
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Arthropod Systematics &amp; Phylogeny</title>
        <description>Latest 8 Articles from Arthropod Systematics &amp; Phylogeny</description>
        <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Corrigendum: Comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genomes of three Zeugodacus species (Insecta: Tephritidae: Dacinae) and their phylogenetic relationships with other congeners. Arthropod Systematics &amp; Phylogeny 81: 747–759. doi: 10.3897/asp.81.e105025</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/137073/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 83: 171-173</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.83.e137073</p>
					<p>Authors: Hoi-Sen Yong, Sze-Looi Song, Kah-Ooi Chua, Yvonne Jing Mei Liew, I. Wayan Suana, Phaik-Eem Lim, Kok-Gan Chan, Praphathip Eamsobhana</p>
					<p>Abstract: The complete mitogenomes of fruit flies Zeugodacus (Javadacus) calumniatus, Z. (Javadacus) heinrichi and Z. (Sinodacus) hochii have similar gene order and contain 37 genes and a non-coding region. They share an identical start codon for the respective protein-coding genes (PCGs), an identical TAA stop codon for 11 PCGs, TAG for cob, and an incomplete T stop codon for nad5. The cloverleaf structure of most of the tRNAs is similar in the three Zeugodacus species. Phylogenetic analyses reveal Z. (Parasinodacus) cilifer to be external to two main clades: (A) monophyletic subgenus Zeugodacus; and (B) subgenera Javadacus and Sinodacus. The present results indicate that the taxonomic status of some taxa needs clarification. Z. calumniatus is genetically very similar to Z. tau and is not congruent with its current placement in the munda complex. Z. mukiae NC_067083 is genetically very similar to Z. scutellaris, but differs significantly from Z. mukiae MG683384 of the arisanicus (arisanica) complex. On the other hand, Z. proprediaphorus is genetically distinct from and not a synonym of Z. diaphorus. Z. caudatus sensu stricto from Indonesia forms a sister lineage with Z. diversus, instead of with the Malaysian and Chinese taxa of Z. caudatus sensu lato. A notable incongruence is the sister lineage of Z. (Sinodacus) hochii and Z. (Javadacus) heinrichi among other taxa of subgenus Javadacus. A more extensive taxon sampling, particularly the subgenus Sinodacus (and other subgenera), is needed to clarify/resolve their subgenus status.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/137073/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/137073/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/137073/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Corrigenda</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>To see the unseen: notes on the larval morphology and systematic position of Achanthiptera Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae)</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/116703/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 82: 305-322</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.82.e116703</p>
					<p>Authors: Kinga Walczak, Thomas Pape, James F. Wallman, Krzysztof Szpila, Andrzej Grzywacz</p>
					<p>Abstract: The muscid genus Achanthiptera Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) was classified within its own subfamily Achanthipterinae for decades due to a misinterpretation of adult morphology. Conversely, the larval morphology suggested that Achanthiptera should be classified within Azeliinae, yet no formal changes were implemented based on this source of data. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), we examined the larval morphology of Ac. rohrelliformis (Robineau-Desvoidy), Potamia littoralis Robineau-Desvoidy and Australophyra rostrata Robineau-Desvoidy. Despite the challenges posed by the poor condition of hundred-year-old museum specimens of Ac. rohrelliformis for light microscopy, CLSM examination yielded satisfactory results. Additionally, CLSM observations revealed peculiar modifications to the cephaloskeleton, including a dome-shaped (second instar) or spade-like (third instar) anterior rod attached to each mouthhook in Ac. rohrelliformis and P. littoralis. These structural modifications are likely to enhance the efficiency of food collecting by enlarging the surface of the mouthhooks. The results of our morphological analyses lead to the conclusion that larvae of Au. rostrata are facultative carnivores, while modified accessory oral sclerites in Ac. rohrelliformis and P. littoralis suggest a saprophagous feeding strategy. This study contributes new evidence that Achanthiptera is the sister taxon to Potamia Robineau-Desvoidy, and both are nested within the subfamily Azeliinae.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/116703/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/116703/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/116703/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Mitochondrial genomes provide new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of Anthomyiidae (Insecta: Diptera)</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/106356/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 81: 1051-1062</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.81.e106356</p>
					<p>Authors: He-Nan Li, Wen-Ya Pei, Ming-Fu Wang, Bang-Qing Chen, Hong-Lin Peng, Rong-Jun Cao, Ming-Teng Zhao, Jun Yang, Xiao-Chen Zhang, Dong Zhang</p>
					<p>Abstract: Anthomyiidae is a cosmopolitan and diverse family of Calyptratae, and is routinely considered to play key roles in both ecology and agriculture. The higher-level phylogenetic classification of Anthomyiidae has been highly controversial, necessitating further molecular data for precise reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships. In this study, we successfully acquired and annotated 18 new mitogenomes of anthomyiids. Moreover, the mitogenomes of the following genera Eustalomyia, Hyporites, Leucophora, Emmesomyia and Eutrichota are reported for the first time. The 18 mitogenomes are compared with confamilial species to assess genetic variation and to better understand evolutionary relationships within the family Anthomyiidae. In comparisons among 13 mitochondrial protein coding genes (PCG), the calculation of evolutionary rate exhibited nad1 as the fastest evolving gene in Anthomyiidae. Among the anthomyiids investigated, cox2 and nad4 had the lowest genetic distance across the 13 PCGs, suggesting a high degree of conservation for these two genes. Herein, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of the newly sequenced mitogenomes along with 11 known anthomyiids to investigate the interrelationships of Anthomyiidae. Our results indicate that Anthomyiidae is a monophyletic lineage and sister group to Scathophagidae, confirming prior findings based on morphological and molecular analyses. We recovered two subfamilies as monophyletic (Myopininae, Pegomyinae) while Anthomyiinae was polyphyletic. The great species diversity of anthomyiid flies limits the availability of mitogenomes for accurately resolving the phylogeny of Anthomyiidae. Nonetheless, our study provides novel insight into the molecular taxonomy, evolution, and phylogeny of the family Anthomyiidae.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/106356/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/106356/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/106356/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>﻿Comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genomes of three Zeugodacus species (Insecta: Tephriti­dae: Dacinae) and their phylogenetic relationships with other congeners</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/105025/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 81: 747-759</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.81.e105025</p>
					<p>Authors: Hoi-Sen Yong, Sze-Looi Song, Kah-Ooi Chua, Yvonne Jing Mei Liew, I. Wayan Suana, Phaik-Eem Lim, Kok-Gan Chan, Praphathip Eamsobhana</p>
					<p>Abstract: The complete mitogenomes of fruit flies Zeugodacus (Javadacus) calumniatus, Z. (Javadacus) heinrichi and Z. (Sinodacus) hochii have similar gene order and contain 37 genes and a non-coding region. They share an identical start codon for the respective protein-coding genes (PCGs), an identical TAA stop codon for 11 PCGs, TAG for cob, and an incomplete T stop codon for nad5. The cloverleaf structure of most of the tRNAs is similar in the three Zeugodacus species. Phylogenetic analyses reveal Z. (Parasinodacus) cilifer to be external to two main clades: (A) monophyletic subgenus Zeugodacus; and (B) subgenera Javadacus and Sinodacus. The present results indicate that the taxonomic status of some taxa needs clarification. Z. calumniatus is genetically very similar to Z. tau and is not congruent with its current placement in the munda complex. Z. mukiae NC_067083 is genetically very similar to Z. scutellaris, but differs significantly from Z. mukiae MG683384 of the arisanicus (arisanica) complex. On the other hand, Z. proprediaphorus is genetically distinct from and not a synonym of Z. diaphorus. Z. caudatus sensu stricto from Indonesia forms a sister lineage with Z. diversus, instead of with the Malaysian and Chinese taxa of Z. caudatus sensu lato. A notable incongruence is the sister lineage of Z. (Sinodacus) hochii and Z. (Javadacus) heinrichi among other taxa of subgenus Javadacus. A more extensive taxon sampling, particularly the subgenus Sinodacus (and other subgenera), is needed to clarify/resolve their subgenus status.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/105025/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/105025/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/105025/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 8 Sep 2023 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Phylogeny of the old and fragmented genus Austrocoenosia Malloch reveals new evidences on the morphology and evolution of the genera Coenosia Meigen and Neodexiopsis Malloch (Diptera: Muscidae)</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/104969/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 81: 611-653</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.81.e104969</p>
					<p>Authors: Luciano Damián Patitucci, Pablo Ricardo Mulieri, Márcia Souto Couri, Martha Cecilia Domínguez</p>
					<p>Abstract: Coenosiini (Diptera: Muscidae) is a large cosmopolitan tribe of muscids, within which Coenosia Meigen and Neodexiopsis Malloch are the genera with the largest number of species. In this work, we revised for the first time, all the species placed by Malloch (1934) under Austrocoenosia, an endemic genus from the Andean Patagonian Forests, whose species are now placed in Coenosia and Neodexiopsis. We provide detail redescriptions for eight species placed by Malloch (1934) under Austrocoenosia, and decribed two new species (Coenosia delneneo sp. nov. and Coenosia patagonica sp. nov.), with high quality photographs detailing new structures of the male and female terminalia. To establish the position of the species of Austrocoenosia with respect to Coenosia and Neodexiopsis, we made a phylogenetic analysis using implied weighting for 36 taxa and 132 morphological characters of adults, including male and female genitalia. We recovered all species of Austrocoenosia as Coenosia species. We propose the following nomenclature actions: Austrocoenosia as a junior synonymy of Coenosia (syn. rest.); Coenosia brevicornis (Malloch) (comb. nov.), Coenosia dubia (Bigot) (comb. rest.); Coenosia hucketti, Pont (nom. nov.) and Coenosia nigerrima (Malloch) (comb. rest.). We also propose Coenosia spumicola Pont as an unplaced species of Coenosia sensu lato. Finally, we updated the geographic distributions for all species and observed several new male and female terminalia structures, which enriched the discussion of the genera and the tribe.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/104969/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/104969/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/104969/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>﻿Integrative species delimitation in the morphologically conservative Stegana subgen. Orthostegana (Diptera, Drosophilidae)</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/102683/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 81: 581-610</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.81.e102683</p>
					<p>Authors: Ya-Lian Wang, Zi-Qi Peng, Feng-Liang Jin, Hong-Wei Chen, Jia Huang</p>
					<p>Abstract: With the increasing number of cryptic species discovered in major branches of the subfamily Steganinae, accurate species identification is becoming challenging. Possible evolutionary stasis often gives rise to the formation of morphological conservatism and cryptic species, as is the case for the members of the Stegana (subgen. Orthostegana). In this study, the species boundaries of all Asian Orthostegana were accessed based on two mitochondrial genes [cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2)] using different species delimitation methods and evolutionary models. By integrating morphological and molecular evidence, we clearly validated the evolutionary independence of all five known species and identified nine new species from Southwest China: Stegana (Orthostegana) aini Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) brevivittata Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) cuodi Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) fuscofemorata Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) latipalpula Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) macrostephana Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) mohnihei Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., S. (O.) obscurala Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov., and S. (O.) pinguitia Peng &amp; Chen sp. nov. Moreover, we discussed the relationship between the Asian Orthostegana lineage and the subgen. Oxyphortica, and the necessity of taxonomic re-evaluation for the Neotropical species with molecular data. The high morphological conservatism within Orthostegana is largely the outcome of in situ diversification for adapting to the ecological environment.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/102683/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/102683/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/102683/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Integrating morphology and DNA barcodes for identification of Delia sanctijacobi Bigot 1885 (Diptera: Anthomyiidae): new host and new records in South America</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/82831/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 80: 511-522</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.80.e82831</p>
					<p>Authors: Lucas Roberto Pereira Gomes, Maria Aparecida Cassilha Zawadneak, Magda Clara Vieira da Costa-Ribeiro, Tiago Miguel Jarek, Claudio José Barros de Carvalho</p>
					<p>Abstract: Delia sanctijacobi is critically assessed and given a revised description using data from scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and DNA barcode analysis. This species is recorded for the first time in Brazil and Peru. We provide a morphological identification key (with figures) for Delia species from Brazil, a molecular identification based on COI (cytochrome C oxidase subunit I) barcode sequences and an updated distributional map. We also report the first occurrence of D. sanctijacobi feeding on Brassica species in Brazil. This potential pest was observed in broccoli roots (Brassica oleracea var. italica; Brassicaceae) in União da Vitória, Paraná, southern Brazil, in August and September of 2017. The infested plants displayed reduced growth due to damage to the stem base or death if severely attacked.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/82831/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/82831/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/82831/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Dufouriini (Diptera: Tachinidae) using a total evidence approach based on adult and immature stages</title>
		    <link>https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/69618/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 80: 1-38</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/asp.80.e69618</p>
					<p>Authors: Marcelo Domingos de Santis, Silvio Shigueo Nihei</p>
					<p>Abstract: Abstract                          Dufouriini are a worldwide distributed tachinid tribe comprised of 51 species in 13 genera, made up of parasitoids of adult Coleoptera. The systematic positioning of Dufouriini has been controversial. Currently, it is placed within Dexiinae, but was previously placed in Phasiinae and Voriinae, and has even had the status of subfamily. Delimitation and composition of Dufouriini has also been debated, whether it is a single tribe or divided into two (Dufouriini and Freraeini) or three (Dufouriini, Oestrophasiini and Freraeini) tribes. Herein, we present the first phylogenetic analysis of Dufouriini based on total evidence using morphological data from adult and immature stages. The taxonomic sampling included all genera in Dufouriini (including Oestrophasiini) and also the genus belonging to Freraeini, a historically related tribe. Data matrix comprised 35 species and 22 genera in the ingroup, and 185 characters constructed from eggs, first instar larvae, puparia and adults, including female and male terminalia and spermathecae. The phylogenetic analysis recovered Dexiinae as paraphyletic in relation to Phasiinae, since the clade (Freraeini (Dufouriini + Oestrophasiini)) is more closely related to Phasiinae than Dexiinae. Dufouriini, Oestrophasiini and Freraeini are recovered as separate monophyletic tribes, strongly supported by a number of synapomorphies. Oestrophasiini is revalidated. A new synonymy is proposed: Comyopsis Townsend syn. nov. of Ebenia Macquart. Accordingly, Ebenia fumata (Townsend, 1919) is nomen preoccupatum by Ebenia fumata (Wulp, 1891), thus we change its specific epithet by designation of the new replacement name Ebenia neofumata Santis and Nihei [nomen novum]. The genera Mesnilana and Rhinophoroides are removed from Dufouriini and tentatively placed into Palpostomatini. Finally, Cenosoma stat. rev., previously a subgenus of Oestrophasia, is revalidated as genus.</p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/69618/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/69618/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/69618/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	