi M, Minervini M, Ghielmi M, Rogledi S (2015) Messinian and Pliocene erosional surfaces in the Po Plain-Adriatic Basin: insights from allostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy in assessing play concepts related to accommodation and gateway turnarounds in tectonically active margins. Marine and Petroleum Geology 66: 192–216.
  • Sbordoni V (2010) Strength and Limitations of DNA Barcode under the Multidimensional Species Perspective. In: Nimis PL, Vignes Lebbe R (eds.) Tools for Identifying Biodiversity: Progress and Problems: 275–280.
  • Thomas JA, Welch JJ, Lanfear R, Bromham L (2010) A generation time effect on the rate of molecular evolution in invertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 1173–1180.
  • Xie W, Lewis PO, Fan Y, Kuo L, Chen M-H (2011) Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Systematic Ecology 60(2): 150–160.
  • Zinetti F, Dapporto L, Vovlas A, Chelazzi G, Bonelli S, Balletto E, Ciofi C (2013) When the rule becomes the exception. No evidence of gene flow between two Zerynthia cryptic butterflies suggests the emergence of a new model group. PLoS ONE 8(6): e65746.
  • Zink RM, Groth JG, Vazquez-Miranda H, Barrowclough GF (2013) Phylogeography of the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) using multilocus DNA sequences and ecological niche modeling: implications for conservation. The Auk 130: 449–458.


GenBank accession codes.

MW617448 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, Folmer primers
MW617382 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, Rif. Brioschi, Folmer primers
MZ313365 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, Jerry/Pat primers
MZ313369 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, Rif Brioschi, Jerry/Pat primers
MZ313362 Dichotrachelus orobicus Pizzo Arera, Folmer primers
MZ313363 Dichotrachelus orobicus Pizzo della Presolana, Folmer primers
MZ313366 Dichotrachelus orobicus Colle del Baione, Folmer primers
MZ313364 Dichotrachelus orobicus Zuccone dei Campelli, Folmer primers
MZ313368 Dichotrachelus orobicus Pizzo Arera, Jerry/Pat primers
MZ313367 Dichotrachelus orobicus Pizzo della Presolana, Jerry/Pat primers
MZ313370 Dichotrachelus orobicus Colle del Baione, Jerry/Pat primers
MZ313222 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, ITS2 primers
MZ313223 Dichotrachelus grignensis Grigna, Rif. Brioschi, ITS2 primers
MZ313210 Dichotrachelus orobicus Colle del Baione, ITS2 primers
MZ313224 Dichotrachelus orobicus Presolana, ITS2 primers
login to comment